Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Determining Nutritive Value of Soybean Straw for Ruminants Using Nylon Bags Technique

Naser Maheri-Sis, Bayaz Abdollahi-Ziveh, Ramin Salamatdoustnobar, Alireza Ahmadzadeh, Abolfazl Aghajanzadeh-Golshani and Mehdi Mohebbizadeh
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

This study was carried out to determine the chemical composition and ruminal degradability of Soybean Straw (SBS). Samples were collected from several soybean grain threshing farms in Moghan, Iran. Chemical composition for Dry Matter (DM), Crude Protein (CP), Ether Extract (EE), Organic Matter (OM), Neutral Detergent Fibre (NDF), Acid Detergent Fibre (ADF) and Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL) of pooled samples were 89.18, 5.10, 2.85, 96.90, 80.80, 63.20 and 13.00%, respectively. Degradation procedure was performed using nylon bags filled with 5 g of SBS and suspended in the rumen of three fistulated Gezel rams for 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h and obtained data were fitted to a non-linear degradation model to calculate ruminal degradation characteristics. Results showed that soluble fraction (a) of SBS were very low, especially in case of DM and OM. Potential degradability (a + b) of SBS for DM, OM and CP were 36.97, 37.74 and 68.07% and for effective degradability (Out flow rate 0.02 h-1) were 21.40, 22.27 and 48.30%, respectively. It is conclude that, SBS have low DM and OM degradability and higher CP degradability in the rumen. Based on chemical composition and degradation characteristics, untreated SBS can be used in the ration of ruminant in limited levels.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

Naser Maheri-Sis, Bayaz Abdollahi-Ziveh, Ramin Salamatdoustnobar, Alireza Ahmadzadeh, Abolfazl Aghajanzadeh-Golshani and Mehdi Mohebbizadeh, 2011. Determining Nutritive Value of Soybean Straw for Ruminants Using Nylon Bags Technique. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10: 838-841.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2011.838.841


1:  Aghajanzadeh-Golshani A., N. Maheri-Sis, A. Mirzaei-Aghsaghali and A. Baradaran-Hasanzadeh, 2010. Comparison of nutritional value of tomato pomace and brewer's grain for ruminants using in vitro gas production technique. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 5: 43-51.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Abreu, J.M.F. and A.M. Bruno-Soares, 1998. Characterization and utilization of rice legume and rape straw. Options Mediterraneennes Ser., 17: 39-51.
Direct Link  |  

3:  AOAC., 1990. Official Method of Analysis. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA., pp: 66-88.

4:  Bhargava, P.K. and E.R. Orskov, 1987. Manual for the use of Nylon Bag Technique in the Evaluation of Feedstuffs. Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

5:  Bruno-Soares, A.M., J.M.F. Abreu, C.V.M. Guedes and A.A. Dias-da-Silva, 2000. Chemical composition, DM and NDF degradation kinetics in Rumen of seven legume straws. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 83: 75-80.

6:  Chumpawadee, S., A. Chantiratikul and P. Chantiratikul, 2007. Chemical compositions and nutritional evaluation of energy feeds for ruminant using in vitro gas production technique. Pak. J. Nutr., 6: 607-612.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

7:  Goering, H.K. and P.J. van Soest, 1970. Forage fibre analysis (Apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook 379. Agricultural Research Services, USDA, Washington, DC.

8:  Gupta, B.S., D.E. Johnson and F.C. Hinds, 1978. Soybean straw intake and nutrient digestibility by sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 46: 1086-1090.
Direct Link  |  

9:  Gupta, B.S., D.E. Johnson, F.C. Hinds and H.C. Minor, 1973. Forage potential of soybean straw. Agron. J., 65: 538-541.

10:  Karsli, M.A. and J.R. Russell, 2002. Prediction of the voluntary intake and digestibility of forage-based diets from chemical composition and ruminal degradation characteristics. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 26: 249-255.

11:  Maheri-Sis, N., M. Chamani, A.A. Sadeghi, A. Mirza-Aghazadeh and A. Aghajanzadeh-Golshani, 2008. Nutritional evaluation of kabuli and desi type chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for ruminants using In vitro gas production technique. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7: 2946-2951.
Direct Link  |  

12:  Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, 2009. Statistics Book of Animal and Agricultural Products. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Iran, ISBN: 978-964-467-042, Pages: 114.

13:  Orskov, E.R., F.D.D. Hovell and F. Mould, 1980. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop. Anim. Prod., 5: 195-213.
Direct Link  |  

14:  Orskov, E.R. and I. McDonald, 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci., 92: 499-503.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

15:  Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture, 2008. Straw, a roughage source for ruminants. Production Fact Sheet, Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture.

16:  Sruamsiri, S. and P. Silman, 2008. Nutritive composition of soybean by-products and nutrient digestibility of soybean pod husk. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol., 2: 568-576.
Direct Link  |  

17:  Van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved