Submit Manuscript

Pakistan Journal of Nutrition

Year: 2010 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 5 | Page No.: 444-446
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Evaluation of Production and Economic Feasibility of Using the Recommended Nutrient Requirement for Lactating Cows

Ahmed Nabaweia, T, K.E. Elabid, A.M. Fadel Elseed and A. Elhag

ABSTRACT

An experiment was carried out to evaluate production and economic feasibility of using the recommended nutrient requirements for lactating cows in small scale dairy farms in Khartoum state. The study consisted of two parts; a survey of 90 dairy farms in Khartoum State and an experiment carried out on 16 lactating dairy cows in the Judiciary farm. These cows were divided into two groups: A and B (8 cows in each group). Group A was distributed in eight pens and given balanced ration, whereas group B was fed as practiced in the farm. The experiment lasted for seven months extending from January to July 2007. The survey results revealed that the balanced ration costs were only 23, 38 and 55% of unbalanced ration at 10, 15 and 20 lbs level of milk production respectively. The results of the experiment revealed that the use of balanced ration increased the cow milk production by 27% compared with the unbalanced ration. The four months milk yield of cows fed balanced and unbalanced ration were significantly different (P<0.05). The mean cost of four months milk production for cows fed balanced ration was significantly (P<0.05) lower than these fed unbalanced ration, being 435 and 578 SDG, respectively. The mean cost of production per pound of milk for cows fed balanced ration was significantly (P<0.05) lower than the cows fed unbalanced ration; it was 0.107 and 0.206 SDG, respectively. The balanced ration has a greater trend coefficient of 32.36 compared with 18.56 for the unbalanced ration. In conclusion, the balanced ration increased the level of cow milk production and decreased the cost milk production compared to unbalanced ration.
PDF References Citation

Search

REFERENCES

  1. AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington VA, Pages: 684.
  2. Fadel Elseed, A.M.A., A.G. Mahala and A.H. El Khaier, 2008. Evaluation of nutritional regime in small-scale dairy farms in Khartoum state, Sudan. Int. J. Dairy Sci., 3: 93-96.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  3. Ferguson, J.D. and W. Chalupa, 1989. Impact of protein nutrition on reproduction in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 72: 746-766.
    CrossRef
  4. Krober, T.F., H. Steingass, R. Funk and W. Drochner, 1999. Effects of reduced crude protein supply on dry matter intake digestibility, excretion and performance of dairy cows in a lactation period. Zuechtungs Kunde, 71: 182-195.
  5. Muller, L.D. and S.L. Fales, 1998. Supplementation of Cool-Season Grass Pastures for Dairy Cattle. In: Grass for Dairy Cattle, Cherney, J.H. and D.J.R. Cherney (Eds.). CABI Publishing, New York, pp: 335-374.
  6. Niels, M.N., T. Kristensen and H. Hansen, 2003. The effect of low protein supplementation to dairy cow grazing clover grass during half of the day. Livest. Prod. Sci., 81: 293-306.
    CrossRef
  7. NRC, 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th Edn., National Academy Press, Washington, DC, Pages: 405.
    CrossRefDirect Link
  8. Orskov, E.R., 1998. The feeding of ruminant (principles and practice). 2nd Edn., Chalcombe Publication, UK.
  9. Shing Field, K.J., M. Jokela, K. Kaustell, P. Huhtannen and J. Nousiainen, 1999. Association between protein feeding and reproductive efficiency in the dairy cow: Specific emphasis on protein feeding in Finland. Agric. Food Sci. Finl., 8: 365-392.
    Direct Link
  10. SPSS for Windows, 1998. Standard Version 10. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL.

Search

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *