HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Asian Journal of Algebra

Year: 2010 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 36-42
DOI: 10.3923/aja.2010.36.42
Weakly Distributive and Sectionally *Semilattice
J.V. Rao and E.S.R.R. Kumar

Abstract: This study concerns with the concepts of dense element, pseudocomplemented semilattice, *semilattice, sectionally *semilattice and also the concept of *semilattice to each section (0, a) in a semilattice. It imparts an account on the connections of sectionally *semilattice with pseudocomplemented semilattices. We establish that sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice is a sectionally *semilattice, but not conversely.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
J.V. Rao and E.S.R.R. Kumar, 2010. Weakly Distributive and Sectionally *Semilattice. Asian Journal of Algebra, 3: 36-42.

Keywords: pseudocomplemented semilattice, sectionally pseudocomplemented semialattice, *semilattice, sectionally *semilattice and Meet semilattice

INTRODUCTION

Speed (1969) has introduced the concept of distributive *-lattice, the same condition was applied on a distributive lattice to become a *-lattice was placed on any meet semilattice and such semilattice are called as *semilattice and showed that almost all the results of Speed can be extended to a more general class of distributive *semilattices by Krishnamurthy (1980).

In pseudocomplemented semilattices and distributive semilattice, the set of annihilators of an element is an ideal in the sense of Gratzer (1976). But it is not so in general and thus a weakly distributive semilattice S is defined.

The concept of *semilattice has been extended to semilattice by Krishnamurthy (1980) and that of pseudocomplement by Katrinak (1968), Nawar (1974), Birkhoff (1967) and Krishnamurthy (1980).

Venkateswara Rao and Ravi-Kumar (2010a) studied about Distributive Convex Sub lattices. Venkateswara Rao and Ravi-Kumar (2010b) investigated the Characterization of super modular semilattices. Venkateswara Rao and Ravi-Kumar (2010c) introduced the concept of modular and classic ideals of directed below join semi lattice. Venkateswara Rao and Ravi-Kumar (2010d) studied extensively about Characterization of standard and distributive ideals in semi lattice.

In this study we investigate about weakly distributive semilattice and the necessary and sufficient condition for a modular *semilattice to be a weakly distributive semilattice. We extend the concept of *semilattice to each section (0, a) in a semilattice. We also establish its connections with pseudocomplemented semilattices.

PRELIMINARIES

Definition 1
A meet semilattice (S, ∧) is a set with an idempotent, commutative and associative binary operations on S.

Definition 2
A partial order may be defined on S by b = a if and only if a ∧ b = b where a, b ∈ S.

Definition 3
A meet semilattice S is said to be directed above if and only if for x, y in S, there exists a in S such that x = a, y = a.

Definition 4
A non empty subset I of a meet semilattice S is called an Ideal if (i) for x, y ∈ I implies x ∧ y ∈ I, (ii) for x ∈ I, t ∈ S such that x = t implies t ∈ I.

Definition 5
A non empty subset D of a meet semilattice S is called a filter of S if and only if (i) x ∈ D and x = a implies a ∈ D, (ii) x, y ∈ D implies there exists z ∈ D such that x = z and y = z.

Definition 6
A meet semilattice S with 0 is called a weakly distributive semilattice, if (a)* is an ideal for any a ∈ S, where (a)* = { x ∈ S/ x ∧ a = 0, for a ∈ S}.

Definition 7
A meet semilattice S with 0 is said to be a *semilattice if and only if for any a in S, there exists a1 in S, such that (a)* = (a1)**, where a ∧ a1 = 0.

Definition 8
If S is a meet semilattice with 0 then for any subset A of S, A*stands for {x in S/x ∧ a = 0, for all a in A}. If A = {a} then A* = (a)*.

Definition 9
An element a in S is called a dense element of S if and only if (a)* = {0}.

Remark 1
If D denotes the set of all dense elements of S, then D is a filter.

Proof
Let D = {x/x is dense element of S} = {x/(x)* = {0}, for x ∈ S}. (i) Let x ∈ D and a ∈ S such that a = x. (a)* ⊆ (x)* = {0}. Also {0}⊆ (a)* as 0 is least element of S. Therefore (a)* = {0}. Hence a ∈ D. (ii) Let x, y ∈ D. Then x and y are dense elements, (x)* = {0}; (y)* = {0}. Let z∈ S such that x = z, y = z. Then (z)* ⊆ (x)* and (z)* ⊆ (y)* ⇒ (z)* ⊆ {0}. Also {0} ⊆ (z)* as 0 is least element. Therefore (z)* = {0}. Hence D is a filter.

WEAKLY DISTRIBUTIVE SEMILATTICE

Now we produce a condition for a *semilattice with modularity property to be a weakly distributive semilattice.

Theorem 1
In a weakly distributive semilattice S, the following are equivalent. (i) S is a *semilattice (ii) For any x ∈ S, there exists x1 ∈ S such that x ∧ x1 = 0 and (x) ∩ (x1) ⊆ D, where D is a filter.

Proof: Let S be a weakly distributive semilattice, then for every a ∈ S, (a)* = {x ∈ S / x ∧ a = 0} is an ideal.

(i)⇒(ii)
Let S be a *semilattice, then for every x in S, there exists x1 in S, such that (x)* = (x1)** where x ∧ x1 = 0. Implies x1 ∈ (x)* = (x1)** implies x1 ∈ (x1)**. Let t ∈ S such that t ∧ x = 0 = t ∧ x1 implies t ∈ (x)*, since (x)* is an ideal for x ∈ S such that x ≤ t, then t ∈ (x), also t ∈ (x1)*.And since (x1)* is an ideal for x1 ∈ S such that x1 ≤ t implies t ∈ (x1).Thus t ∈ (x) ∩ (x1) and as D is filter of S for x, x1 in D there exists t in d such that x ≤ t and x1 ≤ t. Hence (x) ∩ (x1) ⊆ D.

(ii)⇒(i)
Assume that for any x ∈ S, there exists x1 ∈ S such that x ∧ x1 = 0 and (x) ∩ (x1) ⊆ D. Since x ∧ x1 = 0 implies x1 ∈ (x)*. Let s ∈ (x1)**, then s ∧ (x1)* = 0 which implies s ∧ x = 0 for x ∈ (x1)*. So s ∈ (x)*. Thus (x1)** ⊆ (x)* --- (i).

Let t ∈ S be such that t ∧ x = 0 and r∈ S be such that r ∧ x1 = 0, then t ∧ x ∧ r = 0 ∧ r = 0 which implies x ∈ (t ∧ r)*. Similarly t ∧ r ∧ x1 = t ∧ 0 = 0, then x1 ∈ ( t ∧ r)*. Since for t, r ∈ S, we have t ∧ r ∈ S and (t ∧ r)* is an ideal of S (since S is a weakly distributive). It follows that there exists z ∈ S such that z ≥ x, x1 as z∈ (t ∧ r)* which implies z ∧ t ∧ r = 0. Since z ≥ x, x1, we have z ∈ (x) and z ∈ (x1) which implies z ∈ (x) ∩ (x1) ⊆ D. Thus z ∈ D and hence t ∧ r = 0, thus t ∈ (r)* which shows (x)* ⊆ (x1)** --- (ii) As t ∧ x =0, t ∈ (x)* and r ∧ x1 = 0, r ∈ (x1)*. Therefore, from (i) and (ii), we have (x)* = (x1)** for x ∧ x1 = 0. Hence S is a * semilattice.

Note
For any filter F of a semilattice S, θF = {(x, y) ∈ S X S / x ∧ f = y ∧ f for some f ∈ F} is a congruence on S.

Definition 10
A meet semilattice S is called modular if and only if a ∧ b ≤ w ≤ a implies there exists y in S such that y ≥ b and w = a ∧ y.

Theorem 2
In a modular *semilattice S, we have θD = R, where R = { (x, y) ∈ S X S / (x)* = (y)*}.

Proof
Let S be a modular * semilattice. For any filter D of S, θD = {(x, y) ∈ S X S / x ∧ d = y ∧ d for d ∈ D} is a congruence on S. Given R = {(x, y) ∈ S X S / (x)* = (y)*}. Clearly θD ⊆ R. Let (x)* = (y)* for x, y ∈ S then (x ∧ x)* = (x ∧ y)* which implies (x ∧ y)* = (x)*. Since (x)* = (x1)** for x1 ∈ S, then (x ∧ y)* = (x1)**. Since x ∧ x1 = 0, x1 ∈ (x)* = (y)* thus y ∧ x1 = 0 ≤ y ∧ x ≤ y. Now, by using the modularity of S, there exists x2 ≥ x1 such that y ∧ x = y ∧ x2. Thus (x2)* = 0, which implies x2 is dense, since x2 ≥ x1 and x2 ≥ y ∧ x. Similarly, x ∧ x1 = 0 ≤ y ∧ x ≤ x, by modularity of S, there exists y2 ≥ x1 such that y ∧ x = y2 ∧ x. As above y2 is dense. Hence x2 ∧ y2 is dense. Now x ∧ x2 ∧ y2 = x ∧ x2 ∧ y = y ∧ x2 ∧ x = y ∧ x2 ∧ y2. Therefore, x ∧ x2 ∧ y2 = y ∧ x2 ∧ y2 for x2 ∧ y2 ∈ D. Thus R ⊆ θD. Hence θD = R.

In the following theorem, it is provided a necessary and sufficient condition for a modular *semilattice to be weakly distributive.

Theorem 3
If S is a *semilattice which is directed above such that θD = R, then S is a weakly distributive semilattice if and only if for all x, y in S ((x) ∧ (y) ∨ D = ((x) ∧ D) ∩ ((y) ∨ D).

Proof
Assume S is weakly distributive. Let t ∈ S be such that t ∈ ( ((x) ∨ D) ∧ ((y) ∨ D)) which implies that there exists d1, d2 ∈ D such that x ∧ d1 ≤ t and y ∧ d2 ≤ t. Put d = d1 ∧ d2 ∈ D. It follows that, there exists d ∈ D such that x ∧ d ≤ t and y ∧ d ≤ t. Since S is a * semi lattice, there exists t1 ∈ S such that (t)* = (t1)** where t ∧ t1 = 0. It follows that x ∧ d ∧ t1 = 0 = y ∧ d ∧ t1, then d ∈ D is a dense element and S is a weakly distributive, there exists z ∈ S such that z ≥ x, y and z ∧ t1 = 0. Since z ∧ t1 = 0, we have (z)* = (t1)** = (t)* which implies (z)* = (t)* or (z ∧ t)* = (z)*, so that there exists e ∈ D such that z ∧ e = z ∧ t ∧ e which implies that z ∧ e ≤ t. Hence there exists z ∈ (x) ∩ (y) and e ∈ D such that z ∧ e ≤ t. Thus we have t ∈ ((x) ∩ (y)) ∨ D. Thus ((x) ∨ D) ∧((y) ∨ D) ⊆ ((x) ∧ (y)) ∨ D. Also clearly ((x) ∧ (y)) ∨ D ⊆ ((x) ∨ D) ∧ ((y) ∨ D). Hence, ((x) ∧ (y)) ∨ D = ((x) ∨ D) ∧ ((y) ∨ D) ------- (i) Conversely, suppose (i) holds and x, y ∈ (a)* in order to prove that (a)* is an ideal for a ∈ S. Thus x ∧ a = y ∧ a = 0. Let t ∈ (x ∧ a1)*, t ∧ x ∧ a1 = 0 which implies t ∧ x = 0, t ∈ (x)*. Thus (x ∧ a1)* ⊆ (x)*. Similarly, we obtain (x)* ⊆ (x ∧ a1)*.Therefore (x ∧ a1)* = (x)*. Similarly (y ∧ a1)* = (y)* where a1 is an element of S satisfying the condition (a)* = (a1)**. Therefore, x ∧ a1 ∈ (x) ∨ D and y ∧ a1 ∈ (y) ∨ D, since θD = R, we get that a1 ∈ (((x) ∨ D) ∧ ((y) ∨ D). By assumption a1 ∈ (((x) ∧ (y)) ∨ D), it follows that there exists e ∈ D such that z ∧ e ≤ a1, since z ≥ x, y. Now z ∧ e ∧ a ≤ a1 ∧ a = 0, hence we have z ∧ a = 0 thus z ∈ (a)* for e ∈ D. Hence (a)* becomes an ideal. Hence S is a weakly distributive.

SECTIONALLY *SEMILATTICE

Now we define a *semilattice as sectionally and we give a relation with pseudocomplemented and sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattices.

Definition 11
A meet semilattice S with 0 is said to be a sectionally *semilattice if and only if for every a in S, the interval (o,a) is a *semilattice.

Theorem 4
Every *semilattice is a sectionally *semilattice.

Proof
Let (S,∧) be a semilattice and a in S be arbitrary. Since S is a *semilattice, for x in S, there exists a in S such that (x)* = (a)** where x ∧ a = 0.Now we show that (S, ∧) is sectionally *semilattice. Consider (0,a) in S and Put X = (0,a). To Show that (X, ∧) is a *semilattice. Clearly 0 is in X, let x be in X. Since X ⊂ S and x is in X, x is in S. Thus there exists a1 in S such that (x)* = (a1)** where x ∧ a1 = 0.Put x1 = x ∧ a1 = a ∧ a1 = 0 (take x = a)⇒ x1 = 0 is in X. Therefore x ∧ x1 = x ∧ (a ∧ a1) = x ∧ 0 = 0. Therefore x ∧ (a ∧ a1) = 0. Hence x is in (a ∧ a1)*.
To show that (X)[0, a] = (a ∧a1)[0, a]
Let y be in (X)[0, a] ⇒ y ∧ (a ∧ a1) = 0
⇒ y ∧ x = 0 for x is in (a ∧ a1) * ⇒ y is in (X)[0, a] ⇒(a ∧a1)[0, a] ⊆ (X)*[0, a].
Let y is in (X)*[0, a] be arbitrary, then y ∧ x =0.
⇒ y is in (x)* for all x in (0,a) ⊆ S, y is in (x)* for x is in S ⇒ y is (a1)**
⇒ y ∧ (a1)* = 0 ⇒ y ∧ z = 0 for all z in (a1)* = {x ∈ S/ x ∧ a1 = 0}
⇒ y ∧ z = 0, for every z in (0,a) with z ∧ a ∧ a1 = 0 ⇒ z ∈ (a ∧ a1)*(0,a)
⇒ y ∧ z = 0 for every z in (a ∧a1)[0, a] ⇒ y is in (a ∧a1)[0, a].
Therefore, (x)*⊆ (a ∧a1)[0, a].
Therefore,(x)*[0, a] = (a ∧a1)[0, a]
Therefore, (x, ∧) is a *semilattice Therefore (0,a) is a *semilattice. Hence, (S, ∧) is a sectionally *semilattice. Hence, every *semilattice is a sectionally *semilattice.

Theorem 5
Every sectionally *semi lattice is not necessarily a *semilattice.

Proof
Let S be a sectionally *semilattice. Then for every a in S, the interval (0, a) is a *semilattice. We prove S need not be a *semilattice by taking an example. Let S = {0, a, x, d} be a sectionally *semilattice.

Clearly the intervals (0, a), (0, d) and (0, x) are *semilattices, but for any b in S, (0)* ≠ (b)**. Hence, S is not a * semilattice.

Theorem 6
A directed above semilattice S is a * semilattice if and only if it is a sectionally *semilattice and S contains a dense element.

Proof
Let S be directed above and a *semilattice. To prove that S contains a dense element. Since S is a *semilattice, then S is a sectionally *semilattice and for every x in S there exists x1 in S such that (x)* = (x1)** where x ∧ x1 = 0, also there exists an element d in S such that d ≥ x, x1. ⇒ d ≥ x ∧ x1 = 0 ⇒ (d)* ⊂ (0)* = S Now for any a in (d)*, we have a ∧ d = 0 ⇒ a ∧ d ∧ x = 0.

⇒ a ∧ x = 0 for d ≥ x also a ∧ d ∧ x1 = 0 ⇒ a ∧ x1 = 0 for d ≥ x1. Thus, a is (x)* and a is in (x1)*
⇒ a is in (x)* ∩ (x1)*.
⇒ a is in (x1)** ∩ (x1)* ⇒ a is in {0} ⇒ a = 0.

Therefore, (d)* = {0}. Therefore S contains a dense element. Conversely, Let S be a directed above sectionally *semilattice and it contains a dense element d. To prove that S is a *semilattice.

Let x is in S and choose a such that a ≥ x, d. Then a is a dense element because (a)* ≤ (d)* = {0}. Since S is a sectionally * semilattice, we have for every x in the interval (0,a) there exists x1 in the interval (0, a) such that (x)* (0,a) = (x1)** (0,a), where x ∧ x1 = 0.Now, it is enough to show that (x)* = (x1)**. Since x ∧ x1 = 0 We have x is in (x1)* ⇒ (x1)** ⊆ (x)* (i)

Let y is in (x)* and z is in (x1)* ⇒ y ∧ x = 0 and z ∧ x1 = 0.

⇒ y ∧ x ∧ z = 0 and y ∧ z ∧ x1 = 0 ⇒ y ∧ z ∧ a ∧ x = 0 and y ∧ z ∧ a ∧ x1 = 0
⇒ y ∧ z ∧ a is in (x)* (0,a) and y ∧ z ∧ a is in (x1)* (0,a)
⇒ y ∧ z ∧ a is in (x)* (0,a) ∧ (x1)* (0,a) = {0} ⇒ y ∧ z ∧ a = 0
⇒ y ∧ z is in (a)* ={0} since a is dense element ⇒ y ∧ z = 0
⇒ y is in (z)* for z is in (x1)* ⇒ y is in (x1)**. Therefore (x)* ⊆ (x1)** (ii)

Therefore, from (i) and (ii) we have (x)* = (x1)** where x ∧ x1 = 0. Hence S is a * semilattice.

Definition
A meet semilattice S with 0 is said to be pseudocomplemented if and only if for a in S, a1 is a pseudocomplement of a in S, that is x ∧ a = 0 in S if and only if x ≤ a1. 3.6 Definition A meet semilattice S with 0 is called a sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice if and only if for every a in S, the interval (0, a) is a pseudocomplemented semilattice.

Remark 2
Every pseudocomplemented semilattice is a sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice.

Proof
Let S be the pseudocomplemented semilattice, then for a ∈ S, a* is a pseudocomplement of a in S that is x ∧ a = 0 in S if and only if x = a*. Since a* is a pseudocomplement of a, then a ∧ a* = 0.Let y ∈ (0, a) ⇒ 0 = y = a ⇒ y ∧ a = y also y ∧ 0 = 0 ⇒ y ∧ a = 0. y ∧ a = y ∧ 0 = y ∧ a ∧ a* ⇒ y ∧ a = y ∧ a* ∧ a ⇒ y = y ∧ a* ⇒ y = a*. Let y = a*, then y ∧ a* = y ⇒ y ∧ a* ∧ a = y ∧ a ⇒ y ∧ 0= y ∧ a⇒ 0 = y ∧ a.

Therefore, (0, a) is pseudocomplemented semilattice. Hence every pseudocomplemented semilattice is sectionally pseudocomplemented semilatice.

Theorem 7
Every sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice is sectionally *semilattice.

Proof
Let S be a sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice. To prove that for every a in S, the interval (0, a) is a *semilattice. Let x in the interval (0, a) which is a pseudocomplemented semilattice. Then there exists a pseudocomplement x1 of x in the interval (0, a) that is y ∧ x = 0 in the interval (0, a) if and only if y ≤ x1. Then (x)* = (x1) ⇒ (x)** = ((x1))* = (x1)*. ⇒ (x)* = (x1)** where x1 is a pseudocomplement of x in the interval (0, a). Therefore, the interval (0, a) is a *semilattice. Hence, S is a sectionally *semilattice.

Theorem 8
Every sectionally *semilattice is not necessarily a sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice.

Proof
Let S be a sectionally *semilattice, then for every a in S, the interval (0, a) is a *semilattice.

For example S = {0, a, x, d} be a meet semilattice with 0, which is a sectionally *semilattice. But the interval (0, d) is not a pseudocomplemented semi lattice, because there does not exists pseudocomplement x1 of x in the interval (0, d) such that y v x = 0 in the interval (0, d) if and only if y ≤ x1. Therefore, S is not sectionally pseudocomplemented semilattice.

REFERENCES

  • Birkhoff, G.D., 1967. Lattice Theory. 3rd Edn., American Mathematical Society, Colloguim Publications, Rhode Island, New Delhi.


  • Gratzer, G., 1976. General Lattice Theory. Academic press, Inc., Burlington


  • Katrinak, T., 1968. Pseudokomplementare halbverbande. Mat. Casopis, 18: 121-143.


  • Krishnamurthy, M., 1980. Neutrality in partial order sets. Doctorial Thesis, Andhra University, Waltair, India.


  • Nawar, H.P.S., 1974. Congruence lattices of pseudo-complemented semilattice. Algebra Universalis, pp: 304-318.


  • Speed, T.P., 1969. Some remarks on a class of distributive lattices. J. Aust. Math. Soc., 9: 289-296.


  • Venkateswara Rao, J. and E.S.R. Ravi-Kumar, 2010. Characterization of standard and distributive ideals in semilattice. Southeast Asian Bull. Math. China, 34: 177-180.


  • Venkateswara Rao, J. and E.S.R. Ravi-Kumar, 2010. Characterization of super modular semilattices. Southeast Asian Bull. Mathematics, Volume: 34.


  • Venkateswara Rao, J. and E.S.R. Ravi-Kumar, 2010. Modular and classic ideals of directed below join semi lattice. Int. J. Algebra, volume 262.


  • Venkateswara Rao, J. and E.S.R. Ravi-Kumar 2010. Characterization of standard and distributive ideals in semilattice. Int. J. Syst. Cybernetics Inform.,

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved