Abstract: Background and Objective: Cylas species infestation is a serious pest threat to sustainable sweetpotato production in Ghana. For integrated Cylas species management, exploiting the potential of entomopathogenic nematodes, noting and appreciating sweetpotato farmers’ production practices is essential. Sweetpotato production practices and Cylas spp. management options in some major growing areas of southern Ghana were assessed. Materials and Methods: Farmer-level structured questionnaire was designed, pretested and used to collect information from 270 respondents employing both qualitative and quantitative techniques. Results: Seventy-nine percent of the farmers cultivated local sweetpotato cultivars. Eighty-six percent practiced sole cropping while 47% managed their own planting material from the previous crop. Sixty-nine percent cited Cylas species as the most important sweetpotato pest. Ninety-seven percent responded positively to awareness of Cylas spp. infestations in sweetpotato production. Major Cylas species management options indicated by farmers were; insecticides application, early harvesting, earthing up, crop rotation and weed control in order of significance. Seventy percent (70%) did not manage Cylas species infestations in sweetpotato production. Conclusion: Cylas spp. management with synthetic farm insecticides must be discouraged on grounds of human and environmental health concerns. Biological control, which involves incorporating entomopathogenic nematodes should be encouraged in an integrated pest management system for environmental friendliness.
INTRODUCTION
Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam) provides good ground cover and prevents soil erosion1. It has high β-carotene content than any other root and tuber crop2. It has numerous medicinal uses which include managing menstrual problems and osteoporosis3. Sweetpotato is also used in industrial starch production4, microbial hydrogen5and ethanol fuel production6.
However, high sweetpotato crop productivity is constrained by Cylas spp. infestations. Cylas spp. is the most serious biotic threat to sustainable sweetpotato production worldwide. Tuber losses between five and 97% have been recorded in areas where Cylas species infestations occur7. There is often a positive relationship between vine damage or weevil population density and tuber damage. Major symptom of a heavy infestation is yellowing of the vines and tuber mining by Cylas species larvae. Infested storage roots are often riddled with cavities, spongy in appearance and dark in storage root flesh color. This greatly reduces the food and market value of the economic harvest. The tunneling damage caused by Cylas species larvae predisposes the storage roots to other soil-borne pathogens. Even low levels of the larvae feeding on tubers induce a chemical reaction that imparts a bitter taste and bad odor to the storage roots8. The damage ultimately renders sweetpotato storage roots unwholesome for human and farm animals’ consumption.
Entomopathogenic nematodes have the potential for practical biological suppression of Cylas spp. Strains of Steinernema carpocapsae (Nematoda: Steinernematidae) and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Nematoda: Heterorhabditidae) penetrate the soil and storage roots to infest and kill storage root damaging Cylas species larvae7. Entomopathogenic nematodes occur naturally in cropland soils and the infective juveniles are often persistent; remaining active for up to four months. In some cases, entomopathogenic nematodes are more effective than insecticides at reducing damage caused by Cylas species in sweetpotato production9. Integrating entomopathogenic nematodes in sustainable Cylas species management, noting and appreciating sweetpotato farmers’ production practices is essential. In this study, sweetpotato production practices in some major growing areas of southern Ghana were assessed especially with regards to options for indigenous management against Cylas species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A farmer-level structured questionnaire was used to collect data on sweetpotato production practices from farmers employing both qualitative and quantitative techniques10. The questionnaire was administered in nine major sweetpotato growing districts in southern Ghana. The study areas covered three regions; Central, Volta and Eastern (Table 1). Two hundred and seventy active sweetpotato farmers were purposely selected as respondents across nine districts (30 respondents per district). Farmer selection was done in collaboration with local Agricultural Extension Agents of Ministry of Food and Agriculture in the respective districts. The survey was conducted between February and May 2017. Data collected were analyzed with SPSS and results presented in tables and graphs.
RESULTS
Across the districts, 71% of the respondents were males (Fig. 1). In the Fanteakwa and Ketu North Districts, 54 and 10% of the farmers respectively, had no formal education (Table 2). In the Ketu North district, 35% of the respondents had cultivated sweetpotato for over 20 years whilst 20% in the Upper Manya Krobo and Upper West Akyem districts had the same wealth of experience in sweetpotato cultivation (Table 3). Sixty-three percent respondents were cultivating sweetpotato primarily for cash income whilst, 26% cited “quick returns’’ or “early maturing” as the most important reason for growing the crop (Fig. 2).
Table 1: Some identifiable characteristics of the surveyed districts | |||
District | Region | Agro ecology | District location |
Ketu South | Volta | Coastal Savanna | N6° 08.041' E1° 11.011' |
Ketu North | Volta | Coastal Savanna | N6° 08.303' E0° 53.716' |
Akatsi South | Volta | Coastal Savanna | N6° 10.721' E0° 52.228' |
Abura Asebu Kwamankese | Central | Coastal | N5° 11.152' W1° 15.333' |
Twifo Heman Lower Denkyira | Central | Coastal Savanna | N5° 15.281' W1° 21.430' |
Komenda Edina Eguafo Abirem | Central | Coastal Savanna | N5° 04.514' W1° 29.465' |
Fanteakwa | Eastern | Transitional Forest | N6° 20.466' W0° 21.074' |
Upper Manya Krobo | Eastern | Transitional Forest | N6° 22.986' W0° 01.889' |
Upper West Akyem | Eastern | Transitional Forest | N5° 47.551' W0° 25.405' |
Fig. 1: | Distribution of sweetpotato farmers by sex in nine districts of southern Ghana |
Fig. 2: | Reasons why farmers cultivate sweetpotato in nine districts of southern Ghana, N = 270 |
Table 2: Sweetpotato farmer's formal education levels in nine districts of southern Ghana | ||||
Formal education level (%) | ||||
District | None |
Basic |
Secondary |
Tertiary |
Ketu South | 7 |
77 |
16 |
0 |
Ketu North | 10 |
77 |
13 |
0 |
Akatsi South | 26 |
60 |
10 |
3 |
Abura Asebu Kwamankese | 33 |
61 |
6 |
0 |
Twifo Heman Lower Denkyira | 33 |
57 |
10 |
0 |
Komenda Edina Egufo Abirem | 13 |
74 |
13 |
0 |
Fanteakwa | 54 |
43 |
3 |
0 |
Upper Manya Krobo | 40 |
47 |
7 |
6 |
Upper West Akyem | 20 |
60 |
20 |
0 |
Mean | 26 |
62 |
10 |
1 |
N: 30 respondents per district |
Averagely, 79% of respondents cultivated local sweetpotato cultivars (Fig. 3). None from Twifo Heman Lower Denkyira district cultivated sweet potato crop above five acres (Table 4).
Fig. 3: | Kind of sweetpotato grown by farmers in nine districts of southern Ghana, N = 270 |
Fig. 4: | Adoption of improved sweetpotato cultivars by farmers in nine districts of southern Ghana |
Table 3: Percentage of respondents to sweetpotato cultivation experience in nine districts of southern Ghana | |||||||
Experience in sweetpotato cultivation (years) | |||||||
District | 1-5 |
6-10 |
11-15 |
16-20 |
>20 |
||
Ketu South | 40 |
20 |
13 |
3 |
24 |
||
Ketu North | 17 |
19 |
13 |
16 |
35 |
||
Akatsi South | 39 |
13 |
22 |
7 |
19 |
||
Abura Asebu Kwamankese | 30 |
17 |
13 |
10 |
30 |
||
Twifo Heman Lower Denkyira | 36 |
23 |
16 |
13 |
12 |
||
Komenda Edina Eguafo Abirem | 23 |
33 |
6 |
13 |
25 |
||
Fanteakwa | 23 |
23 |
17 |
10 |
27 |
||
Upper Manya Krobo | 13 |
17 |
17 |
33 |
20 |
||
Upper West Akyem | 27 |
40 |
10 |
3 |
20 |
||
Mean | 28 |
23 |
14 |
12 |
24 |
||
N: 30 respondents per district |
Table 4: Sweetpotato farm size and mode of land preparation across the study area | |||||||
Sweetpotato farm size (acres) | Land preparation method | ||||||
District | <0.5 |
0.6-1 |
2-4 |
>5 |
Flat plough |
Mounds |
Ridges |
Ketu South | 27 |
30 |
27 |
16 |
3 |
63 |
34 |
Ketu North | 7 |
13 |
70 |
10 |
6 |
67 |
27 |
Akatsi South | 40 |
33 |
20 |
7 |
0 |
67 |
33 |
Abura Asebu Kwamankese | 37 |
30 |
26 |
7 |
6 |
41 |
53 |
Twifo Heman Lower Denkyira | 16 |
37 |
47 |
0 |
3 |
73 |
24 |
Komenda Edina Eguafo Abirem | 20 |
47 |
20 |
13 |
0 |
53 |
47 |
Fanteakwa | 13 |
7 |
57 |
23 |
20 |
77 |
3 |
Upper Manya Krobo | 7 |
40 |
37 |
13 |
3 |
97 |
0 |
Upper West Akyem | 17 |
46 |
33 |
4 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
Mean | 20 |
26 |
37 |
10 |
6 |
71 |
25 |
N: 30 respondents per district, <: less than or equal to, >: Greater than or equal to |
Fig. 5: | Sources of farmers’ sweetpotato planting material, N = 270 |
Fig. 6: | Farmers responses to sweetpotato planting material chemical treatment prior to planting, N = 270 |
Fig. 7: | Farmers responses to major sweetpotato crop pests, N = 270 |
Land preparation methods employed for growing sweetpotato were flat ploughed, mounds and ridges. In the Akatsi South, Komenda Edina Eguafo Abirem and Upper West Akyem districts, none used flat ploughed to cultivate sweet potato. In the Upper West Akyem district, all the farmers used mounds to cultivate the crop, whilst none used ridging in the Upper Manya Krobo district (Table 4). Six, 8, 16 and 4% were growing Santom Pona, Sauti, Ogyefo and Tek Santom improved sweetpotato varieties, respectively (Fig. 4).
In the Ketu South and Fanteakwa districts, all the farmers practiced sole cropping whilst 93%, 93% and 94% farmers in the Ketu South, Ketu North and Upper West Akyem districts respectively, practiced same (Table 5).
Averagely, 47% of respondents managed their own sweetpotato planting material from the previous crop. Almost 18%, 23% and 12% got their supply from the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, friends and open market, respectively (Fig. 5).
Ninety-seven percent (respondents) did not subject their sweet potato planting material to any form of chemical treatment prior to planting to ward off pre-existing pests and pathogens (Fig. 6).
Fig. 8: | Farmers awareness of sweetpotato Cylas species infestations, N = 270 |
Fig. 9: | Farmers responses to Cylas species management, N = 270 |
Fig. 10: | Farmers responses to major management options against Cylas species infestations, N = 81 |
Farmers responses to major sweetpotato pests across the districts were; weevils (69%), caterpillars (14%), grasshoppers (6%), millipedes (4%), viruses (3%), centipedes (1%), beetles (1%), whiteflies (1%) and termites (1%) (Fig. 7).
Table 5: Responses of sweetpotato farmers to various questions by the district in percentage | ||||
Cropping system rotational cropping | ||||
District | Sole |
Mixed |
Yes |
No |
Ketu South | 100 |
0 |
93 |
7 |
Ketu North | 83 |
7 |
93 |
7 |
Akatsi South | 77 |
23 |
72 |
28 |
Abura Asebu Kwamankese | 50 |
50 |
43 |
57 |
Twifo Heman Lower Denkyira | 73 |
27 |
73 |
27 |
Komenda Edina Eguafo Abirem | 97 |
3 |
33 |
63 |
Fanteakwa | 100 |
0 |
27 |
73 |
Upper Manya Krobo | 93 |
7 |
27 |
73 |
Upper West Akyem | 97 |
3 |
94 |
6 |
Mean | 86 |
13 |
62 |
17 |
N: 30 respondents per district |
Ninety-seven percent of the farmers responded positively to awareness of sweetpotato Cylas species infestations (Fig. 8).
Seventy percent of the respondents never managed Cylas species infestations in sweetpotato production (Fig. 9).
DISCUSSION
Majority (71%) of the respondents across the study area were males. Illiteracy rate found among the sweetpotato farmers was below the 46% Ghanaian adult illiteracy rate as cited by Ghana Education Service in 2012. Sixty-six percent of farmers who had adopted improved sweetpotato cultivars were growing Apomuden variety (Orange Fleshed Sweetpotato, a precursor for pro-vitamin A). This may be due to cultural norms that designate sweetpotato as men’s crop in the study areas or the drudgery nature of land preparation which may be unbearable for prospective sweetpotato women farmers. In a similar study involving 120 sweetpotato farmers in four districts of Ghana, 69% of the respondents were males11. Adoption of improved agricultural practices is positively correlated with education, whether formal or informal12. Sweetpotato farming was found to be a lucrative venture as 63% of respondents were cultivating the crop primarily for cash income. However, the profit margin for sweetpotato traders far outweighed that of the farmers due to lack of storage and processing facilities which compelled the farmers to sell off their produce quickly at the farm gate11. Land preparation methods recorded agreed with the study of others who posited that sweetpotato in southern Ghana was planted mainly on constructed mounds13. Sweetpotato farmers used other land preparation methods but said that planting was easier on mounds than on ridges. Mounding was prominent in sweetpotato production11 and most preferable because of the easier harvesting of the produce. Land preparation for sweetpotato cultivation in the southern and middle belt of Ghana consisted of bush burning or tractor ploughing after which hoes and or mattocks were used to prepare mounds14,15.
Seventy percent of the 120 sweetpotato farmers were aware of improved sweetpotato cultivars out of which 21% cultivated one or more of the improved cultivars11. However, earlier findings by others reported non-availability of improved sweetpotato cultivars in the southern and middle belt of Ghana14. In the current study, the use of local sweetpotato cultivars for cultivation was common. Similarly, most sweetpotato farmers didn’t have access to improved planting materials in southern Benin16. All the improved sweetpotato planting materials encountered in the current study were developed by CSIR-Crops Research Institute of Ghana, except Tek Santom which was developed by Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Ghana. Similarly, Santompona, Sauti, Faara, Okumkom and Apomuden were recorded as improved sweetpotato cultivars being cultivated by farmers in four districts of Ghana11. Sole cropping was the most popular sweetpotato cropping system practiced among the 120 sweetpotato farmers11. As was found in the current study, Cylas species and caterpillars were reported as major insect pests that damaged sweetpotato in Dangbo and Bonou townships of southern Benin16. Cylas species was also found to be a common pest infesting sweetpotato in Ghana11.
Significantly, farmers reported of six major sweetpotato production practices with no mention of Cylas species management11. There is reported lack of adequate methods for managing pests and diseases in sweetpotato production in Benin16. In the current study, 70% of the respondents did not practice any management options against Cylas species infestations. On the contrary, insecticides were used to control insect pests in sweetpotato production in southern Benin16. Actellic 50EC insecticide was reported to be commonly used to manage Cylas species in the Twifo-Ati Mokwa district of Ghana11.
Subsequently, similar studies must be conducted in other major sweetpotato growing areas in other regions of Ghana to give a broader picture of cultivation practices especially with regards to Cylas species management. This study would guide Agricultural Extension Workers and other relevant stakeholders on the dissemination of improved sweetpotato production practices to promote integrated management of Cylas species in sweetpotato production, highlighting the potential of entomopathogenic nematodes as biological control agents. Hence, it is recommended that sweetpotato farmers should contact their Agricultural Extension Workers in their communities on improved sweetpotato production practices to increase the productivity of the crop. Some of the sweetpotato farmers were highly illiterate across the study areas. This made analyzing some of their responses tedious. Also, some of the respondents were reluctant to respond to the questions asked for fear that nothing would come out of the study just like other earlier research works.
CONCLUSION
For sustainable high sweetpotato crop productivity, Cylas species must be managed effectively. Cylas species management with synthetic farm chemicals must be discouraged on grounds of human and environmental health concerns. Biological control, especially employing entomopathogenic nematodes should be encouraged in an integrated pest management system for environmental friendliness. Agricultural Extension Agents, Crop Scientists and relevant NGOs should informally educate sweetpotato farmers on improved production practices that would promote biological control of Cylas species to minimize reliance on synthetic farm chemicals.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
This study discovered that Cylas species management that can be beneficial for increased sweetpotato crop productivity is regrettably unpopular in sweetpotato production in Ghana. This study will help researchers to uncover the critical areas of exploring entomopathogenic nematodes in an integrated management system against Cylas species in sweetpotato production that many researchers were not able to explore. Thus, a new theory on applying entomopathogenic nematodes in Cylas species management may be arrived at.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors express profound gratitude to Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) for the financial assistance to carry out this work. The Agricultural Extension Agents of MoFA, Ghana who identified the respondents and led the research team in the various districts are also acknowledged.