|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Quality of Dried Bacillus NP5 and Its Effect on Growth Performance
of Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) |
|
Diah Ayu Satyari Utami,
Widanarni
and
M. Agus Suprayudi
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
The main things that need to be considered in the preparation of probiotics
are viability during preparation and storage which are the disadvantages of
the use of fresh culture probiotics. Dried probiotic can be applied through
the feed, easy to be applied, and has a long shelf life, but application of
dried probiotic in aquaculture is still not widely studied. This study aimed
to evaluate the quality of dried Bacillus NP5 as the probiotic through
in vitro assays and determine the best dose for the growth performance of tilapia.
The treatment of in vitro assays including the production of dried probiotic
without using of the coating material and dried by spray drying method (NS);
freeze drying method (NF); with using of the coating material and dried by spray
drying method (WS); freeze drying method (WF). The treatment which showed the
best result at in vitro assays was applied for in vivo assays. The in vivo assays
containing 4 treatments and 5 replicates which were control (K) and the administration
of dried Bacillus NP5 RfR (1010 CFU g-1)
in feed with dose of 0.5% (A), 1% (B) and 2% (C). The fish fed 3 times a day
by at satiation for 28 days. Probiotic that encapsulated by maltodextrin and
dried by spray drying method that stored in room temperature had the higher
percentage product, viability after drying process, and storage. The administration
of 0.5% dried Bacillus NP5 showed the best growth performance in tilapia.
|
|
|
|
|
Received: November 22, 2014;
Accepted: January 19, 2015;
Published: March 13, 2015
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is a commodity that is widely cultivated
in the world because has rapid growth, wide tolerance of environmental condition
and has high market demand. Developing countries, especially Asia such as China,
Indonesia, Philippines and Thailand are major producers of tilapia (Josupeit,
2005). In 2012, the production of tilapia by the aquaculture sector in Asia
increased to 3.3 million tons(FAO., 2014). The production
increased in order to fulfill the increasing market demand for tilapia.
Fulfillment of the high market demand for tilapia is reached through the intensive
culture application. Artificial feed is one of the main components in intensive
culture. Feed is the energy source for the fish to grow and takes the biggest
part of production cost in aquaculture in the amount of 40-89% (Suprayudi,
2010). Therefore, the important aspects that have to be considered in the
feeding management is how to increase the feed efficiency and fish health status
(Naylor et al., 2009). It is necessary to produce
the feed which not only gives high growth performance but also results a higher
survival rate and lower feed conversion ratio, so that the nutrients in the
feed are utilized optimally and wasted to the environment in a little amount.
Probiotics are live or dead microbes or microbial components that give some
benefits to the host (Fuller, 1989; Lazado
and Caipang, 2014). The development of research on the use of probiotics
in aquatic animals are the result of the necessity of eco-friendly aquaculture
system (Gatesoupe, 1999), in which the main role of probiotics
in aquaculture include the increase of fish productivity and feed utilization,
disease control, water quality control and bioremidiation of the polluted environment,
so that the application of probiotics can be the answer to the efficiency of
feed utilization and eco-friendly aquaculture system. The main things that need
to be considered in the preparation of probiotics are viability during preparation
and storage which are the disadvantages of the use of fresh culture probiotics
(Wang et al., 2008). Dried probiotic can be
applied through the feed and has several advantages such as the easier application
and a long shelf life (Decamp and Moriarty, 2007).
The previous study showed that the application of freeze-dried form of Lactobacillus
rhamnosus JCM 1136 could increase the Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) number
in the intestine and phagocytic activity of rainbow trout (Panigrahi
et al., 2005). In addition, application of dried probiotic in aquaculture
is still not widely studied. One of the factors that affect the probiotic performance
is dose (Nayak, 2010). This study aimed to evaluate
the quality of dried Bacillus NP5 as the probiotic through in vitro
assays and determine the best dose for the growth performance of tilapia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of dried probiotic and in vitro assays: Probiotic
used in this study was Bacillus NP5 isolated from the gastrointestinal
tract of tilapia (Putra, 2010). Probiotic was given the
rifampicin resistant marker (Bacillus NP5 Rf R). The method
to construct the marker was carried out according to Widanarni
et al.(2004). Colonies of Bacillus NP5 Rf R were
cultured in luria bertani slant agar.
The treatment of in vitro assays including the production of dried
probiotic without using of the coating material and dried by spray drying method
(NS); freeze drying method (NF); with using of the coating material and dried
by spray drying method (WS); freeze drying method (WF). The fresh culture probiotic
)inoculant( was harvested by centrifugation at speed of 7000 rpm for 20 min
to obtain the probiotic biomass. Furthermore, the probiotic biomass(pellet)
was homogenized using a homogenizer in Phosphate Buffered Saline(PBS) for the
uncoating treatments and sterile solution of 10% maltodextrin for the coating
treatments. The proportion of inoculants with PBS or sterile solution of 10%
maltodextrin is 1:1 (v/v). Furthermore, those were dried using a spray dryer
with an inlet temperature of 120°C and an outlet temperature of 70°C
for drying treatment by spray drying method and a freeze dryer with a temperature
of -50°C for drying treatment by freeze drying method. The dried forms of
probiotic were measured their product percentages and viabilities after drying
process. The dried forms which had the high product percentages and viabilities
were stored at Room Temperature (RT) and Cold Temperatures (CT) for a month,
then tested their viabilities and observed their physical qualities after storage.
The treatment which showed the best result at in vitro assays was applied
for in vivo assays.
Product percentages and viabilities after drying process: The product
percentage of probiotic after drying process was calculated by comparing the
amount of inoculant which would be dried with dried forms which produced after
drying )v/w(. Viability of probiotic was calculated by comparing the total probiotic
before and after drying. Total probiotic was enumerated by the spread plate
technique using LBA )Luria Bertani Agar( that was supplemented with 50 mg mL- 1 rifampicin )LBA+Rf(.
Viabilities and physical qualities of probiotic after storage: Viability
of probiotic was calculated by comparing the total probiotic after drying and
storage. Total probiotic was enumerated by spread plate technique using LBA+Rf.
The physical quality of probiotic after storage was observed by observing the
form and color of dried forms of probiotic after drying and the changes in the
form and color after storage for a month.
Experimental design of in vivo assays: The fish strain used
in this study was tilapia nirwana strain that were obtained from Center of Fish
Breeding Research Sukamandi, West Java, Indonesia. The fish were acclimatized
in the tanks sized 120 L. The 6.38±0.05 g fish were reared in aquarium sized
60×30×30 cm 3 at a density of 10 fish per aquarium.
This study was conducted in Completely Randomized Design (CRD) consisting of
4 treatments with 5 replications, including administration of dried Bacillus
NP5 in feed with different doses(0.5% (A), 1% (B) and 2%(C)) which were 10
10 CFU g- 1 as the concentration and control (K) without administration
of dried Bacillus NP5. The test feed was commercial pellet (Hi-Provite
781-1) with 30.18% protein content, 5.25% fat, 52.53% carbohydrate, 9.12% ash
and 2.92% crude fiber. The dried Bacillus NP5 was added to the feed
and mixed with 2% egg white as a binder. The fish were fed three times a day
(08.00, 12.00, 16.00) by at satiation for 28 days. Replacement of water in the
rearing tanks as much as 80% of total volume were conducted every 4 days to
maintain water quality. The water quality was maintained in the normal range
for freshwater culture, according to Boyd (1990) that
dissolved oxygen <5 mg L- 1, temperature at 24-30°C, pH at
6.5-9.5 and Total Ammonia Nitrogen (TAN)>0.52 ppm.
Observation of growth performance parameters: The growth performance
parameters including Survival Rate(SR); Specific Growth Rate )SGR(; Feed Conversion
Ratio (FCR) were calculated with the following equation:
where, Nt is the number of fish that live at the end of the study )individuals(,
N0 is the number of fish at the beginning of the study (individuals), We is
the average weight of fish at the end of the study )g(, Ws is the average weight
of fish at the beginning of the study (g), t is the duration of the study )day(,
F is the amount of consumed feed (g), Bt is the biomass of fish at the end of
the study (g), B0 is the biomass of fish at the beginning of the study (g).
Enumeration of total viable bacteria count and total Bacillus NP5
Rf R count in the fish intestine: The enumeration was carried
out by the spread plate technique. The fish intestine was taken as much as 0.1
g and homogenized with 0.9 mL of 0.85% physiological buffer solution. Furthermore,
there were the serial dilutions of the sample and then spread them as much as
0.05 mL on LBA medium for Total Viable Bacteria Count (TVBC) and LBA+Rf medium
for total Bacillus NP5 Rf R count (TNP5) in the intestine.
The enumeration of TVBC and TNP5 were conducted at the beginning and end of
the study.
Statistical analysis: All data was tabulated using Microsoft Excel
2007. The data of in vitro assays were analyzed by descriptive analysis
using table and graphic while the data of in vivo assays were analyzed
by one way-ANOVA, then continued by Duncan test with significance as much as
0.05 using SPSS 20.
RESULTS
In vitro assays: The higher product percentages after drying
were shown by the treatments which using the coating material which dried by
spray drying method )WS( and freeze drying method (WF) (5.18±0.98; 4.79±0.64%),
while the other treatments without using the coating material (NS and NF) resulted
the lower product percentages were 0.40±0.00; 0.81±0.01%, respectively (Fig.
1a). The higher probiotic viabilities also were shown in WS and WF which
were 99.88±0.12; 94.59±3.47%, respectively while NS and NF showed the lower
viabilities were 63.84±6.97; 81.48±10.49%, respectively (Fig.
1b).
Based on data of Fig. 1a and 1b, so the
viability test after storage and physical quality observation of dried forms
of probiotic were only conducted in the best treatments (WS and WF) which were
stored in Room Temperature (RT) and Cold Temperature (CT). After being stored
for a month, the highest probiotic viability was obtained in WS which stored
at room temperature (WSRT) with a percentage of 92.54±2.03% and followed by
WSCT, WFCT and WFRT (61.76±0.04; 56.87±0.12; 37.43±2.99%) (Fig.
2).
At the end of the in vitro assays, there were the form changes in WSCT
and WFRT which there were an clotting or caking and discoloration while WSRT
and WFCT were able to maintain their physical forms which were in powder and
flake form (Table 1).
Based on the data of in vitro assays, the production method of dried
probiotic (Bacillus NP5) and storage method that chosen for in vivo
assays was WSRT.
|
Fig. 1(a-b): |
(a) Product percentage and (b) Probiotic
viability after drying. Production dried probiotic without using of the
coating material which dried by spray drying method (NS); freeze drying
method (NF); with using of the coating material which dried by spray drying
method (WS); freeze drying method (WF) |
|
Fig. 2: |
Probiotic viability after storage. Production
of dried probiotic with using of the coating material which dried by spray
drying method and stored in room temperature (WSRT); cold temperature
(WSCT); dried by freeze drying method and stored in room temperature (WFRT);
cold temperature (WFCT) |
|
Fig. 3(a-b): |
(a) Total viable bacteria and (b) Bacillus
NP5 RfR, count in the intestine of tilapia before and after treatments.
Different letters on each bar on the same observation period (Mean±SD)
indicated significant differences (Duncan, p<0.05). Control (K), administration
of dried Bacillus NP5 in feed at a dose of 0.5% (A), 1% (B), 2% (C) |
Table 1: |
Physical quality of dried probiotic |
 |
WS: Coating material spray drying, WF: Coating material freeze
drying, RT: Room temperature, CT: Cold temperature |
Table 2: |
Survival Rate (SR), Specific Growth Rate (SGR) and Feed Conversion
Ratio (FCR) of tilapia |
 |
Different letters in the same row indicated significant differences
(Duncan; p<0.05), the values shown were means and standard deviations |
This treatment had the higher product percentage and viability after drying,
the higher viability after storage and could maintain its form as well as its
initial form after being stored for a month.
In vivo assays: The survival rates of tilapia in this study were
100±0.00% in all dose treatments. The best growth performance was shown by A
with the higher Specific Growth Rate (SGR) was 3.04±0.05% which was significantly
different (p>0.05) with control (K) and C (2.72±0.12; 2.75±0.14%) but was
not significantly different (p<0.05) with B(2.89±0.17%). In addition, A showed
the lowest Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) was 1.25±0.07 which significantly different
)p>0.05( with all the other treatments (Table 2).
In the end of the rearing period, there were the increasing of TVBC in the
intestine of tilapia (Fig. 3a), in which the initial TVBC
of all treatments were 8.43±0.19 log CFU g- 1. Treatment C showed
the highest TVBC (13.20±0.12 log CFU g- 1) in the end of this study
which was significantly different (p>0.05) with the other treatments. The
improvement also occurred in TNP5 in the intestine of tilapia (Fig.
3b), in which there was no colony of Bacillus NP5 Rf R
before the feeding trial. Treatment C showed the highest TNP5 (10.86±0.04 log
CFU g- 1)in the end of this study which was significantly different
(p>0.05) with the other treatments, in which TNP5 of A and B were 6.81±0.04;
8.79±0.02 log CFU g- 1, respectively while there was no colony of
Bacillus NP5 Rf R in the control.
DISCUSSION
Drying is one of the methods for production of dried probiotic as the treatments
in this study used. In addition, drying is also an encapsulation technique used
for the active ingredient which dissolved in the coating material and forming
an emulsion or suspension (Petrovic et al., 2007).
Encapsulation is the process which a material or mixture of materials coated
with or trapped in the material or other systems (Risch,
1995) which will produce particles with diameters varying from a few nanometers,
micrometers to one millimeter (Anal and Singh, 2007;
Zuidam and Shimoni, 2010). This technology is called
microencapsulation and its products is called microencapsulated product. Microencapsulation
through drying method which often used for laboratory and industrial scale are
spray drying and freeze drying which are the physical methods of microencapsulation
(Vidhyalakshmi et al., 2009; Bansode
et al., 2010). Spray drying and freeze drying are widely used for
the production of probiotics, because these methods are able to produce probiotics
in powder form (Krasaekoopt et al., 2003) with
stable quality. According to Zuidam and Shimoni (2010),
spray drying can produce the final product as much as 5-50% while the percentage
of microencapsulated product produced by freeze drying is so various. This was
in line with the results of this study.
The coating materials used in drying method are the material which dissolved
easily in the water like maltodextrin (Desai and Park,
2005; Zuidam and Shimoni, 2010). In addition, the
materials also have an ability to protect the active compound during the process,
able to form a film, dan cheap (Gharsallaoui et al.,
2007). The higher probiotic viability of the treatments which using the
coating material were caused by the coating material protected the probiotic
from oxygen stress, heat and extreme environment during the drying process (Crittenden
et al., 2006). This protection occurred because of a film which
formed by the coating material during the drying process (Reineccius,
2004). Otherwise, the lower viabilities of the uncoated treatments were
caused by the extreme temperature during drying destroyed cell membrane, DNA
and particular proteins within probiotic (Teixeira et
al., 1997; Anal and Singh, 2007).
Besides a high product percentage and viability after drying, the probiotic
product also must have a high viability in the storage period. In this current
study, the viability of probiotic which dried by spray drying method was higher
than freeze drying. This was in line with the previous study by Ying
et al.(2010). Room temperature storage of microencapsulated probiotic
which dried by spray drying method (WSRT) showed the higher viability because
stability of the humidity of the product during storage, in which humidity will
cause clotting or caking and then lead to the reduction of probiotic viability
(Anekella, 2011).
In this study, the administration of dried Bacillus NP5 in feed by
oral application was safe and able to improve the growth performance of tilapia,
especially at a dose of 0.5% with concentration of 10 10 CFU g-
1. Probiotic produces some digestive enzymes which can improve the feed
utilization and the host digestion (Bairagi et al.,
2002). Bacillus NP5 produces amylase (Putra,
2010) which plays a role in carbohydrate absorption. The dose of probiotic
which given to the host have to be carefully determined to avoid the overdose
that can give unexpected side effects and lost in production cost (Dash
et al., 2014). In this study, the administration of probiotic in
higher doses (1 and 2%) did not give a better result in the growth performance
of tilapia. Probiotic in the very high dose will cause imbalance of the microbiota
in the digestive tract and interfere immune response that can cause the lost
of energy which used for the growth (Li et al., 2012;
Ramos et al., 2013).
The enhancement of fish growth performance was also suggested caused by the
presence of the intestinal microbial modulation that shown by the increasing
of TVBC and TNP5 in the intestine of tilapia. This findings also similar with
the previous study by Hoseinifar et al. (2011)
who showed that the administration of probiotic could affect microbial community
of the fish digestive tract by the increasing of LAB level in the digestive
tract, in which LAB level could be the supporting factor of the growth performance
improvement of beluga( Huso huso) juvenile. The TVBC of the treatments
in this study were in the normal range as explained by Austin(2006)
that bacterial population in the fish digestive tract is ~ 10 8 CFU
g- 1. On the other hand, high metabolic activity of fish might be
a cause for high bacterial load in the intestine as reported by Uddin
and Al-Harbi (2012) who found TVBC in the intestine of carp and catfish
ranged at 1.4±2.9×10 10 to 1.7±6.0×10 11 and 2.7±3.4×10
10 to 1.0±4.5×10 11 CFU g- 1, in which those numbers
were higher than the normal range. In addition, the probiotic counts in this
study were in line with Ziaei-Nejad et al. (2006)
who revealed Bacillus numbers took 61.5-93.0% of total bacteria flora
when Indian white shrimp larvae were inoculated with Bacillus via culture
water or enriched Artemia.
CONCLUSION
Probiotic which encapsulated by maltodextrin and dried by spray drying method
and stored in room temperature showed the higher product percentage, viability
after drying and storage. This treatment was also able to maintain physical
quality of the dried probiotic after being stored for a month. The administration
of 0.5% dried Bacillus NP5 in feed by oral application showed the best
growth performance in tilapia.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Thanks to Indonesian General Directorate of Higher Education that has provided
master program scholarship for the first author.
|
REFERENCES |
1: Anal, A.K. and H. Singh, 2007. Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends Food Sci. Technol., 18: 240-251. CrossRef | Direct Link |
2: Anekella, K., 2011. Microencapsulation of probiotics (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus) in raspberry powder by spray drying: Optimization and storage stability studies. Master's Thesis, McGill University, Quebec.
3: Austin, B., 2006. The bacterial microflora of fish, revised. Scient. World J., 6: 931-945. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
4: Bairagi, A., K.S. Ghosh, S.K. Sen and A.K. Ray, 2002. Enzyme producing bacterial flora isolated from fish digestive tracts. Aquacult. Int., 10: 109-121. CrossRef | Direct Link |
5: Bansode, S.S., S.K. Banarjee, D.D. Gaikwad, S.L. Jadhav and R.M. Thorat, 2010. Microencapsulation: A review. Int. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. Rev. Res., 1: 38-43. Direct Link |
6: Boyd, C.E., 1990. Water Quality in Ponds for Aquaculture. 2nd Edn., Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Auburn, AL., USA., Pages: 482.
7: Crittenden, R., R. Weerakkody, L. Sanguansri and M. Augustin, 2006. Synbiotic microcapsules that enhance microbial viability during nonrefrigerated storage and gastrointestinal transit. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 72: 2280-2282. CrossRef | Direct Link |
8: Dash, G., R.P. Raman, K.P. Prasad, M. Makesh, M.A. Pradeep and S. Sen, 2014. Evaluation of Lactobacillus plantarum as feed supplement on host associated microflora, growth, feed efficiency, carcass biochemical composition and immune response of giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man, 1879). Aquaculture, 432: 225-236. CrossRef | Direct Link |
9: Decamp, O. and D. Moriarty, 2007. Aquaculture species profit from probiotics. Feed Mix, 15: 20-23.
10: Desai, K.G.H. and H.J. Park, 2005. Recent developments in microencapsulation of food ingredients. Drying Technol. Int. J., 23: 1361-1394. CrossRef | Direct Link |
11: FAO., 2014. Market reports: Tilapia-June 2014. FAO Globefish, Rome, Italy, http://www.globefish.org/tilapia-june-2014.html.
12: Fuller, R., 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Applied Bacteriol., 66: 365-378. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
13: Gatesoupe, F.J., 1999. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. Aquaculture, 180: 147-165. CrossRef | Direct Link |
14: Gharsallaoui, A., G. Roudaut, O. Chambin, A. Voilley and R. Saurel, 2007. Applications of spray-drying in microencapsulation of food ingredients: An overview. Food Res. Int., 40: 1107-1121. CrossRef | Direct Link |
15: Hoseinifar, S.H., A. Mirvaghefi and D.L. Merrifield, 2011. The effects of dietary inactive brewer's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus on the growth, physiological responses and gut microbiota of juvenile beluga (Huso huso). Aquaculture, 318: 90-94. CrossRef | Direct Link |
16: Josupeit, H., 2005. World market of Tilapia. GLOBEFISH Research Programme, FAO, Rome, Italy, January 2004.
17: Krasaekoopt, W., B. Bhandari and H. Deeth, 2003. Evaluation of encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yoghurt. Int. Dairy J., 13: 3-13. CrossRef | Direct Link |
18: Lazado, C.C. and C.M.A. Caipang, 2014. Mucosal immunity and probiotics in fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 39: 78-89. CrossRef | Direct Link |
19: Li, X.Q., Y.H. Zhu, H.F. Zhang, Y. Yue and Z.X. Cai et al., 2012. Risks associated with high-dose Lactobacillus rhamnosus in an Escherichia coli model of piglet diarrhoea: Intestinal microbiota and immune imbalances. PLoS ONE, Vol. 7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040666
20: Nayak, S.K., 2010. Probiotics and immunity: A fish perspective. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 29: 2-14. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
21: Naylor, R.L., R.W. Hardy, D.P. Bureau, A. Chiu and M. Elliott et al., 2009. Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 106: 15103-15110. CrossRef | Direct Link |
22: Panigrahi, A., V. Kiron, J. Puangkaew, T. Kobayashi, S. Satoh and H. Sugita, 2005. The viability of probiotic bacteria as a factor influencing the immune response in Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture, 243: 241-254. CrossRef | Direct Link |
23: Petrovic, T., V. Nedovic, S. Dimitrijevic-Brankovic, B. Bugarski and C. Lacroix, 2007. Protection of probiotic microorganisms by microencapsulation. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q., 13: 169-174. Direct Link |
24: Putra, A.N., 2010. [Study of probiotic, prebiotic and sinbiotic to increase growth performance Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)]. M.Sc. Thesis, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, Indonesia.
25: Ramos, M.A., B. Weber, J.F. Goncalves, G.A. Santos, P. Rema and R.O.A. Ozorio, 2013. Dietary probiotic supplementation modulated gut microbiota and improved growth of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A: Mol. Integr. Physiol., 166: 302-307. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
26: Reineccius, G.A., 2004. The spray drying of food flavors. Drying Technol. Int. J., 22: 1289-1324. CrossRef | Direct Link |
27: Risch, S.J., 1995. Encapsulation: Overview of Uses and Techniques. In: Encapsulation and Controlled Release of Food Ingredients, Risch, S.J. and G.A. Reineccius (Eds.). American Chemical Society, Washington, DC., ISBN-13: 9780841231641, pp: 2-7.
28: Suprayudi, M.A., 2010. [Local materials: The challenges and hopes of the future aquaculture]. Proceedings of the National Symposium of Biotechnology Aquaculture III, October 7, 2010, Bogor, pp: 31, (In Indonesian)-.
29: Teixeira, P., H. Castro, C. Mohacsi-Farkas and R. Kirby, 1997. Identification of sites of injury in Lactobacillus bulgaricus during heat stress. J. Applied Microbiol., 83: 219-226. Direct Link |
30: Uddin, N. and A.H. Al-Harbi, 2012. Bacterial flora of polycultured common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Int. Aquat. Res., Vol. 4. 10.1186/2008-6970-4-10
31: Vidhyalakshmi, R., R. Bhakyaraj and R.S. Subhasree, 2009. Encapsulation “The future of probiotics”-A review. Adv. Biol. Res., 3: 96-103. Direct Link |
32: Wang, Y.B., J.R. Li and J. Lin, 2008. Probiotics in aquaculture: Challenges and outlook. Aquaculture, 281: 1-4. CrossRef | Direct Link |
33: Widanarni, D.M., S. Nuryati and A.S. Sukenda, 2004. [Pathogenicity assay of Vibrio harveyi in tiger shrimp larvae employing rifampicin-resistant as a molecular marker]. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia, 3: 23-27, (In Indonesian). Direct Link |
34: Ying, D.Y., M.C. Phoon, L. Sanguansri, R. Weerakkody, I. Burgar and M.A. Augustin, 2010. Microencapsulated Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG powders: Relationship of powder physical properties to probiotic survival during storage. J. Food Sci., 75: E588-E595. CrossRef | Direct Link |
35: Ziaei-Nejad, S., M.H. Rezaei, G.A. Takami, D.L. Lovett, A.R. Mirvaghefi and M. Shakouri, 2006. The effect of Bacillus spp. bacteria used as probiotics on digestive enzyme activity, survival and growth in the Indian white shrimp Fenneropenaeus indicus. Aquaculture, 252: 516-524. CrossRef | Direct Link |
36: Zuidam, N.J. and E. Shimoni, 2010. Overview of Microencapsulation for Use in Food Products or Processes and Methods to Make Them. In: Encapsulation Technologies for Active Food Ingredients and Food Processing, Zuidam, N.J. and V.A. Nedovic (Eds.). Chapter 2, Springer, New York, USA., ISBN-13: 978-1-4419-1008-0, pp: 3-30.
|
|
|
 |