|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Investigation of Cytotoxicity and Mutagenicity of Cement Dust Using Allium cepa Test |
|
T. Yahaya,
J. Okpuzor
and
O. Oladele Esther
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
In this study, the mutagenesis of cement dust on plants and animals was investigated. The cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of cement dust was monitored using Allium cepa test model. Allium cepa grouped into 4 of 10 A. cepa per group, after taking their baselines, were exposed to cement dust over three different periods of time at about 100 m from a cement factory. The control group (group 1) was kept in an environment free of cement dust pollution, about 6 km from the cement factory. The test groups (groups 2-4) were exposed to the dust for 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks, respectively. The elemental analysis of the A. cepa in the test groups revealed significant (p<0.05) levels of calcium, silicon, aluminum, chromium and lead compared to the control group. Also, significant differences (p<0.05) exist among the levels of the elements detected in the A. cepa in various test groups. Furthermore, the mean root length growths and the relative growth rates of the test groups were higher than the control, but there was no statistical difference (p>0.05) among them. However, there was a direct linear relationship between the concentrations of calcium and root length growths of the A. cepa across the groups. Chromosomal aberrations observed in the test groups are stickiness, c-mitosis, chromosomal bridge, chromosome fragmentation, vagrant chromosomes, bi-nucleus chromosomes and multi-polar anaphase. No chromosomal aberration was observed in the control group. The total number of chromosomal aberrations increases significantly (p<0.05) with the length of exposure. The findings of the research highlight the toxicity of cement dust and the need for pollution control measures to safeguard plants and animals in the environment.
|
|
|
|
|
Received: October 09, 2011;
Accepted: October 20, 2011;
Published: March 20, 2012
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Air pollution is the release of chemicals, particulate matter, or biological
materials in to the atmosphere through human activities, causing harm to his
health, other living organisms and the environment (Seyyednjad
et al., 2011). Pollution stress can alter plant and animal growth
as well as quality and the effects are often extensive (Krupa
et al., 1982). Furthermore, air pollution can have both short-term
and long-term effects and physical injuries to the leaves of plants and skin
of animals are the immediate effects of air pollution (Colls,
2002). Of all the main poisonous gases in polluted air, sulfur dioxide appears
to be the most toxic to plants and animals and has been implicated in some diseases.
Other pollutants that may adversely affect plants and animals are nitrogen dioxide,
ammonia, carbon monoxide and troposphere ozone (TRF, 2008).
The calcinations and burning processes of cement production produce these poisonous
gases that cause injuries to plants and animals (Abimbola
et al., 2007; Gbadebo and Bankole, 2007).
The cement industry is involved in the development of structures in this advanced
and modern world because it is the basic ingredient of concrete use in constructing
modern edifices and structures. In fact, life without cement in this 21st century
is inconceivable. Cement, however, generates dust during its production (Meo,
2004). Cement is a fine, gray or white powder which is largely made up of
Cement Kiln Dust (CKD), a by-product of the final cement product, usually stored
as wastes in open-pits and landfills (Hansen, 1998) Although,
the basic constituents of cement dust are calcium (CaCO3), silicon
(SiO2), aluminum (Al2O3), ferric and manganese
oxides (Akpan et al., 2011) its production produces
known toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic substances, such as particulate matters,
sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, volatile compounds, long lived dioxins and
heavy metals (Davidovits, 1994). Exposure to cement dust
for a short period may not cause serious problem, however prolonged exposure
can cause serious irreversible damage to plant and animal (Heather,
2003).Cement dust of sufficient quantities have been reported to dissolve
leaf tissues and cause injury to both plants and animals (TRF,
2008). Other reported effects of cement dust on plants and animals include
reduced plant and animal growths, reduced chlorophyll of plants, clogged stomata
of plants leaves, cell metabolism disruption in plants and animals, respiratory
diseases in animals, hematological disease, cancers, eye defects and genetic
problems (Iqbal and Shafug, 2001; Meo,
2004; Mohammed and Sambo, 2008; Ogunbileje
and Akinosun, 2011).
Several methods are being used to monitor mutagenesis of pollutants or chemical
agents, but Allium cepa test has proofed to be more effective. Allium
test has been extremely useful in biological monitoring and determination
of toxicity of chemical agents and pollution. Application of Allium test
as a model to detect mutagens dates back to the 1940s and has been used to this
day to assess a great number of chemical agents due to its effectiveness. It
is characterized as a low cost test, easy to handle and give accurate and reliable
results (Sehgal et al., 2006).
Although, much work has been published on the health risks posed by cement
dust on the survival of plants and animals, the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity
of cement dust are still not clear. While many researchers confirm the cytotoxicity
and mutagenicity of cement dust, cement manufacturers deny the claims. They
argue that the individuals affected in several studies could have developed
the diseases from previous environments they have lived in (Tajudeen
et al., 2011). The cement manufacturers argued further that most
of the studies were based on spirometry, radiology or questionnaire and the
studied organism, man, is mobile. Therefore, one of the objectives of this study
was to clear the controversy surrounding the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of
cement dust using A. cepa test model. In the face of the advantages that
A. cepa test model offers, there is no doubt that the results of the
study will clear the controversy surrounding the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity
of cement dust.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Description of study site: The West African Portland Cement Company,
Ewekoro is the oldest cement company in Nigeria. The company is along the ever-busy
Lagos-Abeokuta motorway in South-West Nigeria, about 43 km from Lagos and 37
km from Abeokuta. There are human settlements around the company made up of
mostly artisans, farmers, traders, children and factory workers.
Allium cepa Bulbs: Healthy purple variety of Allium cepa bulbs (25-32 g) were purchased from Sango-Ota market, Ogun state, Nigeria, in November, 2010. Eighty of the Allium cepa bulbs were grown in the dark for 48 h in beakers containing 100 mL of tap water at ambient temperature until the roots have grown to about 2-3 cm. The 40 viable bulbs were selected and used for the research.
Experimentation: The research commenced in mid November, 2010. The 40
viable Allium bulbs selected were divided into 4 groups of 10 Allium
bulbs per group. The control group (group 1) was kept in a cement dust-free
environment in the same climatic zone, about 6 km from the company. The test
groups (groups 2-4) were exposed to cement dust at about 100 m from the cement
factory for 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks, respectively. At the end of the exposures,
the Allium cepa across the groups were taken to the Environmental Biology
Laboratory, University of Lagos. Elemental analysis of the Allium bulbs
was done by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy using UNICAM model 969 Spectrophotometer
and cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of the elements in the Allium bulbs
were determined using Allium test as described by Fiskesjo
(1988).
Examination of chromosomal aberrations: The ten viable onions in each
group were grown over tap water in beakers under ambient temperature and humidity.
The root tip growths of the onions were monitored for seven days after which
they were cut and fixed immediately in aceto-alcohol in ratio 1:3. About 4-5
cm root tips from each bulb were macerated in drops of 1 N HCl at 60°C for
about 3 min followed by staining in Carbol Fuchsin stain (Koa,
1975). The root tips were then squashed in a 2% aceto-orcein in 45% acetic-acid.
Permanent slides were made and mounted on Canadian balsam where chromosomal
aberrations were examined and photographed. Mitotic index and chromosomal aberrations
were determined by examination of 500 cells per slide and calculated as mitotic
cells per 100 cells. Chromosomal aberrations were characterized and classified
as bridges, c-mitoses, vagrant, fragment, stickiness, bi-nucleus and multi-polar.
Statistical analysis: A database file was created in a personal computer and all statistical analysis was carried out with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17 for windows and Microsoft Office Excel 2007. Comparison of data among exposed and control groups were calculated using Students t-test. The p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Table 1 showed that the concentrations of the elements detected in the test groups were significantly higher (p<0.05) than the concentrations of the elements detected in the control group. Furthermore, significant difference (p<0.05) exist among the concentrations of the elements detected in various test groups and the amount increased with the length of exposure. For example, the final mean concentration of calcium in the control (group 1) is 1.25 mg kg-1, while the final mean concentrations of calcium in groups 2, 3 and 4 are 2.69, 3.16 and 6.14 mg kg-1, respectively. Furthermore, the final mean concentration of silicon in the control group is 0.033 mg kg-1, while the final mean concentrations of silicon in groups 2, 3 and 4 are 0.12, 0.14 and 0.17 mg kg-1, respectively. Also, the final mean concentration of aluminum in the control group is 0.033 mg kg-1, while the final mean concentrations of aluminum in groups 2, 3 and 4 are 0.063, 0.103 and 0.293 mg kg-1, respectively. Moreover, the final mean concentration of chromium in the control group is 0.003 mg kg-1, while the final mean concentrations of chromium in groups 2, 3 and 4 are 0.008, 0.012 and 0.021 mg kg-1, respectively. Finally, the final mean concentration of lead in the control group is 0.0004 mg kg-1, while the final mean concentrations of chromium in groups 2, 3 and 4 are 0.008, 0.013 and 0.020 mg kg-1, respectively. Period of exposure: Group 1 (Un-exposed): Group 2 (2 weeks): Group 3 (4 weeks): Group 4 (6 weeks). Table 2 showed that the test groups gained more root length than the control group. However, there was no statistical difference (p>0.05) between the root length growth and relative growth rate of the test and control groups. For instance, the minimum and maximum root lengths of the control group are 1.2 and 5.5 cm, respectively, while the minimum and maximum root lengths of groups 2, 3 and 4 are 0.8, 1.4, 0.8 cm and 6.2, 5.8, groups 2, 3 and 4 are 0.008, 0.013 and 0.020 mg kg-1, respectively 5.7 cm, respectively. Furthermore, the relative growth rate of the control group is 44.3% while the relative growth rate of groups 2, 3 and 4 are 67.1, 58.6 and 58.6%, respectively.
Period of exposure of the chromosomal analysis of the Allium cepa
across the groups: Table 3 showed the results of the chromosomal
analysis of the Allium cepa across the groups. The mitotic index of the
test groups were higher than the control group but there was no statistical
difference (p>0.05) between them. Furthermore, the control group showed no
chromosomal aberration (Fig. 1a) while groups 2, 3 and 4 showed
14 (2.8%), 20 (4.0%) and 25 (5.0%) chromosomal aberrations, respectively. Chromosomal
fragmentation, bridges and stickiness were found in groups 2, 3 and 4 (Fig.
1b, c). Moreover, vagrant, scattered and multi-polar chromosomes
were found in groups 3 and 4 (Fig. 1d, e).
Table 1: |
Concentrations of the elements (mg kg-1) in the
Allium cepa |
 |
Data are expressed as Mean±SD: When *p<0.05 = Significant
from control and when **p>0.05 = Not significant from control: Mean values
in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different
at p<0.05 |
Table 2: |
Root length growth [CM] of the exposed A. cepa |
 |
Data are expressed as Mean±SD: When *p<0.05 = Significant
from control and when p>0.05 = Not significant from control: Mean values
in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different
at **p<0.05 |
Table 3: |
Chromosomal Analysis of the Exposed Allium cepa |
 |
|
Fig. 1(a-e): |
(a) Control [anaphase], (b) Bridges and fragmentation observed
in groups 2, 3 and 4, (c) chromosome stickiness observed in group 2, 3 and
4, (d) Vagrant chromosome in observed in groups 3 and 4, (e) Multi-polar
and scattered chromosome observed in groups 3 and 4 |
DISCUSSION
The results of the elemental analysis of the exposed Allium cepa support
the findings of Abimbola et al. (2007), Davidovits
(1994), Gbadebo and Bankole (2007) and Ade-Ademilua
and Obalola (2008). They reported that apart from the basic constituents
of cement dust, the calcination and burning process of cement making produce
poisonous substances such as particulate matters, dioxin, heavy metals, sulfur
dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and volatile compounds. But this research revealed
high concentrations of calcium, silicon, aluminum, chromium and lead. The results
further confirm the submission of Bilen (2010) that
cement factories are one of the great polluters of the environment with the
release of poisonous dust and gases. Considering the short period of exposure
and the high levels of the elements detected in the exposed A. cepa,
it showed that the cement company is badly polluting the environment. The high
level of pollution from the cement company might be due to several factors.
Firstly, the machines and technologies in place in the company might be old
with non-efficient dust collectors and dust-filters. This assertion is more
probable because the factory is the oldest in the country and no major turn-around
maintenance has been done since its establishment in 1978. Secondly, the company
might be burning hazardous waste substances as alternative fuels. This assertion
has been corroborated by IPC (1996), who found that the
levels of heavy metals and dioxins are higher in cement kilns burning hazardous
wastes as fuels than those burning coal or gas alone. Thirdly, the high level
of pollution might be due to accumulation of excavated limestone and leftover
cement kiln dust which were not packed promptly.
Although many researchers, including Abdullah and Iqbal
(1991), Akinola et al. (2008), Gupta
and Mishra (1994), Iqbal and Shafug (2001), Nigragau
and Davidson (1986) and Krupa et al. (1982)
reported reduction in plant and animal growth from cement dust pollution, this
research did not find such results. Contrary, the results of the research revealed
that cement dust promotes plant and animal growth. Calcium, the main component
of cement dust, is involved in the metabolism of plant and animal and serves
as regulator of plant and animal growth and development (Hepler,
2005; Tajudeen and Okpuzor, 2011; Tajudeen
et al., 2011). Hence, the increase in the root length growth of the
exposed A. cepa is not surprising. But aluminum, chromium and sulfur
dioxide emitted by cement plants may also affect plant and animal growth negatively.
Root apex seems to be the major target of aluminum toxicity where it inhibits
cell division and cell extension (Mossor-Pietraszeweska,
2001), while sulfur dioxide and chromium disrupts metabolic activities (Shanker
et al., 2005; Zou et al., 2006). So,
these toxic metals and calcium work in antagonistic order. While calcium is
building plant and animal cells and growth, aluminum, chromium and sulfur dioxide
are slowing down the rate at which it does it. This explains variations that
exist among the growth rates of the test groups. As the levels of these toxic
elements increase with length of exposure, the growth rate decreases. However,
the net root lengths gained by the test groups were higher than the control
groups probably because of the preponderance of calcium against the toxic elements
in the cement dust.
The chromosomal aberrations observed in the study confirms the findings of
Calistus Jude et al. (2002) who reported that
exposure to cement dust may increase the frequency of sister chromatid exchanges,
decreased cell kinetics and significantly increased the frequency of chromosomal
aberrations in men environmentally and occupationally exposed to cement dust.
However, our results revealed high frequency of chromosome stickiness, c-mitosis,
chromosomal bridges and fragmentation, multi-polar anaphase, bi-nucleus chromosome
and vagrant chromosome. Chromium VI has been implicated to cause chromosomal
bridge, chromosome stickiness, decrease in mitotic index, c-mitoses, aneuploid
and sister chromatid exchange in plant and animals (IARC,
1990; Zou et al., 2006). Aluminum has also
been reported to cause chromosome stickiness, laggards, sticky bridge, occurrence
of micronuclei, bi-nucleated and multi-nucleated cells (Balasubramanyam
et al., 2009; Mohanty et al., 2004).
Furthermore, silica has been fingered in gene mutation, DNA strands break and
bi-nucleus chromosome in exposed animals (NTP, 2009).
Finally, lead has been reported to cause bi-nucleus chromosome and cytokinetic
effects in exposed earthworms (Muangpha and Gooneratne,
2011).
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The results of this research had clearly shown that the environment surrounding the cement factory is highly polluted with poisonous gases and elements. The effects of these pollutants had shown in chromosomal aberrations in the exposed Allium cepa. Definitely, all other organisms including man in the cement polluted environment will be experiencing similar problems. Apart from the fact that we need to protect ourselves, the integrity and population of plants and animals around cement factories must also be protected. This is because man depends on plant and animal for survival and the chromosomal aberrations may be transferred to them. Therefore, environmental pollution from cement factories must be checked by using efficient dust collectors and dust-filters. Cement companies must put in place new machines and technologies and must ensure prompt packaging and transportation of both finished product and left-over cement kiln dust. The use of hazardous waste substances as fuels should be discouraged and there must be a policy on minimum distance from cement companies in which settlements and farming activities will be allowed. Finally, the use of medicinal plants as detoxifiers should be introduced to people living around industrial areas. These will go a long way in preserving the populations of plants and animals as well as health of humans in polluted environments.
|
REFERENCES |
1: Abdullah,C.M. and M.Z. Iqbal, 1991. Response of automobile, stone and cement particulate matters on stomata clogging of plants. Geobios, 181: 196-201. Direct Link |
2: Abimbola, A.F., O.O. Kehinde-Phillips and A.S. Olatunji, 2007. The sagamu cement factory, SW Nigeria: Is the dust generated a potential health hazard. Environ. Geochem. Health, 29: 163-167. CrossRef | PubMed |
3: Ade-Ademilua, O.E. and D.A. Obalola, 2008. The effect of cement dust pollution on Celosia argentea (Lagos Spinach) plant. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 1: 47-55. CrossRef | Direct Link |
4: Akinola, M.O., N.A. Okwok and T. Yahaya, 2008. The effects of cement dust on albino rats (Rattus norvegicus) around West African portland cement factory in Sagamu, Ogun state, Nigeria. Res. J. Environ. Toxicol., 2: 1-8. CrossRef | Direct Link |
5: Akpan, I.O., A.E. Amodu and A.E. Akpan, 2011. An assessment of the major elemental composition and concentration in limestones samples from yandev and odukpani areas of Nigeria using nuclear techniques. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 4: 332-339. CrossRef | Direct Link |
6: Balasubramanyam, A., N. Sailaja, M. Mahboob, M.F. Rahman, S.M. Hussain and P. Grover, 2009. In vivo genotoxicity assessment of aluminum oxide nanomaterials in rats peripheral blood cells using the comet assay and micronucleus test. Mutagenesis, 24: 245-251. CrossRef | Direct Link |
7: Bilen, S., 2010. Effect of cement dust pollution on microbial properties and enzyme activities in cultivated and no-till soils. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 4: 2418-2425. Direct Link |
8: Calistus Jude, A.L., K. Sasikala, R. Ashok Kumar, S. Sudha and J. Raichel, 2002. Hematological and cytogenic studies in workers occupationally exposed to cement dust. Int. J. Human Gen., 2: 95-99. Direct Link |
9: Colls, J., 2002. Air Pollution. 2nd Edn., Spon Press, New York, USA., pp: 25
10: Davidovits, J., 1994. Global warming impact on the cement and aggregate industries. World Resour. Rev., 6: 263-278. Direct Link |
11: Fiskesjo, G., 1988. The Allium test-an alternative in environmental studies: The relative toxicity of metal ions. Mutat. Res., 197: 243-260. PubMed |
12: Gbadebo, A.M. and O.D. Bankole, 2007. Analysis of potentially toxic metals in airborne cement dust around sagamu, Southwestern Nigeria. J. Applied Sci., 7: 35-40. CrossRef | Direct Link |
13: Gupta, A.K. and R.M. Mishra, 1994. Effect of lime kilns air pollution on some plant species. J. Pollut. Res., 13: 1-9.
14: Hansen, M.A., 1998. Airing their concerns neighbors of cement plant worry about their health risks. Colorado daily 1 (coll) October 6.
15: Heather, G., 2003. Effects of Air Pollution on Agricultural Crops. Ministry of Agricultural, Air Pollution on Agricultural Crops, Ontario, Canada. Direct Link |
16: Hepler, P.K., 2005. Calcium: A central regulator of plant growth and development. Plant Cell, 17: 2142-2155. Direct Link |
17: IARC, 1990. Chromium, Nickel and Welding, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Vol. 49, IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon, France, pp: 256, 447-525
18: IPC, 1996. Review of IPC authorization and variations. Castle Cement Limited, Ribblesdale Works, Friends of the Earth Briefings, Integrated Pollution Control, Ireland.
19: Iqbal, M.Z. and M. Shafiq, 2001. Periodical effect of cement dust pollution on the growth of some plant species. Turk. J. Bot., 25: 19-24. Direct Link |
20: Koa, K.N., 1975. A Chromosomal Staining Method for Cultured Cells. In: Plant Tissue Culture Methodes, Gamborg, O.L. and L.R. Wetter (Eds.). National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
21: Krupa, S.V., G.C. Pratt and P.S. Teng, 1982. Air pollution. An important issue in plant health. J. Plant Dis., 66: 429-434.
22: Meo, S.A., 2004. Health hazards of cement dust. Saudi Med. J., 25: 1153-1159. PubMed |
23: Mohammed, A.K. and A.B. Sambo, 2008. Haematological assessment of the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus exposed to sublethal concentrations of portland cement powder in solution. Int. J. Zool. Res., 4: 48-52. CrossRef | Direct Link |
24: Mohanty, S., A.B. Das, P. Das and P. Mohanty, 2004. Effect of a low dose of aluminum on mitotic and meiotic activity, 4C DNA content and pollen sterlity in rice, Oryza sativa L. Cv. Lalat. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 59: 70-75. PubMed |
25: Mossor-Pietraszewska, T., 2001. Effect of aluminium on plant growth and metabolism. Acta Biochim. Pol., 48: 673-686. PubMed | Direct Link |
26: Muangpha, P. and R. Gooneratne, 2011. Comparative genotoxicity of cadmium and lead in earthworm Coelomocytes. Applied Environ. Soil Sci., 2011: 1-7.
27: NTP, 2009. Chemical information review document for Silica (CAS No. 14808-60-7). US Department of Health and Human Services. Research Triangle Park, New Jersey, USA.
28: Nigragau, J.O. and C.L. Davidson, 1986. Toxic Metals in the Atmosphere. John Wiley and Sons, New York
29: Ogunbileje, J.O. and O.M. Akinosun, 2011. Biochemical and haematological profile in Nigerian cement factory workers. Res. J. Environ. Toxicol., 5: 133-140. CrossRef | Direct Link |
30: Sehgal, R., S. Roy and V.L. Kumar, 2006. Evaluation of cytotoxic potential of latex of Calotropis procera and Podophyllotoxin in Allium cepa root model. Biocell, 30: 9-13. PubMed | Direct Link |
31: Seyyednjad, S.M., K. Majdian, H. Koochak and M. Niknejad, 2011. Air pollution tolerance indices of some plants around industrial zone in South of Iran. Asian J. Biol. Sci., 4: 300-305. CrossRef | Direct Link |
32: Shanker, A.K., C. Cervantes, H. Loza-Tavera and S. Avudainayagam, 2005. Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ. Int., 31: 739-753. CrossRef | Direct Link |
33: TRF, 2008. Air pollution effects: Effects on forests, trees and plants. Tropical Rain Forest.
34: Tajudeen, Y. and J. Okpuzor, 2011. Variation in exposure to cement dust in relation to distance from Cement Company. Res. J. Environ. Toxicol., 5: 203-212. CrossRef | Direct Link |
35: Tajudeen, Y., J. Okpuzor and A.T. Fausat, 2011. Investigation of general effects of cement dust to clear the controversy surrounding its toxicity. Asian J. Sci. Res., 4: 315-325. CrossRef | Direct Link |
36: Zou, J.H., M. Wang, W.S. Jiang and D.H. Liu, 2006. Effects of hexavalent chromium[V1] on root growth and cell division in root tips cells of Amaranthus viridis L. Pak. J. Bot., 38: 673-681. Direct Link |
|
|
|
 |