HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2019 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 17-23
DOI: 10.17311/ajbs.2019.17.23
Flowering Phenology of European Plum (Prunus domestica L.) in the Semi-arid Environment of North-west India
Nidhi Wadhwa and Ram Chander Sihag

Abstract: Background and Objective: European plum (Prunus domestica L.) is a new introduction in the semi-arid environment of north-west India. The objective of the present study was to investigate the flowering phenology of European plum under the semi-arid environment of northwest India. Materials and Methods: The studies were made on three varieties of the European plum (Prunus domestica L.) planted at the Horticultural Research Farm of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (India) during 2009 and 2010. Results: The results revealed that the flowering period of plum lasted for 40-42 days in both the observational years. The time of anthesis in all the three varieties was at 800 h in the morning. Maximum anthesis in the three varieties took place between 1200 and 1400 h and continued till 1800 h during both the years. Dehiscence of anthers started with the opening of flowers, flower longevity was about 3 days. Conclusion: The flowering phenology of plum in the north-western part of India revealed that this is a winter flowering plant, anthesis and anther dehiscence peak is in the middle of the day and flower longevity is about 3 days.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Nidhi Wadhwa and Ram Chander Sihag, 2019. Flowering Phenology of European Plum (Prunus domestica L.) in the Semi-arid Environment of North-west India. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences, 12: 17-23.

Keywords: flower longevity, European plum, flowering phenology, Prunus domestica and Anthesis

INTRODUCTION

European plum (Prunus domestica L.) is an important fruit plant. The plum fruit is a good source of vitamins, minerals, fiber and enzymes and has a high nutritional and medicinal value. It is rich in proteins, calcium, potassium and phosphorus1. Due to the presence of these ingredients, the plum fruit is good for the digestive system and is positively associated with nutrient intake. It improves the anthropometric measurements, a useful antistresser2 and reduces the risk of hypertension3, 4. In addition to the presence of various sugars, acids, pectins, tannins and enzymes. European plum fruits also contain several important secondary metabolites such as flavonoids and phenolic acids5-8, which have a strong anti-oxidant capacity9-18. Ascorbic acid is another anti-oxidant present in plum fruit, essential for higher primates and a small number of other species6. Prunes are anti hyper-cholestremia19 and anti-cancerous20 also, increase bone mass, prevent osteoporosis21,22, improve the bone health23 and the liver function24 and enhance the resistance to fungal infection25.

The duration of flowering period is collectively referred to as flowering phenology. Many factors affect the flowering phenology of plants, European plum is no exception. Among these factors, the timing, frequency and duration of the flowering period is obviously of great importance26. The phenology of a species not only encompasses when, how often and how long reproduction takes place but also determines the degree of reproductive synchrony with other plant species27,28. Synchrony among species might be advantageous if the presence of one species facilitates increases in pollinator visitation and thus fruit/seed set in another species26,29,30. Conversely, in the case of wind-pollinated species or species sharing generalist biotic pollinators, there might be divergence in flowering times, presumably to reduce interspecific pollen collection and possible stigma clogging31,32. Perhaps similarly, competition for biotic pollinator visits favors divergence, given that reduced visitation rates due to competition among simultaneously flowering species can result in lower pollen transfer and thus lower fruit/seed set26,33. Some studies have already been made on the reproductive biology of plums under temperate conditions. It is now known that the plums are self-incompatible34,35 and melittophilous mode of pollination predominates36. However, its flower phenology under semi-arid environment is not completely understood. In earlier study, the pollinators and pollination mechanism of this plant was investigated in this region36. The present study deals with flowering phenology of this fruit plant in the semi-arid environment of north-west India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was carried out at the Research Farm of Department of Horticulture and in the Apidology Laboratory of the Department of Zoology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (India). Three varieties of plum (Prunus domestica L.) viz. Alu Bokhara, Titron and Kala-Amritsari, selected for this study were grown in the adjacent plots (Fig. 1).

The date of appearance of first fresh flowers on the trees was considered as the beginning and the date of complete disappearance as the cessation of the flowering season. The number of flowers per square meter were counted at 6 ft height once a week and categorized as scanty flowers when number was 1-3 flowers per square meter, mediocre when number was 4-6 flowers per square meter and peak when the number was more than 7 flowers per square meter. The ambient temperature and relative humidity prevailed during the flowering period of this plant were also recorded Fig. 2.

Fig. 1: Plants of plum crop in the field in peak blooming stage

Fig. 2: An inflorescence of plum

The flower buds due to open, the next day were tagged on the previous evening. The number of fully opened flowers was noticed from 0500-1700 h at hourly interval. Similarly, the dehiscence of anthers was determined by observing the presence of yellow powdery mass of pollen on the anthers with the help of a hand lens and presence of nectar at the base of the flower with the help of a micro-capillary and a hand lens. In each case, the observations were recorded at weekly intervals for 7 weeks and 350 flowers. Likewise, the longevity of the flower was determined by recording the time of its opening till it was shed and was repeated in 350 flowers. The data needing statistical analysis were separately subjected to one way Completely Randomized Design” following Snedecor and Cochran37 and means were tested at 5% level of significance.

RESULTS

Commencement and cessation of flowering: All the three varieties of plum viz. Alu Bokhara, Titron and Kala-Amritsari flowered once a year for about 40-42 days in 3rd/4th week of January to last week of February/first week of March (Table 1, 2). The flowering started when minimum and maximum temperatures fluctuated around 10 and 24°C, respectively. Thereafter, the flowering was mediocre for around a week when maximum and minimum temperatures fluctuated around 11 and 26°C , respectively. Peak flowering occurred in the 2nd/3rd week of February when the minimum and maximum temperatures 8.5-13.7°C and 23-30.5°C, respectively. Thereafter, the flowering started to decline from 21st-25th February when the minimum and maximum temperatures were around ranged between 12 and 27°C, respectively. Flowering ceased completely in the last week of February or 1st week of March when minimum and maximum temperatures were around 15 and 32°C, respectively (Table 1, 2).

Time of anthesis, anther dehiscence and nectar production: Anthesis in plum took place rather slowly. The sepals were pushed backward gradually by expanding petals. It took 1 day for this process. The next day, petals appeared as a dome above the sepals. Slowly the outermost petal started straightening up and was followed by the next in succession. Gradually, they got pushed backwards exposing the stamen and the pistil. The pattern of anthesis was same in all the varieties of plum of this study. Peak anthesis in these varieties took place at 1300 h. Anthesis started at 800 h and continued till 1800 h (Fig. 3, 4). Dehiscence of anthers first started in inner whorl of anthers. Dehiscence started only after complete opening of the flower and went on for a day. It took more than a day to complete the dehiscence of all the anthers in a single flower. Dehiscence of anthers also reached a peak at 1300 h and continued till 1800 h (Fig. 5, 6).

Floral longevity: Flower in all the three varieties of plum lasted for about 2.5 days and inter-varietal differences were non-significant. It was 59.07±1.87 h for Alu Bukhara, 59.79±1.65 h for Titron and 59.65±1.31 h for Kala-Amritsari (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

Phenology is the scientific study of periodic biological phenomena, such as flowering, breeding and migration in relation to climatic condition. Phenology has been principally concerned with the dates of first occurrence of natural events in their annual cycle.

Table 1: Flowering phenology of plum (Prunus domestica) in 2009 in relation to ambient temperature

Table 2: Flowering phenology of plum (Prunus domestica) in 2010 in relation to ambient temperature

Fig. 3: Time of anthesis in different varieties of plum in 2009

Fig. 4: Time of anthesis in different varieties of plum in 2010

Fig. 5: Time of anther dehiscence in different varieties of plum in 2009

Fig. 6: Time of anther dehiscence in different varieties of plum in 2010

Table 3: Different floral attributes of three varieties of plum
*Mean±SD of 350 observations. Differences between varieties were non-significant (p>0.05, ANOVA, F-test)

The flowering habits of all the three varieties of plum viz. Alu-Bokhara, Kala-Amritsari and Titron under the semi-arid environment of Hisar were found to be similar. In this study, three varieties of plum viz Alu-Bokhara, Kala-Amritsari and Titron were found to flower once a year i.e., (January-March) when the weather matched the temperate conditions (Table 1, 2). Similar pattern of flowering was observed by Stinson38 in Potentilla pulcherrima (Rosaceae) a high altitude plant, flowering quickly ensures reproductive success within a short snow-free period but limits maturation time and fecundity. Natural selection on prefloration intervals may, therefore, vary in contrasting snow-melt environments and could influence the outcome of phenological responses to climatic change.

The pattern of anthesis was same in all the varieties of plum under study. After full opening, the flower remains in an open condition for about 2-3 days till the petals shed. Maximum anthesis in these varieties took place between 12:00 h and 14:00 h with the increase of daily temperature, the time of anthesis was hastened. Anthesis started at 800 h and continues till 1800 h (Fig. 3, 4). Dehiscence of anthers first started in inner whorl of anthers. Dehiscence starts only after complete opening of flower and goes on for a day. It took more than a day to complete the dehiscence of all the anthers in a single flower. These results were at par with the findings of Ansari and Davarynejad39 in sour cherry cultivars who reported that the stigma viability was 2-3 days. This process was intensive between 9:00-2:00 h clock and reached the maximum at 11:00 h clock. During 2 years of experiment, anther dehiscence started only a few min after flower opening. Maximum anther dehiscence occurred at 11:00-1:00 h clock in rather high temperature (Fig. 5, 6). Verma and Jindal40 also reported that plum took about 2 days for completion of anthesis. Anthesis started at 800 h in the morning, continued till 1800 h while peak stigma receptivity staggered 1 day before and a day after anthesis. Bajwa et al.41 and Randhawa and Nair42 also reported that the dehiscence of the anthers in different plum varieties was completed in 2 days after the opening of the flower. The period when maximum anthers dehisced varied from 12:00 to 13:00 h depending upon the temperature of the day. In the present study, floral longevity was found to be 2.5-3 days. These results were at par with the findings of various earlier workers, for example, Verma and Jindal40 and Randhawa and Nair42 reported that the flowers of plum varieties shed their petals normally after 2-3 days and rarely after 1 or 3 days. Nectar concentration was found to be at peak in the afternoon from 1:00 to 3:00 h as compared to rest of the day. These finding were found to be in agreement with the present study. Horvath and Orosz-Kovacs43 studied the nectar production in plum. Flowers attracted bees both for their nectar and pollen. Nectar was secreted at 09.00-10.00 h and 18.00 h, its amount varied. The findings of present study are broadly in agreement with the previous ones (Fig. 3-6).

CONCLUSION

The flowering phenology of plum in the semi-arid environment of northwest India reveals that this is a winter flowering fruit plant in this region. The flowering season takes 40-42 days, the peak anthesis and dehiscence takes place around noon time. The flower remains alive for about 3 days. The knowledge of these findings would be useful in deciding the pollination management strategy of plum in the semi-arid environments of northwest India.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

European plum is a new introduction in the semi-arid environment of north-west India. Its establishment would depend upon the availability of basic knowledge on the reproduction and ecology of this plant under such conditions. This study is the first step and effort in this direction.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Authors are thankful to the Head, Department of Horticulture for providing the field facility and the Head, Department of Zoology for providing laboratory and other facilities. This study was carried out under the project ‘B (IV) Plan Agri.’ funded by the State Government of Haryana. NW received University Fellowship during the course of this study.

REFERENCES

  • Ertekin, C., S. Gozlekci, O. Kabas, S. Sonmez and I. Akinci, 2006. Some physical, pomological and nutritional properties of two plum (Prunus domestica L.) cultivars. J. Food Eng., 75: 508-514.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hiramoto, K., 2008. Prunus domestica and Prunus armeniaca seed extracts as anti-stress agents, immunostimulants against UV-induced immunosuppression and health foods. Japanese Tokkyo Koho JP 67 76, 59992 76,599 (Cl. A61K36/73), April 2008.


  • Beals, K.A. and V.L. Fulgoni, 2005. Consumption of peaches, plums and nectarines is associated with better nutrient intakes, improved anthropometric measurements and reduced risk of hypertension in NHANES 1999-2002. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc., 105: 61-61.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ahmed, T., H. Sadia, A. Khalid, S. Batool and A. Janjua, 2010. Report: Prunes and liver function: A clinical trial. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., 23: 463-466.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Tomas-Barberan, F.A., M.I. Gil, P. Cremin, A.L. Waterhouse, B. Hess-Pierce and A.A. Kader, 2001. HPLC-DAD-ESIMS analysis of phenolic compounds in nectarines, peaches and plums. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: 4748-4760.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gil, M.I., F.A. Tomas-Barberan, B. Hess-Pierce and A.A. Kader, 2002. Antioxidant capacities, phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and vitamin C contents of nectarine, peach, and plum cultivars from California. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: 4976-4982.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Walkowiak-Tomczak, D., J. Regula and G. Lysiak, 2008. Physico-chemical properties and antioxidant activity of selected plum cultivars fruit. Acta Sci. Polonorum Technol. Aliment., 7: 15-22.
    Direct Link    


  • Slimestad, R., E. Vangdal and C. Brede, 2009. Analysis of phenolic compounds in six Norwegian plum cultivars (Prunus domestica L.). J. Agric. Food Chem., 57: 11370-11375.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kahkonen, M.P., A.I. Hopia, H.J. Vuorela, J.P. Rauha, K. Pihlaja, T.S. Kujala and M. Heinonen, 1999. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem., 47: 3954-3962.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Nakatani, N., S.I. Kayano, H. Kikuzaki, K. Sumino, K. Katagiri and T. Mitani, 2000. Identification, quantitative determination and antioxidative activities of chlorogenic acid isomers in prune (Prunus domestica L.). J. Agric. Food Chem., 48: 5512-5516.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Vinson, J.A., X. Su, L. Zubik and P. Bose, 2001. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods:  Fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: 5315-5321.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kayano, S., N.F. Yamada, T. Suzuki, T. Ikami and K. Shioaki et al., 2003. Quantitative evaluation of antioxidant components in prunes (Prunus domestica L.). J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 1480-1485.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kayano, S.I., H. Kikuzaki, N. Fukutsuka, T. Mitani and N. Nakatani, 2002. Antioxidant activity of prune (Prunus domestica L.) constituents and a new synergist. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: 3708-3712.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kayano, S.I., H. Kikuzaki, N.F. Yamada, A. Aoki and K. Kasamatsu et al., 2004. Antioxidant properties of prunes (Prunus domestica L.) and their constituents. Biofactors, 21: 309-313.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kikuzaki, H., S.I. Kayano, N. Fukutsuka, A. Aoki and K. Kasamatsu et al., 2004. Abscisic acid related compounds and lignans in prunes (Prunus domestica L.) and their Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC). J. Agric. Food Chem., 52: 344-349.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kimura, Y., H. Ito, M. Kawaji, T. Ikami and T. Hatano, 2008. Characterization and antioxidative properties of oligomeric proanthocyanidin from prunes, dried fruit of Prunus domestica L. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochemem., 72: 1615-1618.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rop, O., T. Jurikova, J. Mlcek, D. Kramarova and Z. Sengee, 2009. Antioxidant activity and selected nutritional values of plums (Prunus domestica L.) typical of the white carpathian mountains. Scientia Horticulturae, 122: 545-549.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dhingra, N., R. Sharma and A. Kar, 2014. Evaluation of the antioxidant activities of Prunus domestica whole fruit: An in vitro study. Int. J. Farmacy Pharmaceut. Sci., 6: 271-276.
    Direct Link    


  • Tinker, L.F., B.O. Schneeman, P.A. Davis, D.D. Gallaher and C.R. Waggoner, 1991. Consumption of prunes as a source of dietary fiber in men with mild hypercholesterolemia. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 53: 1259-1265.
    Direct Link    


  • Fujii, T., T. Ikami, J.W. Xu and K. Ikeda, 2006. Prune extract (Prunus domestica L.) suppresses the proliferation and induces the apoptosis of human colon carcinoma Caco-2. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol., 52: 389-391.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Deyhim, F., B.J. Stoecker, G.H. Brusewitz, L. Devareddy and B.H. Arjmandi, 2005. Dried plum reverses bone loss in an osteopenic rat model of osteoporosis. Menopause, 12: 755-762.
    Direct Link    


  • Bu, S.Y., M. Lerner, B.J. Stoecker, E. Boldrin, D.J. Brackett, E.A. Lucas and B.J. Smith, 2008. Dried plum polyphenols inhibit osteoclastogenesis by downregulating NFATc1 and inflammatory mediators. Calcified Tissue Int., 82: 475-488.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hooshmand, S. and B.H. Arjmandi, 2009. Viewpoint: Dried plum, an emerging functional food that may effectively improve bone health. Ageing Res. Rev., 8: 122-127.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ahmed, T., H. Sadia, S. Batoo, A. Janjua and F. Shuja, 2010. Use of prunes as a control of hypertension. J. Ayub Med. College Abbottabad, 22: 28-31.
    Direct Link    


  • El-Kereamy, A., I. El-Sharkawy, R. Ramamoorthy, A. Taheri, D. Errampalli, P. Kumar and S. Jayasankar, 2011. Prunus domestica pathogenesis-related protein-5 activates the defense response pathway and enhances the resistance to fungal infection. PLoS One, Vol. 6.
    CrossRef    


  • Rathcke, B. and E.P. Lacey, 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 16: 179-214.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rathcke, B., 1988. Interactions for pollination among coflowering shrubs. Ecology, 69: 446-457.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rathcke, B., 1988. Flowering phenologies in a shrub community: Competition and constraints. J. Ecol., 76: 975-994.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Thomson, J.D., 1980. Skewed flowering distributions and pollinator attraction. Ecology, 61: 572-579.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Thomson, J.D., 1982. Patterns of visitation by animal pollinators. Oikos, 39: 241-250.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Waser, N.M., 1978. Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology, 59: 934-944.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Waser, N.M., 1978. Interspecific pollen transfer and competition between co-occurring plant species. Oecologia, 36: 223-236.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mosquin, T., 1971. Competition for pollinators as a stimulus for the evolution of flowering time. Oikos, 22: 398-402.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hegedus, A. and J. Halasz, 2006. Self-incompatibility in plums (Prunus salicina Lindl., Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. and Prunus domestica L.). A minireview. Int. J. Horticult. Sci., 12: 137-140.
    Direct Link    


  • Dragan, N. and M. Dragan, 2010. Examining self-compatibility in plum (Prunus domestica L.) by fluorescence microscopy. Genetika, 42: 387-396.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wadhwa, N. and R.C. Sihag, 2015. Melittophilous mode of pollination predominates in European plum (Prunus domestica L.) in the semi-arid environment of Northwest India. Asian J. Agric. Res., 9: 189-207.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran, 1967. Statistical Methods. 6th Edn., Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, Pages: 593
    Direct Link    


  • Stinson, K.A., 2004. Natural selection favors rapid reproductive phenology in Potentilla pulcherrima (Rosaceae) at opposite ends of a subalpine snowmelt gradient. Am. J. Bot., 91: 531-539.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ansari, M. and G. Davarynejab, 2008. The flower phenology of sour cherry cultivars. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 4: 117-124.
    Direct Link    


  • Verma, L.R. and K.K. Jindal, 1997. Fruit Crops Pollination. Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, pp: 265-269


  • Bajwa, G.S., A.S. Bindra, J.S. Bal and P.P.S. Minhas, 1989. Problems of pollination and fertilisation in plum. Acta Hortic., 283: 157-162.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Randhawa, G.S. and P.K.R. Nair, 1960. Studies on floral biology of plum grown under sub-tropical conditions. II. Anthesis, dehiscence, pollen studies and receptivity of stigma. Indian J. Hortic., 17: 83-95.
    Direct Link    


  • Horvath, A. and Z.S. Orosz-Kovacs, 2004. Individual variability of nectar secretion in the flowers of plum cv. 'Reine-claude d'althann'. Acta Hortic., 636: 357-363.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved