• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition
  2. Vol 10 (9), 2011
  3. 838-841
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Pakistan Journal of Nutrition

Year: 2011 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 9 | Page No.: 838-841
DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2011.838.841
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Determining Nutritive Value of Soybean Straw for Ruminants Using Nylon Bags Technique

Naser Maheri-Sis, Bayaz Abdollahi-Ziveh, Ramin Salamatdoustnobar, Alireza Ahmadzadeh, Abolfazl Aghajanzadeh-Golshani and Mehdi Mohebbizadeh

ABSTRACT


This study was carried out to determine the chemical composition and ruminal degradability of Soybean Straw (SBS). Samples were collected from several soybean grain threshing farms in Moghan, Iran. Chemical composition for Dry Matter (DM), Crude Protein (CP), Ether Extract (EE), Organic Matter (OM), Neutral Detergent Fibre (NDF), Acid Detergent Fibre (ADF) and Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL) of pooled samples were 89.18, 5.10, 2.85, 96.90, 80.80, 63.20 and 13.00%, respectively. Degradation procedure was performed using nylon bags filled with 5 g of SBS and suspended in the rumen of three fistulated Gezel rams for 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h and obtained data were fitted to a non-linear degradation model to calculate ruminal degradation characteristics. Results showed that soluble fraction (a) of SBS were very low, especially in case of DM and OM. Potential degradability (a + b) of SBS for DM, OM and CP were 36.97, 37.74 and 68.07% and for effective degradability (Out flow rate 0.02 h-1) were 21.40, 22.27 and 48.30%, respectively. It is conclude that, SBS have low DM and OM degradability and higher CP degradability in the rumen. Based on chemical composition and degradation characteristics, untreated SBS can be used in the ration of ruminant in limited levels.
PDF References Citation

How to cite this article

Naser Maheri-Sis, Bayaz Abdollahi-Ziveh, Ramin Salamatdoustnobar, Alireza Ahmadzadeh, Abolfazl Aghajanzadeh-Golshani and Mehdi Mohebbizadeh, 2011. Determining Nutritive Value of Soybean Straw for Ruminants Using Nylon Bags Technique. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10: 838-841.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2011.838.841

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2011.838.841

Search


REFERENCES


  1. Aghajanzadeh-Golshani A., N. Maheri-Sis, A. Mirzaei-Aghsaghali and A. Baradaran-Hasanzadeh, 2010. Comparison of nutritional value of tomato pomace and brewer's grain for ruminants using in vitro gas production technique. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 5: 43-51.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  2. Abreu, J.M.F. and A.M. Bruno-Soares, 1998. Characterization and utilization of rice legume and rape straw. Options Mediterraneennes Ser., 17: 39-51.
    Direct Link

  3. AOAC., 1990. Official Method of Analysis. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA., pp: 66-88.

  4. Bhargava, P.K. and E.R. Orskov, 1987. Manual for the use of Nylon Bag Technique in the Evaluation of Feedstuffs. Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

  5. Bruno-Soares, A.M., J.M.F. Abreu, C.V.M. Guedes and A.A. Dias-da-Silva, 2000. Chemical composition, DM and NDF degradation kinetics in Rumen of seven legume straws. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 83: 75-80.

  6. Chumpawadee, S., A. Chantiratikul and P. Chantiratikul, 2007. Chemical compositions and nutritional evaluation of energy feeds for ruminant using in vitro gas production technique. Pak. J. Nutr., 6: 607-612.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  7. Goering, H.K. and P.J. van Soest, 1970. Forage fibre analysis (Apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Handbook 379. Agricultural Research Services, USDA, Washington, DC.

  8. Gupta, B.S., D.E. Johnson and F.C. Hinds, 1978. Soybean straw intake and nutrient digestibility by sheep. J. Anim. Sci., 46: 1086-1090.
    Direct Link

  9. Gupta, B.S., D.E. Johnson, F.C. Hinds and H.C. Minor, 1973. Forage potential of soybean straw. Agron. J., 65: 538-541.

  10. Karsli, M.A. and J.R. Russell, 2002. Prediction of the voluntary intake and digestibility of forage-based diets from chemical composition and ruminal degradation characteristics. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 26: 249-255.

  11. Maheri-Sis, N., M. Chamani, A.A. Sadeghi, A. Mirza-Aghazadeh and A. Aghajanzadeh-Golshani, 2008. Nutritional evaluation of kabuli and desi type chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) for ruminants using In vitro gas production technique. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 7: 2946-2951.
    Direct Link

  12. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, 2009. Statistics Book of Animal and Agricultural Products. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Iran, ISBN: 978-964-467-042, Pages: 114.

  13. Orskov, E.R., F.D.D. Hovell and F. Mould, 1980. The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop. Anim. Prod., 5: 195-213.
    Direct Link

  14. Orskov, E.R. and I. McDonald, 1970. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci., 92: 499-503.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  15. Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture, 2008. Straw, a roughage source for ruminants. Production Fact Sheet, Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture. http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=13d85902-ba4c-4170-a2c0-7f4486ea031d.

  16. Sruamsiri, S. and P. Silman, 2008. Nutritive composition of soybean by-products and nutrient digestibility of soybean pod husk. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol., 2: 568-576.
    Direct Link

  17. van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

Search


Related Articles

Comparison of Nutritional Value of Tomato Pomace and Brewer’s Grain for Ruminants Using in vitro Gas Production Technique
Chemical Compositions and Nutritional Evaluation of Energy Feeds For Ruminant Using In vitro Gas Production Technique

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved