|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Seroprevalence of Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis in Dairy Animals with Reproductive Disorders in Uttar Pradesh, India |
|
Amit Kumar Verma,
Amit Kumar,
Sahzad ,
N.C. Prakash Reddy
and
A.N. Shende
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
Respiratory and reproductive disorders in dairy animals due
to various etiological agents have led to significant economic losses to dairy
industry. These losses are due to abortions, metritis, retention of placenta,
repeat breeding, death of animals, loss of production and trade restrictions
etc. The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to detect the seroprevalence
of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR, BHV-1) in dairy animals of western
parts of Uttar Pradesh, India. Anti BHV-1 antibodies were measured using a commercial
ELISA kit (SYANOVIR® IBR-Ab). Blood samples were collected from
a total of 134 animals of different age, gender from 8 districts. Overall individual
seroprevalence was 32.84%. The study revealed that BHV-1 is comparatively more
widespread in cattle (46.51%) than buffalo (35.28%). Comparison of different
sex groups of animals revealed that the higher numbers of infected animals were
identified in male (48.00%) than female (29.35%). The seropositivity of IBR
increased with age of animals. The highest prevalence of IBR (66.67%) was observed
in animals aged more than 8 years. As vaccination against IBR is not practiced
in the region and higher percent positivity (>20%) in all age group of animals
indicated the natural circulation of BHV-1 virus in the population. Because
of less awareness on the vaccination of animals against this virus, the disease
may spread rapidly. The results of present study also indicate that strict monitoring
and surveillance of IBR is need of today to protect the animals from infection
and further spread.
|
|
|
|
|
Received: May 30, 2013;
Accepted: June 06, 2013;
Published: November 27, 2013
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Respiratory and reproductive disorders in dairy animals due to various etiological
agents like Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus (BVDV), bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1),
Mycoplasma, Brucella, Leptospira, Listeria etc.
have led to significant economic losses. These losses are due to abortions,
metritis, retention of placenta, repeat breeding, death of animals, loss of
production and trade restrictions etc. (Kumar et al.,
2009, 2011; Raizman et
al., 2011; Verma et al., 2012). Infectious
Bovine Rhinotrachitis (IBR), caused by Bovine herpesvirus-1 (BoHV-1), a member
of the genus Varicellovirus, family Herpesviridae, subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae,
is a highly contagious disease of animals. The disease occurs in a variety of
syndrome such as Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis (IBR), Infectious Pustular
Vulvovaginitis (IPV), infectious pustular balanoposthitis (IBP), abortion, conjunctivitis,
encephalitis and generalized symptoms in young calves (Lata
et al., 2009; Nandi et al., 2009;
Jacevicius et al., 2010; Raizman
et al., 2011; Raaperi et al., 2012).
The disease is clinically characterized by inflammation of respiratory and genital
tract and abortion. In young calves various organs may be affected by systemic
infection of the virus. To effectively control this disease, screening, surveillance
and monitoring along with vaccination is important but unfortunately no exact
data is available for its status in many of the countries including India (Raizman
et al., 2011). Since India is the largest producer of milk in the
world, so the IBR infection in India is also assumed a great importance. The
disease was first time reported in India from Uttar Pradesh (Mehrotra
et al., 1976) and since then many studies have been conducted in
different parts of India (Renukaradhya et al., 1996;
Rajkhowa et al., 2004; Nandi
et al., 2011) viz., Bihar (Singh and Sinha,
2006), Gujrat (Lata et al., 2008), Andaman
and Nicobar islands (Sunder et al., 2005) and
West Bengal (Ganguly et al., 2008) etc. However,
scanty of information is available for Uttar Pradesh state. Therefore, the objectives
of this cross-sectional study were to detect the anti BHV-l antibodies in the
sera of cattle and buffaloes of Uttar Pradesh, India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area: The study area was various districts (Agra, Amroha, Baghpat,
Bijnor, Ghaziabad, Hathras, Mathura and Moradabad) of Uttar Pradesh, India (Fig.
1). The climate of the state is humid subtropical with dry winter type.
The meteorological parameters of the area is as follows:the average annual temperature
(11.0 to 36.9°C); annual rainfall (650-1000 mm), relative humidity (20-50%),
predominant vegetation is tropical dry deciduous forest. The predominant economic
activity is agriculture along with animal rearing. The main cattle breeds are
Zebu, Brahaman and crossbreds, while the main buffalo breeds are Murrah. For
seroprevalence study, the individual animal was the research unit.
Sampling: In the present study, blood samples from 134 animals with
the history of reproductive disorders as abortions, repeat breeding, retention
of placenta and metritis and calves in near vicinity to those animals including
43 cattle and 91 buffaloes (of various sex, age and districts) were collected
during 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. About 5 mL of blood was collected from the juglar
vein of each animal using sterilized disposable syringe and needles. Samples
were brought to laboratory on ice and kept there for 6-8 h and thereafter centrifuged
at 3000 rpm for 15 min to obtain the serum. Serum samples were collected and
stored in labelled vials at -20°C till use.
Serological test: The serological testing of sera samples was performed
at the Departments of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Uttar
Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayay Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishvidhyalaya Evum
Go-Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura, India. Commercial standardised ELISA
kits (SYANOVIR® IBR-Ab
ELISA kit, Sweden) were used for the detection of anti BHV 1 antibodies. The
testing was conducted as per the protocol given by manufacturer.
Statistical analysis: All the statistical significance of the differences
between prevalence percentages were calculated at 95% probability using the
standard procedures.
|
Fig. 1: |
Uttar Pradesh State map showing the districts of study for
serosurveillance of IBR |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 134 animals (43 cattle and 91 buffalo) from 08 districts of western
Uttar Pradesh were sampled and screened for the presence of anti BHV-1 antibodies
using ELISA test. Out of 134 serum samples screened, 44 (32.84%) of them exhibited
positive reaction (Table 1-3). The high
seropositivity of animals against IBR is probably due to lack of control measures
towards this infection. The result obtained in the study was within the range
14.75 to 68.90% as reported in previous studies like Singh
and Sinha (2006), Ganguly et al. (2008),
Lata et al. (2008) and Nandi
et al. (2011) conducted in other states of India like Bihar, West
Bengal, Gujrat, Aasam, Madhya Pradesh etc. The percent positivity was higher
in cattle (48.84%) than that of in buffaloes (35.28%). The possible reason for
higher seropositivity in cattle might be due to the inclusion of crossbred animals
of cattle species in the study and the involvement of artificial insemination
in cattle breeding. The animals were categorised according to age. Lowest seroprevalence
was found in age group below two years of age and highest in the age group above
8 years of age. The age wise percent positivity increased with age (Fig.
2), which is in accordance to the results reported by earlier studies (Singh
and Sinha, 2006; Ganguly et al., 2008). The
possible reason may be increased susceptibility of animals with age or repeated
subclinical infection with the virus that boost to keep the antibody titre higher
enough to be detected positive or decrease in immunity and increase in stress,
which may lead to reactivation of latent virus (Singh and
Sinha, 2006). Generally all the members of Herpesviridae family has the
chances to infect their host as latent infection as a sequel to primary infection
(Nandi et al., 2009). The percent positivity
was higher in male animals (48.00%) in comparison to that of female animals
(29.35%). This might be due to behaviour of male animals as they used to lick
the discharges, which is the good source of infection, from female genitalia
and also the exposure to more number of females and that to during the estrous
or post abortion period or post parturition estrous when there are more chances
of virus excretion in discharges. This variation in place wise (district wise)
percent positivity (8.33 to 62.50%) is very much expected and has been observed
in other states too like West Bengal (Ganguly et al.,
2008). The disease occurs to be more prevalent in areas of intensive animal
husbandry practices such as organized farms (Ganguly et
al., 2008). The present study is based on limited number of serum samples
from eight district of Uttar Pradesh, India.
Table 1: |
Seroprevalence of IBR in dairy animals considering different
parameters |
 |
Table 2: |
Seroprevalence of IBR in cattle considering different parameters |
 |
Table 3: |
Seroprevalence of IBR in buffalo considering different parameters |
 |
However, the results are indicative of circulation of Bovine Herpes virus in
the state, thus further systemic epidemiological studies are warranted to know
the true status of disease in Uttar Pradesh state so that further necessary
action can be taken to formulate the control strategies.
|
Fig. 2: |
IBR seroprevalence dynamics in age groups of dairy animals
(cattle and buffalo) |
CONCLUSION
The present study clearly showed the widespread sero-positive cases of IBR
in various districts of western parts of Uttar Pradesh. As vaccination against
IBR is not practiced in the region and higher percent positivity (>20%) in
all age group of animals indicates the natural circulation of BHV-1 virus in
the population. As the disease affect the reproductive function of the animals,
thus may cause a significant economic losses to dairy industry. Because of less
awareness on the vaccination of animals against this virus, the disease may
spread rapidly. The results of present study also indicate that strict monitoring
and surveillance of IBR is need of today to protect the animals from infection
and further spread.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are highly thankful to Head, Department of Veterinary Microbiology
and Immunology; Dean, College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry and
Honble Vice chancellor, Uttar
Pradesh Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayay Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan Vishvidhyalaya Evum
Go-Anusandhan Sansthan (DUVASU), Mathura, India; for providing all the necessary
support and facilities for conducting this study.
|
REFERENCES |
1: Ganguly, S., S.K. Mukhopadhayay and I. Paul, 2008. Studies on seroprevalence of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in cattle population of West Bengal. Indian J. Comp. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. Dis., 29: 12-16. Direct Link |
2: Jacevicius, E., A. Salomskas, J. Milius, S. Petkevicius and I. Jaceviciene et al., 2010. Five year serological study of Bovine Herpesvirus type-1 in cattle in Lithuania. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy, 54: 289-292. Direct Link |
3: Lata, J., A.N. Kanani, V. Kumar, C.G. Joshi and J.H. Purohit, 2009. Detection of bovine herpesvirus 1 infection in breeding bulls by ELISA and PCR assay. Indian J. Vet. Res., 18: 1-4.
4: Lata, J., A.N. Kanani, T.J. Patel, J.H. Purohit, M.K. Jhala, H.C. Chuahan and B.S. Chandel, 2008. Seroprevalence of bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) in Indian breeding bulls of Gujarat. Buffalo Bull., 27: 165-169. Direct Link |
5: Kumar, A., A.K. Verma and A. Rahal, 2011. Mycoplasma bovis, a multi disease producing pathogen: An overview. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 6: 537-546. CrossRef | Direct Link |
6: Kumar, N., B.C. Pal, S.K. Yadav, A.K. Verma, U. Jain and G. Yadav, 2009. Prevalence of bovine brucellosis in Uttar Pradesh, India. J. Vet. Public Health, 7: 129-131. Direct Link |
7: Mehrotra, M.L., B.S. Rajya and S. Kumar, 1976. Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis (IBR) keratoconjunctivities in calves. Indian J. Vet. Pathol., 1: 70-73.
8: Nandi, S., M. Kumar, M. Manohar and R.S. Chauhan, 2009. Bovine herpes virus infections in cattle. Anim. Health Res. Rev., 10: 85-98. PubMed |
9: Nandi, S., M. Kumar, V. Yadav and V. Chander, 2011. Serological evidences of bovine herpesvirus‐1 infection in bovines of organized farms in India. Transbound. Emerg. Dis., 58: 105-109. CrossRef |
10: Raaperi, K., A. Aleksejev, T. Orro and A. Viltrop, 2012. Dynamics of bovine herpesvirus type 1 infection in Estonian dairy herds with and without a control programme. Vet. Rec., 171: 99-99. CrossRef |
11: Raizman, E.A., R. Pogranichniy, M. Negron, M. Schnur and D.E. Tobar-Lopez, 2011. Seroprevalence of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and bovine viral diarrhea virus type 1 and type 2 in non-vaccinated cattle herds in the Pacific Region of Central Costa Rica. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 43: 773-778. CrossRef |
12: Rajkhowa, S., C. Rajkhowa, H. Rahman and K.M. Bujarbaruah, 2004. Seroprevalence of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in mithun (Bos frontalis) in India. Rev. Sci. Tech., 23: 821-829. PubMed |
13: Renukaradhya, G.J., M. Rajasekhar and R. Raghavan, 1996. Prevalence of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis in southern India. Rev. Sci. Tech., 15: 1021-1028. PubMed |
14: Singh, A. and B.K. Sinha, 2006. Seroprevalence of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) in cattle in Bihar. Indian J. Comp. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. Dis., 27: 107-108. Direct Link |
15: Sunder, J., R.B. Rai, A. Kundu, R.N. Chatterjee, S. Senani and S. Jeyakumar, 2005. Incidence and prevalence of livestock diseases of Andaman and Nicobar islands. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 75: 1041-1043.
16: Verma, A.K., A. Kumar, K. Dhama, R. Deb, A. Rahal, Mahima and S. Chakraborty, 2012. Leptospirosis-Persistence of a dilemma: An overview with particular emphasis on trends and recent advances in vaccines and vaccination strategies. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 15: 954-963. CrossRef | Direct Link |
|
|
|
 |