HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2011 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 572-579
DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2011.572.579
The Healing Effect of Mixture of Honey, Putty, Vitriol and Olive oil in Pseudomonas aeroginosa Infected Burns in Experimental Rat Model
S.V. Hosseini, H. Niknahad, N. Fakhar, A. Rezaianzadeh and D. Mehrabani

Abstract: This study was carried out to investigate the healing effect of mixture of honey, putty and vitriol dissolved in olive oil on burn wounds infected with P. aeruginosa in rat as an experimental animal model. From April to July 2008, 60 rats were divided into three equal groups, Group A as control left without any treatment, Group B received mixture of honey, putty and vitriol dissolved in olive oil and Group C received just silver sulfadiazine. A standard 3rd degree burn wound was established and after 24 h, 108 colony forming units of toxigenic strains of P. aeruginosa were inoculated subcutaneously. Samples from infected areas were cultured to identify the bacteria. After 7, 14 and 21 days, the burn areas were studied histologically. Bacterial count of the wound on 2nd day was 105 P. aeruginosa. On day 7, 14 and 21, the number of bacteria in groups B and C significantly decreased in comparison to Group A. Regarding epithelialization on day 7, no significant difference was noticed between groups B and C. On day 14, Group B demonstrated better re-epithelialization than groups A and C. On day 21, best results were observed in Group B but the difference was not significant. On day 21, there was poor re-epithelialization in Group A. The mean score of group C was between A and B groups. Our results showed that our mixture for treatment of burn site was safe and effective. However, to use this mixture clinically, more supportive studies seem necessary.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
S.V. Hosseini, H. Niknahad, N. Fakhar, A. Rezaianzadeh and D. Mehrabani, 2011. The Healing Effect of Mixture of Honey, Putty, Vitriol and Olive oil in Pseudomonas aeroginosa Infected Burns in Experimental Rat Model. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 6: 572-579.

Keywords: rat, putty, vitriol, silver sulfadiazine, honey, healing and Burn

INTRODUCTION

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has an important role in infected burned wounds and effectiveness of the tested antibiotics against this bacterium was shown to be 54.0% in hospitalized patients with bloodstream infections in southern Iran (Japoni et al., 2010) and 72.7% in Central Iran (Noorbakhsh Sabet et al., 2010). It is an important cause of severe, acute and chronic nosocomial infection and is generally resistant to numerous antimicrobial agents due to natural resistance in particular impermeability or mutations and acquisition of resistant determinants (Japoni et al., 2009). It may lead to septicemia and death due to exotoxin A as the principal lethal factor of the bacteria (Manafi et al., 2009). Antiseptic ointments such as silver sulfadiazine are used for treatment of the infected wounds; however the resistance to silver sulfadiazine ointment has been a therapeutic problem of the infected wounds (Japoni et al., 2005).

There are several reports on antimicrobial activities against P. aeruginosa as a dressing for infected wounds using experimental animals models (Amini et al., 2010; Hazrati et al., 2010; Hosseini et al., 2007; Nejabat et al., 2009). Honey is a supersaturated sugar solution with approximately 17% water which is obtained when the nectar and sweet deposits from plants are collected, changed and stored in the honeycomb by honeybees (White and Molan, 2005). It was first used in the management of wounds by Egyptians 4000 years ago. It was shown that the ancient Greeks, Romans and Chinese applied honey as a topical antiseptic for skin ulcers and sores (White and Molan, 2005). It has been used for various applications including burn wounds, grafts sites and ulcers (Ahmed et al., 2002; Dumfort et al., 2000; Lusby et al., 2002; Molan, 2002; Namias, 2003; Vandeputte, 2003). Honey has been shown to be bactericidal to several micro-organisms including Staphylococcus aureas, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis (Ahmed et al., 2002; Dumfort et al., 2000; Lusby et al., 2002; Molan, 2002; Namias, 2003; Vandeputte, 2003).

Vitriol has been used since ancient time for treatment of several diseases such as eye infections. Its main constituent is zinc oxide, which is produced during refinement and melting of some quarries containing zinc and/or copper compounds as zinc sulfur, calamine and smitsonit. In Mount Lebanon and Mount Hermon as the origin of this medicine, a notable tendency to use the substances for treating diseases of the skin, the eyes, the sexual organs and hemorrhoids was detected (Lev, 2002).

Putty was shown to have antimicrobial and healing properties, while its major constituents are lead and tin oxide (AgO2) (www.encyclopaediaislamica.com; http://dictionary.reference.com).

As mixture of honey, putty and vitriol dissolved in olive oil was used by migrating nomads as a therapeutic measure in burn wounds for its healing effects especially in infected ones, this study was conducted to determine the healing effect of this mixture on burn wounds infected with P. aeruginosa in rat as an experimental animal model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April to July 2008, 60 rats with the weight range of 180-220 g were randomly divided into three equal groups, control (Group A), mixture of honey, putty, vitriol and olive oil (Group B) and silver sulfadiazine (Group C). Ketamine (15 mg kg-1) and xylocain (1.1 mg kg-1) were injected intramuscularly to sedate the animals. The back hairs of all animals were shaved and their skin was cleansed with povidone iodine solution and wiped with sterile water. A standard 3rd degree burn wound was established by a hot plate with an identical size about 20% of Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) and at similar temperature as described by Manafi et al. (2009).

After 24 h of burn production, 108 Colony Forming Units (CFU) of toxigenic strains of P. aeruginosa (PA 103) were inoculated subcutaneously into the burned area. All groups were supervised in their cages for 21 days. Samples were obtained from the infected areas using sterile swabs and saline and checked for the presence of P. aeruginosa after 48 h and 1, 2 and 3 weeks of experimental production of burns.

All swabs were cultured on blood and Muller-Hinton agar plates. They were incubated at 37°C under ambient conditions for 24 h. P. aeruginosa was identified by colony morphology, odor, a zone of hemolysis and oxidase, methyl red, Voges Proskauer, citrate and TSI tests (Forbes et al., 1998).

Animal selection, all experiments, subsequent care and the sacrifice procedure were all adhered to the guidelines of Animal Care Committee of Iran Veterinary Organization. All experiments were undertaken under aseptic conditions in Laboratory Animal Center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. The protocol of anesthesia, procedures, postoperative care and sacrifice were similar for all animals. During the experiments, the animals were housed one per cage, maintained under controlled environmental conditions (ambient temperature of 21±2°C, relative humidity of 65-70% and a balanced diet with free access to food and water).

For treatment of wounds in Group B, a dressing of the mixture of honey, putty, vitriol and olive oil (2 cm each) was used and in Group C, 1% silver sulfadiazine ointment was applied on the burn wounds and in the control group (Group A), it was left without any treatment.

In group B, the mixture of honey, putty, vitriol and olive oil was produced in the paste form as follows: (1) Honey wax as base of 35 g (35% of the compound), (2) Powder of putty (Soranj) as 15 g (15% of the compound), (3) Powder of vitriol (Totia) as 25 g (25% of the compound) and (4) Olive oil as 25 mL (25% of the compound).

After 7, 14 and 21 days of treatment, the animals were sacrificed with an overdose of anesthetics and the burn areas were removed for histological studies. The samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin overnight at room temperature. The 5 μ thick sections of paraffin-embedded tissues were prepared and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined at x10-20 magnification for presence or absence of reepithelialization, crusting blistering, spongiosis, granulation tissue and collagen matrix organization, inflammation, congestion, edema, etc.

Histological scorings were made at magnification of x40 from 20 random fields per section from each specimen as described by Mehrabani et al. (2009) including degree of epithelialization (absence or presence of epithelial covering, number of epithelial cell layers, crusting, spongiosis, intraepithelial inflammatory cells and blistering), granulation tissue and collagen matrix organization (adipose tissue substitution as an index of impaired wound closure, loose connective tissue or dense eosinophilic collagen matrix, edema, hemorrhage, degree of inflammation, number and organization of fibroblasts as well as their morphologic characteristics such as a plumped, spindle, or stellate-morphology as indexes of activity), inflammatory infiltrates (number of inflammatory cells and their localization such as perivascular or intravascular inflammatory infiltration or diffuse tissue inflammation of both neutrophils and lymphocytes) and angiogenesis (number of capillary lumens, congestion, fibrin deposition, hemorrhage). The histological scoring system ranged between 1 and 5 (Table 1).

Table 1: Scoring system of the histological changes in burn wound healing

All wounds were examined daily for any changes in appearance, discharge, color, smell of wounds and time of scar separation. Animal activity was also recorded if they were lethargic.

The results were expressed as mean±SD. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (Version 11.5, Chicago, IL, USA) by t and Chi-Square tests. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

After first induction of general anesthesia 9 out of 60 rats did not recovered from anesthesia and died, so they were excluded from the control group and number of rats in the control group reduced to 11 animals.

Bacterial count of the wound culture on the 2nd day after burn production revealed a mean bacterial count of 105 P. aeruginosa. The bacterial number after 1 week decreased significantly in Group B and C in comparison to Group A (p = 0.001). After 3 weeks, the difference was significant between Group A and B (p = 0.001) but was not significant between Group A and C. The difference was significant between Group B and C after 1, 2 and 3 weeks too (p = 0.001).

On day 7, histological findings demonstrated no significant difference between treatment groups for re-epithelialization, granulation, inflammatory cells and angiogenesis. On day 14, in Group B less inflammatory cell infiltration was noticed, the number of capillaries increased and re-epithelialization was better when compared with groups A and C. The best results were observed on day 21 in Group B but the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 1). After 3 weeks, the epidermal re-epithelialization was poor in Group A (Fig. 2). In group C, the mean score was between groups A and B (Fig. 3).

In clinical practice, antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa and its associated costs are still important in burn patients (Al-Waili et al., 2005). The advent of topical antimicrobials in 1960s reduced the mortality from burn wound sepsis from 60 to 28%. However, burn wound sepsis remains an important and potentially remediable cause of significant mortality and morbidity. The advent of multi-resistant bacteria has hastened the almost exclusive use of silver-based topical antimicrobial agents for the prevention of burn wound sepsis. The mainstay of burn wound topical antimicrobials in most countries is the preparation of 1% silver sulphadiazine (SSD) (Fraser et al., 2004; Paddle-Ledinek et al., 2006).

Silver sulfadiazine was shown as the gold standard in topical burn therapies which is also a useful antibacterial agent. It may delay the wound healing process (Cho et al., 2005) and may produce serious cytotoxic effects on host cells (Braydich-Stolle et al., 2005; Hussain et al., 2005).

Fig. 1: Scar tissue formation and Epithelialization in group B (200x)

Fig. 2: Healing with scar formation in group A (200x)

Fig. 3: Granulation tissue formation in group C (200x)

The silver released from its commercial products is very toxic to both fibroblasts and keratinocytes (Poon and Burd, 2004). It may lead to transient leukopenia due to bone marrow suppression (Homann et al., 2007). Its anti-infective products may not also provide the moisture to promote a rapid wound healing (Homann et al., 2007). There are also many reports on resistance of silver sulfadiazine (Wasiak et al., 2008). So, there is a need for new products for therapy of burn wounds in the healthcare industries (Van Den Plas et al., 2008).

Honey was reported to be effective in wound healing since ancient times (Cooper et al., 2002). Hazrati et al. (2010) reported more epithelialization in honey treated group in comparison with silver sulfadiazine ointment and the control group with a significant decrease in bacterial count in the wound area. Similar result was demonstrated by Nejabat et al. (2009) while honey was more effective in reduction of P. aeruginosa induced keratitis in comparison to the control group. In present study, honey was part of our therapeutic mixture in group B revealing more significant re-epithelization on days 14 and 21 in comparison to groups A and C. On days 7, 14 and 21, the number of bacteria in group B was significantly less than group A, but this difference was not significant between groups A and C which are identical to previous reports.

Several researchers showed that honey can help wound healing when used topically in several rat models of wound healing. Its acidic pH and hyper-tonicity are regarded as major factors in accelerating the healing in burns. Honey can enhance wound healing by accelerating glycolytic enzyme activity and supplying enough energy for cellular repair. Formation of collagen, wound contraction and epithelization are important stages in wound healing while inflammation is interlinked. Thus an intervention in any one of these phases may result into either promotion or depression of the collagen formation stage of healing. The healing effect of honey was shown to be due to its unique properties including the pH, high osmolarity, osmotic effect, hydrogen peroxide content and some phytochemicals (Ahmed et al., 2002; Dumfort et al., 2000; Lusby et al., 2002; Molan, 2002; Namias, 2003; Vandeputte, 2003).

Its antimicrobial activities are related to its high osmolarity, ability to produce hydrogen peroxide when diluted, acidity and direct action of antimicrobial chemicals with anti-infammatory properties (Ahmed et al., 2002; Dumfort et al., 2000; Lusby et al., 2002; Molan, 2001, 2002; Namias, 2003; Vandeputte, 2003; White and Molan, 2005).

In RCTs, Iftikhar et al. (2010) showed that treatment with honey increased both granuloma tissue weight and the breaking strength. Pieper (2009) reported that honey-based dressings facilitate healing in chronic wounds and burns. Gethin and Cowman (2008) compared honey and hydrogel in treatment of 104 patients. During 12 weeks, the percentage of patients healed was more in honey-treated (44%) than the hydrogel group (33%). Slough reduction was also more noticed in honey group at 4 weeks, although the percentage of the venous leg ulcer covered in slough significantly decreased in both groups from the baseline to week 4 (from 85 to 29% in the honey group and from 78 to 43% for the hydrogel group). Smith et al. (2009) evaluated application of honey in 11 patients with venous incompetence and non-healing venous leg ulcers failing to respond to an assortment of different therapeutic measurements including 4 layer compression, non-adherent dressings, topical silver and antibiotic therapy. A complete wound closure was visible within 3 to 4 weeks.

They demonstrated that the effects of honey increased the velocity of healing when used together with multilayer compression bandages. These reports confirm the healing effect and antimicrobial activity of honey which were also visible in our study as part of the mixture.

Vitriol which was part of our mixture has been used since ancient time for treatment of several infections in the Levant in the Medieval and early Ottoman periods (Lev, 2002). This property against infection may partially explain the decrease in our microbial count in the site of injury.

Putty as the other part of our mixture was also shown to have antimicrobial and healing properties (Neiva et al., 2008; Turner et al., 2003; Vastardis et al., 2005; Wilkins and Kelly, 2003). These findings also are in agreement with our results demonstrating the healing effect and antimicrobial property of the mixture.

In this study, olive oil was the solvent part of the mixture which was shown to have healing effects (Suntar et al., 2010).

Present findings show that the mixture of honey, vitriol and putty dissolved in olive oil can be a safe therapeutic method for treatment of burn site when infected with P. aeruoginosa. So, it can be recommended in burn patients effectively as a topical therapeutic measurement. However, to use this mixture clinically, more researches seem necessary.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to thank Medicinal Chemistry Research Center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for financial support and Mr. Tolidehi at Shiraz Burn Research Center for statistical analysis.

REFERENCES

  • Al-Waili, N.S., M. Akmal, F.S. Al-Waili, K.Y. Saloom and A. Ali, 2005. The antimicrobial potential of honey from United Arab Emirates on some microbial isolates. Med. Sci. Monit., 11: BR433-BR438.
    PubMed    


  • Amini, M., M. Kherad, D. Mehrabani, N. Azarpira, M.R. Panjehshahin and N. Tanideh, 2010. Effect of Plantago major on burn wound healing in rat. J. Applied Anim. Res., 37: 53-56.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Braydich-Stolle, L., S. Hussain, J.J. Schlager and M.C. Hofmann, 2005. In vitro cytotoxicity of nanoparticles in mammalian germline stem cells. Toxicol. Sci., 88: 412-419.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cho, L.A.R., H. Leem, J. Lee and K.C. Park, 2005. Reversal of silver sulfadiazine-impaired wound healing by epidermal growth factor. Biomaterials, 26: 4670-4676.
    Direct Link    


  • Cooper, R.A., E. Halas and P.C. Molan, 2002. The efficacy of honey in inhibiting strains of Pseudomonas aeroginosa from infected burns. J. Burn. Care. Rehabil., 23: 366-370.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Forbes, B.A., D.F. Sahm and A.S. Weissfeld, 1998. Pseudomonas, burkholderia and similar organisms. Baily Scott's Diagnostic Microbiol., 5: 448-461.


  • Fraser, J.F., L. Cuttle, M. Kempf and R.M. Kimble, 2004. Cytotoxicity of topical antimicrobial agents used in burn wounds in Australia. Austr. N.Z. J. Surg., 74: 139-142.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Homann, H.H., O. Rosbach, W. Moll, P.M. Vogt and G. Germann et al., 2007. A liposome hydrogel with polyvinyl-pyrrolidone iodine in the local treatment of partial-thickness burn wounds. Ann. Plast. Surg., 59: 423-427.
    PubMed    


  • Hosseini, S.V., N. Tanideh, J. Kohanteb, Z. Ghodrati, D. Mehrabani and H. Yarmohammadi, 2007. Comparison between alpha and silver sulfadiazine ointments in treatment of Pseudomonas infections in 3rd degree burns. Int. J. Surg., 5: 23-26.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hussain, S.M., K.L. Hess, J.M. Gearhart, K.T. Geiss and J.J. Schlager, 2005. In vitro toxicity of nanoparticles in BRL 3A rat liver cells. Toxicol. In vitro, 19: 975-983.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Japoni, A., S. Farshad and A. Alborzi, 2009. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Burn infection, treatment and antibacterial resistance. Iran Red Crescent. Med. J., 11: 244-253.
    Direct Link    


  • Japoni, A., M. Hayati, A. Albozi, S. Farshad and A. Abbasian, 2005. In vitro susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from a burn center to silver sulfadiazine and silver nitrate in Shiraz, south of Iran. IJMS., 30: 63-67.
    Direct Link    


  • Japoni, A., M. Kalani, S. Farshad, M. Ziyaeyan, A. Alborzi, D. Mehrabani and N. Rafaatpour, 2010. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in hospitalized patients with bloodstream infections: Analysis of some associated factors. Iran Red Crescent. Med. J., 12: 163-171.
    Direct Link    


  • Manafi, A., J. Kohanteb, D. Mehrabani, A. Japoni and M. Amini et al., 2009. Active immunization using exotoxin A confers protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a mouse burn model. BMC J. Microbiol., 9: 19-23.
    Direct Link    


  • Mehrabani, D., A. Rezaee, N. Azarpira, M.R. Fattahi and M. Amini et al., 2009. The healing effects of Teucrium polium in the repair of indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats. Saudi Med. J., 30: 494-499.
    PubMed    


  • Nejabat, M., A.R. Astaneh, M. Eghtedari, M. Mosallaei, M.J. Ashraf and D. Mehrabani, 2009. Effect of honey in Pseudomonas aeruginosa induced stromal keratitis in rabbits. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 35: 101-104.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Noorbakhsh Sabet, N., A. Japoni, D. Mehrabani and S. Japoni, 2010. Multi-drug resistance bacteria in Qom hospitals, central Iran. Iran Red Crescent. Med. J., 12: 501-503.
    Direct Link    


  • Paddle-Ledinek, J.E., Z. Nasa and H.J. Cleland, 2006. Effect of different wound dressings on cell viability and proliferation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 117: 110S-118S.
    PubMed    


  • Poon, V.K.M. and A. Burd, 2004. In vitro cytotoxity of silver: Implication for clinical wound care. Burns, 30: 140-147.
    Direct Link    


  • Van Den Plas, D., K. De Smet, D. Lens and P. Sollie, 2008. Differential cell death programmes induced by silver dressings in vitro. Eur. J. Dermatol., 18: 416-421.
    PubMed    


  • Wasiak, J., H. Cleland and F. Campbell, 2008. Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 4: CD002106-CD002106.
    PubMed    


  • Ahmed, A.K., M.J. Hoekstra, J.J. Hage and R.B. Karim, 2002. Honey-medicated dressing: Transformation of an ancient remedy into modern therapy. Ann. Plast. Surg., 50: 143-147.
    PubMed    


  • Dunford, C., R. Cooper, P. Molan and R. White, 2000. The use of honey in wound management. Nurs. Stand., 15: 63-68.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Gethin, G. and S. Cowman, 2008. Manuka honey vs. hydrogel: A prospec-tive, open-label, multicenter, randomised controlled trial to compare desloughing effcacy and healing outcomes in venous ulcers. J. Clin. Nurs., 18: 466-474.
    CrossRef    


  • Hazrati, M., D. Mehrabani, A. Japoni, H. Montasery, N. Azarpira, A.R. Hamidian-Shirazi and N. Tanideh, 2010. Effect of honey on healing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infected burn wounds in rat. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 37: 161-165.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Iftikhar, F., M. Arshad, F. Rasheed, D. Amraiz, P. Anwar and M. Gulfraz, 2010. Effects of acacia honey on wound healing in various rat models. Phytother. Res., 24: 583-586.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Lev, E., 2002. Medicinal exploitation of inorganic substances in the Levant in the Medieval and early Ottoman periods. Adler. Mus. Bull., 28: 11-16.
    PubMed    


  • Lusby, P.E., A. Coombes and J.M. Wilkinson, 2002. Honey: A potent agent for wound healing? J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs., 29: 295-300.
    PubMed    


  • Molan, P.C., 2001. Honey as a topical antibacterial agent for treatment of infected wounds. World Wide Wounds,


  • Molan, P.C., 2002. Re-introducing honey in the management of wounds and ulcers-theory and practice. Ostomy/Wound Manage., 48: 28-40.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Namias, S., 2003. Honey in the management of infections. Surg. Infect., 4: 219-226.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Neiva, R.F., Y.P. Tsao, R. Eber, J. Shotwell, E. Billy and H.L. Wang, 2008. Effects of a putty-form hydroxyapatite matrix combined with the synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 on alveolar ridge preservation. J. Periodontol., 79: 291-299.
    PubMed    


  • Pieper, B., 2009. Honey-based dressings and wound care: An option for care in the United States. J. Wound Ostomy Continence. Nurs., 36: 60-66.
    PubMed    


  • Smith, T., K. Legel and J.R. Hanft, 2009. Topical Leptospermum honey in recalcitrant venous leg wounds: A preliminary case series. Adv. Skin Wound Care, 22: 68-71.
    PubMed    


  • Suntar, I.P., E.K. Akkol, D. Yilmazer, T. Baykal, H. Kirmizibekmez, M. Alper and E. Yesilada, 2010. Investigations on the in vivo wound healing potential of Hypericum perforatum L. J. Ethnopharmacol., 127: 468-477.
    PubMed    


  • Vandeputte, J., 2003. Clinical evaluation of mesitran a honey based wound ointment. EWMAJ., 3: 8-11.


  • Vastardis, S., R.A. Yukna, E.T. Mayer and B.L. Atkinson, 2005. Periodontal regeneration with peptide-enhanced anorganic bone matrix in particulate and putty form in dogs. J. Periodontol., 76: 1690-1696.
    PubMed    


  • White, R. and P.C. Molan, 2005. Recent Clinical Usage of Honey in the Treatment of Wounds. Wounds Publishing, Aberdeen, UK


  • Turner, T.M., R.M. Urban, D.J. Hall, S. Infanger, S. Gitelis, D.W. Petersen and W.O. Haggard, 2003. Osseous healing using injectable calcium sulfate-based putty for the delivery of demineralized bone matrix and cancellous bone chips. Orthopedics, 26: 571-575.
    PubMed    


  • Wilkins, R.M. and C.M. Kelly, 2003. The effect of allomatrix injectable putty on the outcome of long bone applications. Orthopedics, 26: 567-570.
    PubMed    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved