Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Nutrient Composition of Selected Sweet Potato [Ipomea batatas (L) Lam] Varieties as Influenced by Different Levels of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application



A.N. Ukom, P.C. Ojimelukwe and D.A. Okpara
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Total ß-carotene content of four varieties of Sweet potatoes [Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam] as influenced by different levels of nitrogen fertilizer were determined by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) The proximate composition and mineral contents were also determined. The nitrogen fertilizer treatments were combinations of four levels of 0kgN/ha(control), 40 kgN/ha, 80 kg/Nha, 120 kgN/ha on the four varieties of Sweet potato; white-fleshed TIS87/0087 and TIS8164, orange-fleshed Ex-Igbariam and CIP Tanzania. Nitrogen fertilizer significantly (p<0.05) increased the total ß-carotene and crude protein with increase in nitrogen fertilizer application up to 120 kgN/ha. Generally there was a trend in the total ß-carotene increase from 0-80 kgN/ha for all the varieties except CIP Tanzania which showed no such trend. On the average, TIS87/0087 and Ex-Igbariam varieties gave the highest total ß-carotene content at 40-80 kgN/ha when compared with the control. The highest yield for the crude fiber was observed at the control (0 kgN/ha) for all the varieties except TIS8164 which highest value was observed at 40 kgN/ha. Application of nitrogen above 80 kgN/ha did not increase the yield of most nutrient (namely, ß-carotene and protein). Generally, application of nitrogen fertilizer increased the mineral contents of most Sweet potato varieties significantly (p<0.05) from 0-120 kgN/ha with the exception of phosphorus which showed significant decrease. The overall results indicate increased bioavailability of ß-carotene (Provitamin A) and crude protein for good nutrition and health particularly at 40-80 kgN/ha.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

A.N. Ukom, P.C. Ojimelukwe and D.A. Okpara, 2009. Nutrient Composition of Selected Sweet Potato [Ipomea batatas (L) Lam] Varieties as Influenced by Different Levels of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 8: 1791-1795.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2009.1791.1795

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2009.1791.1795

INTRODUCTION

Sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam] is a perennial crop grown as a annual (Woolfe, 1992). It is a root crop that provides food to a large segment of the world population, especially in the tropics where the bulk of the crop are cultivated and consumed (Kocklar, 1981; Opeke, 2006). The International Potato Centre (CIP) holds the largest Sweet potato gene bank in the world with more than 6,500 wild, traditional and improved varieties (Food and Culture Encyclopedia, 2003). According to FAO (2006) statistics, West African Sweet potato production stood at 2.516 million metric tons. Sweet potato is high in nutritive value, outranking most carbohydrate foods in vitamins, minerals, protein and energy content (Watt and Merrill, 1975; Onuh et al., 2004). Sweet potato serves as a staple food vegetable (fleshy roots and tender leaves), snack food, weaning food, animal feed, as well as a raw material for industrial starch and alcohol. It is processed into diverse products (Bouwkamp, 1985; Lin et al., 1985; Udensi, 2000).

Sweet potato, depending on cultivar is high in carotenoids, particularly, the hydrogen carotenoid, the ß-carotene (Kosambo et al., 1998). ß-carotene is a potent provitamin A with 100% activity. The importance of this carotenoid in nutrition and health in the developing countries where deficiency of vitamin A remains a serious health problem cannot be over-emphasized (Rodriguez-Amaya, 1997).

Nitrogen is an important factor in determining the yield and nutrient composition of root tubers, especially Sweet potato. Nitrogen application to Sweet potato was shown to linearly increase dry matter content, carotenoid and protein content of Sweet potato (Constantin et al., 1984). Nitrogen also plays a vital role in the plant biochemistry as an essential constituent of cell wall, cytoplasmic proteins, nucleic acid, chlorophyll and other parts of the cell (Hay and Walker, 1989). Villagarcia (1996) found that the response of Sweet potato to nitrogen fertilizer application depends highly on genotypic and environmental variations. Four Sweet potato varieties and four levels of nitrogen fertilizer application were therefore evaluated within Umudike in Southeastern Nigeria agro ecological zone. To compare the nutrient composition of these varieties, analysis of total ß-carotene, proximate and mineral content were performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Field work and experimental design:
The study area was Umudike, Ikwuano LGA, Abia State Southeast, Nigeria, located at latitude 05 29 N and longitude 07 33 E and at an elevation of 122 meters above sea level. This soil is classified as sandy loam, acidic and characterized as an ultisol (Eke-Okoro, 2001).

The experimental field was marked and harrowed. A 4*4 factorial Arrangement in a Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used. Sweet potato vine cuttings of 20 cm of each variety were planted at a spacing of 1 cm* 0.3 m. The fertilizer treatment were four levels of nitrogen (0, 40, 80 and 120 kgN/ha) and four varieties of Sweet potato (TIS87/0087, TIS8164, Ex-Igbariam and CIP Tanzania) were used. Nitrogen was applied as urea. Each of the plots had a blanket application of 150 kgK/ha as muriate of potash and 25 kgP/ha as single super phosphate. The fertilizer application were made at the same time, four weeks after planting. Weeding was done once by hand pulling at 6 weeks after planting. The Sweet potato tuber were harvested 16 weeks after planting and was used for the analysis.

Sample preparation: Freshly harvested samples were washed with clean water, peeled, washed and quartered longitudinally. They were sliced to 1 cm thickness and mixed manually. Part of the sample was packaged in aluminium foil, labeled and stored at -80oC for subsequent ß-carotene analysis using HPLC at 450 nm. The remaining part of the sample was dried in a hot air oven (Gallemkamp model OV-440) at a temperature of 60oC for 24 h. The dried sample was milled in attrition mill to obtain fine flour used for chemical analysis.

Carotenoid extraction: The method of Rodriguez-Amaya and Kimura (2004) (Harvest Plus Method) was used.

Duplicates of the -80oC frozen and thawed samples were used for the analysis under a UV-filtered white fluorescent lighting to avoid carotenoid oxidation (Howe and Tanumihardjo, 2006). Carotenoids were extracted by grinding about 3 g of each sample in a mortar using pestle with 50 ml of cold acetone and about three (3) gram Hyflosupercel. The residue was filtered in Buchner funnel equipped with filter paper (Whatman # 2 filter paper), Maidstone, England). The residue was returned to the mortar and extraction was repeated using 20 ml of cold acetone until the residue was nearly colourless.

The total extract was transferred to separating funnel (250 ml) containing 20 ml petroleum ether. One liter of distil water was used to wash the organic phase which separated from aqueous phase. The aqueous phase was discarded. Dilute brine solution was used to wash the aqueous phase to break-up any emulsion that may have formed. The brine solution separated from organic phase was discarded. The organic phase was collected through anhydrous sodium sulphate (15 g) into flat bottom flask. Ten (10) ml of the sample extract was concentrated with a rotary evaporator (Buchi Waterbath B-481 Switzerland) and dried under vacuum for reverse-phase HPLC determination of ß-carotene at 450 nm.

ß-Carotene analysis using reverse-phase HPLC: HPLC procedures for ß-carotene analysis in sweet potato was adopted from Howe and Tanumihardjo (2006). The concentrated sample was reconstituted in methanol/dichloroethane mixture (1000 μl, 50:50 v/v) and 10 μl of it injected into the HPLC consisting of a guard column, C30 YMC carotenoids column (4.6* 250 mm, 3 μm), 625 HPLC pump, 717 auto sampler and a 2996 photodiode array detector (Waters Corporation, Milford, M A). Solvent A was 100% methanol and Solvent B was 100% methyl tert-butyl ether. The isocratic elusion was 50% of solvent A and 50% of solvent B at 1 ml/minute for 15 min. ß-carotene eluted at about 8 min. Chromatograms were generated at 450 nm. Identification of ß-carotene was done using standards and with verification of the absorption spectrum.

Chemical analysis: Flour samples were analyzed in duplicates for dry matter, moisture, ash and fiber contents using Pearson (1976), while protein and fat contents were determined by AOAC (1995). The carbohydrate content was calculated by difference. The mineral content was determined by multiple nutrient extractions (wet-acid digestion) method by Novozamsky et al., 1983). Sodium and potassium were determined by flame photometric method (A.O.A.C., 1984). Calcium and magnesium were determined by EDTA versanate complexometric titration method while phosphorus was determined by Molybdate yellow method (Onwuka, 2005) using spectrophotometer.

Statistical analysis and calculations: The mean, standard deviation and analysis of variance ( ANOVA) of the data obtained from the study were computed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version B. Means were separated using least significant difference test (LSD) at p<0.05. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was specifically performed to check for significant difference (p<0.05) between means.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table 1 shows the total ß-carotene of the different sweet potato varieties at different levels of nitrogen fertilizer application. The response of these sweet potato varieties to the different levels of nitrogen fertilizer application with respect to ß-carotene yield shows significant (p<0.05) difference for most of the varieties. At zero (0 kgN/ha) level of nitrogen fertilizer application, the values of ß-carotene content of all the varieties of the sweet potato were closely the same. Increase in the application of nitrogen fertilizer from 0-80 kgN/ha increased ß-carotene yield with the highest numerical value of 13.02 μg/g for Ex-Igbariam at 40 kgN/ha, 18.11 μg/g at 80 kgN/ha for TIS87/0087 and 9.77 μg/g for TIS8164 at 80 kgN/ha. This may indicate that nitrogen stimulate carotenoid biosynthesis, thus agreeing with the report of Constantin et al. (1984); Hay and Walker (1989) that nitrogen increased carotenoid and protein yield in cultivars of sweet potato.


Table 1:

Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer application (kgN/ha) on ß-Carotene Content of Various Varieties of Sweet Potatoes

Means with the same superscript in the same row are not significantly different (p>0.05)

Table 2:

Effect of Nitrogen concentration on the proximate composition of each sweet potato variety

abc means ± standard deviation with similar superscript in the same row for each proximate component are not significantly different (p>0.05)

The implication of low ß-carotene yield for CIP Tanzania (Table 1) at 40-80kgN/ha may possibly be due to poor adaptation to Umudike ultisol and or low nitrogen response ability (Okon, 2006).

Ex-Igbariam and TIS87/0087 with higher ß-carotene yield agrees with the report of Okon (2006) which remarked that both Ex-Igbariam and TIS87/0087 are high nitrogen response varieties with interception of over 70% radiation resulting into a high photosynthetic activity (Uchida et al., 1982). Lintig (2007); Cavalcante and Rodriguez-Amaya (1992) and Kimura et al. (1991) observed the importance of light absorbing power of carotenoids at the visible spectrum (450-550 nm) to aid photosynthetic activities, thus, directly affecting carotenogenesis in fruits and vegetables. The difference in the ß-carotene concentrations observed in this work may be due to such positive influence of high radiation interception and photosynthetic activities of Ex-Igbariam and TIS87/0087 varieties of the sweet potato. The use of nitrogen fertilizer to produce sweet potato in Southeastern Nigeria agro ecological zone for ß-carotene yield may be best at 40-80 kgN/ha (Table 1).

Chemical composition: Table 2 indicates the effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on the proximate composition of sweet potato varieties. The results showed low dry matter with high amount of moisture (Table 2). The values obtained agrees with the data reported by Onuh et al. (2004) and Oboh et al. (1989). Nitrogen fertilizer application significantly (p<0.05) increased the protein content of the varieties at different nitrogen concentrations. For most varieties, protein yield was best at 40-80 kgN/ha with TIS87/0087 having the highest value of 9.84% at 80 kgN/ha (Table 2). This protein values are comparable to the average protein value of 4.41 g/100 g reported by Ravindran et al. (1995) and 4.93-16.11% reported by Grant et al. (1992).


Table 3:

Effect of nitrogen concentration on the mineral content of each variety

abcmeans ± standard deviation with similar superscript in the same row for each mineral component are not significantly different (p<0.05)

The application of nitrogen fertilizer significantly decreased crude fiber in all the varieties. The higher fiber value observed for the control (Table 2) confirms the report of Igbokwe et al. (2005) that non-synthetic input cropping system enhanced crude fiber more than the conventional (chemical intensive) cropping system. The mean fat values for the different varieties ranged from 1.10-2.0%. Although these values were low, there are comparable to the values of 1.2-2.7% reported by Holloway et al. (1985). Also the low ash contents would mean that the sweet potato varieties might be low in some minerals. The carbohydrate content was high in most of the varieties. The high carbohydrate content of the sweet potatoes makes it a good source of energy.

Table 3 indicates the effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on the mineral content of the sweet potato varieties. Generally the application of nitrogen fertilizer significantly (p>0.05) decreased phosphorus content in most of varieties (Table 3). However, the value of potassium was significantly (p<0.05) increased for most of the varieties at different levels of nitrogen fertilizer application. Njoku et al. (2001) had reported that nitrogen and potassium were critical to sweet potato production. The blanket application of 150 kgN/ha as muriate of potash would have a positive influence on the potassium content at 40 kgN/ha for all the varieties. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer application also increased the sodium content significantly (p<0.05) for most of the varieties. Calcium and magnesium contents were significantly increased (p<0.05) for most of the varieties at the different levels of nitrogen fertilizer application.

Conclusion: The results obtained in this study shows that TIS87/0087 and Ex-Igbariam are the sweet potato varieties with the highest content of ß-carotene and protein. Nitrogen fertilizer application improved the ß-carotene and protein contents of most varieties at 40-80 kgN/ha while the control (no nitrogen fertilizer) was associated with the highest crude fiber values. The variability in the ß-carotene and chemical composition of the various varieties of sweet potato can be useful in directing sweet potato research production and consumption with the view to increasing nutritional (provitamin A and protein) status of the consumers.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors thank Dr Maziya Dixon and Mr E. A. Alamu of the Crop Utilization Unit, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA),Ibadan, for providing the facilities for carotenoid analysis.

REFERENCES
1:  AOAC., 1984. Official Method of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

2:  Bouwkamp, J.C., 1985. Introduction-part 1. In: Sweet Potato Products: A National Resource for the Tropics, Bouwkamp, J.C. (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., USA., pp: 3-7.

3:  Cavalcante, M.L. and D.B. Rodriguez-Amaya, 1992. Carotenoid Composition of the Tropical Fruits Eugenia Uniflora and Malpighia Glabra. In: Food Science and Human Nutrition, Charalambous, G. (Ed.). Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp: 643-650.

4:  Constantin, R.J., L.G. Jones, H.L. Hammett, T.P. Hernandez and C.G. Kahlich, 1984. The response of three sweet potato cultivars to varying levels of nitrogen. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 109: 610-614.
Direct Link  |  

5:  Eke-Okoro, O.N., 2001. Effect of attitude and NPK fertilizer and photosynthetic efficiency and yield of sweet potato cultivars in Nigeria. J. Sustain. Agric. Environ., 2: 205-213.

6:  FAO, 2006. FAOSTAT Database Results. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nation, Rome, Italy.

7:  Grant, P., J. Lu, D. Mortley, P. Loretan, C. Monsi, W. Hill and C. Morris, 1992. Nutritive Composition of Sweet Potatoes Growth in NFT with Different Nutrient Solution Application Protocols. In: Sweet Potato for 21st Century Technology, Hill, W.A., C.K. Bonsi and P.A. Loretan (Eds.). Tuskegee University, Alabama, USA., pp: 439-444.

8:  Hay, R.K.M. and A.J. Walker, 1989. An Introduction of the Physiology of Crop Yield. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, England, pp: 292.

9:  Holloway, W.D., J.A. Monro, J.C. Gurnsey, E.W. Pmare and N.H. Stce, 1985. Dietary fiber and other constituents of some Tongan foods. J. Food Sci., 50: 1756-1757.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Howe, A.J. and A.T. Sherry, 2006. Evaluation of analytical methods for carotenoid extraction from bio-fortified maize (Zea mays spp). J. Agric. Food Chem., 54: 7992-7997.

11:  Igbokwe, E.I., L.C. Haum, F.O. Chukwuma and J. Huam, 2005. Sweet potato yield and quality as influenced by cropping systems. J. Vegetable Sci., 11: 35-46.

12:  Kimura, M., D.B. Rodriguez-Amaya and S.M. Yokoyama, 1991. Cultivar difference and geographic effects on the carotenoid composition and vitamin A value papaya. Lebens. Wissen Technol., 24: 415-418.

13:  Kocklar, S.L., 1981. A Textbook of Economic Botany. Macmillan Publishers Ltd., USA., pp: 230-232.

14:  Kosambo, L.M., E.E. Carey, A.K. Misera, J. Wilkes and V. Hagenimana, 1998. Influence of age, farming site and boiling provitamin A contents in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) lam) storage roots. J. Food Compos. Anal., 11: 305-321.

15:  Lin, S.S.M., C.C. Peet, D.M. Chen and H.F. Lo, 1985. Sweet Potato Production and Utilization in Asia and the Pacific. In: Sweet Potato Production. A National Resource for the Tropics, Bouwkamp, J.C. (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., USA., pp: 139-148.

16:  Lintig, J.V., 2007. The colorful world of carotenoid (Vitamin A) metabolism. Sight Life Magazine, 2: 6-12.

17:  Njoku, J.C., D.A. Okpara and J.E. Asiegbu, 2001. Growth and yield response of sweet potato to inorganic nitrogen and potassium in a tropical ultisol. Nig. Agric. J., 32: 30-41.

18:  Novozamsky, I., V.J.G. Houba, R. van Eck and W. van Vark, 1983. A novel digestion technique for multi‐element plant analysis. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 14: 239-248.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Oboh, S., A. Ologhobo and O. Tewe, 1989. Some aspects of the biochemistry and nutritional value of the sweet potato (Ipomea batatas). Food Chem., 31: 9-18.

20:  Okon, O.F., 2006. Growth and productivity of white and orange-fleshed sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) varieties as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. M.Sc. Thesis, Departmant of Agronomy, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike.

21:  Onuh, J.O., M.A. Akpapunam and M.O. Iwe, 2004. Comparative studies of the physio-chemical properties of two local varieties of sweet potato flours. Nig. Food J., 22: 141-146.

22:  Onwuka, G.I., 2005. Food Analysis and Instrumentation: Theory and Practice. 1st Edn., Naphthali Prints, Lagos, Nigeria, pp: 1-219.

23:  Opeke, L.K., 2006. Essentials of Crop Farming. Spectrum Books Ltd., Ibadan, Nigeria, pp: 205.

24:  Pearson, D., 1976. The Chemical Analysis of Foods. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, London, pp: 487-573.

25:  Ravindran, V., G. Ravindran, R. Sivakanasam and S.B. Rajaguru, 1995. Biochemical and nutritioal assessment of tubers from 16 cultivars of sweet potato (Ipomea batatas). J. Agric. Food Chem., 43: 2646-2651.

26:  Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B., 1997. Carotenoids and Food Preparation: The Retention of Provitamin A in Prepared, Processed and Stored Foods. OMNI/USAID, Washington, DC., USA.

27:  Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B. and M. Kimura, 2004. Harvestplus Handbook for Carotenoid Analysis. 1st Edn., IFPRI, Washington, DC., pp: 1-59.

28:  Uchida, N., Y. Wada and Y. Murata, 1982. Studies on the changes in photosynthetic activities of a crop leaf during its development and senescence. 11 Effect of Nitrogen deficiency of leaf of rice. J. Crop Sci., 51: 583-597.

29:  Udensi, E.A., 2000. Local Weaning Food for Propective Cottage Industries. In: Sustainable Agro-allied Projects with Great Economic Potentials for Nigeria, Onyenobi, F.I. (Ed.). Willy Rose and Appleseed Publishing Co., Abakaliki, Nigaria, pp: 142-149.

30:  Villagarcia, O.M.R., 1996. Analysis of Sweet potato growth under different rates of nitrogen fertilization. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, NC., USA.

31:  Watt, B.K. and A.L. Merrill, 1975. Composition of Foods: Raw, Processed and Prepared. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC., pp: 190.

32:  Woolfe, J.A., 1992. Sweet Potato: An Untapped Food Resource. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA., USA., ISBN-13: 9780521402958, Pages: 643.

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved