Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Dose Combination of Ofloxacin and
Ornidazole Against Some Aerobic Bacteria
The present study is undertaken to evaluate the antimicrobial
properties of a new Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) of Ofloxacin Ornidazole
for infusion against some aerobic bacteria in comparison with Ofloxacin
and Ornidazole individually. Antibiotic Susceptibility Test (AST) and
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of FDC of Ofloxacin Ornidazole,
Ofloxacin and Ornidazole for P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, E.
coli, K. pneumoniae, S. epidermis and MRSA were determined
by disc method and broth micro dilution method. In Antimicrobial Susceptibility
Test, lytic zone of combination was found to be more than Ofloxacin or
Ornidazole alone in all microbial strains under study. The MIC value of
FDC of Ofloxacin Ornidazole was found to be higher than both Ofloxacin
and Ornidazole. The data suggests that fixed dose combination of Ofloxacin
and Ornidazole can be a good option for use in mixed microbial infection
of aerobic bacteria, anaerobic bacteria and pathogenic protozoans.
to cite this article:
S.M. Shrivastava, S. Kumar and M. Chaudhary, 2009. Comparative Evaluation of Fixed Dose Combination of Ofloxacin and
Ornidazole Against Some Aerobic Bacteria. Trends in Medical Research, 4: 30-34.
Development of antibiotic resistance places a large burden on the health care system, with results in both increased costs and increased morbidity and mortality. Infection with resistant bacteria and multiple infection can significantly increase hospital length of stay and associated costs (French, 2005). The situation becomes worst in the case of mixed infection of aerobic bacteria, anaerobic bacteria and pathogenic protozoans. Fluoroquinolone group of antibiotics are widely used for the treatment of various infections and have efficient oral absorption, long serum elimination half-lives, good tissue distribution and a broad range of activities against aerobic pathogens (Hooper and Wolfson, 1991). Present trend to combat the resistance of organisms against antibiotics is to use various newer molecules and newer combination of drugs. This has resulted in the widespread use of drugs and the development of several new agents and combinations of antibiotics over the past decade.
The in vitro antibacterial activity of fluoroquinalones evident against
Gram positive and negative bacteria including activity against Staphylococcus
aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Biedenbach et al., 1995;
Masuda et al., 1996; Khan et al., 2008). Ofloxacin is one of the
most effective and quinolones which is used in current clinical practices. When
first introduced, Ofloxacin could only be administered orally, but recently
a parenteral form has been developed with favorable pharmacokinetic properties,
including high serum concentrations and a long terminal half-life, resulting
in a higher area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) than comparative drugs
such as ciprofloxacin (Farinotti et al., 1988; Gruenberg et al.,
1988; Lode et al., 1987).
Ornidazole is a nitro imidazole derivative with antiprotozoal and antibacterial properties. Ornidazole is used preferably in the treatment of abdominal or gynaecological anaerobic infection (Goldstein et al., 1978). In some clinical conditions of mixed infection, combinations of antibacterial and antiprotozoal agents is required to increase the antimicrobial spectrum. The combination of antibiotics have also been attempted in order to overcome resistance development of microorganisms (Michael et al., 1990).
There are some studies made to analyze serum bactericidal activities of Ofloxacin in combination of Ornidazole (Michael et al., 1990). Some researchers have also established that the combination of ofloxacin and ornidazole is non toxic even at maximum prescribed individual drug level (Chaudhary et al., 2009). Ornidazole has an established profile against protozoans and anaerobic bacteria whereas Ofloxacin can be used against aerobic microorganisms. The present study is undertaken to evaluate the antimicrobial properties of novel FDC of Ofloxacin Ornidazole infusion in some aerobic bacteria in comparison with Ofloxacin and Ornidazole individually.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Following strains obtained from Microbial Type Collection Center of Institute
of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India were used for the study-Pseudomonas
aeruginosa (MTCC No.-1688), Staphylococcus aureus (MTCC No.-737),
Escherichia coli (MTCC No.-1687), Klebsiella pneumoniae (MTCC-109),
Staphylococcus epidermis (MTCC No.-435). Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA) was obtained from PGI, Chandigarh as a clinical isolate.
Infusion of Ofloxacin Ornidazole fixed dose combination (700 mg 100 mL,
in ratio of 1:2.5), Ofloxacin and Ornidazole used in study were provided by
manufacturer (Venus Remedies Limited, India) for the study.
Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth supplemented with calcium (25 mg L-1)
and magnesium (1.25 mg L-1) was used for susceptibility tests. Colony
counts were determined with MH agar plates.
Antibiotic Susceptibility Test (AST) and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
(MIC) of Ofloxacin Ornidazole combination, Ofloxacin and Ornidazole for P.
aeruginosa, S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. epidermis
and MRSA were determined by disc method and broth micro dilution method
as per the standard (NCCLS, 1997). Overnight MH broth cultures were used to
prepare inocula of 105 cfu mL-1. The MIC was performed
in Ofloxacin Ornidazole Infusion of fixed dose combination having the ratio
of 1 : 2.5, Ofloxacin and Ornidazole. Thirty microgram of Ofloxacin and Ornidazole
individually and 30 μg of Ofloxacin with 30 μg of Ornidazole in combination
were taken on each disc for AST. Minimum inhibitory concentration and AST studies
were performed at Microbiology and Biotechnology Laboratory of Venus Medicine
Research Centre, India. These studies were carried out from January 2009 to
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with student-Newman-Keuls comparison
test was used to determine statistical difference between different groups under
AST study. p values<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
In case of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumoniae
and MRSA MIC value of Ofloxacin Ornidazole combination was found to be higher
than Ofloxacin. In S. Epidermis MIC vaue was found to be similar to the
combination. In case of Ornidazole, MIC value of 256 was found in E. coli
and P. aeruginosa. Minimum inhibitory concentration of 512 μg
mL-1 was found in S. aureus. In all other organisms growth
was found in all conditions (Table 1).
In Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test, lytic zone of combination was found
to be more than Ofloxacin alone in all microbial strains under study. Lytic
Zone less than 10 mm was found in S. aureus, E. coli and P.
aeruginosa in Ornidazole whereas no other organism showed any lytic zone
development with Ornidazole (Fig. 1).
||The MIC values of fixed dose combination of Ofloxacin Ornidazole,
Ofloxacin and Ornidazole
||Lytic Zone size (mm) in Antibiotic susceptibility test of
fixed dose combination of Ofloxacin Ornidazole, Ofloxacin and Ornidazole
As the problem of antibiotic resistance is growing in mixed microbial infection, awareness of use of fixed dose combination for antibacterials has also increased. It is the present trend to evaluate interaction and efficacy of antibiotic combinations such as quinolones with other antibiotics like gentamicin to being used overcome the resistance in microorganisms (Iroha et al., 2008). This concept has most firmly taken root in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), where empiric antibiotic regimens have been developed not only for safety and efficacy of treatment, but also to prevent the rise of resistant organisms (Kollef, 2005). The traditional antimicrobial therapy of choice in any circumstance has been a regimen that is efficacious, safe and inexpensive. However, if that regimen induces antibiotic resistance then efficacy soon suffers. Ofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone with an indication for bacterial infection. It is well documented that Ornidazole is a potent antiprotozoal and also has antibiotic property against anaerobic bacteria (Merdjan et al., 1985; Jokipii and Jokipii, 1977). There have been attempts to combine these antimicrobials into intravenous infusion for treatment of mixed microbial infection particularly gastric tact infection and diarrhea. It is also evident that pharmacokinetics of these groups of antibacterials do not interfere with each other (Michael et al., 1990).
Present study was carried out with the hypothesis that fixed dose combination of Ofloxacin and Ornidazole act synergistically in aerobic bacteria apart from having proven individual anaerobic antibacterial and antiprotozoal properties. There has been increase in MIC value of combination by 2 to 8 folds in all bacteria other than S. epidermis under study, when compared with Ofloxacin alone. In case of S. epidermis MIC of the combination was found to be similar to Ofloxacin. The MIC of the combination was significantly lower when compared with Ornidazole alone in all organisms under study. Ornidazole practically no therapeutic significant MIC value in organisms under study. In AST, Zone of Ofloxacin alone was found to be similar to FDC with non significant variation. There is statistically significant increase of lytic zone of FDC when compared with Ornidazole alone in S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa under this study. The FDC has proven efficacy against aerobic bacteria and expected to have efficacy against anaerobic bacteria and pathogenic protozoans. There are earlier reports describing antimicrobial properties of Ofloxacin (Farinotti et al., 1988; Gruenberg et al., 1988) and Ornidazole (Goldstein et al., 1978) individually. There is no earlier work done on antimicrobial efficacy of there drugs in combination, although there has been published reports of toxicological studies of this FDC (Chaudhary et al., 2009).
In the present study, antimicrobial properties of FDC of Ofloxacin Ornidazole infusion is evaluated in some aerobic bacteria in comparison with Ofloxacin and Ornidazole individually. Minimum inhibitory concentration and AST results suggests that the FDC is more effective than Ofloxacin or Ornidazole alone in all organisms under study. It is already established that Ornidazole has got activity against anaerobic bacteria and pathogenic protozoans. It may be concluded that fixed dose combination of Ofloxacin and Ornidazole can have be a good potential for use in mixed microbial infection of aerobic bacteria, anaerobic bacteria and pathogenic protozoans.
Authors are thankful CGM, Domestic operations of Venus Remedies Limited for providing the samples of FDC of Ofloxacin Ornidazole, Ofloxacin and Ornidazole for this study.
Biedenbach, D.J., L.D. Sutton and R.N. Jones, 1995.
Antimicrobial activity of CS-940, a new trifluorinated quinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 39: 2325-2330.Direct Link |
Chaudhary, M., A. Tamta and R. Sehgal, 2009.
Sub-chronic toxicity study of fixed dose combination of ofloxacin-ornidazole in Mus musculus
mice. Open Toxicol. J., 3: 24-29.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Farinotti, R., J.H. Trouvin, V. Bocquet, N. Vermerie and C. Carbon, 1988.
Pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin after single and multiple intravenous infusions in healthy subjects. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 32: 1590-1592.Direct Link |
French, G.L., 2005.
Clinical impact and relevance of antibiotic resistance. Adv. Drug Del. Rev., 57: 1514-1527.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Goldstein, E.J.C., V.L. Sutter and S.M. Finegold, 1978.
Comparative susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria to metronidazole, ornidazole and SC-28538. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 14: 609-613.Direct Link |
Gruenberg, R.N., D. Felmingham, M.D. OHare, M.J. Robins, K. Perry, R.A. Wall and G.L. Ridgway, 1988.
The comparative in vitro
activity of ofloxacin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 22: 9-19.PubMed | Direct Link |
Hooper, D.C. and J.S. Wolfson, 1991.
Fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents. N. Engl. J. Med., 324: 384-394.CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
Iroha, I.R., E.S. Amadi, J.O. Orji, A.C. Ogabus, A.E. Oji and C.O. Esimone, 2008.
The interaction between gentamicin and floroquinolones against ESBL producing clinical isolates of Escherichia coli
. Trends Med. Res., 3: 90-94.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Jokipii, L. and A.M.M. Jokipii, 1977.
Bactericidal activity of metronidazole, tinidazole and ornidazole against bacteroides fragilis in vitro
. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 3: 571-577.Direct Link |
Khan, J.A., Z. Iqbal, S.U. Rahman, K. Farzana and A. Khan, 2008.
Prevalance and resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against various antibiotics. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., 21: 311-315.Direct Link |
Kollef, M.H., 2005.
Bench-to-bedside review: antimicrobial utilization strategies aimed at preventing the emergence of bacterial resistance in the intensive care unit. Crit Care, 9: 459-464.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Lode, H., G. Hoffken, P. Olchewski, B. Sievers, A. Kirch, K. Borner and P. Koeppe, 1987.
Pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin after parenteral and oral administration. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 31: 1338-1342.Direct Link |
Masuda, N., Y. Takahashi, M. Otsuki, E. Ibuki, H. Miyoshi and T. Nishino, 1996. In vitro
and In vivo
antibacterial activities of CS-940, a new 6-fluoro-8-difluoromethoxy quinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 40: 1201-1207.Direct Link |
Merdjan, H., A. Baumelou, B. Diquet, O. Chick and E. Singlas, 1985.
Pharmacokinetics of ornidazole in patients with renal insuffeciency; influence of haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacapy, 19: 211-217.Direct Link |
Boeckh, M., H. Lode, K.M. Deppermann, S. Grineisen and F. Shokry et al
Pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal activities of quinolones in combination with clindamycin, metronidazole and ornidazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 34: 2407-2414.Direct Link |
Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. 4th Edn., National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA., USA