Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Abstract
Fulltext PDF
References
Research Article
 

Performance Analysis of Multiplex-PCR based Detection of Salmonella sp. and Salmonella Typhimurium in Chicken Egg Samples



Monzur Morshed Ahmed, Md. Siddique Hossain, Khandaker Rayhan Mahbub, Himel Nahreen Khaleque, Zakir Hossain, Md. Fakruddin, Abhijit Chowdhury, Md. Nur Hossain and Md. Zobaidul Alam
 
ABSTRACT

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) based molecular detection techniques of food pathogens are taking place of conventional media based biochemical methods due to more quick and reliable performances. Detection of Salmonella sp. from food matrixes requires several steps, culture media and at least four consecutive days of incubation period, therefore we designed primer based (invA and fliC genes) multiplex-PCR analysis for detection of Salmonella sp. and Salmonella Typhimurium from chicken egg samples of local market in Dhaka city. The prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Salmonella Typhimurium were analyzed by standard biochemical detection method as well as multiplex-PCR technique from a total of 200 egg samples. The primers were selected for the presence of invA and fliC genes of Salmonella sp. and Salmonella Typhimurium, respectively. Twenty four samples out of 200 egg samples were found positive for Salmonella sp. through standard culture technique, on the other hand among all the biochemically positive samples, only 16 samples (66%) offered excellent response in multiplex-PCR assay. The results indicate that the present multiplex-PCR technique requires further optimization for getting higher response for detection of Salmonella sp. and Salmonella Typhimurium from egg samples.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Monzur Morshed Ahmed, Md. Siddique Hossain, Khandaker Rayhan Mahbub, Himel Nahreen Khaleque, Zakir Hossain, Md. Fakruddin, Abhijit Chowdhury, Md. Nur Hossain and Md. Zobaidul Alam, 2012. Performance Analysis of Multiplex-PCR based Detection of Salmonella sp. and Salmonella Typhimurium in Chicken Egg Samples. Singapore Journal of Scientific Research, 2: 25-32.

DOI: 10.3923/sjsres.2012.25.32

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=sjsres.2012.25.32
 
Received: February 03, 2012; Accepted: April 19, 2012; Published: June 25, 2012

INTRODUCTION

Salmonella have been regarded as one of the most prevalent food borne pathogens around the world (Gillespie et al., 2003; Malorny et al., 2003a). Individual attacks with Salmonella have been increasing globally since 1980 and have been proven to be related mainly to intake of egg and egg items (CDC, 1998; Khakhria et al., 1997).

There are three different types of Salmonella (Salmonella typhi, S. choleraesuis and S. enteritidis) and thousands of serovars that contaminate a wide range of different hosts (Hook, 1985). Some types and serovars are coordinator tailored (e.g., S. typhi and S. gallinarum), while others can contaminate a wide range of hosts (e.g., Salmonella Typhimurium and S. enteritidis). Although attack of epithelial tissues seems to be a typical important virulence aspect of all salmonellae, it is not known whether all types and serovars socialize with eukaryotic tissues likewise. Actually, there is some proof to recommend that variations may be available. Difficult variations of S. choleraesuis and S. typhi are lacking in their capability to get into mammalian tissues (Finlay et al., 1988; Mroczenski-Wildey et al., 1989), while Salmonella Typhimurium rough variations are not (Kihlstrom and Edebo, 1976; Kihlstrom and Nilsson, 1977). However, S. blockley, S. weltevreden and S. amsterdam have been determined as typical serovars discovered in broilers, levels and dog breeder parent stock respectively and Salmonella has been recognized in egg from layers, according to a Thai review (Mead et al., 1999).

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis are the most frequently isolated serovars from food-borne outbreaks throughout the world (Herikstad et al., 2002). According to the antigenic profile of Salmonella species they show different disease syndromes and host specificity. Therefore, it is necessary and important to discriminate Salmonella serovars from each other in order to ensure that each pathogen and epidemiology is correctly recognized (Lim et al., 2003).

Salmonella isolation by conventional culture methods, are based on non-selective pre-enrichment followed by selective enrichment and plating on selective and differential agars. Suspected colonies are then confirmed by biochemical and serological methods (Van Kessel et al., 2003). Generally, these techniques take longer time, since they give only presumptive results after 3-4 days and definitive results after 5-6 days (Malorny et al., 2003b). Rapid detection methods, such as DNA or RNA probing, immuno-detection methods and nucleic acid hybridization have been developed but they do not have enough sensitivity and specificity (Zhu et al., 1996). Selective enrichment combined with PCR has been applied to the detection of many bacterial pathogens (Schrank et al., 2001) to improve sensitivity and dilution of PCR inhibitory substances (Fluit et al., 1993). In vitro amplification of DNA by the PCR method is a powerful tool in microbiological diagnostics (Malorny et al., 2003b). Several genes have been used to detect Salmonella in natural environmental samples as well as food and feces samples namely invA, invE, himA, phoP, ipaB, iroB, lamb and fliC etc. (Malorny et al., 2003a, b; Feder et al., 2001; Bej et al., 1994; Way et al., 1993; Kong et al., 2002; Szabo and Mackey, 1999; Bej et al., 1991; Itoh et al., 1997). The flagellin gene fliC encodes the major component of the flagellum in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (Aldridge et al., 2006). Due to high variability of its central region the fliC gene has also been used for molecular typing studies on Salmonella (Dauga et al., 1998). This structural gene encodes the phase 1 flagellar protein (H1 antigen) and is expressed alternately with the fljB gene which encodes the phase 2 flagellar protein (H2 antigen) (MacNab, 1996).

The invA gene of Salmonella is unique to this genus and has been demonstrated as an appropriate PCR focus on, with prospective analytical programs (Rahn et al., 1992). Boosting of this gene now has been acknowledged as a worldwide conventional method for recognition of Salmonella genus (Malorny et al., 2003a). This gene encodes amino acids in the inner tissue layer of bacteria which is accountable for attack to the epithelial tissues of the host (Darwin and Miller, 1999). The present study results suggest that the invA and fliC genes based multiplex-PCR assay appeared to be useful for detection of Salmonella sp. and Salmonella Typhimurium serovar from chicken egg samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection and enrichment of samples: For the present study 10 local markets of Dhaka city such as Tezgaon poultry farm, New Market Kacha Bazar, Katabon Kacha Bazar, Kawran Bazar, Mohammadpur, Kazipara Mirpur, Azimpur Kacha Bazar, Shewrapara Mirpur, Anandabazar, Matijheel Kacha Bazar were selected for sample collection. The whole egg samples were inoculated in 100 mL sterile buffered peptone water (HI-MEDIA, India) containing beaker. The inoculated buffered peptone water was incubated at 35°C for 24 h. For selective enrichment, 1 mL portions from pre-enriched BPW broth was transferred into two tubes containing, 10 mL of Selenite-Cystine Broth (HI-MEDIA, India) and Tetrathionate Broth (HI-MEDIA, India), respectively. The tubes were vortexed well and incubated at 35°C for 24 h.

Biochemical detection of Salmonella sp.: Selectively enriched samples from both the Selenite-Cystine and Tetrathionate Broth were streaked onto the surface of Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD) Agar, Salmonella-Shigella (SS) Agar and Bismuth Sulfite Agar (BSA). All microbiological media were obtained from HI-MEDIA, India. The Petri- dishes were incubated at 35°C for 24 h. After incubation, typical or suspicious salmonella colonies were confirmed by biochemical tests including Urease test, motility test, gram staining, sugar (lactose, glucose and esculin) fermentation test, MR-VP reaction, TSI test, LIA test, Indole reaction, oxidase reaction and catalase reaction. Biochemically confirmed isolates were then transferred to nutrient agar slant for further analysis (Ahmed et al., 2011).

Chromosomal-DNA extraction: Chromosomal-DNA of the culture was isolated using DNA-boiling method. One milliliter fresh culture (grown at 37°C for 18 h) was transferred to a micro-centrifuge tube and centrifuged for 8 min at 8000 rpm. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was re-suspended in Phosphate Buffer Saline. Then the suspension was boiled in water bath (100°C) for 10 min and immediately transferred into ice-cube. After cooling down, it was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant was transferred into a sterile 1.5 mL micro centrifuge tube. This DNA was used for multiplex-PCR (Table 1).

Multiplex-PCR amplification of extracted DNA: The purified DNA was used as template for the multiplex-PCR assay. Two primer pairs were used whose sequences are shown in Table 2. The 139 and 141 primers are specific for the invA gene of Salmonella sp. (Rahn et al., 1992) and fliC-1 and fliC-2 primers are specific for the fliC gene of Salmonella Typhimurium (Soumet et al., 1999). Reactions with these primers were carried out in a 25 μL amplification mixture consisting of 2.5 μL 10x PCR buffer (500 mM KCl, 200 mM Tris HCl), 1.25 μL dNTPs (10 mM), 1.5 μL MgCl2 (50 mM), 0.5 μL of each primer, 0.5 μL of Taq DNA polymerase (fermentase) and 2 μL of extracted DNA (Soumet et al., 1999). Amplification was performed in a gradient thermocycler (Biorad, DNA engine).

Table 1: Primers used in the multiplex-PCR

The cycling conditions were as follows: An initial incubation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 60 sec, annealing at 56°C for 30 sec, elongation at 72°C for 30 sec and final extension period for 10 min at 72°C. Amplified products were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gel and a 50 bp DNA ladder (Promega) was used as a size reference.

Agarose gel electrophoresis and gel documentation of the PCR product: When the PCR amplification completed, 15 μL PCR products and 2 μL blue juice (invitrogen) were mixed and loaded on 2% agarose gel. Fifty bp DNA ladder (Promega) was used to determine the size of the PCR product. The buffer used for the gel preparation and electrophoresis was 1 times TBE solution and the running condition was 60 V for 2 h. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with ethidium bromide solution (0.5 μg mL-1) and washed with distilled water for 15 min each. Gel was visualized using a gel documentation system (Alpha Innotech).

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

All Salmonella isolates recovered from egg samples showed similar colony characteristics on BS agar, XLD agar and SS agar. The morphological characteristics of all isolates were same i.e., Gram negative, short rod and motile. All isolates fermented glucose producing acid and gas but did not ferment lactose and esculin. They were negative to Voges Proskauer test, indole test and oxidase test but all isolates showed positive result to methyl red test, catalase test with the exception of a few isolate.

On the basis of biochemical tests a total of 24 out of 200 (12%) samples found positive for Salmonella sp. Multiplex-PCR assay was done for all these 24 isolates using 139 and 141 primers that amplify a 284 bp sequence of the invA gene and fliC-1 and fliC-2 primers that amplify a 559 bp sequence of the fliC gene (Fig. 1). Among these isolates, eleven (isolate- 21S, 39S, 63S, 81S, 106S, 116S, 119S, 122S, 128S, 149S and 159Y) were found positive for gene invA confirmed Salmonella sp. and four (isolate-18S, 53Y, 96S, 109S) harboured fliC gene represented Salmonella Typhimurium, only the isolate 74Y was found positive for both invA and fliC genes (Table 2). Although all these 24 isolates were confirmed as Salmonella spp by biochemical tests but only 16 isolates out of 24 were positive in multiplex-PCR assay (Fig. 2). In a previous study the prevalence of Salmonella spp in egg samples in Bangladesh was found 8% while the detection method was biochemical (Ahmed et al., 2011).

Fig. 1: Multiplex-PCR assay of all 24 biochemically positive isolates using two sets of primers. The 284 bp amplified product from invA gene specific for Salmonella sp. and 559 bp from fliC gene specific for Salmonella Typhimurium. Lanes 1, 3, 7, 10, 11, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 show amplification of invA, lane 8 shows both invA and fliC amplified, lanes 12, 17, 20 show amplification of fliC. M Lanes contain 50 bp DNA ladder

Fig. 2: Percentage of detection of Salmonella by both biochemical tests and multiplex-PCR (M-PCR) tests

Table 2: Comparison between biochemical detection and multiplex-PCR detection of isolates
ND: Not detected

The predominant serotypes differ in different regions but Salmonella Typhimurium is not as prevalent as other serotypes (Uyttendaele et al., 1998; Soumet et al., 1999; Joys, 1985) and our results also showed a very low prevalence of this serotype after detection using multiplex-PCR (4 out of 24 samples). Oliveira et al. (2002) reported that the multiplex-PCR assay using invA gene for detection of Salmonella and fliC gene for identification of Salmonella Typhimurium from poultry related samples was 100% specific.

In this study we processed 200 samples from 10 different markets of Dhaka city and the results determine the lower prevalence of Salmonella sp. and even lower in case of Salmonella Typhimurium in chicken eggs in Dhaka city. The results of this study highlight the usefulness of the multiplex-PCR for concurrent and rapid detection of Salmonella sp. and Salmonella Typhimurium from chicken eggs. The multiplex-PCR based detection can be an alternative method for detection of Salmonella sp. and Salmonella Typhimurium but more optimization of the PCR techniques are required for higher sensitivity and specificity.

REFERENCES
Ahmed, M.M., M.M. Rahman, K.R. Mahbub and M. Wahiduzzaman, 2011. Characterization of antibiotic resistant Salmonella spp isolated from chicken eggs of Dhaka city. J. Sci. Res., 3: 191-196.
CrossRef  |  

Aldridge, P., J. Gnerer, J.E. Karlinsey and K.T. Hughes, 2006. Transcriptional and translational control of the Salmonella fliC gene. J. Bacteriol., 188: 4487-4496.
Direct Link  |  

Bej, A.K., M.H. Mahbubani, J.L. Dicesare and R.M. Atlas, 1991. Polymerase chain reaction-gene robe detection of microorganisms by using filter concentrated samples. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 57: 3529-3534.
Direct Link  |  

Bej, A.K., M.H. Mahbubani, M.J. Boyce and R.M. Atlas, 1994. Detection of Salmonella spp. in oysters by PCR. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 60: 368-373.
PubMed  |  

CDC, 1998. Standardized molecular sub typing of food borne bacterial pathogens by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. The National Molecular Sub typing Network for Food borne Disease Surveillance, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta.

Darwin, K.H. and V.L. Miller, 1999. Molecular basis of the interaction of Salmonella with the intestinal mucosa. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 12: 405-428.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Dauga, C., A. Zabrovskaia and P.A.D. Grimont, 1998. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of some flagellin genes of Salmonella enteric. J. Clin. Microbiol., 36: 2835-2843.

Feder, I., J.C. Nietfeld, J. Galland, T. Yeary and J.M. Sargeant et al., 2001. Comparison of cultivation and PCR hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples. J. Clin. Microbiol., 39: 2477-2484.
Direct Link  |  

Finlay, B.B., M.N. Starnbach, C.L. Francis, B.A. Stocker, S. Chatfield, G. Dougan and S. Falkow, 1988. Identification and characterization of TnphoA mutants of Salmonella that are unable to pass through a polarized MDCK epithelial cell monolayer. Mol. Microbiol., 2: 757-766.
PubMed  |  

Fluit, A.C., M.N. Widjojoatmodjo, A.T. Box, R. Torensma and J. Verhoef, 1993. Rapid detection of Salmonella in poultry with the magnetic immune polymerase chain reaction. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 59: 1342-1346.
Direct Link  |  

Gillespie, B.E., A.G. Mathew, F.A. Draughon, B.M. Jayarao and S.P. Oliver, 2003. Detection of Salmonella enteric somatic groups C1 and E1 by PCR-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J. Food Prot., 66: 2367-2370.
Direct Link  |  

Herikstad, H., Y. Motarjemi and R.V. Tauxe, 2002. Salmonella surveillance: A global survey of public health serotyping. Epidemiol. Infect., 219: 1-8.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Hook, E.W., 1985.. Salmonella Species (Including Typhoid Fever). In: Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, Mandell, G.L., R.G. Jr. Douglas and J.E. Bennerr (Eds.). 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA., pp: 1258-1269.

Itoh, Y., K. Hirose, M. Miyake, A.Q. Khan, Y. Hashimoto and T. Hezaki, 1997. Amplification of rfbE and fliC genes by polymerase chain reaction for identification and detection of Salmonella serovar enteritidis, dublin and gallinarum-pullorum. Microbiol. Immunol., 41: 791-794.
PubMed  |  

Joys, T.M., 1985. The covalent structure of the phase-1 flagellar filament protein of Salmonella typhimurium and its comparison with other flagellins. J. Biol. Chem., 260: 15758-15761.
Direct Link  |  

Khakhria, R., D. Woodward, W.M. Johnson and C. Poppe, 1997. Salmonella isolated from humans, animals and other sources in Canada, 1983-92. Epidemiol. Infect., 119: 15-23.
PubMed  |  

Kihlstrom, E. and L. Edebo, 1976. Association of viable and inactivated Salmonella typhimurium 395 MS and MR 10 with HeLa cells. Infect. Immun., 14: 851-857.
Direct Link  |  

Kihlstrom, E. and L. Nilsson, 1977. Endocytosis of Salmonella typhimurium 395 MS and MR 10 by HeLa cells. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand., 85B: 322-328.
PubMed  |  

Kong, R.Y.C., S.K.Y. Lee, T.W.F. Law, S.H.W. Law and R.S.S. Wu, 2002. Rapid detection of six types of bacterial pathogens in marine waters by multiplex PCR. Water Res., 36: 2802-2812.
CrossRef  |  

Lim, Y.H., K. Hirose, H. Izumiya, E. Arakawa and H. Takahashi et al., 2003. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for selective detection of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis., 56: 151-155.
PubMed  |  

MacNab, R.M., 1996. Flagella and Motility. In: Escherichia coli and Salmonella Typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2nd Edn.,Neidhardt, F.C. (Ed.). ASM Press, Washington DC, USA., pp: 123-145.

Malorny, B., J. Hoorfar, C. Bunge and R. Helmuth, 2003. Multicenter validation of the analytical accuracy of Salmonella PCR: towards an international standard. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 69: 290-296.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Malorny, B., J. Hoorfar, M. Hugas, A. Heuvelink and P. Fach et al., 2003. Interlaboratory diagnostic accuracy of a Salmonella specific PCR-based method. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 89: 241-249.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Mead, P.S., L. Slutsker, V. Dietz, L.F. McCaig and J.S. Bresee et al., 1999. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis., 5: 607-625.
Direct Link  |  

Mroczenski-Wildey, M.J., J.L. Di Fabio and F.C. Cabello, 1989. Invasion and lysis of HeLa cell monolayers by Salmonella typhi: The role of lipopolysaccharide. Microb. Pathog., 6: 143-152.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Oliveira, S.D., L.R. Santos, D.M.T. Schuch, A.B. Silva, C.T.P. Salle and C.W. Canal, 2002. Detection and identification of salmonellas from poultry-related samples by PCR. Vet. Microbiol., 87: 25-35.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Rahn, K., S.A. De Grandis, R.C. Clarke, S.A. McEwen and J.E. Galan et al., 1992. Amplification of an invA gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase chain reaction as a specific method of detection of Salmonella. Mol. Cell. Probes., 6: 271-279.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Schrank, I.S., M.A.Z. Mores, J.L.A. Costa, A.P.G. Frazzon and R. Sonicini et al., 2001. Influence of enrichment media and application of a PCR based method to detect Salmonella in poultry industry products and clinical samples. Vet. Microbiol., 82: 45-53.
Direct Link  |  

Soumet, C., D. Blivet, G. Ermel, P. Colin and G. Salvat, 1999. An immunoconcentration- PCR assay to detect Salmonella in the environment of poultry houses. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 48: 221-224.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Szabo, E.A. and B.M. Mackey, 1999. Detection of Salmonella enteritidis by reverse transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Int. J. Food Microbiol., 51: 113-122.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Uyttendaele, M.R., J.M. Debevere, R.M. Lips and K.D. Neyts, 1998. Prevalence of Salmonella in poultry carcasses and their products in Belgium. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 40: 1-8.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Van Kessel, J.S., J.S. Karns and M.L. Perdue, 2003. Using a portable real-time PCR assay to detect Salmonella in raw milk. J. Food. Prot., 66: 1762-1767.
PubMed  |  

Way, J.S., K.L. Josephson, S.D. Pillai, M. Abbaszadegan, C.P. Gerba and I.L. Pepper, 1993. Specific detection of Salmonella spp. by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 59: 1473-1479.
Direct Link  |  

Zhu, Q., C.K. Lim and Y.N. Chan, 1996. Detection of Salmonella typhi by polymerase chain reaction. J. Applied Microbiol., 80: 244-251.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2019 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved
Fulltext PDF References Abstract