Hydrogen peroxide is a reactive oxygen species that presumably occurs as a metabolite in all aerobic organisms. Hydrogen peroxide is universally cytotoxic at high concentrations, mainly, due to conversion to the stronger oxidant, hydroxyl radical •OH (Apel and Hirt, 2004). Together with other reactive oxygen species, H2O2 is recognized to be involved in plant resistance mechanisms to infective diseases. These compounds suppress the development of microbes directly and participate in diverse defense responses (Baker and Orlandi, 1995; Garcia-Brugger et al., 2006).
For any biologically active compound, it is essential to know what concentrations are effective and what concentrations are actually present in vivo. To verify the role of endogenous H2O2, the latter is often applied exogenously. In many reports, concentrations of the added peroxide exceeded their natural level in plant tissues by several orders. Such high amounts are necessary because lower ones appear to be ineffective. For example, in tobacco cultured cells inoculated with incompatible bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae (Glazener et al., 1996) or zoospores of Phytophthora nicotianae (Able et al., 2000), the oxidative burst accompanies hypersensitive necrosis and yields micromolar level of H2O2 but only addition of millimolar amounts causes plant cell death. A similar discrepancy was found for tomato cells treated with the elicitor of Cladosporium fulvum (Lu and Higgins, 1999). This casts doubt on the role of the endogenous peroxide.
At first sight, tests of compounds taken in doses below their apparent activity
threshold are meaningless. Meanwhile, the evergrowing body of evidence indicates
that many substances are biologically active at very low levels such as 10-10-10-20
M. Importantly, the ranges of active concentrations may be divided by so called
dead zones where the compound does not afford activity (Crain and Shen, 1995;
Maltseva et al., 1998; Kátay and Tyihák, 2002; Ostrovskaya
et al., 2003; Brailoiu1 et al., 2004; Burlakova et al.,
2004). It is easy to imagine that an experimenter analyzing effects of a certain
substance at more and more dilute solutions will believe the task is done when
the first dead zone is achieved.
Earlier we studied the fungus Magnaporthe grisea (formerly Pyricularia oryzae), causing blast, the most harmful disease of rice. We reported that rice leaf diffusates suppressed the first two stages of the fungus development, namely, spore germination and appressorium formation. These fungitoxic effects were more pronounced in rice plants possessing inheritable or induced resistance to this disease than in susceptible plants. Hydrogen peroxide involvement in the antifungal action of diffusates was indicated by the inhibition of this action with exogenous catalase (EC 126.96.36.199) or low-molecular weight scavengers of H2O2 (Aver'yanov et al., 1993; Pasechnik et al., 1998; Aver'yanov et al., 2001). We estimated the hydrogen peroxide concentration in infection droplets on rice leaf surface as low as 5x10-7 M (Aver'yanov and Lapikova, 1988). Pure H2O2 at about 10-2 M inhibited M. grisea spore germination by 80% (Aver'yanov et al., 1987). Peng and Kuć (1992) reported that hydrogen peroxide ceased conidial germination of fungi Peronospora tabacina, Cladosporium cucumerinum and Colletotrichum lagenarium at about 2x10-5 M whereas 3x10-7 M had no effect.
This work examined effects of hydrogen peroxide on spore germination of M. grisea and Cladosporium cucumerinum over the wide range of H2O2 concentration (10-2 to 10-14 M). In addition, influence of the same amounts of peroxide on M. grisea appressorium formation was explored. The aim was to elucidate whether this substance can suppress or stimulate the fungus development at concentrations, natural in vivo but much lower than usually studied in this respect. The fungitoxicity of H2O2 was found multimodal, as the peroxide concentration decreased and actually it was significant at concentrations close to minimal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fungi: The culture of the cucurbit scab fungus Cladosporium cucumerinum Ell. et Arth was obtained from the All-Russian Research Institute for Vegetable Breeding and Seed Production. The culture was initially sampled from cucumber plants. By means of colonies emerged from single spores, five fungal strains were isolated. The strain C5, aggressive against cucumber leaves of cv. Phoenix, was used. The cultures were maintained on agar-containing (20 mg mL-1) potato-glucose medium at +25°C. At the age of about 10 days, they were transferred to the refrigerator (about +6°C) for 10 days more to stimulate production of spores (conidia). The latter were harvested by washing with 50 mL distilled water per Petri dish and concentrated to 10 mL using the concentrator (Lapikova and Aver'yanov, 1992) with membrane filter (Nucleopore type PC MB, pores 8 μm, Costar). To wash spores the suspension was then diluted with fresh distilled water to 50 mL and was concentrated once more to 10 mL. Using a haemocytometer the spore count was diluted to 2x105 spore mL-1.
The natural isolate H5-3 (race 007) of the fungus Magnaporthe grisea (Hebert) Barr. was taken from the collection of the Research Institute of Phytopathology, Russia. About three months prior to the experiments, plants of the susceptible rice cv. Sha-tiao-tsao were infected with this strain. The fungus was re-isolated from leaf lesions. The culture was maintained on agarized carrot broth and spores were collected from 10 day colonies (Aver'yanov et al., 1993). They were washed and condensed to the concentration 3.5x105 spore mL-1 with the technique similar to that for C. cucumerinum.
Application of H2O2 and evaluation of its effects: Hydrogen peroxide (Suprapur, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was diluted to 10-2 M according to its extinction coefficient, 43.6 M-1 cm-1 at 240 nm (Claiborn, 1987). The spectrophotometer UV-260 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was employed. From this stock, the set of standard solutions was prepared by 10-fold dilution of each previous sample. Mono-distilled water, passed through the purifying cartridge Elgacan C-114 (Elga Group, UK), was used for all procedures.
Spore suspensions of C. cucumerinum (50 μL) were mixed with 50 μL H2O2 in a well of a 96-well tissue culture plate Linbro (Flow Laboratories, UK). This gave the uniform final spore concentration 105 spore mL-1 and varied concentrations of peroxide. Each experimental treatment was represented in two equal wells. The material was incubated for 18 h in the dark at 23°C. Then it was fixed with ethanol (one drop per well) and observed under the inverted microscope (Leitz-Diavert, Wetzlar, Germany). In each treatment, the spore germination (%) was counted in 4 series of 100 spores each. The inhibition (%) of spore germination was calculated against the water control. In each treatment, the data of three independent experiments were pooled. Means and standard deviations were computed for n = 12.
Spore suspensions of M. grisea, in 10 μL drops, were placed into wells of a 96-well plate. Drops (10 μL) of water or water solution of catalase (10700 units mg-1 material, thymol-free, from bovine liver, Sigma, St. Louis, USA; EC 188.8.131.52) were placed in the same wells but separate from the suspension droplets. After 10 min, 80 μL of water or hydrogen peroxide was added to mix all components simultaneously. The final cell concentration was 3.5x104 spore mL-1 and catalase concentration was 50 μg mL-1. The final concentration of hydrogen peroxide is accounted for in the plots. The material was incubated for 5 h in the dark at 23°C and was fixed with ethanol. The inhibition of spore germination was calculated the same way as for C. cucumerinum. In two independent experiments, germination was counted in 4 and 5 series of 100 spores (n = 9) and all data were united for each treatment.
To estimate the effect of H2O2 on appressorium development, spore suspensions of M. grisea were treated as above but fixed after 9 h. Numbers of germinated spores and those carrying appressoria were counted. The inhibition (%) of appressorium formation by germinated spores against water control and the significance of this difference were evaluated for n = 9. This inhibition index shows the decrease in appressorium incidence, which was not due to decrease in spore germination.
All the experiments were carried out in the Research Institute of Phytopathology, Russia.
Effect of H2O2 concentrations on C. cucumerinum spore germination: In water, the germination of freshly harvested C. cucumerinum spores after 18 h varied around 53±15% in three experiments. Hydrogen peroxide suppressed germination strongly at 10-2 M. Upon dilution of peroxide, its effect decreased gradually until there was no significant difference from the water control at 10-6 M (Fig. 1). Interestingly, further dilution of H2O2 increased spore inhibition again, comparable to those of its highest concentrations. This index reached the maximum at 10-12 M H2O2 and then decreased to zero at 10-14 M.
To check whether the inhibition of fungus development was an irreversible arrest or just retardation, another experiment was carried out using longer (28 h) spore incubation in hydrogen peroxide (Table 1). In the water control, the extra time allowed more spore germination to occur. It was also observed in peroxide solutions at some but not highest concentrations.
Effect of H2O2 concentrations on M. grisea
spore germination: To test whether the sensitivity of spores to low amounts
of H2O2 is peculiar to species other than C. cucumerinum,
we examined blast fungus M. grisea. Its spores developed faster than
those of C. cucumerinum. In water, the germination of M. grisea
spores was 77± 4% in 5 h. Expectedly, hydrogen peroxide was the most
toxic at the maximum concentration 10-2 M (Fig. 2A).
The effect decreased dramatically in weaker solutions and disappeared at 10-5
M. As with C. cucumerinum, far more diluted H2O2
also exhibited significant fungitoxicity to M. grisea, although to a
||Effect of H2O2 on the germination of
Cladosporium cucumerinum spores. Freshly harvested spores (2x105
spore mL-1) were incubated in peroxide for 18 h at 23°C.
The plot represents the relative inhibition of spore germination in peroxide
solutions against water control. Values are means±SD from three independent
experiments. For every concentration, spore germination was counted in 12
series of 100 spores (n = 12). Asterisks indicate counterparts, where spore
germination in H2O2 solutions differed from germination
in water significantly at p<0.01
||Effect of H2O2 Concentration on Germination
of Cladosporium cucumerinum spores
|(A) Freshly harvested spores (2x105 spore mL-1)
were incubated in peroxide for different times at 23°C. (B) Values are
means±SD from one experiment. For every concentration, spore germination
was counted in 4 series of 100 spores (n = 4). Asterisks indicate H2O2
concentrations where spore germination in 28 h differed from germination
in 18 h significantly at p<0.05
Two maxima were observed, at 10-7 M H2O2
and at 10-10-10-11 M H2O2. Again,
there was no inhibition at 10-9 or 10-14 M H2O2.
Exogenous catalase did not affect spore germination of M. grisea in water
but abolished the fungitoxicity of peroxide over the entire concentration range.
To test the effect of H2O2 on appressorium formation,
M. grisea spores were incubated for 9 h. The germination rate increased
to 84±7% in water.
||Effect of H2O2 on the germination of
Magnaporthe grisea spores. Freshly harvested spores (3.5x105
spore mL-1) were incubated in peroxide at 23°C for 5 h (A)
or 9 h (B). The plots represent the relative inhibition of spore germination
in peroxide solutions against water control. Values are means±SD
from two independent experiments. For every concentration, spore germination
was counted in 9 series of 100 spores (n = 9). Asterisks indicate the same
as in Fig. 1. Empty symbols represent treatments where
media contained catalase (535 units mL-1)
Hydrogen peroxide at 10-2 M reduced the germination rate in 5 and
9 h equally. However, at lower H2O2 concentrations, its
inhibitory effect was reduced with the increased time of incubation. The bimodal
dependency plot observed with the 5 h incubation looked less pronounced with
the 9 h incubation treatments. Catalase remained protective under these conditions
as well (Fig. 2B).
Effect of H2O2 concentrations on M. grisea
appressorium formation: The frequency of appressoria formation was 12±4%
of total spores and 13±5% of germinated spores after 9 h. The latter
index represents the suppression of the fungus development in addition to that
occurring with spore germination. As that index was diminished in H2O2
solutions (Fig. 3), the second phase of the development was
peroxide-sensitive per se, not as a result of inhibition of the previous
||Effect of H2O2 on appressorium formation
by Magnaporthe grisea spores. Freshly prepared spores whose germination
is depicted on the Figure 2b were incubated in peroxide
for 9 h at 23°C. The percentage of appressorium formation was calculated
as a fraction of germinated spores. Asterisks indicate counterparts, where
appressorium formation in peroxide solution differs from that in water significantly
at p<0.05. The negative values mean stimulation towards water control
but they were insignificant
Although the percentage of appressoria varied more than that of germination it is seen that both processes were affected by peroxide concentration in a similar manner. The strongest peroxide concentration prevented the appressorium development completely and lost the effect at 10-4-10-5 M. Then the anti-appressorial activity returned at 10-6-10-8 M and 10-13 M H2O2, whereas other concentrations of the range tested were not effective.
As anticipated, hydrogen peroxide suppressed the spore germination of C.
cucumerinum and M. grisea in a concentration-dependent manner. Its
fungitoxicity decreased with its dilution and nearly disappeared at 10-5
-10-6 M. However, further dilutions of peroxide exhibited the toxicity
again and in some cases even stronger than at millimolar levels. One mode of
inhibitory activity was found for C. cucumerinum and two modes were found
for M. grisea. The lowest concentration tested, 10-14 M, was
ineffective at inhibiting spore germination of both fungi. Broadly speaking,
it is possible that hydrogen peroxide may have some effects even under this
level but we did not test this. In all treatments the added peroxide was the
inhibitory factor of germination because catalase diminished or abolished the
action. The second phase of the spore development for M. grisea, the
appressorium formation, was also sensitive to hydrogen peroxide at concentrations
as low as 10-13 M. The dose-response plot revealed dead zones similar
to those found for spore germination and occupied approximately the same parts
of the concentration axis. High variability of the appressorium frequency did
not allow precise location of principal points of the concentration dependency.
We did not exclude possible stimulation of the fungus development by low doses of peroxide but found only inhibition. These effects may be universal among various fungi inasmuch as it was observed on two different fungal species. C. cucumerinum was somewhat more sensitive to peroxide although it is rather difficult to interpret the difference.
Therefore, the initial suggestion was supported that H2O2, at concentrations far beneath the apparent threshold of its biological activity, can affect the fungus development. The concentration/effect relations were found not simple but multimodal. Such a dependency including dead zones and peaks of activity at trace concentrations agrees with the concept of ultra-low doses (Burlakova et al., 2004). Although various substances in various biological and biochemical systems behave themselves in terms of this concept our results appear to be the first with H2O2 and fungal spores.
This work was not aimed at unraveling mechanisms of the effects reported. In general, dead zones may appear if a factor applied causes certain effect through multiple mechanisms, which are different in their sensitivity to the factor. Then some intensity of the factor (i.e., some concentration of a chemical) will be ineffective if it is too low for one and too high for other mechanism. Such relations are scarcely pertinent to gross structural damages but feasible in signaling. To our opinion, H2O2 damaged spores at maximal concentrations but was regulatory below 10-5-10-6 M.
In these experiments, high H2O2 amounts suppressed spores strongly regardless of the treatment time probably by irreversible oxidizing alterations. At some, not high peroxide concentrations, the inhibitory effect decreased with time and might be reversible to some extent. It is feasible that this slowing down of a parasite development caused by plant-originated hydrogen peroxide could contribute to the disease resistance as the host has more time to mobilize defense mechanisms.
In case of a multimodal dose-effect dependency, the term ED50 becomes inapplicable. Consequently, estimation of H2O2 concentrations underlying some biological effects by adding exogenous peroxide solutions also becomes meaningless because some one degree of the effect may be caused by several concentrations of peroxide which differ by several orders.
We think that not only direct fungitoxicity but also diverse anti-infectional plant responses, which are reversed by exogenous catalase, may be driven by low concentrations of endogenous hydrogen peroxide. In living tissues, these concentrations are more probable than, for example, millimolar ones. Our observations make it possible whereas the premise that only high amounts of H2O2 are needed to elicit defense responses suggests that endogenous amounts are inadequate for elicitation (Glazener et al., 1996; Lu and Higgins, 1999; Able et al., 2000).
It would be interesting to study effectiveness in other plant defense responses of H2O2 and other signal molecules (salicylic acid, for example) taken at low concentrations.
The authors are very much grateful to Prof. E.B. Burlakova (Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics) for the valuable discussion of the work. We also thank Dr. A.N. Samokhvalov (All-Russian Research Institute for Vegetable Breeding and Seed Production) for the kindly provided culture of C. cucumerinum. This investigation was partially supported by the grant No 2682p sponsored by ARS USDA and mediated by the International Science and Technology Center.