In vitro Free Radical Scavenging and Antimicrobial Activity of Some Selected Thai Medicinal Plants
The aims of the present study were to determine the free radical scavenging activity and antimicrobial activity against 15 food spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms of 18 selected Thai medicinal plants from 12 different families based on ethnopharmacological and taxonomic information. The methanolic extract of Allium sativum L. gave highest yield (34.76% db) following Rheum officinale Baill. (24.94% db) and Curcuma longa L. (23.39% db), respectively. Sixteen plant materials out of 18 selected Thai medicinal plants showed high effective scavenging capacity (IC50<0.06 mg mL-1) that order: Mansonia gagei Drumm., Pterocarpus santalinus L., Cinnamomum iners Blume., Kaempferia parviflora Wall., Caesalpinia sappan L., Rheum officinale Baill. and Albizia myriophylla Benth., respectively. The highest antioxidant activity was detected in Kaempferia parviflora Wall. by using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method. The most active medicinal plant extracts showed broad spectrum antimicrobial activity against 15 food spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms. The Allium sativum L., Caesalpinia sappan L., Mansonia gagei Drumm., Alpinia galangal Swartz., Curcuma longa L. and Kaempferia parviflora Wall. extracts had the greatest inhibitory effect against B. cereus ATCC 11778, E. coli ATCC 29214, Staph. aureus ATCC 13150, Pr. vulgaris TISTR 100, Strep. cremoris TISTR 058, Salm. typhi ATCC 43579 and C. krusei TISTR 5256 by using the disc diffusion method. The findings support the view that some Thai medicinal plants are promising sources of potential antioxidants and antimicrobial activity, which may be efficient as preventive agents in the pathogenesis of some diseases.
Received: April 01, 2010;
Accepted: June 21, 2010;
Published: August 13, 2010
For thousands of years, mankind has known about the benefit of drugs from nature.
Plant extracts for the treatment of various ailments were highly regarded by
the ancient civilizations. Today, plant materials remain an important resource
for combating illnesses, including infectious diseases and many of these plants
have been investigated for novel drugs or templates for the development of new
therapeutic agents (Kumarasamy et al., 2002).
Searches for medicinal plants that are more potent and efficient antibiotic
agents have accelerated in recent years. In Thailand most medicinal plants are
traditionally used in Thai folk medicine to treat several diseases (Taylor
and Attaur, 1994). It has been established that oxidative stress is among
the major causative factors in more than 100 diseases such as malaria, acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome, heart disease, stroke, arteriosclerosis, diabetes
and cancer (Alho and Leinonen, 1999). In recent years,
many studies evidenced that medicinal plants with high content of antioxidants
can be effective in prevention of the free radical formation by scavenging,
thus playing an important role in the prevention of these diseases (Farrukh
et al., 2006; Al-Fatimi et al., 2007).
Subsequently, a worldwide trend towards the use of natural phytochemicals present
in berry crops, tea, herbs, oilseeds, beans, fruits and vegetables has increased
(Karaman et al., 2003; Butkhup
et al., 2008). Several herbs and spices have been reported to exhibit
antioxidant activity, including rosemary, sage, thyme, nutmeg, turmeric, white
pepper, chili pepper, ginger and several Chinese medicinal plants (Lee
et al., 2003). The natural active compounds found in medicinal plants
belong to various chemical structures including terpenes, alkaloids, coumarins,
lignans, quinines, flavonoids, tannins, stilbenes, curcuminiods, polysaccharides,
etc. and some of these compounds have anti cancer, antioxidant and antimicrobial
activity (Kumar et al., 2007).
Medicinal plants, which form the backbone of traditional medicine, have in
the last few decades been the subject for very intense pharmacological studies;
this has been brought about by the acknowledgment of the value of medicinal
plants as potential sources of new compounds of therapeutic value and as sources
of lead compounds in drug development. In developing countries, it is estimated
that about 80% of the population rely on traditional medicine for their primary
health care (Taylor and Attaur, 1994). There arises
a need therefore to screen medicinal plants for bioactive compounds as a basis
for further pharmacological studies. In recent years, multiple drug/chemical
resistance in both human and plant pathogenic microorganisms have been developed
due to indiscriminate use of commercial antimicrobial drugs/chemical commonly
used in the treatment of infectious diseases. This situation has forced scientists
to search for new antimicrobial substances from various sources like medicinal
plants. However, the intensive search for novel types of antioxidants has been
carried out from numerous plant materials (Lee et al.,
2003; Al-Fatimi et al., 2007; Kumar
et al., 2007). Scientific studies of antioxidant and antimicrobial
activities in Thai medicinal plants are limited. In addition, the different
botanical varieties and geographical origin may affect the qualitative and quantitative
phytochemicals in the interested plant. Therefore, the search for antimicrobial
and antioxidant activity of some selected medicinal plants, which can be applied
to synthesize new drugs in order to cure infectious disease. Moreover, the determination
of potential antioxidant and antimicrobial activities in plant extracts may
provide information for further use in food industry. Consequently, the aims
of the present study were to determine the free radical scavenging activity
and antimicrobial activity against 15 food spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms
of 18 selected Thai medicinal plants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant materials: Eighteen plant species from 12 different families, native to Thailand, were selected on the basis of ethnopharmacological information or taxonomic relationship with medicinally important species. These plants were obtained from the Department of Plant Production Technology, Mahasarakham University, Thailand during October 2009, identified by using Encyclopedia of Plants in Thailand and authenticated by Suttira Khumkratok, Walai Rukhavej Botanical Research Institute, Mahasarakham University, Thailand (Table 1). The plant materials were cleaned, dried and carefully powdered. All samples were kept in tightened light-protected containers.
||Botanical, traditional or folk uses, extract yield (%, of
the dried weight), phytochemicals detected, inhibitory concentration (IC50)
and antiradical activity (AAR) of methanolic extracts obtained
from 18 Thai medicinal plants
|NI: No information. Phyto: Phytochemicals detected key: A:
Alkaloids; C: Coumarin; P: Phenols; F: Flavonoids; G: Glycosides, Sa: Saponins;
T: Tannins. aR: Roots or rhizomes, S: Stems, B: Bulb, Ri: Rind,
Se: Seeds, H: Heartwood. bInformation of traditional use has
been taken from native people. cDry weight basis of the original
sample of plant parts. dFarrukh et al.
(2006), eCai et al. (2003),
fChanwitheesuk et al. (2005),
gJang et al.. (2007), hChan
et al. (2008), iKrishnaveni and Rao
(2000), jDamre et al. (2003), kMahabusarakama
et al. (2004), lYoshikawa et al.
(2002), mChatterjee et al. (2007),
nTiew et al. (2002)
Extraction and hydrolysis: Ground samples (5 g) were extracted and hydrolysed
with 50 mL of 60% aqueous methanol containing 1.2 M HCl. The mixture was refluxed
at 85°C for 2 h to ensure complete extraction (Butkhup
et al., 2008). Next, the extracts were filtered through Whatman No.
1 paper under vacuum and the residue was repeatedly extracted with the same
solvent until it was colorless and centrifuged (10 min, 5000x g). Methanol was
evaporated from the supernatants on a rotary evaporator at 50 mmHg pressure
and 50°C. The extract was kept in a freezer at -20°C for further study.
Determination of plant extract yield: The yield of evaporated dried extracts based on dry weight basis was calculated from equation:
where, W1 was the weight of extract after evaporation of methanol and W2 was the dry weight of the fresh plant sample.
Free radical scavenging activity (DPPH assay): A 0.1 mL aliquot of the
methanol extract prepared above was mixed with 3.9 mL of an 80% ethanolic 0.6
mM DPPH solution. The tubes were vortexed for 15 sec and allowed to stand for
180 min, as described by Cai et al. (2003), after
which the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 517 nm using the Hewlett
Packard UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-vis model 1601, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
Most tested compounds should be reacted completely within 180 min in this condition
and reaction time for vitamin C is less than 1 min due to its fast oxidation.
Ethanol (80%) was used as a blank solution and DPPH solution without test samples
(3.9 mL of DPPH+0.1 mL of 80% ethanol) served as the control. All tests were
performed in triplicate. The antioxidant activity of the test samples was expressed
as (1) the median inhibitory concentration for radical-scavenging activity (IC50):
total phenolics (mg) of antioxidant (test sample) required for a 50% decrease
in absorbance of DPPH radicals and (2) inhibition (%) of DPPH absorbance:
A plot of the absorbance of DPPH vs. concentration of antioxidant was made to establish a standard curves (dose-response curves) and to calculate IC50. Acontrol is the absorbance of the control (DPPH solution without the test sample) and Atest is the absorbance of the test sample (DPPH solution plus 0.1 mL of 5 μM test compound). Ascorbic acid served as a standard and the results of the assay were expressed relative to ascorbic acid equivalent.
Preparation of test microorganisms: The microbial strains were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD, USA). They included the Gram-positive bacteria: Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 13150,Streptococcus thermophilus ATCC 19258, the Gram-negative bacteria: Escherichia coli ATCC 29214, Salmonella typhi ATCC 43579, Vibrio chlolerea ATCC 14033, Shigella dysenteriae ATCC 13313 and the fungi: Candida tropicalis ATCC 9968, Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 18824 and Kluyveromyces marxianus ATCC 8554 whereas the Gram-positive bacteria: Streptococcus faecalis TISTR 459, Streptococcus cremoris TISTR 058, the Gram-negative bacteria: Proteus vulgaris TISTR 100 and the fungi Candida krusei TISTR 5256 were obtained from the culture collection at the Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research (TISTR, Thailand) and were employed for determination of antimicrobial activity.
The bacterial and fungal stock cultures were stored frozen in 40% (v/v) glycerol-either nutrient or yeast malt broth. Working bacterial culture and fungal culture were grown at 37°C for 24 h on nutrient agar and at 30°C for 48 h in yeast malt agar, respectively. To obtain cells in the stationary growth phase, bacterial culture and fungal culture were subcultured twice at 37°C for 24 h on nutrient broth and at 30°C for 48 h in yeast malt broth, respectively. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6,000x g for 2 min and washed once with a 5 mM NaCl solution. The supernatant was discarded and the cells were washed again. Bacterial cells and fungal cells were re-harvested and suspended in fresh nutrient broth and yeast malt broth, respectively. The concentration of cultures was to 106 colony forming units (1x106 CFU mL-1).
Antimicrobial assay: The antimicrobial activity of medicinal plant extracts
were separately determined using the disc diffusion method as described by Mackeen
et al. (1997). Two hundred microlitres of prepared culture was spread
on surfaces of Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA). Ten microlitres (1 mg mL-1)
of each plant extract was applied to a sterile filter paper disc (Whatman No.1;
6 mm in diameter) and allowed to dry for 15 min. The discs were then placed
on the surface of inoculated medium. The plates were inverted and incubated
for 24 h at 37°C. Each test was carried out in triplicate with controls.
Antibiotic susceptibility discs including ampicillin (10 μg disc-1),
ciprofloxacin (10 μg disc-1) and ketoconazole (10 μg disc-1)
were used as a positive control. The solvent of each extract was used as a negative
control. The results were recorded by measuring the zones of growth inhibition
surrounding the disc. Clear inhibition zones around the discs indicate the presence
of antimicrobial activity.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC): The Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) were determined for medicinal plant extracts showing antibacterial activity in the disc diffusion assay. Concentrate extracts of plants were added at two-fold serial dilution (0 to 2640 μg mL-1) to sterilize MHA. Ten microlitres of an overnight culture of each microbial strain, containing approximately 106 CFU, was applied on agar surfaces. MIC values were taken as the lowest concentration of extract that completely inhibited microbial growth after 24 h of incubation at 37°C.
Statistical analysis: The data were analyzed by the Windows SPSS program (Version 11.01). Data were expressed as mean using ANOVA, if justified by the statistical probability (p<0.05), by Duncans new multiple range test. IC50 values for all the above experiments were determined by linear regression.
From 18 medicinal plant extracts, the methanolic extract of Allium sativum
L. gave highest yield (34.76% db) following Rheum officinale Baill. (24.94%
db) and Curcuma longa L. (23.39% db), respectively. Among these, the
methanolic extract of Caesalpinia sappan L. and Alpinia galangal
Swartz. Gave lowest yield with average of 9.94 and 7.44% db, respectively (Table
1). Considering the large variation of IC50 values, ranging from
0.02 mg mL-1 in Mansonia gagei Drumm., Pterocarpus santalinus
L., Cinnamomum iners Blume. and Kaempferia parviflora Wall. to
2.06 mg mL-1 in Globba laeta K. Larsen and Zingiber officinale
Roscoe (Table 1).
The results show a significant (p<0.05) scavenging activity of medicinal plant extracts and standards. The scavenging effect on the DPPH radical that order: Kaempferia parviflora Wall. > Rheum officinale Baill.>Piper chaba Hunt.>Cinnamomum inersBlume.>Saussurea lappa Clarke.>Caesalpinia sappan L.>Mansonia gagei Drumm.>Allium sativum L.>Piper nigrum L.> Albizia myriophylla Benth.>Conioselinum univitatum Turcz.>Zingiber officinale Roscoe.> Derris scandens Benth.>Alpinia galangal Swartz.>Cymbopogon citratus Stapf.>Pterocarpus santalinus L.>Curcuma longa L.> Globba laeta K. Larsen extracts, which were 86.35, 85.94, 85.14, 84.33, 83.94, 82.93, 82.73, 82.53, 82.33, 81.93, 81.93, 80.19, 79.92, 78.92, 78.51, 75.90, 63.05 and 29.72%, respectively, at the concentration of 2.00 mg mL-1 (Table 2). Among the 18 plants tested, 16 plants showed more than 75% decolorization. They had good DPPH radical scavenging activity. These extracts exhibited a remarkable antioxidant effect at low concentrations. In particular, the methanolic extracts of K. parviflora Wall., R. officinale Baill. and P. chaba Hunt. exhibited at 0.01 mg mL-1 an extraordinary antioxidant effect (5.71, 5.52 and 5.48% successively) whereas the ascorbic acid showed at this concentration an effect of 5.46%. The activity of Curcuma longa L. (63.05%) showed moderate radical scavenging capacity, while the extract of Globba laeta K. Larsen (29.72%) showed negligible activity. However, free radical scavenging activity also increased with increasing concentration.
|| Antimicrobial activity of the methanolic extracts of Thai
|(-/): No inhibition at the concentration tested., NT: Not
tested. Microbial strains: BC: Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778; BS:
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633; SA: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 13150;
ST: Streptococcus thermophilus ATCC 19258; SF: Streptococcus faecalis
TISTR 459; SCr: Streptococcus cremoris TISTR 058; EC: Escherichia
coli ATCC 29214; SD: Shigella dysenteriae ATCC 13313; STy, Salmonella
typhi ATCC 43579; PV: Proteus vulgaris TISTR 100; VC: Vibrio
chlolerea ATCC 14033; CK: Candida krusei TISTR 5256; CT: Candida
tropicalis ATCC 9968; SC: Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 18824;
KM: Kluyveromyces marxianus ATCC 8554
The results of the antimicrobial screening of a total of 18 extracts against fifteen microbial species are shown Table 3, among the 18 plant extracts, 8 plants showed the most pronounced activity with inhibition zones of more than 12 mm shown by the methanolic extracts of A. sativum L. (bulb), A. myriophylla Benth. (root), C. sappan L. (heartwood), P. nigrum L. (seed), M. gagei Drumm. (heartwood), A. galangal Swartz. (rhizomes), C. longa L. (rhizomes) and K. parviflora Wall. (rhizomes). The inhibitory effect of the studied medicinal plant extracts was exhibited mainly against the Gram-positive bacteria namely, Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 13150, Streptococcus faecalis TISTR 459 and Streptococcus cremoris TISTR 058 and Gram-negative bacteria namely, Escherichia coli ATCC 29214, Shigella dysenteriae ATCC 13313 and Salmonella typhi ATCC 43579. Some of the extracts include Derris scandens Benth., Albizia myriophylla Benth. and Caesalpinia sappan L. showed any activity against fungi. It was interesting to note that Bacillus strains, Streptococcus strains, E. coli ATCC 29214, Sh. dysenteriae ATCC 13313 and Salm. typhi ATCC 43579 showed more sensitivity to the investigated extracts than the other antibiotic susceptible bacteria or fungi.
The results obtained from the screening of the extracts of 18 Thai medicinal
plants were very promising, especially, the activity of the methanolic extract
of A. sativum L. (Alliaceae), as it was effective against B. cereus
ATCC 11778 (MIC = 4 μg mL-1) (Table 4)
while C. sappan L. (Papilionaceae) showed outstanding antimicrobial properties
against E. coli ATCC 29214 with a MIC value of 4 μg mL-1.
|| Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the methanolic
extracts of Thai medicinal plants
|NT: Not tested. Microbial strains: BC: Bacillus cereus
ATCC 11778; BS: Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633; SA: Staphylococcus
aureus ATCC 13150; ST: Streptococcus thermophilus ATCC 19258;
SF: Streptococcus faecalis TISTR 459; SCr: Streptococcus cremoris
TISTR 058; EC: Escherichia coli ATCC 29214; SD: Shigella dysenteriae
ATCC 13313; STy: Salmonella typhi ATCC 43579; PV: Proteus
vulgaris TISTR 100; VC: Vibrio chlolerea ATCC 14033; CK: Candida
krusei TISTR 5256; CT: Candida tropicalis ATCC 9968; SC: Saccharomyces
cerevisiae ATCC 18824; KM: Kluyveromyces marxianus ATCC 8554.
It was interesting to note that the extract of M. gagei Drumm (Sterculiaceae)
was very effective against B. cereus ATCC 11778, Staph. aureus
ATCC 13150, Pr. vulgaris TISTR 100 and C. krusei TISTR 5256 (MIC
= 4 μg mL-1) than the other strains tested. In addition, the
A. galangal Swartz., C. longa L. and K. parviflora Wall.
(Zingiberaceae) extracts also showed good antimicrobial effects against Strep.
cremoris TISTR 058 and Salm. typhi ATCC 43579 (MIC = 4 μg mL-1).
Free radicals have been implicated in many disease conditions, the important
ones being superoxide radicals, hydroxy radicals, peroxyl radicals and single
oxygen, from both endogenous and exogenous sources, may be involved in the etiologies
of such diverse human diseases as arteriosclerosis, ischemic injury, cancer
and neurodegenerative diseases, as well as in processes like inflammation and
ageing (Alho and Leinonen, 1999). There is evidence
that indigenous antioxidants may be useful in preventing the deleterious consequences
of oxidative stress and there is increasing interest in the protective biochemical
functions of natural antioxidants contained in spices, herbs and medicinal plants
(Farrukh et al., 2006; Al-Fatimi
et al., 2007). Our attention has been focused, in particular, on
the parts of 18 commonly used Thai medicinal plants. The antioxidant activities
of the plant extracts were measured by DPPH radical assay. The characteristics
of the used medicinal plants and the inhibitory effects of their methanolic
extracts on DPPH radical oxidation, expressed as IC50. Considering
the large variation of IC50 values, ranging from 0.02 mg mL-1
in Mansonia gagei Drumm., Pterocarpus santalinus L., Cinnamomum
inersBlume. and Kaempferia parviflora Wall. to 2.06 mg mL-1
in Globba laeta K. Larsen and Zingiber officinale Roscoe., the
potential of antioxidant activity of plant materials of this study was divided
into 3 groups: high (IC50<0.10 mg mL-1), moderate (0.10
mg mL-1 <IC50<1.00 mg mL-1) and low (IC50>1.00
mg mL-1). Six plant materials out of 18 samples showed a high effective
antioxidant capacity (IC50<0.06 mg mL-1) that order:
Mansonia gagei Drumm., Pterocarpus santalinus L., Cinnamomum
iners Blume., Kaempferia parviflora Wall., Caesalpinia sappan
L., Rheum officinale Baill. and Albizia myriophylla Benth.,
respectively. These plants can be considered as good sources of natural antioxidants
since their extracts were found to possess high antioxidant activity. Chanwitheesuk
et al. (2005) suggest that the antioxidant activities of medicinal
plants may be attributed to the antioxidant components present, especially vitamin
E, xanthophylls and phenolics. Antioxidants are secondary metabolites produced
by plants to protect against oxidative damage by free radicals (Larson,
1988). In the family Zingiberaceae, i.e., Alpinia galangal Swartz.,
Curcuma longa L., Globba laeta K. Larsen, Kaempferia parviflora
Wall. and Zingiber officinale Roscoe., the antioxidants produced by the
plant are transported to the rhizomes where they are accumulated. This implies
that rhizomes would have higher antioxidant activity than other plant parts
(Chan et al., 2008). On the other hand nine medicinal
plant species, namely Cymbopogon citratus Stapf., Piper nigrum
L., Saussurea lappa Clarke., Conioselinum univitatum Turcz., Piper
chaba Hunt., Allium sativum L., Alpinia galangal Swartz. and
Derris scandens Benth. were in moderate range whereas the Curcuma
longa L., Globba laeta K. Larsen and Zingiber officinale Roscoe.
extracts showed low antioxidant activity. Similar observations have been made
by Chan et al. (2008), who reported the rhizomes
of Zingiber officinale Roscoe. had low concentration of total phenolic
content and its extracts showed low antioxidant activity (0.96 mg AA g-1
fresh weight). The antiradical activity (AAR) defined as 1/IC50
was seen in extracts from various medicinal plants. As expected, extracts with
higher AAR were obtained from the medicinal plant extracts mentioned
The radical scavenging activity of plant extracts may be an indicator of its
antioxidant activity. DPPH is a stable free radical and accepts an electron
or hydrogen radical to become a stable diamagnetic molecule. The reduction capability
of DPPH radicals was determined by the decrease in its absorbance at 517 nm,
which is induced by antioxidants. Hence, DPPH is often used as a substrate to
evaluate antioxidative activity of antioxidants. Different plant extracts reduce
DPPH radicals significantly. The methanolic extract of the rhizomes of K.
parviflora Wall. exhibited the highest level of radical scavenging activity
with average value 86.35%. The plant K. parviflora Wall. is a medicinal
plant naturally distributed throughout Southeast Asia, In Thailand, it is widely
grown in the countrys northeastern region, especially in Leoi province
where there are suitable conditions for growth and production of the active
compounds. It is widely used as material for organic red wine and traditional
medicine. The rhizomes of K. parviflora Wall. have been known to be effective
against some diseases, including stomachic, hypertension, diuretic and diabetics.
A few studies on pharmacological activities of the K. parviflora Wall.
extract have been scientifically investigated. It has been reported that the
extract of K. parviflora Wall. has health-promoting for longevity, treatment
for colic disorder, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and allergy (Yenjai
et al., 2004; Rujjanawate et al., 2005;
Tewtrakul and Subhadhirasakul, 2007). In addition, the
alcoholic infusion of its rhizome has been used as a tonic for rectifying male
impotence, body pains and gastrointestinal disorders. The result of this study
suggests that the K. parviflora Wall. can be used as a potential source
of natural antioxidants, with pharmaceutical applications.
After evaluating the effects on the Gram-negative bacteria we found that extracts
of sixteen plants inhibited E. coli ATCC 29214, all medicinal plant extracts
inhibited Sh. dysenteriae ATCC 13313 and Salm. typhi ATCC 43579,
seven extracts inhibited Pr. vulgaris TISTR 100 and six extracts inhibited
V. chlolerea ATCC 14033. Among the Gram-positive bacteria, all medicinal
plant extracts inhibited Strep. faecalis TISTR 459, seventeen extracts
inhibited B. cereus ATCC 11778M, nine extracts inhibited B. subtilis
ATCC 6633, eleven extracts inhibited Staph. aureus ATCC 13150 and
Strep. cremoris TISTR 058. It is remarkable that the A. myriophylla
Benth., C. sappan L. and A. galangal Swartz. extracts exhibited
only antibacterial activity against Strep. thermophilus ATCC 19258. The
highest activity was shown against the Gram-positive bacterium, B. cereus
ATCC 11778, B. subtilis ATCC 6633, Staph. aureus ATCC 13150,
Strep. faecalis TISTR 459 and Strep. cremoris TISTR 058. It has
been reported that Gram-negative bacteria had low susceptibility to plant extracts
when compared to Gram-positive bacteria (Kumarasamyet
al., 2002; Al-Fatimi et al., 2007). The
resistance of Gram-negative bacteria towards antibacterial substances is related
to lipopolysaccharides in their outer membrane.
The disk diffusion method gives the opportunity to determine an approximate
MIC indicating the degree of potential antimicrobial activity compared with
that of positive control, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and ketoconazole. Generally,
A. sativum L. and M. gagei Drumm, are well known for its traditional
use as an antiseptic. However, it is interesting to note that many other species,
like C. sappan L., A. galangal Swartz., C. longa L. and
K. parviflora Wall., etc., which have traditionally been used to treat
wounds and infections, were found to be effective against the microorganism
tested in our study. It is remarkable that the methanolic extracts of A.
galangal Swartz. and K. parviflora Wall. showed interesting antibacterial
activity against Salm. typhi ATCC 43579 with a MIC = 4 μg mL-1.
They are the one of most popular herbal remedies which have traditionally been
used in Thai traditional medicine for antidiarrhoea, skin diseases, toothaches,
gastric diseases, diuretic, antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant activities
(Chanwitheesuk et al., 2005; Oonmetta-Aree
et al., 2006). The activity of the medicinal plant extracts against
both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria may be an indication of the presence
of a broad spectrum of antibiotic compounds which are mainly distributed in
the seed, bulb, heartwood and rhizomes of plants (Kumarasamy
et al., 2002; Al-Fatimi et al., 2007).
In conclusion, the findings in the present study are in agreement to a certain degree with the traditional uses of the plants. The findings support the view that some Thai medicinal plants are promising sources of potential antioxidants and antimicrobial activity, which may be efficient as preventive agents in the pathogenesis of some diseases. The study shows that there are differences in the antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of the medicinal plants commonly consumed in Thailand. Some of the plants can be considered as good sources of natural antioxidants since their extracts were found to possess high antioxidant activity. The highest antioxidant activities were detected in K. parviflora Wall., followed by R. officinale Baill., P. chaba Hunt. and C. inersBlume., respectively. Based on the antimicrobial activity, the A. sativum L., C. sappan L., M. gagei Drumm., A. galangal Swartz., C. longa L. and K. parviflora Wall. extracts had the greatest inhibitory effect against B. cereus ATCC 11778, E. coli ATCC 29214, Staph. aureus ATCC 13150, Pr. vulgaris TISTR 100, Strep. cremoris TISTR 058, Salm. typhi ATCC 43579 and C. krusei TISTR 5256 among medicinal plant studied. Some Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria and fungi were susceptible to the extract. The obtained results could form a good basis for selection of medicinal plant species for further investigation in the potential discovery of new natural bioactive compounds. However, the characteristics of the phytochemicals and the pharmacological mechanisms of the extracts should be further studied to gain more understanding of their antioxidant and antimicrobial activity in body and food systems, which may be further exploited to synthesize new drugs in order to cure infectious disease.
Authors acknowledge S. Sikhruadong, Department of Plant Production Technology, Mahasarakham University, Thailand, that allowed us to benefit from their knowledge of the plants studied. We would like to gratefully acknowledge the staff of the Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, Technology Faculty, Mahasarakham Universty, Thailand, for their collaboration and providing laboratory facilities. Besides this we thank S. Khumkratok, Walai Rukhavej Botanical Research Institute, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand, for the assistance by the taxonomical identification of some medicinal plant species.
1: Al-Fatimi, M., M. Wurster, G. Schroder and U. Lindequist, 2007. Antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of selected medicinal plants from Yemen. J. Ethnopharmacol., 111: 657-666.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
2: Alho, H. and J. Leinonen, 1999. Total antioxidant activity measured by chemiluminescence method. Methods Enzymol., 299: 3-15.
Direct Link |
3: Butkhup, L., I. Khanprom and S. Samappito, 2008. Influence of the drying process on flavonoid contents and their effects on antioxidant activity of mulberry (Morus alba L.) green tea production. J. Sci. Technol. MSU., 27: 1-11.
4: Cai, Y., M. Sun and H. Corke, 2003. Antioxidant activity of betalains from plants of the Amaranthaceae. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 2288-2294.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
5: Chan, E.W.C., Y.Y. Lim, L.F. Wong, F.S. Lianto and S.K. Wong et al., 2008. Antioxidant and tyrosinase inhibition properties of leaves and rhizomes of ginger species. Food Chem., 109: 477-483.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
6: Chanwitheesuk, A., A. Teerawutgulrag and N. Rakariyatham, 2005. Screening of antioxidant activity and antioxidant compounds of some edible plants of Thailand. Food Chem., 92: 491-497.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
7: Aqil, F., I. Ahmad and Z. Mehmood, 2006. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties of twelve traditionally used Indian medicinal plants. Turk. J. Biol., 30: 177-183.
Direct Link |
8: Karaman, I., F. Sahin, M. Gulluce, H. Ogutcu, M. Sengul and A. Adiguzel, 2003. Antimicrobial activity of aqueous and methanol extracts of Juniperus oxycedrus L. J. Ethnopharmacol., 85: 231-235.
CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
9: Kumar, G.S., K.N. Jayaveera, C.K.A. Kumar, U.P. Sanjay and B.M.V. Swamy et al., 2007. Antimicrobial effects of Indian medicinal plants against acne-inducing bacteria. Trop. J. Pharm. Res., 6: 717-723.
Direct Link |
10: Larson, R.A., 1988. The antioxidant of higher plants. Phytochemistry, 27: 969-978.
11: Lee, S.E., H.J. Hwang, J.S. Ha, H.S. Jeong and J.H. Kim, 2003. Screening of medicinal plant extracts for antioxidant activity. Life Sci., 73: 167-179.
CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
12: Mackeen, M.M., A.M. Ali, S.H. El-Sharkawy, M.Y. Salleh, N.H. Lajis and K. Kawazu, 1997. Antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties of some Malaysian traditional vegetables (Ulam). Int. J. Pharmacol., 35: 174-178.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
13: Mahabusarakama, W., S. Deachathaia, S. Phongpaichitb, C. Jansakulc and W.C. Taylord, 2004. A benzil and isoflavone derivatives from Derris scandens Benth. Phytochemistry, 65: 1185-1191.
14: Oonmetta-Aree, J., T. Suzuki, P. Gasaluck and G. Eumkeb, 2006. Antimicrobial properties and action of galangal (Alpinia galangal Linn.) on Staphylococcus aureus. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 39: 1214-1220.
Direct Link |
15: Rujjanawate, C., D. Kanjanapothi, D. Amornlerdpison and S. Pojanagaroon, 2005. Anti-gastric ulcer effect of Kaempferia parviflora. J. Ethnopharmacol., 102: 120-122.
16: Tewtrakul, S. and S. Subhadhirasakul, 2007. Anti-allergic activity of some selected plants in the Zingiberaceae family. J. Ethnopharmacol., 109: 535-538.
17: Tiew, P., A. Puntumchai, U. Kokpol and W. Chavasiri, 2002. Coumarins from the heartwoods of Mansonia gagei Drumm. Phytochemistry, 60: 773-776.
18: Kumarasamy, Y., P.J. Cox, M. Jaspars, L. Nahar and S.D. Sarker, 2002. Screening seeds of scottish plants for antibacterial activity. J. Ethnopharmacol., 83: 73-77.
PubMed | Direct Link |
19: Yenjai, C., K. Prasanphen, S. Daodee, V. Wongpanich and P. Kittakoop, 2004. Bioactive flavonoids from Kaempferia parviflora. Fitoterapia, 75: 89-92.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
20: Taylor, W.C. and R. Attaur, 1994. Constituents of some Asian medicinal plants. Pure Appl. Chem., 66: 2375-2378.
Direct Link |
21: Chatterjee, S., Z. Niaz, S. Gautam, S. Adhikari, P.S. Variyar and A. Sharma, 2007. Antioxidant activity of some phenolic constituents from green pepper (Piper nigrum L.) and fresh nutmeg mace (Myristica fragrans). Food Chem., 101: 515-523.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
22: Jang, H.D., K.S. Chang, Y.S. Huang, C.L. Hsu, S.H. Lee and M.S. Su, 2007. Principal phenolic phytochemicals and antioxidant activities of three Chinese medicinal plants. Food Chem., 103: 749-756.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
23: Krishnaveni, K.S. and J.V.S. Rao, 2000. An isoflavone from Pterocarpus santalinus. Phytochemistry, 53: 605-606.
24: Yoshikawa, M., T. Morikawa, K. Nakano, Y. Pongpiriyadacha, T. Murakami and H. Matsuda, 2002. Characterization of new sweet triterpine saponins from Albizia myriophylla. J. Nat. Prod., 65: 1638-1642.