Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Exploration Study of Gayo Specialty Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Chemical Compounds, Sensory Profile and Physical Appearance



Murna Muzaifa and Dian Hasni
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Arabica coffee considers as premium export commodity from Indonesia. Nowadays, Gayo Arabica coffee is known as specialty coffee from single origin-Gayo Highland areas Centre Aceh Indonesia. As niche market, coffee specialty points out different bottom lines where cupping quality plays the main role. Cupping quality counts as total score of ten attributes namely as fragrance, flavor, aftertaste, acidity, body, balance, uniformity, clan cups, sweetness and overall. This study aims to explore the quality of four types of popular Gayo Arabica coffee which are regular Arabica, wild palm civet, cultivated palm civet and natural. Sensory properties and physical appearance was examined by Gayo Cupper Team as Q-grader based on specialty coffee standards. Chemical compounds include moisture, crude protein, fat, ash contents were also analyzed. Results showed wild palm civet and Arabica regular considers as specialty coffee, which have highest cupping test score respectively 85.75 and 83.25, uniformity bean size were 71.5% in size of <16" for wild palm civet, 49.1% in size of >19" for Arabica regular, greenish color; quackery beans lev. 1 for wild palm civet and green yellow; quackery beans lev. 3 for Arabica regular. Chemical compounds demonstrated that wild palm civet (12.55%) and Arabica regular (11.63%) also respectively fulfilled moisture contents of specialty coffee standard (9-13%), whereas Arabica regular showed as coffee with lowest content of fat from others. The study concluded processing techniques majorly affects of bean chemical compounds where also coherently affect the cupping quality of bean itself.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Murna Muzaifa and Dian Hasni, 2016. Exploration Study of Gayo Specialty Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): Chemical Compounds, Sensory Profile and Physical Appearance. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 15: 486-491.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2016.486.491

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2016.486.491

REFERENCES
1:  AOAC., 2000. Official Methode of Analysis. 16th Edn., Association of Analytical Chemist, Washington, DC.

2:  Buffo, R.A. and C. Cardelli-Freire, 2004. Coffee flavour: An overview. Flavour Fragrance J., 19: 99-104.
Direct Link  |  

3:  Clarke, R.J. and R. Macrae, 1985. Coffee: Chemistry. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London, UK., ISBN: 9780853343684, Pages: 306.

4:  Cliff, M.A. and B.G. Green, 1994. Sensory irritation and coolness produced by menthol: Evidence for selective desensitization of irritation. Physiol. Behav., 56: 1021-1029.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  Duarte, G.S., A.A. Pereira and A. Farah, 2010. Chlorogenic acids and other relevant compounds in Brazilian coffees processed by semi-dry and wet post-harvesting methods. Food Chem., 118: 851-855.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Farah, A., 2010. Coffee as a Specialty and Functional Beverage. In: Functional and Specialty Beverage Technology, Paquin, P. (Ed.). Elsevier Publisher, London, UK., pp: 370-395.

7:  Farah, A., 2012. Coffee Constituents. In: Coffee: Emerging Health Effects and Disease Prevention, Chu, Y.F. (Ed.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA., ISBN: 9780470958780, pp: 21-58.

8:  Flament, I., 2001. Coffee Flavor Chemistry. 1st Edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA., Pages: 410.

9:  ICO., 2011. Total production of exporting countries: Crop years commencing 2000 to 2009. International Coffee Organization, London, UK.

10:  ICO., 2011. About coffee the story of coffee. International Coffee Organization, London, UK.

11:  ICO., 2014. Trends in coffee consumption in selected importing countries. International Coffee Organization, London, UK. http://www.ico.org/documents/icc-109-8e-trends-consumption.pdf

12:  Illy, A. and R. Viani, 1995. Espresso Coffee: The Chemistry of Quality. Academic Press, London, ISBN: 9780123706706, Pages: 253.

13:  Joshi, A.R., J.L.D. Smith and F.J. Cuthbert, 1995. Influence of food distribution and predation pressure on spacing behaviour in palm civets. J. Mammal., 76: 1205-1212.
Direct Link  |  

14:  Jumhawan, U., S.P. Putri, E. Marwani, T. Bamba and E. Fukusaki, 2013. Selection of discriminant markers for authentication of asian palm civet coffee (kopi luwak): A metabolomics approach. J. Agric. Food Chem., 61: 7994-8001.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

15:  Liu, Y. and D.D. Kitts, 2011. Confirmation that the Maillard reaction is the principle contributor to the antioxidant capacity of coffee brews. Food Res. Int., 44: 2418-2424.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Maier, H.G., 2005. Changes Produced by Roasting in Espresso Coffee. In: Espresso Coffee: The Science of Quality, Illy, A. and R. Viani (Eds.). Elsevier Academic Press, London, UK., pp: 191-197.

17:  Marcone, M.F., 2004. Composition and properties of Indonesian palm civet coffee (Kopi Luwak) and Ethiopian civet coffee. Food Res. Int., 37: 901-912.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Mombaerts, P., 2001. How smell develops. Nat. Neurosci., 4: 1192-1198.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Mombaerts, P., 2001. The human repertoire of odorant receptor genes and pseudogenes. Ann. Rev. Genomics Human Genet., 2: 493-510.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

20:  Petracco, M., 2001. Beverage Preparation: Brewing Trends for the New Millenium. In: Coffee: Recent Developments, Clarke, R.J. and O.G. Vitzthum (Eds.). Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp: 140-164.

21:  Oestreich-Janzen, S., 2010. 3.2. Chemistry of Coffee. In: Comprehensive Natural Products II, Lew, M. and L. Hung-Wen (Eds.). Vol. 3, Elsevier, Oxford, pp: 1085-1117.

22:  Ongo, E., M. Falasconi, G. Sberveglieri, A. Antonelli and G. Montevecchi et al., 2012. Chemometric discrimination of Philippine civet coffee using electronic nose and gas chromatography mass spectrometry. Procedia Eng., 47: 977-980.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

23:  Onishi, N., 2010. From dung to coffee brew with no aftertaste. April 17, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/18/world/asia/18civetcoffee.html?_r=0.

24:  Rawson, N.E. and X. Li, 2004. 3. the Cellular Basis Offlavour Perception: Taste and Aroma. In: Flavor Perception, Taylor, A.J. and D.D. Roberts (Eds.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK., pp: 75.

25:  Ringle, C.M., S. Wende and J.M. Becker, 2015. SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt..

26:  Savonitti, O., 2005. Storage and Packaging. 6.1.3 Other Physico-Chemicalchanges. In: Espresso Coffee: The Science of Quality, Illy, A. and R. Viani (Eds.). Elsevier Academic Press, London, UK., ISBN: 9780123703712, pp: 241-245.

27:  SCAA., 2009. SCAA protocols: Cupping specialty coffee. Specialty Coffee Association of America (SCAA), Santa Ana, California.

28:  SCAI., 2011. Production and processing. Specialty Coffee Association of Indonesia, Kementerian Perindustrian, Indonesia.

29:  Shibamoto, T., 1991. An overview of coffee aroma and flavor chemistry. Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific Colloquium on Coffee, July 14-19, 1991, San Fransisco, pp: 107-116.

30:  Taylor, A.J. and J.P. Roozen, 1996. Volatile flavor release from foods during eating. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 36: 765-784.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved