Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

The Effect of Liquid Smoke Utilization as Preservative for Meatballs Quality



Arnim , Ferawati and Yetti Marlida
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

The aim of this research was to test the effectiveness of coconut shell liquid smoke in preservation of meatballs. The research had been performed using factorial Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with two factors i.e. liquid smoke concentration (0%, 3%, 5% and 7%) and shelf life at refrigeration temperature (0, 5, 10 and 15 days). Parameter analyzed were water content, protein content, fat content, pH and Total Plate Count (TPC). Liquid smoke concentration had significant effect on water content, protein content, fat content, pH and Total Plate Count. Shelf life had significant effect on water content, protein content, fat content and Total Plate Count but not for pH. The interaction of liquid smoke concentration and shelf life had significant effect on protein content only. Applications of 7% liquid smoke in meatballs at 4±1°C increased shelf life until 15 days storage were better accepted and retarded the decreased of pH and moisture content compared to control. The result indicated that liquid smoke was an effective preservative agent for meatballs.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Arnim , Ferawati and Yetti Marlida, 2012. The Effect of Liquid Smoke Utilization as Preservative for Meatballs Quality. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 11: 1078-1080.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2012.1078.1080

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2012.1078.1080

REFERENCES

  1. AOAC, 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association Official Analytical Chemists. In: Official Methods of Analysis, Helrich, K. (Ed.). AOAC International, Arlington, VA., USA


  2. Davidson, P.M., J.N. Sofos and A.L. Branen, 2005. Antimicrobials in Foods. 3rd Edn., Taylor and Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., USA., ISBN-13: 9780824740375, Pages: 720


  3. Faith, N.G., A.E. Yousef and J.B. Luchansky, 1992. Inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by liquid smoke and isoeugenol, a phenolic component found in smoke. J. Food Saf., 12: 303-314.
    CrossRef  |  


  4. Guillen, M.D. and M.J. Manzanos, 1996. Study of the components of a solid smoke flavouring preparation. Food Chem., 58: 251-257.
    CrossRef  |  


  5. Harley, J.P. and L.M. Prescott, 1993. Basic Laboratory and Culture Techniques. In: Laboratory Excercises in Microbiology, Harley, J.P. and L.M. Prescott (Eds.). 2nd Edn., W.C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, pp: 14-46


  6. Kjallstrand, J. and G. Petersson, 2001. Phenols and aromatic hydrocarbons in chimney emissions from traditional and modern residential wood burning. Environ. Technol., 22: 391-395.
    CrossRef  |  


  7. Kowalski, R. and J. Prycz, 2003. Technological basis for the smoking process. Suppliers Meat Ind., 1: 57-68.


  8. Soldera, S., N. Sebastianutto and R. Bortolomeazzi, 2008. Composition of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of commercial aqueous smoke flavorings. J. Agric. Food Chem., 56: 2727-2734.
    CrossRef  |  


  9. Sunen, E., 1998. Minimum inhibitory concentration of smoke wood extracts against spoilage and pathogenic micro-organisms associated with foods. Lett. Applied Microbiol., 27: 45-48.
    CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  


  10. Toth, L. and K. Potthast, 1984. Chemical aspects of the smoking of meat and meat products. Adv. Food Res., 29: 87-158.
    CrossRef  |  


  11. Wahyuningsih, T.D., 2006. Analysis of Liquid Smoke. Organic Laboratory FMIPA UGM, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia


©  2022 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved