Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Effects of Age and Method of Drying on the Proximate Composition of Housefly Larvae (Musca domestica Linnaeus) Meal (HFLM)

A.O. Aniebo and O.J. Owen
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

The effects of age at which House Fly Larvae (HFL) is harvested and method of drying the larvae, on its proximate values were studied. Larvae were harvested on three different days representing three different ages and the harvested larvae were dried using both oven and sun light. Results revealed that protein content of HFL processed into meal after drying significantly (p<0.05) reduced as the age of larvae increased from 55.4% on 2 day old, through 50.2% on three-day old, to 47.1% on four day old. On the other hand, fat content increased with increase in age of HFL, from 20.8% at age of 2 days, through 22.2% at age of 3 days to 25.3% at the age of 4 days. Fibre content minimally increased with age. Oven-dried maggots had mean higher protein content (50.9%) and less fat (22.8%) than sun dried maggots (47 and 26.4% respectively). Therefore, for maximum protein yield, HFL should be harvested at 2 days old. However, where maggot fat is needed in a diet, increased biomass and or ease of harvesting, processing at later age (4 days old) became desirable. Oven-drying is recommended for superior protein and in rainy season, while sun drying produced higher fat and was cheaper.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

A.O. Aniebo and O.J. Owen, 2010. Effects of Age and Method of Drying on the Proximate Composition of Housefly Larvae (Musca domestica Linnaeus) Meal (HFLM). Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9: 485-487.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2010.485.487


1:  AOAC, 1990. Official Method of Analysis. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

2:  Atteh, J.O. and F.D. Ologbenla, 1993. Replacement of fishmeal with maggots in broiler diets: Effect on performance and nutrient utilization. Nig. J. Anim. Prod., 20: 44-49.

3:  Awoniyi, T.A.M., V.A. Aletor and J.M. Aina, 2003. Performance of broiler-chickens fed on maggot meal in place of fishmeal. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 2: 271-274.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Calvert, C.C., R.D. Martins and H.J. Eby, 1970. Housefly pupae as food for poultry. J. Eco. Entomol., 62: 938-939.

5:  Duncan, D.B., 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Fasakin, E.A., A.M. Balogun and O.O. Ajayi, 2003. Nutrition implication of processed maggot meals; hydrolyzed, defatted, full-fat, sun-dried and oven-dried in the diets of Clarias gariepinus fingerlings. Aquacult. Res., 9: 733-738.

7:  Gado, M.S., S.M., El-Aggory, A.A.El-Gawaard and A.K. Mormond, 1982. The possibility of applying insect protein in broiler rations. Nutr. Abst. Rev., 43: 76-76.

8:  Sheppard, C., 2002. Black Soldier Fly and Others for Value-added Manure Management. University of Georgia, Tifton G.A. 31794 USA.

9:  Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 978-0070609259, Pages: 481.

10:  Teguia, A., M. Mpoame and J.A.O. Mba, 2002. The production performance of broiler birds as affected by the replacement of fish meal by maggot meal in the starter and finisher diets. Tropiculture, 20: 187-192.
Direct Link  |  

11:  Teotia, J.S. and B.F. Miller, 1994. Nutritive content of housefly pupae and manure residue. Br. Poult. Sci., 15: 155-182.

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved