Submit Manuscript

Pakistan Journal of Nutrition

Year: 2015 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 7 | Page No.: 396-400
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Heterosis and Heterobeltiosis Analysis for Spike and its Related Attributes in Different Wheat Crosses

Shahzadi Mahpara, Zulfiqar Ali, J. Farooq, Safdar Hussain and Rehana Bibi

ABSTRACT

Yield component breeding and modification of the plant architecture offer possibilities to develop more efficient breeding systems for increased grain yield. Heterosis and heterobeltiosis studies were done at Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan following Matzinger’ approach (1956) among seven wheat genotypes viz., Shahkar-95, Parwaz-94, Iqbal-2000, Uqab-2000, MH-97, 4072 and Punjab-96 for crosses in all possible combinations. Yield and yield related traits like plant height, number of tillers/plant, spike length, spikelets/spike, spike density, grain/spike, 1000-grains weight and grains yield/plant were investigated. Results for analysis of variance indicated significant differences among genotypes for many plant traits under study. Maximum significant heterosis (21.95%) was found in grain yield/plant followed by spike length (14.62%) and grain yield/spike (13.68%). While maximum heterobeltiosis was recorded for grain yield/plant (11.33%), followed by spike length (9.13%). It is concluded that 4072 x Punjab-96 cross showed best performance followed by Parwaz-94 x MH-97, Iqbal-2000 x parwaz-94 than other crosses under study. These crosses cab be utilized in further breeding programme as parents for contributing high yield not only under optimum environment but also under drought conditions as water use efficient crosses. The results of heterosis suggest that hybrid vigor is available for the commercial production of wheat and selection of desirable hybrid among the crosses having heterotic effects in other characters is the best way to improve the grain yield of bread wheat.
PDF References Citation

Search

REFERENCES

  1. Abdullah, G.M., A.S. Khan and Z. Ali, 2002. Heterosis study of certain important traits in wheat. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 4: 326-328.
    Direct Link
  2. Austin, R.B., J. Bingham, R.D. Blackwell, L.T. Evans, M.A. Ford, C.L. Morgan and M. Taylor, 1980. Genetic improvements in winter wheat yields since 1900 and associated physiological changes. J. Agric. Sci., 94: 675-689.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  3. Briggle, L.W., 1963. Heterosis in wheat-a review. Crop Sci., 3: 407-412.
    Direct Link
  4. Fasoula, V.A. and D.A. Fasoula, 2002. Principles underlying genetic improvement for high and stable crop yield potential. Field Crops Res., 75: 191-209.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  5. Grafius, J.E., 1959. Heterosis in barley. Agron. J., 51: 551-554.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  6. Iqbal, M., 2004. Diallelic analysis of some physio-morphological traits in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  7. Jatoi, W.A., M.J. Baloch, N.U. Khan, M. Munir and A.A. Khakwani et al., 2014. Heterosis for yield and physiological traits in wheat under water stress conditions. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 24: 252-261.
    Direct Link
  8. Krishna, R. and Z. Ahmad, 1992. Heterosis for yield components and developmental traits in spring wheat. Genetika, 24: 127-132.
  9. Liver, R.W. and E.G. Hyne, 1968. Hybrid vigor in hard red winter wheat. Proceedings of the 3rd International Wheat Genetics Symposium, August 5-9, 1968, Canberra, Australia, pp: 431-436.
  10. Mahpara, S., 2008. Biometrical analysis of important plant attributes in spring wheat. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  11. Mahpara, S., Z. Ali and M. Ahsan, 2008. Combining ability analysis for yield and yield related traits among wheat varieties and their F1 hybrids. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 10: 599-604.
    Direct Link
  12. Maluszynski, M., I. Szarejko, P. Barriga and A. Balcerzyk, 2001. Heterosis in crop mutant crosses and production of high yielding lines using doubled haploid systems. Euphytica, 120: 387-398.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  13. Matzinger, D.F., T.J. Mann and C.C. Cockerham, 1962. Diallel crosses in Nicotiana tabacum. Crop Sci., 2: 383-386.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  14. Rasul, I., A.S. Khan and Z. Ali, 2002. Estimation of heterosis for yield and some yield components in bread wheat. Int. J. Agric Biol., 4: 214-216.
    Direct Link
  15. Sajnani, D.N., 1968. Studies of hybrid vigour and combining ability in wheat diallel crosses. Diss. Abst., 28: 4641B-4641B.
  16. Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie and D.A. Dickey, 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd Edn., McGraw-Hill Co., New York, USA., ISBN: 9780070610286, Pages: 666.
    Direct Link
  17. Wynne, J.C., D.A. Emery and P.W. Rice, 1970. Combining ability estimates in Arachis hypogaea L. II. Field performance of F1 hybrids. Crop Sci., 10: 713-715.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  18. Yagdi, K. and S. Karan, 2000. [Hybrid vigor in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)]. Turk. J. Agric. Forestry, 24: 231-236, (In Turkish).
    Direct Link

Search

Comments

Asif Baloch Reply

I am student in master in agriculture university and my topic is master hitrosis and hetrobiltosis and now i am sowing eight varities and i am new in master beacuse I am week student some information I ask for your team when i need help then you reply must thanks

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *