Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Physico-chemical and Sensory Evaluation of Market Yoghurt in Nigeria



Joseph A.O. Olugbuyiro and Joy E. Oseh
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

This study examined the quality of some yoghurts made and sold in the Nigerian market. Nine commercially available brands of yoghurt drinks which represent seven different manufacturers were randomly selected. The samples included seven plain yoghurt and two fruit yoghurt samples. All yoghurt samples were analyzed for chemical properties (moisture%, ash %, total solids, SNF, fat, pH and titratable acidity) and the organoleptic tests (color, thickness, appearance, body, texture, taste, smell, flavor and over all acceptability). The results of the study showed that the physico-chemical composition of the manufactured yogurts was different. The pH values of the samples ranged between 3.70-4.33 which were reasonably suitable for yoghurt marketed in tropical areas. No direct relationship was observed between pH values and titratable acidity. There was marked variation in the % fat content of the products. The results of the sensory evaluation revealed that flavor with respect to taste and smell had significant influence (p<0.05) on overall acceptability of yogurt product. So, the yogurt manufacturers need to improve on the sensory properties in particular flavor and taste for better consumer acceptability. Also, they may improve on packaging by labeling to specifications that precisely represent the content and type.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Joseph A.O. Olugbuyiro and Joy E. Oseh, 2011. Physico-chemical and Sensory Evaluation of Market Yoghurt in Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10: 914-918.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2011.914.918

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2011.914.918

REFERENCES
1:  Adolfsson, O., S.N. Meydani and R.M. Russell, 2004. Yogurt and gut function. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 80: 245-256.
PubMed  |  

2:  AOAC., 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th Edn., AOAC International, Arlington, VA., USA., Pages: 1298.

3:  Bodyfelt, F.W., J. Tobias and G.M. Trout, 1988. The Sensory Evaluation of Dairy Products. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, Pages: 598.

4:  Dublin-Green, M. and S.N. Ibe, 2005. Quality evaluation of yogurts produced commercially in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr. J. Applied Zool. Environ. Biol., 7: 78-82.
Direct Link  |  

5:  FDA, 2009. Milk and cream products and yogurt products. Food Drug Administration Fed. Regist., 74: 24-48.

6:  Hassan, A and I. Amjad, 2010. Nutritional evaluation of yoghurt prepared by different starter cultures and their physiochemical analysis during storage. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 9: 2913-2917.

7:  Heyman, M., 2000. Effect of lactic acid bacteria on diseases. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., 19: 137-146.

8:  Iwalokun, B.A. and M.O. Shittu, 2007. Effect of Hibiscus sabdariffa (Calyce) extract on biochemical and organoleptic properties of yogurt. Pak. J. Nutr., 6: 172-182.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

9:  Karagul-Yuceer, Y., P.C. Coggins, J.C. Wilson and C.H. White, 1999. Carbonated yogurt-sensory properties and consumer acceptance. J. Dairy Sci., 82: 1394-1398.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Obi, T.E., F.O. Henshaw and O.O. Atanda, 2010. Quality evaluation of plain-stirred probiotic yoghurt produced from skim and whole milk powder during refrigerated strorage. EJEAF Chem., 9: 1203-1213.
Direct Link  |  

11:  Younus, S., T. Masud and T. Aziz, 2002. Quality evaluation of market yoghurt/dahi. Pak. J. Nutr., 1: 226-230.
Direct Link  |  

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved