HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2013 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 168-174
DOI: 10.17311/ajbs.2013.168.174
Correlation of Traditional Knowledge with Laboratory Based Salmonella Detection in Egg Shell and Contents of Market Sold Egg
Anbessa Dabassa and Shiferaw Demissie

Abstract: Salmonelosis is a leading food borne disease worldwide and Africa at large. Eggs were one of the sources Salmonella for the food. So, this study was aimed to evaluate the traditional knowledge with scientific methods for detection of Salmonella in egg shell and content. Randomly collected egg samples were categorized based upon traditional knowledge and Salmonella metabolic recovery and proliferation of cells were done with primary and secondary enrichment media. From a total of 60 samples analyzed, 31 isolates of Salmonella were detected. Moreover, Conventional biochemical and serological test methods were used to identify the suspected Salmonella. The isolates were checked for their susceptibility to different antibiotics on Muller-Hinton agar in standardized inoculum and disc diffusion technique with 11 Oxoid drug discs. The result of study shows that 71% and 29% of Salmonella isolates were detected from egg shell and contents, respectively. All the isolates were resistant to ampicillin; Amoxicillin, Tetracycline and also 45% of the isolates were susceptible to Gentamicin and 16% for ciprofloxacin. Most Salmonella isolates show multi-drug resistance for at least five antibiotics. The laboratory results were supported the traditional egg spoilage identification knowledge, hence most of Salmonella isolates were detected from movable, floating and opaque eggs. On the other hand, the detection of high number of Salmonella isolate from the egg shell could be due to poor sanitation of the laid egg environment. Hence, the appropriate care and awareness should be needed before and/or after the egg laid to minimize contamination of egg by Salmonella.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Anbessa Dabassa and Shiferaw Demissie, 2013. Correlation of Traditional Knowledge with Laboratory Based Salmonella Detection in Egg Shell and Contents of Market Sold Egg. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences, 6: 168-174.

Keywords: Salmonella, Egg, MDR, penetration and prevalence

INTRODUCTION

Food-borne bacterial pathogen, with poultry and poultry products in connection to Salmonella sp. were primary source of infection to humans (Baggesen et al., 2000). The entry of Salmonella into the egg was occurring through vertical and horizontal method (Cox et al., 2000), that Salmonella come from an infected Hen and invade the egg through the shell after the egg is laid, respectively. Disease causing bacteria like, Salmonella and other can enter the egg shell at different stage (Aragaw et al., 2007). This is done directly when the egg is in the ovary and also indirectly after the egg laid. A disease due to Salmonella has most often been associated with consumption of contaminated foods of animal origin, such as poultry, swine, dairy products and eggs (Baggesen et al., 2000). In Ethiopia, traditionally people consume uncooked egg as food and medicine to remedy from respiratory disease. On the contrary, Consumption of raw egg is one of the routes of transmission for Salmonella disease. So, Egg is considered an important source of foodborne disease and the illnesses were associated with the consumption of raw contaminated eggs (Aragaw et al., 2007).

A better understanding of the relations and appliances between Salmonella and poultry eggs is necessary to reduce disease caused by Salmonella. Bacterial contamination of the egg shell and contents were reported by different researchers (Zhang et al., 2011). This study was hypothesized to bridge the attitude of traditional knowledge of testing the egg safety with scientifically detection of Salmonella from the egg.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and period: Study duration was from August 2012 to March 2013. The total of 60 egg samples were collected from the market found in Kersa woreda (Fig. 1) Jimma town and around Kochi road. The experimental works were conducted in Biology department, Jimma University College of Natural Science in microbiology and biomedical science laboratory in main campus. Jimma town is located at 335 km from Addis Ababa at 1720 m above sea level, 1000 mm average rainfall. May to September is the main rainy season in Jimma zone. The temperature of Jimma ranges 28 to 8°C from maximum to minimum in a year (Alemu et al., 2011).

Bacteriological analysis: On market and street sold chicken eggs were collected from different site in Jimma town around Kochi. The Unwashed eggs were collected aseptically in sterile polyethylene bags and transported to the microbiology laboratory, Jimma University, Department of biology.

Fig. 1: Map the study area, thee figure shows that Ethiopia, Oromia and study area, Jimma town where the egg contamination survey took place for this study

The entire surface of the eggshell were swabbed with sterile cotton swabs dipped in sterile peptone broth and then added to the primary enrichment broth (buffered peptone water) and subsequently incubated for 24 h at 37°C for bacterial proliferation. For the egg content collection, the eggs were surface sterilized with 75% alcohol for two minute, air dried in laminar flow hood for 10 min and cracked with sterile blade. Each egg's content was mixed thoroughly and 10 mL of the mixed egg content was aseptically inoculated into 90 mL of the buffered peptone water and incubated at 37°C for 20-24 h.

Bacteriological identification: From each pre-enriched egg surface and content sample, 1 mL was inoculated to 10 mL of the RappaportVassiliadis medium (RV) Bio-Rad (Marne-la-Coquette- France) incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Form the young culture a loopful of bacterial isolation were streaked on XLD media and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The Lactose-negative colonies were kept for further studies and were examined for colonies typical of Salmonella. Suspect colonies were streaked on nutrient agar plates to obtain pure cultures which were subjected to oxidase testing, gram-staining and motility testing. Gram-negative short-motile rods and non-motile rods with characteristic red slope/yellow butt reaction on TSI either with the production of H2S or not were taken presumptively as Salmonella (Akoachere et al., 2009). They were further confirmed with using serological agglutination test according to Gruenewald et al. (1990).

Antimicrobial susceptibility test: Antibiotic sensitivity test was conducted using antibiotic disc (Oxoid, UK) according to Kirby-Bauer antibiotic disc diffusion techniques. Briefly described, Mueller-Hinton agar was prepared in petri-dishes (Bibby Sterilin, UK). Pure colonies of the isolated organisms were emulsified in normal saline and the turbidity matched against McFarland No. 0.5 turbidity standard. The bacteria were plated on the Mueller-Hinton agar and antibiotic disc was placed centrally using the antibiotic disc dispenser (Oxoid, UK). The Petri-dish and its content were incubated for 24 h in a humidified incubator at 37°C. The organisms were observed for antibiotic sensitivity by measuring the zone of inhibition on the plate.

Standardization of inocula: The 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards was prepared by adding 0.5 mL of a 1.175% (wt/vol) barium chloride dehydrate (BaCl2•2H20) solution to 99.5 mL of 1% (vol/vol) sulfuric acid (H2SO4). This mix was considered to be equivalent to cell density of about 3x108 cfu mL-1 (Andrews, 2001). The turbidity standard is then aliquoted into test tubes identical to those used to prepare the inoculum suspension. McFarland turbidity standard tubes were Seal with Parafilm, to prevent evaporation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The egg samples collected for analysis were categorized based upon the egg traditionally selected for consumption as, movable content when shacked around the ear and transparency with sunlight in-bounded with finger and floating or sinking in water (Table 1) when immersed.

From the isolated Salmonella 22 (71%) were from egg surface, from which 7 (31.8%) were movable content surface, 3 (13.6%) immovable content surface, 5 (22.7%) opaque surface, 2 (9.1%) transparent surface, 2 (9.1%) floating and 3 (13.6%) from sinking egg surface samples.

Table 1: Frequency of Salmonella detection from various grades of chicken eggs

Table 2: Biochemical analysis results for Salmonella isolated from the egg surface and contents, in Jimma town South western Ethiopia

The content has a total of 9 (29%) bacterial infection from which 3 (33.3%) from movable contents, 1 from immovable content, 3 (33.3%) from opaque, 1 (11.1%) from floating and 1 (11.1%) from sinking egg contents. From Salmonella infected egg 70.9% were from the egg surface and 29.1% were from the egg contents.

Egg contamination with Salmonella or other bacteria could make the egg to decay and have different in appearance and important to identify the infected from the normal egg traditionally. Salmonella penetrations to the egg shell were done during the egg hatch or cross-contamination (Berrang et al., 1998; Cox et al., 2000). Movable content, opaque appearance and floating indicate the egg to be contaminated with bacteria. Report of Berrang et al. (1998) supported these results, in that percentage of weight loss through incubation shows the egg contamination.

Subsequently Salmonella species were confirmed with different biochemical tests method for the colonies resembling Salmonella on XLD are Salmonella. According to the ISO 6579, 2002 standard (ref. 1) and (ref. 2) recommends using the Urea agar, L-lysine decarboxylase, ß-galactosidase (ONPG) and Voges Proskauer and indole tests in this order and Triple Sugar Iron (TSI) agar, mannitol, urea, ornithine decarboxylase and lysine decarboxylase were the suitable methods used to confirm Salmonella suspect colonies with the following results (Table 2).

The presumptive Salmonella were positive for TSI glucose (acid formation), TSI glucose (gas formation), TSI hydrogen sulfide and Lysine decarboxylation (Table 2) and negative for, TSI lactose, Urea splitting, B-Galactosidase reaction, Voges-Proskauer reaction and Indole reaction with negative results. Procop et al. (2008) results supports the idea that Salmonella were positive for TSI for gas and acid production and negative for Urea and lactose. In addition, the Salmonella serological tests were used for further confirmation.

Akoachere et al. (2009) supplemented that, gram-negative short-motile rods and non-motile rods with characteristic red slope/yellow butt reaction on TSI either with the production of H2S or not were taken presumptively as Salmonella. Subsequently, with their biochemical test the antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility of Salmonella were evaluated, as it was the biggest public health concern (Table 3) worldwide.

Table 3: Antimicrobial susceptibility test for salmonella isolated from retail egg shall and contents in Jimma town South western Ethiopia

Table 4: Pattern of multiple drug resistance observed in Salmonella isolates from the egg shell and contents in Jimma town south western Ethiopia, in 2013

The results of the study showed that most Salmonella isolates were resistant to different antibiotics. The frequencies of susceptible isolate were low in number. Salmonella isolates were resistant to all amoxicillin, ampicillin and tetracycline (100%), Chloramphenicol and Sulfisoxazole, respectively. The Salmonella isolate were susceptible to gentamicin and Amikacin. In this study, sensitivity to the entire antibiotic was less than 50%. On the contrary, Prajapati et al. (2008) shows that the Salmonella isolates were sensitive to Amoxycillin, Ciprofloxacin, Chloramphenicol, Ceftriaxone, Cotrimoxazole and Cefotaxime. Asghar et al. (2002) results also that Salmonella isolates were found to be susceptible to gentamicin, cefotaxime and amikacin, while resistant to ampicillin, cefamendole, chloramphenicol, gentamicin and cefuroxime.

Almost all, Salmonella spp. isolated from the egg were resistance to more than five antibiotics. This indicates that Salmonella infection needs special care in the developing world, because of the poor hygienic conditions and their modes of consumption of uncooked egg for different reason that favour its spread. The reports from Swanenburg et al. (2001) strengthen the idea that the spread of drug resistance Salmonella in the developing world were very common. This also confirmed that Salmonella isolates are present in our most egg samples the study area and are seriously becoming a public health concern due to their highest prevalence of multidrug resistance pattern observed (Table 4). Nath et al. (2000) also supports the idea that dissemination of multidrug resistance Salmonella is because of indiscriminate use of the antibiotics.

The high percentage of multi-drug resistance could be indicating for unwise usage and abuse of antibiotics for human and animal at the study area. Reports from Onyango et al. (2008), Nath et al. (2000) and Chandra et al. (2006) also supports that indiscriminate use of antibiotics has led to the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains. These results sound for intensive observation/examination of microbial spp. to control the high prevalence of resistant Salmonella strain.

CONCLUSION

Contamination of an egg can be either though vertical transmission or horizontal transmission. Traditional ways of egg spoilage determination is importantly indicator for bacterial infection of the egg. In addition, egg with movable contents, opaque egg when seen in sunlight by rounding with your finger and the floating on water surface indicate egg contamination/spoilage. Hence, the infected hens (flocks) were the major contamination source for eggs. Thus, the egg producers should have to kept the hen in good environmental hygiene, feed and water safety should be ensured and implement effective management strategies to guard hens against Salmonella infection. Furthermore, consumption of uncooked egg critically aggravates Salmonella dissemination in the community. So, good manufacturing and handling practices were needed to diminish the potential risk of salmonellosis that results from consumption of egg and egg products. Egg handlers also have to make a proper care in light of their practical values coupled with human health concern. After the eggs are laid, it could also be stored at low-temperature storage to reduce the microbial multiplication. Most importantly, eggs have to be well cooked for enough time in case Salmonella recover from washing and physical damage.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Authors thank to Department of Biology, Jimma university, Natural Science College for his support in facility and material to accomplish this work successfully.

REFERENCES

  • Akoachere, J.F., N.F. Tanih, L.M. Ndip and R.N. Ndip, 2009. Phenotypic characterization of salmonella typhimurium isolates from food-animals and abattoir drains in Buea, Cameroon. J.Health Popul. Nutr., 27: 612-618.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Alemu, A., W. Tsegaye, L. Golassa and G. Abebe, 2011. Urban malaria and associated risk factors in Jimma town, South-West Ethiopia. Malar J., Vol. 10.
    CrossRef    


  • Andrews, J.M., 2001. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 48: 5-16.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Aragaw, K., B. Molla, A. Muckle, L. Cole and E. Wilkie et al., 2007. The characterization of Salmonella serovars isolated from apparently healthy slaughtered pigs at Addis Ababa abattoir, Ethiopia. Prev. Vet. Med., 82: 252-261.
    CrossRef    


  • Asghar, U., Noor-us-Saba, A. Samad and A.A. Qazilbash, 2002. Identification, characterization and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella and Shigella species isolated from blood and stool samples of patients visiting N. I. H, Islamabad. J. Med. Sci., 2: 85-88.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Baggesen, D.L., D. Sandvang and F.M. Aarestrup, 2000. Characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 isolated from Denmark and comparison with isolates from Europe and the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol., 38: 1581-1586.
    PubMed    


  • Berrang, M.E., J.F. Frank, R.J. Buhr, J.S. Bailey, N.A. Cox and J. Mauldin, 1998. Eggshell characteristics and penetration by Salmonella through the productive life of a broiler breeder flock. Poult. Sci., 77: 1446-1450.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Chandra, M., B.R. Singh, H. Shankar, M. Agarwal, R.K. Agrawal, G. Sharma and N. Babu, 2006. Study on prevalence of Salmonella infection in goats. Small Rumin. Res., 65: 24-30.
    CrossRef    


  • Cox, N.A., M.E. Berrang and J.A. Cason, 2000. Salmonella penetration of egg shells and proliferation in broiler hatching eggs: A review. Poult. Sci., 79: 1571-1574.
    Direct Link    


  • Gruenewald, R., D.P. Dixon, M. Brun, S. Yappow and R. Henderson et al., 1990. Identification of salmonella somatic and flagellar antigens by modified serological methods. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 56: 24-30.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • ISO 6579, 2002. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs: Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=29315.


  • Nath, G., A. Tikoo, H. Manocha, A.K. Tripathi and A.K. Gulati, 2000. Drug resistance in Salmonella typhi in North India with special reference to ciprofloxacin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 46: 149-150.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Onyango, D., F. Machoni, R. Kakai and E.N. Waindi, 2008. Multidrug resistance of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Typhimurium isolated from clinical samples at two rural hospitals in Western Kenya. J. Infect. Dev. Countries, 2: 106-111.
    Direct Link    


  • Prajapati, B., G.K. Rai, S.K. Rai, H.C. Upreti, M. Thapa, G. Singh and R.M. Shrestha, 2008. Prevalence of Salmonella typhi and paratyphi infection in children: A hospital based study. Nepal Med. Coll. J., 10: 238-241.
    Direct Link    


  • Procop, G.W., J.D. Wallace, M.J. Tuohy, M.M. LaSalvia, R.M. Addison and L.B. Reller, 2008. A single-tube screen for Salmonella and Shigella. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 130: 284-289.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Swanenburg, M., P.J. van der Wolf, H.A.P. Urlings, J.M.A. Snijders and F. van Knapen, 2001. Salmonella in slaughter pigs: The effect of logistic slaughter procedures of pigs on the prevalence of Salmonella in pork. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 70: 231-242.
    CrossRef    


  • Zhang, W., J.X. Zheng and G.Y. Xu, 2011. Toward better control of Salmonella contamination by taking advantage of the egg's self-defense system: A review. J. Food Sci., 76: R76-R81.
    CrossRef    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved