• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition
  2. Vol 10 (3), 2011
  3. 224-228
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Pakistan Journal of Nutrition

Year: 2011 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 224-228
DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2011.224.228
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Enumeration of Listeria and Enteric Bacteria of Public Health Significance on Meat Tables Before and After Sales of Meat in Ibadan Municipal Abattoir, Nigeria

Victoria Olusola Adetunji and Tajudeen Opeyemi Isola

ABSTRACT


A bacteriological assay was done on meat tables in Ibadan municipal abattoir, Nigeria. Swab samples from 1 cm2 of the surface were obtained from meat tables before and after the sales of meat. The swab samples were analyzed for Listeria sp Count (LSC), Listeria monocytogenes Count (LMC), Coliform Count (CC), Enterobacteriaceae Count (EC) and Salmonella sp Count (SSC). The mean values for LSC, EC and SSC were 8.20±0.06 log10CFU/cm2, 8.81±0.05 log10CFU/cm2 and 7.32±0.20 log10CFU/cm2 respectively for before sales while after meat sales was 10.47±0.05 log10CFU/cm2 (LSC), 11.47±0.03 log10CFU/cm2 (EC) and 11.37±0.04 log10CFU/cm2 (SSC). The mean values for before and after meat sales of Coliform Count (CC) were 8.35±0.07 log10CFU/cm2 and 10.86±0.05 log10CFU/cm2 respectively while Listeria monocytogenes Count (LMC) for before and after meat sales were 7.59±0.06 log10CFU/cm2 and 9.78±0.07 log10CFU/cm2 respectively. The mean values (log10CFU/cm2) showed that EC> LSC>SSC for before meat sales while after sales showed that EC>SSC>LSC. A significat difference (p<0.05) was observed in all the counts before and after meat sales. A positive correlation (R2 = 0.396) ensued for LMC and LSC before sales. Results reflect poor hygienic conditions of the meat tables and non adherence to HACCP programs.
PDF References Citation

How to cite this article

Victoria Olusola Adetunji and Tajudeen Opeyemi Isola, 2011. Enumeration of Listeria and Enteric Bacteria of Public Health Significance on Meat Tables Before and After Sales of Meat in Ibadan Municipal Abattoir, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10: 224-228.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2011.224.228

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2011.224.228

Search


REFERENCES


  1. Abdalla, A.G.A., E. Siham, V.V.H. Suliman and A. Alian, 2009. Microbial contamination of sheep carcasses at EL kadero slaughterhouse. Khartoum state. Sudan J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb., 48: 1-2.

  2. Abiola, S.S., 1995. Assessment of abattoir and slaughter slab operation in Oyo state, Nigeria. J. Anim. Sci. Prod., 5: 59-62.

  3. APHA, 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18th Edn., APHA, WEF and AWWA, Washington DC., USA.

  4. Anonymous, 2001. Commission Decision 2001/471/EC. Office. J. Euro. Communit., 165: 48-53.

  5. Arnold international students, 1993. Food Poisonings and Food Hygiene. 6th Edn., Replika press Pvt. Ltd., Delhi, India.

  6. Barrow, G.I. and R.K.A. Feltham, 1993. Cowan and Steel's Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. 3rd Edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, Pages: 331.

  7. Borch, E. and P. Arinder, 2002. Bacteriological safety issues in red meat and ready-to-eat meat products, as well as control measures. Meat Sci., 62: 381-390.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  8. Butterorth-Heineinann, 2000. The Science of Food Hygiene. 3rd Edn., Reed Educational and professional publishing Ltd, London, U.K.

  9. Dunsmore, D.G., A. Twomey, W.G. Whittlestone and H.W. Morgan, 1981. Design and performance of systems for cleaning product-contact surfaces of food equipment: A review. J. Food Prot., 44: 220-240.
    Direct Link

  10. Elmossalami, E. and N. Wassef, 1971. Penetration of some micro organisms in meat. Zbl. Vet. Med. B., 18: 329-336.
    CrossRef

  11. Evans, J.A., S.L. Russell, C. James and J.E.L. Corry, 2004. Microbiological contamination of food refrigeration equipment. J. Food. Eng., 65: 225-232.
    CrossRef

  12. Filani, M.O., 1994. Ibadan region, re-charles publications in conjunction with connell publications. Ibadan, Nigeria.

  13. Forsythe, S.J. and P.R. Hayes, 1998. Food hygiene, Microbiology and HACCP. 3rd Edn., A. Chapman and Hall food science book. Aspen Publishers, Inc., Garthersburg, M.D., U.S.A.

  14. Garcia de siles, J.L., G. Heinz, J.K. Lambert and A. Barnett, 1997. Livestock products and food security. World congress on food hygiene August 1997.

  15. Gill, C.O., 1998. Microbiological Contamination of Meat During Slaughter and Butchering of Cattle, Sheep and Pigs. In: The Microbiology of Meat and Poultry, Davies A. and R. Board (Eds.). Blackie Academic and Professional, New York, pp: 118-157.

  16. Kusumaningrum, H.D., G. Ribodi, W.C. Hazeleger and R.R. Beurner, 2003. Survival of foodborne pathogens on stainless steel surfaces and cross-contamination to foods. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 85: 227-236.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  17. Lauzon, H.L., 1998. The suitability of materials used in the food industry, involving direct or indirect contact with food products. Project P 98076, Wood in the Food Industry, Nordic Industrial Fund, Center for Innovation and Commercial Development and the Industry Partners in Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden, pp: 5.

  18. Lawrie, R.A., 1979. Meat Science. 3rd Edn., Pergamon Press, New York.

  19. Leclercq-Perlat, M.N. and M. Lalande, 1994. Cleanability in relation to surface chemical composition and surface finishing of some materials commonly used in food industries. J. Food Eng., 23: 501-517.
    CrossRef

  20. Lowe, D.E., R.W.J. Steen, V.E. Beattie and B.W. Moss, 2001. The effect of floor type systems on the performance cleanliness, carcass composition and meat quality of housed finishing beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci., 69: 33-42.
    CrossRef

  21. Nel, S., J.F.R. Lues, E.M. Buys and P. Venter, 2004. Bacterial populations associated with meat from the deboning room of a high throughput red meat abattoir. Meat Sci., 66: 667-674.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Cetin, O., T. Kahraman and S.K. Buyukunal, 2006. Microbiological evaluation of food contact surfaces at red meat processing plants in Istanbul, Turkey. Itl. J. Anim. Sci., 5: 277-283.
    CrossRef

  23. Pearce, R.A., D.J. Bolton, J.J. Sheridan, D.A. McDowell, I.S. Blair and D. Harrington, 2004. Studies to determine the critical control points in pork slaughter hazards analysis and critical control point systems. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 90: 331-339.

  24. Rao, N.D., 1992. The microbiology of sheep carcasses processed in a modern Indian abattoir. Meat. Sci., 32: 925-936.
    CrossRef

  25. Samaha, I.A. and A.A. Draz, 1993. Air and water, sources of bacteria contamination of beef carcasses. Alex J. Vet. Sci., 9: 83-88.

  26. Warriner, K., T.G. Aldsworth, S. Kaur and C.F.R. Dodd, 2002. Cross-contamination of carcasses and equipment during pork processing. J. Appl. Microbiol., 93: 169-177.
    CrossRef

  27. WHO, 1995. Surveillance Programme. Sixth Report of WHO surveillance Programme for control of some food Infections and intoxications in Europe Berlin: FAO/WHO collaborating centre for Research and Training in food Hygiene and zoonosis.

  28. Yen, P.K., 2003. Preventing harm from food borne illness. Geriatr. Nurs., 24: 376-377.
    CrossRef

  29. Zweifel, C., D. Baltzer and R. Stephan, 2005. Microbiological contamination of cattle and Pig carcasses at five abattoirs determined by swab sampling in accordance with EU. Decision 2001/471/EC. Meat Sci., 69: 559-566.
    CrossRef

Search


Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved