HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Animal Sciences

Year: 2021 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 53-59
DOI: 10.3923/ajas.2021.53.59
Carcass Characteristics of Vietnamese Indigenous Noi Chicken at 91 Days Old
Nguyen Thi Hong Tuoi, Nguyen Tuyet Giang, Nguyen Thi Dieu Thuy, Huynh Thi Phuong Loan, Takeshi Shimogiri and Do Vo Anh Khoa

Abstract: Background and Objective: Noi is classified as a medium and slow-growing chicken breed of Vietnam, mainly for meat quality and fighting. This study aimed to evaluate carcass performances of Noi broilers at 91 days old. Materials and Methods: A total of 355 Noi chickens (164 males and 191 females) were slaughtered at the time point of 91 days old to record and calculate cut-up traits of the carcass. Results: Most of the evaluated traits were significantly different (p<0.001) between genders. Particularly, the males were always heavier than the females in weights of live body, carcass, thigh meat, breast meat, wing and drumstick (p<0.05),where as abdominal fat displayed a contrast between genders (25.04 g for males and 24.74 g for females) although no significant difference was found for this trait (p>0.05). In addition, genders significantly affected some cut-up portions such as live weight and carcass weight, except differences in weights of breast yield and abdominal fat, which was found in contrast. Live weight, in overall, significantly correlated with most carcass traits (p<0.001), but the coefficients differed due to the type of the observed traits. Females were higher in correlation to the weight of breast, thigh and drumstick than males (r = 0.71-0.88; r = 0.82-0.91, respectively). Conclusion: The findings showed that Noi male broilers had better performances in the live weight and carcass parameter than the female ones, suggesting opportunities for management and genetic improvement through the selection and cross-breeding of the indigenous chicken population.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Nguyen Thi Hong Tuoi, Nguyen Tuyet Giang, Nguyen Thi Dieu Thuy, Huynh Thi Phuong Loan, Takeshi Shimogiri and Do Vo Anh Khoa, 2021. Carcass Characteristics of Vietnamese Indigenous Noi Chicken at 91 Days Old. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences, 15: 53-59.

Keywords: Noi chicken breed, carcass traits, correlation, weight of breast and genetic improvement

INTRODUCTION

Consumption of poultry has dynamically increased over the decade and was ranked second in the world preceded by that of pork. At the same time, selection for chicken genotypes has been greatly developed and as a consequence, improvement for edible carcass yield, mainly for breast meat has intensified standard production1,2. Chicken meat is classified as white meat, supplying an important source of nutrients of the former’s higher protein, essential amino acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, minerals (magnesium, sodium and phosphorus) and vitamins (niacin, vitamin A and vitamin E)3-5. The growth rate and carcass, therefore, have consistently been the major selection trait of broiler chickens since the 1950s, with more emphasis on the yield of feed efficiency and breast meat. Despite the rapid growth rate and high fat deposition (which are considered unfavorable by customers) due to the inactive lifestyles and energy-rich diets, the chickens are required to be leaner and higher in meat quality in order to improve the quality of the product2. Another important aspect affecting the consumption market is the demand of easily prepared products. Few decades ago, the term "ready to grill" of whole carcass was replaced by partial carcass parts according to the need for separate carcass offer, mainly forth quality and yield of the major carcass parts such as thigh and breast muscles without bones6.

Several factors have influenced carcass performances of broiler chicken before slaughtering, including line, age, health, nutrition and rearing conditions. Nikolova and Pavlovski6 observed that the genotype of Cobb 500 influenced the mass of major carcass parts, but only on breast yield and the male chickens had significantly bigger breast, thigh and drumsticks meat than the females did. Age impact was statistically significant, so the chicken slaughtered at the 42nd day of age had much bigger carcass yield than those slaughtered at the earlier stage (the 35th day of age). The differences in breast, thigh and drumstick weight of chicken from different nutrition systems were not statistically significant. Other studies found that variation existed among different genotypes and their genders. Although commercial broiler breeders showed better carcass traits compared to the indigenous breeds7,8, the indigenous chicken performed better meat quality (glutamic acid content, shear values raw and cooked meat) compared to the broiler products9. Chicken’s gender was the determining factor that directly affected their weights of carcass, wings, breast, legs, liver and gizzard with higher values for males than females10,11.

Consumers’ recently increasing demands for food safety and sustainability of animal production systems have encouraged the use of native chicken for relevant markets12. Noi, a Vietnamese indigenous chicken breed has been known to possess desirable traits such as adaptation to local conditions and outstanding meat flavor and tenderness. They are mainly reared in the Southeastern of Vietnam, mostly in the region of South Central Coast and Mekong Delta. Noi chicken is classified as slow-growing broiler with medium body size but an increasing interest in the food servicemarkets13-15. Most of research has focused on the growth performances and body conformation of Noi chicken16-18. However, fewer reports, if any, compared the features of carcass, individual cut-up portions and edible meat types of birds with the same age but different genders. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate carcass performances and cuts of commercial interest of Vietnamese indigenous Noi chicken with different genders (males and females) that were raised at 91 days of age under a semi-arid subtropical environment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area: This study was conducted at Agricultural Service of Can Tho city (formerly Can Tho Center for Breeds of Seed, Livestock and Fish) as well as at Department of Animal Sciences of Can Tho University from July, 2018 to June, 2019.

Birds and measurement of carcass traits: In this study, 355 broilers chicken (164 males and 191 females) of the previous experiment as described by Khoa et al.17 were slaughtered at the time point of 91 days old to record and calculate cut-up traits of carcass including (i) weight traits such as Live Weight (LW, g), Killed Weight (KW, g), De-feather Weight (DFW, g), Carcass Weight (CW, g), Head Weight (HW, g), Weight of Breast Meat (WBM, g), Weight of Thigh Meat (WTM, g), Wing Weight (WW, g), Drumstick Weight (DW, g), Shank Weight (SW, g), Weight of Internal Organs (WIO, g), Gizzard Weight (GW, g), Liver Weight (LW, g), Heart Weight (HW, g), Weight of Abdominal Fat (WAF, g); (ii) length traits such as Caeca Length (CL, mm), Length of Small Intestine (LSI, mm) and (iii) percentage of measured traits with live weight or carcass weight.

Statistical analysis: The collected data on carcass parameters were subjected to analysis by Minitab (ver. 16.0), using the GLM model. Data were expressed as Mean±standard deviation (x±SD).

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05. Pearson correlation coefficients among the measurements were calculated.

RESULTS

Carcass characteristics: Mean values of live weight, carcass composition and gut length measured in Noi chickens of separate sex and in overall are summarized in Table 1. Most of the evaluated traits were significantly different (p<0.001) between the male and female chickens. The males had significantly higher live weights than the females and mixed-sex birds did (1,587.50 g compared to 1,293.04 and 1,429.07 g, respectively). Killed weight and de-feather weight were also notably affected by the chicken’s gender. A significant difference in carcass weight was noticed between gender (1,128.74 and 907.22 g in males and females, respectively). The male group had higher weight of thigh and breast meat, wing and drumstick, whereas the females showed heavier abdominal fat (25.04 g) than the males (24.74 g) did. However, the difference was not significant (p>0.05). Higher values of intestines length were also obtained in males compared to females (Table 1).

Percentages of cut-up portions: Gender also significantly affected some carcass proportions related to animal live weight given in Table 2. It was observed that gender had a significant effect on the percentage of de-feather weight, carcass weight and some portions, except for liver and heart weight (p<0.05). Higher percentages of de-feather weight (90.89%), carcass weight (70.98%), thigh meat (7.21%), wing weight (8.35%), drumstick weight (13.03%) and shank weight (4.45%) were obtained in the male group. These values were slightly higher in males than in females and mixed genders (p>0.05). On the other hand, no differences in weights of killed birds, head, liver and heart were recorded (p>0.05) between male and female chickens. Results for the percentage of cut-up portions related to carcass weight were also shown in Table 2. Similar to the previous tendency, male chickens showed higher performances than the females and the mixed sexes genders did in terms of the percentages of wing, drumstick, shank, internal organs and gizzard (p<0.05). The percentages of head and heart were also higher in male than in female chickens and mixed genders, but these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05). On the contrary, results of breast yield (Table 2) showed that the female Noi chickens had around 8.6% higher breast yield than the females did. It also showed that gender had significant effects on the portion of abdominal fat, which was found higher in the females compared to the males.

Correlation between live weight and carcass traits of Noi chickens: Table 3 presents the correlations between live weight and carcass traits for males and females separately and both genders together. As shown in Table 3, the live weight, in overall, significantly correlated with most traits (p<0.001), but the coefficients differed depending on the type of traits. There was a highly significant and positive correlation observed among the live weight, killed weight, de-feather weight and carcass weight (r>0.98, p<0.001).

Table 1: Carcass characteristics of Noi chicken in general and between genders
Gender
Traits Male (n = 164) Female (n = 191) SEM p-value Overall
LW (g) 1,587.50±220.40a 1,293.04±266.00b 18.50 0.000 1,429.07±286.28
KW (g) 1,547.80±215.20a 1,259.63±257.80b 17.98 0.000 1,392.76±178.70
DFW (g) 1,443.38±206.40a 1,169.17±245.00b 17.15 0.000 1,295.85±265.66
CW (g) 1,128.74±172.90a 907.22±199.50b 14.12 0.000 1,009.55±217.60
HW (g) 90.56±20.64a 71.40±20.22b 1.54 0.000 80.25±22.52
WBM (g) 157.45±30.85a 137.73±30.04b 2.29 0.000 146.84±31.93
WTM (g) 114.99±21.47a 90.91±21.54b 1.62 0.000 102.03±24.61
WW (g) 132.68±25.12a 102.08±24.45b 1.86 0.000 116.22±29.07
DW (g) 207.30±36.87a 160.05±41.74b 2.98 0.000 181.88±46.02
SW (g) 70.55±13.34a 50.29±16.00b 1.12 0.000 59.65±17.94
WIO (g) 158.53±26.86a 140.69±29.32b 2.12 0.000 148.93±29.55
GW (g) 16.74±3.56a 15.52±3.57b 0.27 0.001 16.08±3.61
LRW (g) 27.70±6.15a 22.63±5.64b 0.44 0.000 24.97±6.40
HTW (g) 8.12±1.74a 6.44±2.25b 0.15 0.000 7.22±2.20
WAF (g) 24.74±15.69a 25.04±15.88b 1.19 0.859 24.90±15.77
LSI (mm) 1,361.77±170.20a 1,273.75±185.00b 13.41 0.000 1,314.41±183.40
CL (mm) 319.15±39.11a 293.70±38.99b 2.94 0.000 305.46±41.01
LW: Live weight, KW: Killed weight, DFW: De-feather weight, CW: Carcass weight, HW: Head weight, WBM: Weight of breast meat, WTM: Weight of thigh meat, WW: Wing weight, DW: Drumstick weight, SW: Shank weight, WIO: Weight of internal organs, GW: Gizzard weight, LRW: Liver weight, HTW: Heart weight, WAF: Weight of abdominal fat, CL: Caeca length, LSI: Length of small intestine. a,bMeans followed by different letters in the same row differ significantly (p<0.05)


Table 2: Difference of cut-up parts as percentage between genders
Gender
Traits
Male (n = 164)
Female (n = 191)
SEM
p-value
Overall
Relative to live weight (%)
KW
97.50±1.19
97.45±1.28
0.09
0.689
97.47±1.24
DFW
90.89±1.85a
90.36±1.71b
0.13
0.005
90.61±1.79
CW
70.98±2.36a
69.98±2.06b
0.17
0.000
70.44±2.26
HW
5.76±1.29
5.56±1.27
0.10
0.142
5.65±1.28
WBM
9.91±1.34a
10.68±1.21b
0.10
0.000
10.33±1.33
WTM
7.21±0.70a
7.01±0.65b
0.05
0.005
7.11±0.68
WW
8.35±0.97a
7.90±0.89b
0.07
0.000
8.10±0.96
DW
13.03±1.23a
12.28±1.33b
0.10
0.000
12.63±1.34
SW
4.45±0.60a
3.86±0.67b
0.05
0.000
4.13±0.71
WIO
10.03±1.33a
10.99±1.74b
0.12
0.000
10.54±1.64
GW
1.07±0.24a
1.24±0.34b
0.02
0.000
1.16±0.31
LRW
1.76±0.37
1.77±0.36
0.03
0.717
1.76±0.36
HTW
0.51±0.09
0.50±0.13
0.01
0.229
0.50±0.11
WAF
1.56±0.99a
1.91±1.16b
0.08
0.002
1.75±1.10
Relative to carcass weight (%)
HW
8.13±1.87
7.96±1.91
0.14
0.401
8.04±1.89
WBM
13.96±1.80a
15.27±1.72b
0.13
0.000
14.67±1.88
WTM
10.16±0.93
10.02±0.90
0.07
0.161
10.09±0.91
WW
11.77±1.40a
11.29±1.27b
0.10
0.001
11.51±1.35
DW
18.37±1.73a
17.55±1.87b
0.14
0.000
17.93±1.85
SW
6.27±0.86a
5.51±0.95b
0.07
0.000
5.86±0.99
WIO
14.16±2.06a
15.75±2.81b
0.19
0.000
15.01±2.61
GW
1.51±0.35a
1.77±0.51b
0.03
0.000
1.65±0.46
LRW
2.48±0.55
2.54±0.55
0.04
0.340
2.51±0.56
HTW
0.72±0.14
0.71±0.19
0.01
0.547
0.72±0.17
WAF
2.20±1.41a
2.74±1.68b
0.12
0.001
2.49±1.58
LW: Live weight, KW: Killed weight, DFW: De-feather weight, CW: Carcass weight, HW: Head weight, WBM: Weight of breast meat, WTM: Weight of thigh meat, WW: Wing weight, DW: Drumstick weight, SW: Shank weight, WIO: Weight of internal organs, GW: Gizzard weight, LRW: Liver weight, HTW: Heart weight, WAF: Weight of abdominal fat. a,bMeans followed by different letters in the same row differ significantly (p<0.05)

The live weight was found to be much correlated with the weight of breast, thigh and drumstick in female birds compared to males (r = 0.82-0.91; r = 0.71-0.88, respectively). Weight of abdominal fat was also correlated with the weight of live chickens and carcass, but the coefficients were low (r = 0.23-0.25 in males and r = 0.34-0.37 in females). Length of small intestine and caeca was also correlated with the weights of live chickens and carcass, but the coefficients just ranged from 0.40-0.49 in both genders (p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

In the present study, Noi broilers had heavier carcass performances and yields than indigenous Thai chickens slaughtered at the age of 16 weeks19 and Aseel chicken slaughtered at 60 weeks8 (the slow-growing indigenous breeds as Noi chickens) but lower than the Ross 308 and Cobb chickens, the fast-growing broiler breeds20,21. These differences were probably due to the varied metabolic rates among breeds. The significant effects of gender on most of the weight of live chickens and most of carcass portions (except for the weight of abdominal fat) suggest the differences exist between genders within Noi breed. The non-significant difference in abdominal fat between genders found in this study was also reported by Rondelli et al.22. As indicated in Table 1, the male chickens showed higher values in live weight and carcass traits, meaning that heavier birds produce greater carcass performances. Similar findings were obtained by other authors who reported significant differences in live body weight and carcass traits between genders of three chicken breeds at 12 weeks23 or Ross 308 at 37 days of age24.

For the carcass yield, the significant effects of gender on the results are consistent with the findings of Faria et al.25, who reported higher carcass yield for males slaughtered at 80 to 95 days of age. Noi females presented higher breast yield (8.6%), as compared to males, as also shown by the other authors24,25. Similarly to this study, the previous authors stated that carcass characteristics except the yield of breast meat and abdominal fat were not greatly influenced by gender21,22.

Table 3: Pearson’s correlation coefficients among live weight and carcass traits
Traits LW KW DFW CW HW WBM WTM WW DW SW WIO GW LRW HTW WAF LSI CL
Male and female animals
LW 1.00 1.00*** 0.99*** 0.98*** 0.33*** 0.71*** 0.87*** 0.81*** 0.84*** 0.74*** 0.67*** 0.23*** 0.44*** 0.59*** 0.25*** 0.37*** 0.35***
KW 1.00*** 1.00 0.99*** 0.98*** 0.33*** 0.71*** 0.87*** 0.81*** 0.84*** 0.74*** 0.67*** 0.27*** 0.43*** 0.58*** 0.26*** 0.37*** 0.34***
DFW 1.00*** 1.00*** 1.00 0.99*** 0.34*** 0.73*** 0.88*** 0.81*** 0.84*** 0.76*** 0.67*** 0.27*** 0.42*** 0.57*** 0.25*** 0.40*** 0.35***
CW 0.99*** 0.99*** 0.99*** 1.00 0.32*** 0.74*** 0.88*** 0.80*** 0.84*** 0.74*** 0.62*** 0.25*** 0.39*** 0.55*** 0.23** 0.37*** 0.33***
HW 0.64*** 0.64*** 0.65*** 0.62*** 1.00 0.29*** 0.37*** 0.22*** 0.26*** 0.22** -0.05NS 0.06NS 0.09NS 0.18* -0.04NS 0.14NS 0.10NS
WBM 0.83*** 0.83*** 0.83*** 0.82*** 0.46*** 1.00 0.65*** 0.52*** 0.67*** 0.51*** 0.37*** 0.19* 0.22** 0.30*** 0.15NS 0.30*** 0.25**
WTM 0.90*** 0.90*** 0.90*** 0.88*** 0.58*** 0.87*** 1.00 0.73*** 0.75*** 0.67*** 0.50*** 0.22** 0.35*** 0.56*** 0.18* 0.32*** 0.27***
WW 0.86*** 0.86*** 0.86*** 0.84*** 0.51*** 0.74*** 0.86*** 1.00 0.72*** 0.78*** 0.49*** 0.29*** 0.46*** 0.52*** 0.03NS 0.37*** 0.35***
DW 0.91*** 0.91*** 0.90*** 0.88*** 0.54*** 0.84*** 0.89*** 0.88*** 1.00 0.66*** 0.51*** 0.18* 0.39*** 0.57*** 0.16* 0.28*** 0.31***
SW 0.81*** 0.81*** 0.82*** 0.79*** 0.47*** 0.69*** 0.82*** 0.85*** 0.82*** 1.00 0.40*** 0.37*** 0.47*** 0.46*** -0.11NS 0.49*** 0.41***
WIO 0.73*** 0.74*** 0.74*** 0.69*** 0.26*** 0.66*** 0.67*** 0.60*** 0.70*** 0.54*** 1.00 0.22** 0.42*** 0.41*** 0.58*** 0.35*** 0.34***
GW 0.28*** 0.28*** 0.29*** 0.26*** 0.09NS 0.27*** 0.26*** 0.24*** 0.24*** 0.27*** 0.42*** 1.00 0.17* 0.12NS -0.21** 0.30*** 0.25***
LRW 0.64*** 0.64*** 0.64*** 0.61*** 0.36*** 0.53*** 0.59*** 0.59*** 0.60*** 0.61*** 0.61*** 0.32*** 1.00 0.58*** -0.07NS 0.28*** 0.28***
HTW 0.62*** 0.62*** 0.62*** 0.61*** 0.40*** 0.51*** 0.60*** 0.60*** 0.59*** 0.52*** 0.50*** 0.24*** 0.47*** 1.00 0.01NS 0.25*** 0.21**
WAF 0.37*** 0.38*** 0.36*** 0.34*** 0.12NS 0.32*** 0.31*** 0.28*** 0.36*** 0.12NS 0.58*** 0.01NS 0.17* 0.25*** 1.00 0.01NS -0.05NS
LSI 0.33*** 0.33*** 0.33*** 0.31*** 0.20** 0.26*** 0.31*** 0.27*** 0.30*** 0.30*** 0.39*** 0.08NS 0.25*** 0.18** 0.25*** 1.00 0.38***
CL 0.45*** 0.46*** 0.46*** 0.44*** 0.30*** 0.37*** 0.42*** 0.38*** 0.43*** 0.39*** 0.46*** 0.26*** 0.42*** 0.35*** 0.16* 0.39*** 1.00
Overall (male+female)
LW 1.00
KW 1.00*** 1.00
DFW 1.00*** 1.00*** 1.00
CW 1.00*** 0.99*** 0.99*** 1.00
HW 0.61*** 0.61*** 0.62*** 0.60*** 1.00
WBM 0.79*** 0.79*** 0.80*** 0.80*** 0.46*** 1.00
WTM 0.91*** 0.91*** 0.92*** 0.91*** 0.59*** 0.79*** 1.00
WW 0.88*** 0.88*** 0.88*** 0.87*** 0.51*** 0.67*** 0.85*** 1.00
DW 0.91*** 0.91*** 0.91*** 0.90*** 0.54*** 0.78*** 0.87*** 0.86*** 1.00
SW 0.85*** 0.85*** 0.85*** 0.83*** 0.51*** 0.65*** 0.82*** 0.87*** 0.83*** 1.00
WIO 0.73*** 0.74*** 0.74*** 0.70*** 0.23*** 0.57*** 0.64*** 0.61*** 0.66*** 0.55*** 1.00
GW 0.32*** 0.32*** 0.32*** 0.30*** 0.14*** 0.27*** 0.29*** 0.31*** 0.27*** 0.35*** 0.36*** 1.00
LRW 0.63*** 0.63*** 0.63*** 0.60*** 0.35*** 0.45*** 0.57*** 0.62*** 0.60*** 0.63*** 0.58*** 0.29*** 1.00
HTW 0.68*** 0.68*** 0.67*** 0.66*** 0.42*** 0.49*** 0.65*** 0.64*** 0.65*** 0.59*** 0.52*** 0.24*** 0.59*** 1.00
WAF 0.27*** 0.27*** 0.27*** 0.25*** 0.04NS 0.22*** 0.21*** 0.13** 0.23*** 0.01NS 0.55*** -0.09NS 0.04NS 0.14** 1.00
LSI 0.41*** 0.41*** 0.42*** 0.40*** 0.25*** 0.33*** 0.38*** 0.38*** 0.36*** 0.44*** 0.42*** 0.21*** 0.33*** 0.28*** 0.14** 1.00
CL 0.49*** 0.49*** 0.50*** 0.48*** 0.31*** 0.38*** 0.44*** 0.46*** 0.47*** 0.48*** 0.46*** 0.29*** 0.43*** 0.37*** 0.06NS 0.43*** 1.00
LW: Live weight, KW: Killed weight, DFW: De-feather weight, CW: Carcass weight, HW: Head weight, WBM: Weight of breast meat, WTM: Weight of thigh meat, WW: Wing weight, DW: Drumstick weight, SW: Shank weight, WIO: Weight of internal organs, GW: Gizzard weight, LRW: Liver weight, HTW: Heart weight, WAF: Weight of abdominal fat, CL: Caeca length, LSI: Length of small intestine. *Significant at p<0.05, **Significant at p<0.01, ***Significant at p<0.001, NSNon-significant. Male: Above diagonal line break, Female: Below the diagonal break

It was probably due to sexual dimorphism of the carcass conformation, in which female chicken presented a higher breast development and a lower drumstick percentage compared to males22. The females were normally fatter than the males because female hormones stimulated fat deposition, so they started to store fat 2 weeks earlier than the males22,26,27. From a view of nutrition, these differences limit the slaughter age of females. Furthermore, the fat volume and fat quality (including cholesterol content) in animal products are considered to be the risk of cardio-vascular diseases and in human22.

Gender differs in physiology and it could result in the higher feed conversion efficiency of males than females in the same rearing systems26. Many studies23,28 also confirmed that low live weight was associated with low carcass performances. Not only live weight but also carcass weight was highly and positively associated to other portions (Table 3). Ndomou et al.28, on the contrary, stated that there was no significant association between the carcass yield and the other carcass traits. The significant correlations between live weight and most of the carcass characteristics can be beneficial in predicting the values of these traits with no additional cost and time. In summary, although Noi chickens have low live weight, carcasses and cut-up parts, they cannot be absent from the Vietnamese poultry raising system because their meat quality is preferred by consumers and they are really easy to raised in farming conditions to increase income and improve family life. Therefore, in order to improve the weight and productivity of the Noi chickens, it is recommended to crossbreed with other backyard chicken breeds, for example the fighting cock, namely Choi, in Binh Dinh Vietnam.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study showed that male chicken from Noi breed had better performance in the live weight and carcass parameters. Males had lower breast yield and deposited less fat than females. The other carcass proportions such as thigh meat, wing, drumstick and shank were strongly gender-dependent. In overall, there was a highly significant and positive correlation observed among the live weight and all carcass traits. Higher correlation coefficients between live weight and weight of breast, thigh and drumstick were found in the female group compared to the male one. These results suggest opportunities for management and genetic improvement through the selection and cross-breeding of the indigenous chicken population.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

The current study was undertaken to provide information about carcass characteristics of Noi broiler, a native chicken breed of Vietnam. It helps consumers to select quality traits for meat and breeding. This study would also help the researchers to uncover the critical areas of carcass performances of broiler chickens.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study is funded in part by the Can Tho University Improvement Project VN14-P6, supported by a Japanese ODA loan.

REFERENCES

  • Petracci, M., S. Mudalal, F. Soglia and C. Cavani, 2015. Meat quality in fast-growing broiler chickens. World's Poult. Sci. J., 71: 363-374.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tallentire, C.W., I. Leinonen and I. Kyriazakis, 2016. Breeding for efficiency in the broiler chicken: A review. Agron. Sustainable Dev., Vol. 36.
    CrossRef    


  • Farrell, D., 2010. The role of poultry in human nutrition. Poultry development review. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, pp: 2. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/al709e/al709e00.pdf.


  • Soriano-Santos, J., 2010. Chemical Composition and Nutritional Content of Raw Poultry Meat. In: Handbook of Poultry Science and Technology, Guerrero-Legarreta, I. and Y.H. Hui (Eds.)., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, United States pp: 467-489
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ahmad, R.S., A. Imran and M.B. Hussain, 2018. Nutritional Composition of Meat. In: Meat Science and Nutrition, Arshad, M.S. (Eds.)., IntechOpen, London, pp: 61-77
    Direct Link    


  • Nikolova, N. and Z. Pavlovski, 2009. Major carcass parts of broiler chicken from different genotype, sex, age and nutrition system. Biotechnol. Anim. Husbandry, 25: 1045-1054.
    Direct Link    


  • Ganabadi, S., S. Mutuviren, M.A. Hilmi, S.M.A. Babjee, H. Yaakub and S. Fakurazi, 2009. Carcass composition of jungle fowl in comparison with broilers and indigenous chicken. Asian J. Anim. Sci., 3: 13-17.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Khan, U., J. Hussain, A. Mahmud, A. Khalique and S. Mehmood et al., 2019. Comparative study on carcass traits, meat quality and taste in broiler, broiler breeder and Aseel chickens. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., Vol. 21.
    CrossRef    


  • Wattanachant, S., S. Benjakul and D.A. Ledward, 2004. Composition, color and texture of Thai indigenous and broiler chicken muscles. Poult. Sci., 83: 123-128.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Tareke, M., B. Assefa, T. Abate and E. Tekletsadik, 2018. Evaluation of morphometric differences among indigenous chicken populations in Bale Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Poult. Sci. J., 6: 181-190.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fernandes, J.I.M., C. Bortoluzzi, G.E. Triques, A. Froes, G. Neto and D.C. Peiter, 2013. Effect of strain, sex and age on carcass parameters of broilers. Maringa, 35: 99-105.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Padhi, M.K., 2016. Importance of indigenous breeds of chicken for rural economy and their improvements for higher production performance. Scientifica, Vol. 2016.
    CrossRef    


  • Van Duc, N. and T. Long, 2008. Poultry production systems in Vietnam. GCP/RAS/228/GER Working Paper No. 4, June 2008, Rome, Italy, pp: 1-17.


  • Cuc, N.T.K., H. Simianer, H. Eding, H.V. Tieu and V.C. Cuong et al., 2010. Assessing genetic diversity of Vietnamese local chicken breeds using microsatellites. Anim. Genet., 41: 545-547.
    CrossRef    


  • Lan Phuong, T.N., K.D.T. Dong Xuan and I. Szalay, 2015. Traditions and local use of native Vietnamese chicken breeds in sustainable rural farming. World's Poult. Sci. J., 71: 385-396.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ngu, N.T., N.T.H. Nhan, N.V. Hon, N.V. Quyen and N.T. Muoi et al., 2016. Characteristics of the noichicken raised in the Mekong Delta. J. Animal Husb. Sci. Technics, 203: 7-14.


  • Anh, K.D.V., N.T.H. Tuoi, N.T. Nguyen, N.T.D. Thuy, S. Okamoto, K. Kawabe, and T. Shimogigri, 2019. Some quantitative genetic traits in Vietnamese indigenous Noi chicken from 0 to 28 days old. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb., 35: 141-151.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Anh, K.D.V., T.N.T. Hong, T.N.T. Dieu, O. Shin and K. Kataro et al., 2019. Growth performance and morphology of in 28-84 day-old vietnamese local Noi chicken. Biotechnol. Anim. Husb., 35: 301-310.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jaturasitha, S., A. Kayan and M. Wicke, 2008. Carcass and Meat characteristics between Thai Village chickens compared with improved layer breeds and their crossbred. Poult. Sci., 51: 283-294.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hristakieva, P., N. Mincheva, M. Oblakova, M. Lalev and I. Ivanova, 2014. Effect of genotype on production traits in broiler chickens. Slovak J. Anim. Sci., 47: 19-24.
    Direct Link    


  • Benyi, K., T.S. Tshilate, A.J. Netshipale and K.T. Mahlako, 2015. Effects of genotype and sex on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 47: 1225-1231.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rondelli, S., O. Martinez and P.T. Garcia, 2003. Sex effect on productive parameters, carcass and body fat composition of two commercial broilers lines. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 5: 169-173.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ojedapo, L.O., O. Akinokun, T.A. Adedeji, T.B. Olayeni, S.A. Ameen and S.R. Amao, 2008. Effect of strain and sex on carcass characteristics of three commercial broilers reared in deep litter system in the derived Savannah area of Nigeria. World J. Agric. Sci., 4: 487-491.
    Direct Link    


  • Hussein, E.O.S., G.M. Suliman, A.N. Al-Owaimer, S.H. Ahmed and A.M. Abudabos et al., 2019. Effects of stock, sex and muscle type on carcass characteristics and meat quality attributes of parent broiler breeders and broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 98: 6586-6592.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Faria, P.B., M.C. Bressan, X.R. de Souza, L.V. Rossato, L.M.G. Botega and L.T. da Gama, 2010. Carcass and parts yield of broilers reared under a semi-extensive system. Braz. J. Poultry Sci., 12: 153-159.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Almasi, A., Z. Suto, Z. Budai, T. Donko, G. Milisits and P. Horn, 2012. Effect of age, sex and strain on growth, body composition and carcass characteristics of dual purpose type chicken. World's Poult. Sci. J., 1: 47-50.
    Direct Link    


  • Bihan-Duval, E.L., S. Mignon-Grasteau, N. Millet and C. Beaumont, 1998. Genetic analysis of a selection experiment on increased body weight and breast muscle weight as well as on limited abdominal fat weight. Br. Poult. Sci., 39: 346-353.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ndomou, S., C. Tsapla, F. Djikeng, G. Teboukeu and H. Kohole et al., 2018. Correlation between performance, carcass traits and blood lipid profile of broilers chicken fed with rations supplemented with plant powders. J. Appl. Life Sci. Int., 17: 1-12.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved