Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

A Comparison of Thai Consumers Purchasing Behaviour with the Environmental Characteristics: Electric Appliances Market

Ratchaneekorn Dansirichaisawat and Opal Suwunnamek
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

The purpose of this study was to study three factors of environmental characteristics: Environmental attitude, environmental knowledge and environmental lifestyle that affected the purchasing behaviour of Thai consumers who purchased electric appliances. This study suggested a three-dimension construct of purchasing behaviour: Convenience, efficiency and environmental factor. A random sample survey of 300 individuals was used to verify the conceptual model. Multiple regression and correlation coefficient analysis were applied to examine data. Findings of this study showed that environmental attitude, environmental knowledge and environmental lifestyle had significant effects on environmentally-based purchasing behaviour, environmental attitude and environmental knowledge had significant effects on efficiency-based purchasing behaviour and partial of environmental attitude only one had significant effects on convenience-based purchasing behaviour. This study improves our understanding of how Thai consumers’ lifestyle, knowledge and attitudes define their way of behaving to creating green society for sustainable development.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

Ratchaneekorn Dansirichaisawat and Opal Suwunnamek, 2014. A Comparison of Thai Consumers Purchasing Behaviour with the Environmental Characteristics: Electric Appliances Market. Research Journal of Business Management, 8: 338-352.

DOI: 10.3923/rjbm.2014.338.352

Received: December 11, 2013; Accepted: March 28, 2014; Published: May 27, 2014


As natural resources and the environment have slowly deteriorated and dwindled. Three major environmental problems could be divided: (1) Reduction of quantitative and qualitative due to natural resource problem, (2) Pollution problems and (3) Destruction of natural ecology system. The environmental crisis has triggered a shift toward an “era of green,” the co-effort between producers and consumers have responded with progressive strategies and ideologiesto improve quality of life while reducing environmental problems (UNEP, 2011a, b) such as free-CFCs products, eco carand so on. In addition, the reinforcement of energy costs, climate change and health problems have pushed consumers to seriously consider the benefits and effects thatthey could be the part in improving environment.

According to data produced by the Customs Department of Thailand, imported electric appliances and parts category that were classified according to economic sector become yearly higher values, respectively. Types of electric appliances greatly played key roles toward daily livings because it could be responses toward needs. Different brands have designed environmentally-friendly electric appliances for environmental purpose together with consumer targets. However, consumption campaigns of environmental products in the market would be available but the market for green products has been relatively unsuccessful in Thailand. The consumers of environmentally friendly products were few or less proportion when compared with the consumers who purchased the products without regarding the effect toward health and environment. Furthermore, research of green consumer behaviour in Thailand is insufficient.

This study has focused on a comparison purchasing behaviour of Thai consumers with the environmental characteristicsin the market of electric appliances. The research usefulness have made us understand characteristics of consumers in order to plan the policy and campaign to protect the environment and implementation of green marketing strategy, as well as continuous improvement for sustainable development.


Green marketing: The natural world has been destroyed by humans over the past three decades, on the other hand, the object created by human that has come for more substitution and play role. These are critical factors in the direct and indirect destruction of natural resources. People, organizations and institutions across the globe have started to realize on the problems to prevent the environmental problem into crisis state.

In A.D. 1960, new marketing philosophy called as “green marketing” was initiated from the consumer needs of environmentally friendly products (Awad, 2011). Later in 1990s, the environmental issue become more important as found from social researches and the instruments that become crucial roles toward the study on environmental consideration in purchase decisions (Awad, 2011; Menon et al., 1999; Prothero, 1996). The green marketing concept paralleled with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) concept with main objectives to emphasize on waste disposal, environmental responsibility, fair product price and profit-making (Pride and Ferrell, 2008).

The green marketing would be the opportunities for the entrepreneurs to create new innovations and was a competitive advantage for business (Kaufman, 1999; Laroche et al., 2001; Vaccaro, 2009). Moreover, it could build positive image to brand (Gurau and Ranchhod, 2005; Pugh and Fletcher, 2002). Green marketing is the challenges for marketing in the new millennium (Jain and Kaur, 2003; Murphy, 2005).

Green purchasing behaviour: In the “green era,” it is crucial for organizations and companies to put greater emphasis on environmental and social responsibility (Roberts, 1996), because consumer purchasing behaviour had changed (Chan, 2001; Kim, 2002; Kim and Choi, 2003, 2005). The idea of a dynamic, interactive relationship between people and their environment was widely spread in social psychology, notably in the study of environmental behaviours (Demarque et al., 2013).

Purchasing behaviour is the way that individuals, groups or organizations try to meet their needs when selecting products or services. Green purchasing behaviour refers to the purchasing of products that have a minimal effect on the environment (Mainieri et al., 1997). Products reduce pollution that were called as green products, environmentally-friendly products and ecological products, meaning they focus on saving energy, preserve environment and reduce waste during utilization etc. In addition, green products were designed in order that their materials and components could be recycled and reused (Godfrey, 2002).

According to the study on green purchasing behaviour of the youth groups in Hong Kong, the consumer behaviour were influenced from peers and acquaintances, local environmental involvement and concrete environmental knowledge (Lee, 2010). Moreover, environmentally conscious attitudes linked with the tendency to purchase green products or make changes to purchase green or recycled products (Mainieri et al., 1997). In a similar, environmental lifestyle can be predicted by the environmental concern level of individual such as recycling behaviour (Simmons and Widmar, 1990) and purchasing green products (Chan, 1996).

Green perceived value: Perceived value was defined as overall evaluation of product and service utility gained with total costs that were satisfaction, convenience and social profits (Lapierre, 2000). Patterson and Spreng (1997) indicated that green perceived value refers to a consumer’s overall evaluation of what would be gained in both general and environmental utility of product or service. In addition, (Chen and Chang, 2012; Patterson and Spreng, 1997) notified that green perceived value could be divided into five aspects (product function, product efficiency, environmentally friendly, environmental concern and environmental usefulness) and values and beliefs influenced on purchasing decisions (Hoyer and MacInnis, 2004).

Environmental values played the crucial roles toward pro-environmental behaviour since the values affected human beliefs, leading to consumers’ pro-environmental behaviour (Reser and Bentrupperbaumer, 2005). Roberts (1996) found that convenience and value were the main factors in a consumer’s purchases, who expressed a willingness to purchase environmentally-friendly products and would not be interested in their functional efficiency or convenience (Berger, 1993). Even though pro-environmental values might not clearly indicate the pro-environmental behaviour but pro-environmental values would tend to bring in pro-environmental behavior (Baker and Ozaki, 2008).

Synthesizing on the literature review this researcher utilized purchase behaviour with convenience factor (product function), efficiency factor (product efficiency) and environmental factor (environmentally friendly or environmental usefulness).

Environmental attitude: An attitude can be defined as a positive or negative evaluation of people, objects, events, activities, ideas or just about anything in one’s environment (Eagly and Chaiken, 1998). Lutz (1991) noticed that attitude was derived from learning via individual experiences or passed from gaining data with others and the attitude could be indicated by the thought and feeling person toward people, objects, specific situations and the environment with long term effect. The consumer behaviour studies were complicated and the psychological criterion was a crucial variable, since most green consumers might not only buy products as trends but also according to their desire to be involved in reducing damage to the environment.

According to the literature reviews, the findings of most environmental marketing researchers found that psychographic variables predicted environmental consciousness and green consumer behaviour more than social-demography did (Roberts, 1996; Schlegelmilch et al., 1996). The researchers used psychographic variables to define the term “green consumer” in the study of green consumer behaviour patterns (Chan, 1999; Fraj et al., 2006; Fraj and Martinez, 2006; Kaiser et al., 1999a, b; Ramanaiah et al., 2000). Environmental attitudes were examined in this study in order to understand green purchasing behaviour in Thailand. This study were suggested three-dimention construct of environmental attitude: Perception on environmental concern, perception on environmental problems and perception on environmental responsibility.

The perception on environmental concern was an individual’s attitude toward environmental problems and the method to solve those problems (Chan and Lau, 2000). The level of a consumer’s environmental concerns was determined by level of intention and willingness to pay more. (Bang et al., 2000; Kim and Choi, 2005; Lee, 2009; Mainieri et al., 1997). A high degree of environmental concern reflected distinct green consumption behaviour (Shetzer et al., 1991) and would be delighted to purchase green products (Mainieri et al., 1997; Schwepker and Cornwell, 1991).

The perception on environmental problems was a consumer’s knowledge and understanding of environmental problems as well as subsequent effects. The severity levels of environmental problems varied depending on environmental factors and area conditions (Dunlap, 1994). One such factor was natural (i.e., air pollution that was generated from a volcanic eruption) and the other was generated from human actions. Perceptions about environmental change, in general and concern about climate change, in particular, were found to relate positively to changes in environmental behaviour (Tobler et al. 2012). Two studies (Axelrod and Lehman, 1993; Milfont, 2007) confirmed that perceived environmental threats had a significantly positive effect on environmental behaviour and environmental attitudes (Pahl et al., 2005). Consumer awareness of environmental problems was indicated the effectiveness of behavioralas well (Ellen et al., 1991).

The perception on environmental responsibility was the social responsibility, environmental standards and the direction of social activity policies combined with conservative concept and long-term business strategy development. McGougall (1993) concluded that consumers with strong attitudes toward socially responsible behaviour tended to purchase environmental friendly products. Perception of awareness hazardous depended on responsibility and willingness to pay to protect environment for long term benefits in the world and humanity (Lee, 2009).

H1: Environmental attitude had a significant effect on the convenience-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H1a: Perception on environmental concern had a significant effect on the convenience-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H1b: Perception on environmental problems had a significant effect on the convenience-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H1c: Perception on environmental responsibility had a significant effect on the convenience-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H2: Environmental attitude had a significant effect on the efficiency-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H2a: Perception on environmental concern had a significant effect on the efficiency-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H2b: Perception on environmental problems had a significant effect on the efficiency-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H2c: Perception on environmental responsibility had a significant effect on the efficiency-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H3: Environmental attitude had a significant effect on the environmentally-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H3a: Perception on environmental concern had a significant effect on the environmentally-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H3b: Perception on environmental problems had a significant effect on the environmentally-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H3c: Perception on environmental responsibility had a significant effect on the environmentally-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.

Environmental knowledge: Environmental knowledge at the individual level varies according to degree of exposure to the natural world. Degree of exposure to the environment can be affected by a variety of variables that consisted of cultural, traditions, geographic residence, occupation etc. (Guest, 2002; Johnson and Griffith, 1996; Maffi, 2001). An increase in knowledge may have raised concerns and awareness of environmental problems but it did not necessarily result in behavioral changes (Bamberg and Moser, 2007; Zsoka et al., 2013). Environmental knowledge was divided into two types: Objective knowledge which referred to factual knowledge and kept in the memory, whereas subjective knowledge meant perceptions or evaluations of each individual from the knowledge kept in the memory. Researchers have examined both types of knowledge in relation analyses (Ellen, 1994) and found that objective knowledge was significantly and positively related to environmental behaviour (Bamberg, 2003; McFarlane and Boxall, 2003), recycling behaviour (Ellen, 1994) and green purchasing behaviour (Tilikidou, 2007); on the other hand, subjective knowledge was significantly related to environmental concern (Ellen et al., 1991).

Many studies relied on knowledge to the study of personal behaviour, the transfer of knowledge (Frick et al., 2004) and consumers’ environmental knowledge were key factors in the development of environmental behaviour (Vining and Ebreo, 1990). Moreover, the findings of the results from many researchers concluded that environmental knowledge influenced green purchasing behaviour and pro-environmental behaviour. For instance, Chan and Lau (2000) studied the consumers in Beijing and Guangzhou in China, they discovered that elements of green purchasing were orientation man-nature relationship, ecological feeling and ecological knowledge. Amyx et al. (1994) confirmed that individuals with a high level of environmental knowledge would be willing to pay more for green products. In contrary, Hwang et al. (2000) argued thata high level of environmental knowledge could not confirm that the consumers would have environmental behaviour:

H4: Environmental knowledge had a significant effect on the convenience-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H5: Environmental knowledge had a significant effect on the efficiency-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H6: Environmental knowledge had a significant effect on the environmentally-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.

Environmental lifestyle: The environmental lifestyle was called in different terms such as pro-environmental, recycling behaviour, green lifestyle and so on. However, all of these names refers to behavioural expressions that reduce impact on nature and the environment (i.e., recycling, energy conservation, relying less on natural resources and using non-hazardous substances) (Kollmuss and Agyeman, 2002; Trivedi et al., 2011). Most studies of environmental lifestyle was applied to psychographic factors. Ebreo et al. (1999) examined the relationship between respondents’ beliefs about environmentally responsible consumerism and environmental attitudes, motives and self-reported recycling behaviour. Tilikidou and Delistavrou (2004) investigated pro-environmental and post-purchase behaviour, such as recycling, petrol conservation, product reuse and second-hand sales, donations and maintenance. In addition (Barr, 2007; Barr et al., 2001, 2005) reported on a representative survey of self-reported recycling, reuse and reduction behaviour and attitudes and Wan et al. (2012) explored recycling attitudes and green behaviour in university students.

Moreover, the studies on attitude and environmental lifestyle chiefly relied on two key concepts-importance and inconvenience (Laroche et al., 2001) in the same way as studies of recycling behaviour considered recycling importance and recycling inconvenience. In a similar research of McCarty and Shrum (1994) found that the relationship between inconvenience and recycle, the consumers believed that recycles were complicated things. As a complex mechanism, recycling and a consumer’s belief in its importance to the environment, had significant effects on recycling behaviour:

H7: Environmental lifestyle had a significant effect on the convenience-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H8: Environmental lifestyle had a significant effect on the efficiency-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.
H9: Environmental lifestyle had a significant effect on the environmentally-based purchasing behaviour of consumers.


The researchers studied 300 working aged male and female consumers who purchased electric appliances. According to the Institute for Population and Social Research in 2013, working age referred to people between 15 and 60 years old. The random sampling (SRS) were handed out between April and June, 2013. The instruments utilized in this study were questionnaires with close-ended questions and the five-point Likert scale. They consisted of four parts. The first part measured environmental attitudes, namely, environmental concern and developed from Lee (2008), Thogersen et al. (2010) perception on environmental problems and perception on environmental responsibility adapted from Lee (2008). The second part determined environmental knowledge and adjusted from Laroche et al. (2001) and Polonsky et al. (2011). The third part gauged environmental lifestyle and modified from Baker and Ozaki (2008). The final part was designed to measure the purchasing behaviour of consumers.

According to Charles (1995) items are answered or individual’s scores remain relatively the same can be determined through the test-retest method at two different times. The theoretical value of alpha varies from 0 to 1. A high degree of stability indicates a high degree of reliability which means the results are repeatable. Therefore some professionals require a reliability of 0.70 or higher (obtained on a substantial sample) before they will use an instrument (Nunnally, 1978). Calculated via Cronbach’s Alpha, the reliability of this study was measured at 0.736. The next step, researchers examined using multiple regression statistical analysis.


Multiple regression statistical analysis was measures of consumer purchasing behaviour. However, before analyzing the next step, the researchers employed Pearson’s correlation coefficients to measures the relationship between three dimensions of variables. It was found that these measures were all positively correlated with one another. None of the calculations were over 0.80 and this indicated the non-existence of multicollinearity problems, as shown in Table 1. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the respondents is shown in Table 2. It was found that consumer purchasing behaviours based on convenience, efficiency and environmental-friendliness were significant (p<0.01).

Multiple regression statistical analysis was employed to examine consumer purchasing behaviour. The results of multiple regression analysis and the estimation of the equation were as follows in multiple regression equation:

Yi = β0 + β1Xi12Xi2 +…+βkXik + εi

Table 1: Pearson’s correlation coefficients of environmental attitude, knowledge and lifestyle
Image for - A Comparison of Thai Consumers Purchasing Behaviour with the Environmental Characteristics: Electric Appliances Market
**Correlation is significant at 0.01 level (2-tailed)

Table 2: Analysis of variance in purchasing behaviour
Image for - A Comparison of Thai Consumers Purchasing Behaviour with the Environmental Characteristics: Electric Appliances Market
**p<0.001, *<0.01

Model of purchasing behaviour: Yi = β01 perception on environmental concern+β2 perception on environmental problems+β3 perception on environmental responsibility+β4 environmental knowledge+β5 environmental lifestyle+e.

where, X is the independent variable, (Environmental concerns, environmental problems, environmental responsibility, environmental knowledge, environmental lifestyle) and Y is the dependent variable:

Consumer convenience-based purchasing behaviour
Consumer efficiency-based purchasing behaviour
Consumer environmental-based purchasing behaviour
ε is the residual

Hypothesis testing: Convenience-based purchasing behaviour: The empirical survey findings proved that the perception on environmental problems was significantly related to convenience-based purchasing behaviour (partially supported H1), the coefficient of determination (R2) value could be calculated at 0.164. Nevertheless, the results obtained in relation to another variable have not (not supported H4, H7), as shown in Table 3. From these results it could be concluded that consumers who make purchases based on convenience will think of their own convenience before the effect that their purchases have on the environment. Even though they would realize and perceive the occurring environmental problems. In a sense, convenience was a barrier to the development of environmental characteristics.

Table 3: Regression analysis of convenience-based purchasing behaviour
Image for - A Comparison of Thai Consumers Purchasing Behaviour with the Environmental Characteristics: Electric Appliances Market
**p<0.001, *p<0.01

Table 4: Regression analysis of efficiency-based purchasing behaviour
Image for - A Comparison of Thai Consumers Purchasing Behaviour with the Environmental Characteristics: Electric Appliances Market
**p<0.001, * p<0.01

The finding was consistent with the earlier research of Laroche et al. (2001), who had reported that the consumers with low score of environmental problems and environmentally-friendly purchasing would not consider the environment when making purchases.

Hypothesis testing: Efficiency-based purchasing behaviour: According to the testing, Table 4 illustrates environmental characteristic sregarding efficiency-based purchasing of the respondents. There was a significant relationship between perception on environmental concerns, perception on environmental problems, perception on environmental responsibility and environmental knowledge (supported H2, H5) but environmental lifestyle was not significantly related to efficiency-based purchasing behaviour, R2 value could be calculated at 0.227. The results of this study were consistent with previous studies performed by Ali et al. (2011), Kaplan (2000) and Baker and Ozaki (2008), these studies found that, even though people maintained environmentally conscious attitudes, their actions did not always represent green purchasing behaviour.

Hypothesis testing: Environmental-based purchasing behaviour: The findings demonstrated that environmental attitudes (environmental concern, perception on environmental problems and perception on environmental responsibility), environmental knowledge and environmental lifestyle had a significant effect on environmentally-based purchasing behaviour (supported H3a, H3b, H3c, H6, H9), R2 = 0.309, as shown in Table 5. The results of this study were in line with previous studies showing that environmental attitude was positively related to environmental behaviour (Kim, 2002; Kim and Choi, 2003) and that environmental attitude was related to green product purchasing behaviour (Kim and Choi, 2005; Tilikidou, 2007; Schlegelmilch et al., 1996). The research results included the following:

Environmental concerns significantly related to environmentally-based purchasing behaviour. The results of this study were in line with the findings of Chan (1996), Roberts (1991) and Shetzer et al. (1991) these had discovered that the level of environmental concern was related to green product purchasing behaviour. A high level of environmental concern could be reflected green consumption behaviour (Shetzer et al., 1991) and a willingness to pay more for environment-friendly products (Mainieri et al., 1997)
There was a significant relationship between the perception on environmental problems and environmentally-based purchasing behaviour. The results were corresponding with the research by Milfont (2007) and Pahl et al. (2005). Likewise, Baldassare and Katz (1992) and Tan (2011) had found thatthe belief that environmental problems would cause serious harm toward health and good living influenced environmentally-based purchasing behaviour
The results demonstrated a significant relationship between perceived environmental responsibility and environmentally-based purchasing behaviour. As highlighted by McGougall (1993), consumers with strong attitudes toward socially responsible behaviour would be had intention to purchase in order to respond the environmental
Environmental knowledge had a significant effect on environmentally-based purchasing behaviour. The results of this study were consistent with the prior studies by Chan and Lau (2000), Lee (2010), Schlegelmilch et al. (1996) and Tilikidou (2007), they all confirmed that environmental knowledge influenced environmentally-based purchasing behaviour. Ellen (1994) found that a greater degree of environmental knowledge affected the motivation to purchase environmentally-friendly products. Kaufmann et al. (2012) found that environmental knowledge was the most important factor to environmental system, co-responsibility for sustainable development. Another study showed that a high level of environmental knowledge affect a person’s environmental behavior (Rokicka, 2002). Nevertheless, prior studies arguedthat environmental knowledge did not directly cause environmental behaviour (Hwang et al., 2000)
A statistically significant relationship was demonstrated between environmental lifestyle and environmentally-based purchasing behaviour. The results were in line with the findings of Diamantopoulos et al. (2003), Fraj and Martinez (2006), Kim and Damhorst (1998), Zimmer et al. (1994), ecologically-minded purchasing behaviour could be described from lifestyle, environmentally-friendly product selection, recycling and other actions that expressed favour toward protecting the environment


Over thirty years, different fields of sciences: Engineering, architecture and science to psychology, sociology and management have focused entirely on the research of environment. This study was examined the green purchasing behaviour of Thai consumers. According to the literature review, many previous studies confirmed that environmental attitudes, environmental knowledge (Awad, 2011; Banerjee and McKeage, 1994; Chan, 1999; Mainieri et al., 1997; Mostafa, 2007; Roberts, 1991; Shetzer et al., 1991) and environmental lifestyle (Carrete et al., 2012) affected consumer behaviour andwere necessary factors for marketers to understand in order to implement successful green marketing.

The data were obtained from questionnaires until April to June, 2012 and analyzed via multiple regression statistical analysis. The findings of the study result summaries of environmental characteristics in consumer purchasing behaviour were that (1) The convenience-based purchasing behaviour was not significantly related to environmental knowledge, environmental lifestyle, Even though, they were perceive the environmental problems, (2) Consumer of efficiency-based purchasing behaviour was significantly related to environmental attitude and environmental knowledge but they did not have environmental lifestyle in a daily life and (3) Environmentally-based purchasing behaviour was significantly related to environmental attitudes in all aspects, environmental knowledge and environmental lifestyle, as shown in Table 6.

Table 5: Regression analysis of environmentally-based purchasing behaviour
Image for - A Comparison of Thai Consumers Purchasing Behaviour with the Environmental Characteristics: Electric Appliances Market
**p<0.001, *p<0.01

Table 6: Consumers’ purchasing behaviour in electric appliances products
Image for - A Comparison of Thai Consumers Purchasing Behaviour with the Environmental Characteristics: Electric Appliances Market

The researchers advise on research proposals that policy makers used to conscious and put more effort on this issue as follow for long term usefulness in environmental development. They must reinforce environmental knowledge to all individuals, because a higher level of environmental knowledge may cause more environmental understanding, motivation and attitude as well as environmental problem perception (Dansirichaisawat and Suwunnamek, 2013). In creating a green society, building environmental attitudes, cultivating a sense of personal responsibility in preventing the deterioration of the environment and motivating consumers to get involved in conservation activities are the utmost importance to success. But someone thought that it was just the governmental duty or environment-related organization would be the responsible party. The hesitant feeling to sacrifice for personal convenience might therefore cause failures in green society. Furthermore, fostering environmental lifestyles and promoting policies that seek to improve environmental conditions requires cooperation between governing bodies, consumers and producers. This is the foundation of a green society. Building faith and trust in a green society will be a major challenge for Thai businesses.

The usefulness of this study were as follows: First, the results boost knowledge in the field that will help in the development of the effective and systematic management of natural resources and the environment. Second, the knowledge gained can be applied to sustainability programs aimed at preserving natural resources and environmental well-being in Thailand. Third, the knowledge gained will help in the development of environmentally-friendly technology as well as better production and consumption practices, leading to an overall improvement in consumer safety, quality of life and health.


Several interesting aspects of research required for future research. It should be noted that the convenience and availability of green products is essential to making consumers get involved in pro-social/pro-environmental behaviour (Ismail and Panni, 2008; Ismail et al., 2006). Future studies could examine this condition and its effect on pro-environmental behaviour. In addition, future studies could focus on Perceived Consumer Effectiveness (PCE) and the other factors that affect green behaviour (environmental activism, the new ecology paradigm scale and so forth). Furthermore, barriers factors to green purchase behaviour are worthy of examination.


Dr. Chalita Srinuan, Administration and Management College, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Thailand, for providing constructive comments on an earlier version of this study.

1:  Ali, A., A. Khan, I. Ahmed and W. Shahzad, 2011. Determinants of Pakistani consumers' green purchase behavior: Some insights from a developing country. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., 2: 217-226.
Direct Link  |  

2:  Amyx, D.A., P.F. DeJong, S. Lin, G. Chakraborty and J.L. Wiener, 1994. Influencers of Purchase Intentions for Ecologically Safe Products: An Exploratory Study. In: AMA Winter Educators' Conference, Park, C.W. and D.C. Smith (Eds.). Vol. 5, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL., pp: 341-347.

3:  Awad, T.A., 2011. Environmental segmentation alternatives: Buyers' profiles and implications. J. Islamic Market., 2: 55-73.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Axelrod, L.J. and D.R. Lehman, 1993. Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action? J. Environ. Psychol., 13: 149-159.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  Baldassare, M. and C. Katz, 1992. The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices. Environ. Behav., 24: 602-616.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Banerjee, S. and K. McKeage, 1994. How Green is my Value: Exploring the Relationship between Environmentalism and Materialism. In: Advances in Consumer Research, Allen, C.T. and D.R. John (Eds.). Vol. 21, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT., pp: 147-152.

7:  Bang, H.K., A.E. Ellinger, J. Hadjimarcou and P.A. Traichal, 2000. Consumer concern, knowledge, belief and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychol. Market., 17: 449-468.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Bamberg, S., 2003. How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. J. Environ. Psychol., 23: 21-32.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

9:  Bamberg, S. and G. Moser, 2007. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol., 27: 14-25.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Barr, S., 2007. Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A U.K. case study of household waste management. Environ. Behav., 39: 435-473.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Barr, S., A.W. Gilg and N.J. Ford, 2001. A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes towards household-waste management. Environ. Plann. A, 33: 2025-2048.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

12:  Barr, S., A. Gilg and N. Ford, 2005. Defining the multi-dimensional aspects of household waste management: A study of reported behavior in Devon. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 45: 172-192.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  Berger, I., 1993. The relationship between environmental attitudes and behavior. Can. J. Market. Res., 12: 36-43.

14:  Carrete, L., R. Castano, R. Felix, E. Centeno and E. Gonzalez, 2012. Green consumer behavior in an emerging economy: Confusion, credibility and compatibility. J. Consum. Market., 29: 470-481.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

15:  Chan, T.S., 1996. Concerns for environmental issues and consumer purchase preferences: A two-country study. J. Int. Consum. Market., 9: 43-55.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Chan, R.Y.K. and L.B.Y. Lau, 2000. Antecedents of green purchases: A survey in China. J. Consumer Market., 17: 338-357.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Chan, R.Y.K., 1999. Environmental attitudes and behavior of consumers in China: Survey findings and implications. J. Int. Consum. Market., 11: 25-52.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Chan, R.Y.K., 2001. Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior. Psychol. Market., 18: 389-413.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Charles, C.M., 1995. Introduction to Educational Research. 2nd Edn., Longman, San Diego.

20:  Chen, Y.S. and C.H. Chang, 2012. Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk and green trust. Manage. Decis., 50: 502-520.
CrossRef  |  

21:  Dansirichaisawat, R. and O. Suwunnamek, 2013. Attitudes of electrical appliance consumers towards environmental issues in Thailand. Proceeding of the International Journal of Arts and Sciences, Euro-American Conference for Academic Disciplines, Volume 6, May 14-17, 2013, Prague, pp: 515-525.

22:  Demarque, C., T. Apostolidis and R.V. Joule, 2013. Consideration of future consequences and pro-environmental decision making in the context of persuasion and binding commitment. J. Environ. Psychol., 36: 214-220.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

23:  Diamantopoulos, A., B.B. Schlegelmilch, R.R. Sinkovics and G.M. Bohlen, 2003. Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J. Bus. Res., 56: 465-480.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

24:  Dunlap, R.E., 1994. International Attitudes Towards Environment and Development. In: Green Globe Year Book of International Co-operation on Environment and Development, Bergesen, H.O. and G. Parmann (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp: 115-126.

25:  Eagly, A.H. and S. Chaiken, 1998. Attitude Structure and Function. In: Handbook of Social Psychology, Gilbert, D.T., S.T. Fisk and G. Lindsey (Eds.). McGowan-Hill, New York, pp: 269-322.

26:  Ebreo, A., J. Hershey and J. Vining, 1999. Reducing solid waste: Linking recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism. Environ. Behav., 31: 107-135.
CrossRef  |  

27:  Ellen, P.S., 1994. Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors. J. Bus. Res., 30: 43-52.
CrossRef  |  

28:  Ellen, P.S., J.L. Wiener and C. Cobb-Walgren, 1991. The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. J. Publ. Policy Market., 10: 102-117.
Direct Link  |  

29:  Fraj, E. and E. Martinez, 2006. Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis. J. Consum. Market., 23: 133-144.
CrossRef  |  

30:  Fraj, E., E. Martinez and T. Montaner, 2006. Explaining ecological product purchase using consumers' psychographic characteristics. Adv. Doctoral Res. Manage., 1: 62-85.

31:  Frick, J., F.G. Kaiser and M. Wilson, 2004. Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality Individual Differences, 37: 1597-1613.
CrossRef  |  

32:  Godfrey, S., 2002. An analysis of the trade-off and price sensitivity of european consumers to environmentally friendly food and beverage packaging using conjoint methodology. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

33:  Guest, G., 2002. Market integration and the distribution of ecological knowledge within an Ecuadorian fishing community. J. Ecol. Anthropol., 6: 38-49.
CrossRef  |  

34:  Gurau, C. and A. Ranchhod, 2005. International green marketing: A comparative study of British and Romanian firms. Int. Market. Rev., 22: 547-561.
CrossRef  |  

35:  Hoyer, W. and D. MacInnis, 2004. Consumer Behavior. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

36:  Hwang, Y.H., S.I. Kim and J.M. Jeng, 2000. Examining the causal relationships among selected antecedents of responsible environmental behavior. J. Environ. Educ., 31: 19-25.
CrossRef  |  

37:  Ismail, H.B., M.F.A.K. Panni and D. Talukder, 2006. Consumer perceptions on the environmental consumerism issue and its influence on their purchasing behavior. Proceedings of the Allied Academies International Conference Reno, Volume 10, October 19-21, 2006, Las Vegas, Nevada, pp: 13-18.

38:  Ismail, H.B. and M.F.A.K. Panni, 2008. Consumer perceptions on the consumerism issues and its influence on their purchasing behavior: A view from Malaysian food industry. J. Legal Ethical Regul., 11: 43-64.
Direct Link  |  

39:  Jain, S.K. and G. Kaur, 2003. Strategic green marketing: How should business firms go about adopting it? Indian J. Commerce, 55: 1-16.

40:  Johnson, J.C. and D.C. Griffith, 1996. Pollution, food safety and the distribution of knowledge. Human Ecol., 24: 87-108.
CrossRef  |  

41:  Kaiser, F.G., M. Ranney, T. Hartig and P.A. Bowler, 1999. Ecological behavior, environmental attitude and feelings of responsibility for the environment. Eur. Psychol., 4: 59-74.
CrossRef  |  

42:  Kaiser, F.G., S. Wolfing and U. Fuhrer, 1999. Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. J. Enviro. Psychol., 19: 1-19.
CrossRef  |  

43:  Kaplan, S., 2000. New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: Human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. J. Soc. Issues, 56: 491-508.
CrossRef  |  

44:  Kaufmann, H.R., M.F.A.K. Panni and Y. Orphanidou, 2012. Factors affecting consumers' green purchasing behavior: An integrated conceptual framework. Amfiteatru Econ., 15: 50-69.
Direct Link  |  

45:  Kaufman, L., 1999. Selling green: What managers and marketers need to know about consumer environmental attitudes. Environ. Qual. Manage., 8: 11-20.
CrossRef  |  

46:  Kim, H.S. and M.L. Damhorst, 1998. Environmental concern and apparel consumption. Clothing Textiles Res. J., 16: 126-133.
CrossRef  |  

47:  Kim, Y., 2002. The impact of personal value structures on consumer pro-environmental attitudes, behaviours and consumerism: A cross-cultural study. Ph.D. Thesis, College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University.

48:  Kim, Y. and S.M. Choi, 2003. Antecedents of pro-environmental behaviors: An examination of cultural values, self-efficacy and environmental attitudes. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, May 27, 2003, San Diego, CA -.

49:  Kim, Y. and S.M. Choi, 2005. Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern and PCE. Adv. Consum. Res., 32: 592-599.
Direct Link  |  

50:  Kollmuss, J. and J. Agyeman, 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res., 8: 239-260.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

51:  Laroche, M., J. Bergeron and G. Barbaro-Forleo, 2001. Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J. Consum. Market., 18: 503-520.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

52:  Lapierre, J., 2000. Customer-perceived value in industrial contexts. J. Bus. Indus. Market., 15: 122-145.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

53:  Lee, K., 2010. The green purchase behavior of Hong Kong young consumers: The role of peer influence, local environmental involvement and concrete environmental knowledge. J. Int. Consum. Market., 23: 21-44.
CrossRef  |  

54:  Lee, K., 2008. Opportunities for green marketing: Young consumers. Market. Intell. Plann., 26: 573-586.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

55:  Lee, K., 2009. Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers' green purchasing behavior. J. Consum. Market., 26: 87-96.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

56:  Lutz, R.J., 1991. The Role of Attitude Theory in Marketing. In: Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, Kassarjian, H.H. and T.S. Robertson (Eds.). 4th Edn., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

57:  Maffi, L., 2001. On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge and the Environmen. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC., ISBN: 9781560989059, Pages: 578.

58:  Mainieri, T., E.G. Barnett, T.R. Valdero, J.B. Unipan and S. Oskamp, 1997. Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. J. Soc. Psychol., 137: 189-204.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

59:  McCarty, J.A. and L.J. Shrum, 1994. The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. J. Bus. Res., 30: 53-62.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

60:  McFarlane, B.L. and P.C. Boxall, 2003. The role of social psychological and social structural variables in environmental activism: An example of the forest sector. J. Environ. Psychol., 23: 79-87.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

61:  McGougall, G.H.G., 1993. The green movement in Canada: Implications for marketing strategy. J. Int. Consum. Market., 5: 69-87.

62:  Menon, A., A. Menon, J. Chowdhury and J. Jankovich, 1999. Evolving paradigm for environmental sensitivity in marketing programs: A synthesis of theory and practice. J. Market. Theory Pract., 7: 1-15.
Direct Link  |  

63:  Mostafa, M.M., 2007. Gender differences in Egyptian consumers' green purchase behaviour: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. Int. J. Consum. Stud., 31: 220-229.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

64:  Murphy, P.E., 2005. Sustainable marketing. Bus. Prof. Ethics J., 24: 71-198.

65:  Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd Edn., McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.

66:  Pahl, S., P.R. Harris, H.A. Todd and D.R. Rutter, 2005. Comparative optimism for environmental risks. J. Environ. Psychol., 25: 1-11.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

67:  Patterson, P.G. and R.A. Spreng, 1997. Modelling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business-to-business, services context: An empirical examination. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manage., 8: 414-434.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

68:  Baker, J.P. and R. Ozaki, 2008. Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. J. Consum. Market., 25: 281-293.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

69:  Polonsky, M.J., R. Garma and S.L. Grau, 2011. Western consumers' understanding of carbon offsets and its relationship to behavior. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logist., 23: 583-603.
CrossRef  |  

70:  Pride, W.M. and O.C. Ferrell, 2008. Marketing. 14th Edn., Houghton Mifflin, New York.

71:  Prothero, A., 1996. Environmental decision making: Research issues in the cosmetics and toiletries industry. Market. Intell. Plann., 14: 19-25.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

72:  Pugh, M. and R. Fletcher, 2002. Green international wine marketing. Aust. Market. J., 10: 76-85.
CrossRef  |  

73:  Ramanaiah, N.V., M. Clump and J.P. Sharpe, 2000. Personality profiles of environmentally responsible groups. Psychol. Rep., 87: 176-178.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

74:  Reser, J.P. and J.M. Bentrupperbaumer, 2005. What and where are environmental values? Assessing the impacts of current diversity of use of environmental and world Heritage'values. J. Environ. Psychol., 25: 125-146.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

75:  Roberts, J.A., 1991. The development of a profile of the socially responsible consumer for the 1990s and its marketing management and public policy implications. Ph.D. Thesis, Marketing Department, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE USA.

76:  Roberts, J.A., 1996. Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. J. Bus. Res., 36: 217-231.
CrossRef  |  

77:  Rokicka, E., 2002. Attitudes towards natural environment. Int. J. Sociol., 32: 78-90.

78:  Schwepker, C.H. and T.B. Cornwell, 1991. An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. J. Publ. Policy Market., 10: 77-101.
Direct Link  |  

79:  Schlegelmilch, B.B., G.M. Bohlen and A. Diamantopoulos, 1996. The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. Eur. J. Market., 30: 35-55.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

80:  Shetzer, L., R.W. Stackman and L.F. Moore, 1991. Business-environment attitudes and the new environmental paradigm. J. Environ. Educ., 22: 14-21.
CrossRef  |  

81:  Simmons, D. and R. Widmar, 1990. Motivations and barriers to recycling: Toward a strategy for public education. J. Environ. Educ., 22: 13-18.
CrossRef  |  

82:  Zsoka, A., Z.M. Szerenyi, A. Szechy and T. Kocsis, 2013. Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. J. Cleaner Prod., 48: 126-138.
CrossRef  |  

83:  Tan, B.C., 2011. The roles of knowledge, threat and PCE on green purchase behaviour. Int. J. Bus. Manage., 6: 14-27.
Direct Link  |  

84:  Tilikidou, I., 2007. The effects of knowledge and attitudes upon Greek's pro-environmental purchasing behaviour. Corporate Soc. Responsibil. Environ. Manage., 14: 121-134.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

85:  Thogersen, J., P. Haugaard and A. Olesen, 2010. Consumer responses to ecolabels. Eur. J. Market., 44: 1787-1810.
CrossRef  |  

86:  Tilikidou, I. and A. Delistavrou, 2004. The Influence of the Materialistic Values on Consumers' Pro-Environmental Post-Purchase Behavior. In: Marketing Theory and Applications, Cron, W.L and G.S. Low (Eds.). Vol. 15, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL., pp: 42-49.

87:  Tobler, C., V.H. Visschers and M. Siegrist, 2012. Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers' willingness to act and to support policy measures. J. Environ. Psychol., 32: 197-207.
CrossRef  |  

88:  Trivedi, R.H., J.D. Patel and J.R. Savalia, 2011. Pro-environmental behavior of consumers: A taxonomy and its implications for the green marketer. S. Asian J. Manage., 18: 121-132.
Direct Link  |  

89:  UNEP, 2011. Towards a green economy, pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication: A synthesis for policy makers. United Nations Environment Programme, France.

90:  UNEP, 2011. Green economy report: A preview. United Nations Environment Programme, France.

91:  Vaccaro, V.L., 2009. B2B green marketing and innovation theory for competitive advantage. J. Syst. Inform. Technol., 11: 315-330.
CrossRef  |  

92:  Vining, J. and E. Ebreo, 1990. What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environ. Behav., 22: 55-73.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

93:  Wan, C., R. Cheung and G.Q. Shen, 2012. Recycling attitude and behaviour in university campus: A case study in Hong Kong. Facilities, 30: 630-646.
CrossRef  |  

94:  Zimmer, M.R., T.F. Stafford and M.R. Stafford, 1994. Green issues: Dimensions of environmental concern. J. Bus. Res., 30: 63-74.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

95:  Milfont, T.L., 2007. Psychology of environmental attitudes: A cross-cultural study of their content and structure. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved