|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Low Cost Medium for Spore Production of Bacillus KKU02 and KKU03
and the Effects of the Produced Spores on Growth of Giant Freshwater Prawn (Macrobrachium
rosenbergii de Man) |
|
Charkrit Wangka-Orm,
Sirirat Deeseenthum
and
Vichai Leelavatcharamas
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
In order to extend the shelf life of 2 high potential Bacillus
probiotic isolates which were Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus KKU03,
the spore forms of these 2 Bacillus isolates were studied for using as
probiotic instead. The low cost medium for spore production of these 2 Bacillus
isolates was examined in order to produce probiotic spores for feeding the shrimps.
It was found that cassava at 100 g L-1 and supplemented with 20.0
g L-1 dextrose, 0.1 g L-1 MgSO4 and 2.0 g L-1
(NH4)2SO4 showed the highest spore concentration
at about 1x108 CFU mL-1. The effects of feeding these
2 Bacillus spores on the growth of giant freshwater prawns were further
examined. The spores of Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus KKU03 (~107
spore mL-1) in pure and mixed culture forms were mixed with
commercial prawn feed (200 mL kg-1) to give six feed treatments.
Body length and weight of the prawns in mixed spore culture tanks after rearing
for 90 days (13.5 cm and 59.8 g, respectively) were significantly higher (p
= 0.05) than other treatments. The treated prawns were further challenged with
Aeromonas hydrophila for 7 days. The percentages of survival after the
challenge in the prawns fed with the mixed spores (46.8%) were also found significantly
higher (p = 0.05) than others groups, except the mixed live cell treatment (60%).
These results indicated that the spores of Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus
KKU03 had a high potential for using as commercial probiotics.
|
|
|
|
How
to cite this article:
Charkrit Wangka-Orm, Sirirat Deeseenthum and Vichai Leelavatcharamas, 2014. Low Cost Medium for Spore Production of Bacillus KKU02 and KKU03
and the Effects of the Produced Spores on Growth of Giant Freshwater Prawn (Macrobrachium
rosenbergii de Man). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 17: 1015-1022. DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2014.1015.1022 URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2014.1015.1022
|
|
|
Received: June 26, 2013;
Accepted: January 17, 2014;
Published: March 29, 2014
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii de Man) is commonly
found in the nature among Southeast Asian countries. This prawn is used to be
caught along the major rivers in Thailand and is an alternative source of protein,
especially for the North-eastern area of Thailand where the productivity of
agricultural crop is low. Because of its good taste and texture, the freshwater
shrimp has become a very popular food which, consequently, resulting in an over
fishing and destroying of its natural habitat. The natural catching, thus, has
been reduced dramatically. The production of post larvae in hatcheries with
potential for pond culture and number of prawn farms, thus, has significantly
increased. The fast growing of shrimp farming and the continuous use of the
farming land led to the neglect of good husbandry and environmental management.
Under these damaging environmental conditions, shrimps were stressed and weakened
and, thus, could cause the development of shrimp diseases. Thus, the major problem
for the shrimp farming industry is the shrimp disease. Vaccines and antibiotics
are the important disease control measures for the shrimp farming. Vaccines
alone, however, could not be used in controlling all shrimp diseases. Thus it
is not an economical measure for shrimp protection. Antibiotic and chemotherapeutics
treatments are, hence, the important measures for disease controlling in aquaculture.
Bacterial resistance to antibiotics development has been well documented. The
fear of the spread of this resistance to human pathogens has led to the banning
of several antibiotics as so-called growth promoters in animal husbandry within
the European Union and the year 2006 is the date proposed for a complete ban
of antibiotics in animal feed within Europe (Cartman and
La Ragione, 2004; Hong et al., 2005). This
concern has also been raised in the aquaculture industry and has led to suggestions
for other disease control measures. The use of probiotic is an alternative measure
and many species have been used and produced (Westerdahl
et al., 1991; Smith and Davey, 1993; Gatesoupe,
1994; Austin et al., 1995; Bly
et al., 1997; Gram et al., 1999; Sanders
et al., 2003; Hong et al., 2005; Cutting,
2011). However, the fear of antibiotic resistant gene transfer among the
bacterial species is another concern. Thus, new isolates of probiotic which
could not transfer antibiotic resistance gene are still needed.
Most probiotic, generally found normally in the Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT)
of humans and animals, are supplied as live supplements in feed which must have
the ability to survive passage through the intestinal tract. However, microorganisms
which are not normally found in the GIT, such as the spore forming bacteria,
are alternative interesting probiotic sources. One disadvantage of using live
non-spore forming bacteria is the stability of the probiotic product. If the
spore form is used, thus it can be stored longer on the shelf (Hong
et al., 2005; Cutting, 2011).
Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus KKU03 have been isolated from the
intestine of the giant freshwater prawns. It was found that these 2 isolates
of Bacillus showed a high potential for using as prawn probiotic (Deeseenthum
et al., 2007). However, when these 2 isolates were applied in the
field by the farmers, their efficiencies were declined because of the reduction
of their viabilities. The advantage of the Bacillus sp. was they could
form spores which could survive in some stress conditions, such as heat and
dry conditions. In order to use the spore for testing the probiotic efficiency,
the mass production of spore need to be examined. Thus, the low cost medium
for spore production and the effects of the produced spores of Bacillus
KKU02 and Bacillus KKU03 as probiotic on growth of giant freshwater prawn
after feeding with the probiotic were the aims of these studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Low cost media formulation for Bacillus KKU02 and KKU03 spores production
Microorganism: Two Bacillus sp. isolated from the intestine
of the giant freshwater prawn which were Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus
KKU03 as reported earlier (Deeseenthum et al., 2007),
were used in this study.
Media formula for spore production: Four cheap agricultural substrates
which were sweet potato (Impomoea batatasil), cassava root (Manihot
esculenta), rice (Oryza sativa) and sticky rice (Oryza sativa
var. glutinosa), were added to the tested media 200 g L-1 as carbon
source, comparison to Nutrient Broth (NB). Each agricultural substrate medium
was boiled for a given time to obtain the aqueous extract which was then supplemented
with 20.0 g L-1 dextrose and use as spore production medium. Control
medium was consisted of 20.0 g L-1 dextrose as a sole carbon source.
The initial pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.0 prior to sterilization at 121°C
for 15 min. The sterilized culture medium (150 mL in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks)
was inoculated with 1.0% of 12 h culture of Bacillus KKU02 and KKU03
and cultivated at 37°C on a rotary shaker (150 rpm). The obtained optimum
carbon source medium was further examined for the mineral salt supplementation
by adding the aqueous extract medium with MgSO4 0.1 g L-1
and (NH4)2SO4 2.0 g L-1 which were
used in the previous cell production medium (Deeseenthum
et al., 2007). In order to obtain the optimum concentration of the
carbon source, the concentrations of the obtained carbon source medium were
then further varied to 50, 100 and 200 g L-1. The culture condition
was the same as described earlier.
Analysis: Spore concentration was determined by viable plate count technique.
Samples were taken every 4-6 h and boiled at 80°C for 10 min for eliminating
of the vegetative cells. The remaining spore sample was then used for viable
plate counting.
Giant freshwater prawn production using Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus
KKU03 in spore form as probiotic
Preparation of experimental animals: Post larvae of giant freshwater prawns
(PL-15) were obtained from a hatchery located in Supanburi province, Thailand.
The prawns were acclimatized in the tanks for 60 days and fed with only the
commercial feed. Two hundred giant freshwater prawns of uniform size (12.0-14.0
g) were kept in each tank. The prawns were reared with probiotic bacteria in
six feed treatments until reach to 90 days.
Experimental conditions: The experiment was conducted for 150 days at
the Department of Biotechnology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
The experiment was divided into six triplicates experimental groups in 18 concrete
tanks (1.50x2.00x1.00 m3 at 0.5 m water height). The total water
in each tank was maintained at 1,500 L and aeration was continuously provided.
About 50% of water was replaced with fresh water once a week. The details of
the experimental groups were as follows:
Treatment 1: |
Commercial diet+spore of Bacillus
KKU03 |
Treatment 2: |
Commercial diet+spore of Bacillus KKU02 |
Treatment 3: |
Commercial diet+spores of Bacillus KKU02
and KKU03 |
Treatment 4: |
Commercial diet+vegetative cells of Bacillus
KKU02 and KKU03 (Deeseenthum et al., 2007) |
Treatment 5: |
Commercial diet (control) |
Treatment 6: |
Commercial diet+commercial probiotic (reference control) |
The commercial feed used was purchased from Charoen Pokphand Company, Samutsakhon,
Thailand (CP No. 9041). The feed was autoclaved at 110°C for 28 min before
mixing with the cultured spore for eliminating of the contamination.
Bacterial strains and feeding regime: The Bacillus KKU03 and
Bacillus KKU02 were grown in cooked cassava chip aqueous extract medium
as described earlier for 48 h at 37°C on a shaker at 150 rpm. The final
spore concentration of about 107 spore mL-1 was mixed
with the feed at the ratio of 200 mL to 1 kg feed (the expected concentration
in the feed was 2x106 spore g-1). After acclimatization,
the prawns were fed twice daily, at 08.00 am and 06.00 pm. The daily feeding
rate was about 10% of total body weight.
Analysis of samples: Ten randomly collected live prawns from each tank
were measured for lengths and weights once every 3 weeks. Water quality was
checked weekly for pH, dissolved oxygen and temperature. The amount of ammonium,
total hardness and total alkalinity were also determined by test kits (HACH®)
obtained from HACH Company, USA.
Statistical analysis: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used
to determine any significant differences among the treatment groups. The comparison
was done by using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) test between the six
treatments.
Challenge test of the probiotic treated giant freshwater prawns
Experimental
conditions: After rearing shrimps in six feed treatments (prawn production
section) until reach 120 days, 30 shrimps from each treatment (triplicate of
10 shrimps per tank) were transferred into a glass container (15x18x15
at 6 of water height) and challenge with Aeromonas hydrophila which
was cultured and maintained using NB at 37°C, 200 rpm for 24 h. The bacterial
suspension with a final concentration of 105-108 CFU mL-1
(300 mL) was added to each tank. The number of survival shrimps was recorded
daily until 0% survival was reached in any treatment.
RESULTS
Low cost medium formulation for spore productions of Bacillus KKU02
and KKU03: Four abundant agricultural substrates which were sweet potato
(Impomoea batatasil), cassava root (Manihot esculenta), rice (O.
sativa Linn.) and sticky rice (O. sativa var. glutinosa), were added
to the tested media as carbon sources in comparison to Nutrient Broth (NB).
The results were shown in Fig. 1. It was found that all substrates
could support the spore productions of Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus
KKU03 better than without adding any agricultural substrates (the control
group).
|
Fig. 1(a-b): |
Spore production of Bacillus (a) KKU02 and (b) KKU03
when using different agricultural substrates as carbon sources |
It could be seen that only cassava root and sweet potato supplementation gave
an equal or better spore concentration than the nutrient broth. However, when
consider the price of cassava and sweet potato, the cooked cassava root was
the optimum carbon source for Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus KKU03
spore productions which showed the highest concentration of Bacillus KKU02
and Bacillus KKU03 spores at 8.32 and 1.35x 108 spores mL-1,
respectively.
Supplementation of cooked cassava medium with mineral salts, 0.1 g L-1
MgSO4 and 2.0 g L-1 (NH4)2SO4,
resulted in 1.75 times increase of spore productions in both Bacillus
strains (Fig. 2). The highest concentrations of Bacillus
KKU02 and Bacillus KKU03 spores were 1.62x108 and 6.61x107
spore mL-1, respectively.
Various cassava concentrations (50, 100 and 200 g L-1) for spore
production were studied in order to obtain the optimum cassava concentration
for spore production.
|
Fig. 2(a-b): |
Spore production of Bacillus (a) KKU02 and (b) KKU03
) when supplementation with mineral salts in the cassava medium |
The optimum cassava concentration for spore production of both Bacillus
strains was 100 g L-1 which showed the highest spore concentrations
of Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus KKU03 at 1.78x108 and
1.48x108 spores mL-1, respectively (Fig.
3).
Giant freshwater prawn production using Bacillus KKU02 and Bacillus
KKU03 in spore form as probiotic: Water quality during shrimp cultivation
was also concerned in this study. The range of water quality parameters during
experimental period in each prawn culture tank were shown in Table
1. All of the measured parameters which were pH, temperature, %DO, the amount
of ammonium, hardness and alkalinity were in the ranges of 7.02-8.72, 23-30°C,
4.0-8.5%, 0-0.25, 120-250 and 80-180 ppm, respectively. These results were in
the acceptable ranges suggested by Armstrong et al.
(1976), New (1990) and Boyd and
Zimmerman (2000).
The rearing prawns with the probiotic in six feed treatments for 90 days showed
significant differences (p≥0.05) of body weight and length gain between T1,
T2, T3, T4, T6 and the control group (T5) during probiotic feeding, as shown
in Fig. 4.
|
Fig. 3(a-b): |
Spore production of Bacillus (a) KKU02 and (b) KKU03
at various cassava concentrations |
Table 1: |
Physical and chemical water quality parameters ranges during
shrimp cultivation with 6 feed treatments of pure and mixed cultures of
Bacillus KKU 02 and KKU03 |
|
|
Fig. 4(a-b): |
(a) Body weight and (b) Length of giant freshwater prawn after
rearing for 90 days in six feed treatments |
The prawns fed with mixed culture of spore form (T3) exhibited the highest
body weight and length at 59.75 g and 13.50 cm, respectively. On the other hand,
the body weight and length of the probiotic treatment groups T1, T2, T4 and
T6 were not significantly different from each other (p≥0.05).
Challenge test of the treated giant freshwater prawn: After 3 days of
post challenge with A. hydrophila, 50% of shrimps in the control group
(T5 without any probiotic supplementation) were dead while more than 70% of
shrimps in all probiotic treatment groups still survive, as shown in Fig.
5.
|
Fig. 5: |
Percentage of survival in challenged prawn after challenging
prawns with A. hydrophila for 7 days compared to the control group |
All shrimps in the control treatment (T5) could not survive after 7 days of
the challenge. In contrast, the survival rate of prawn in mixed culture treatments
both spore and vegetative cell, could survived more than 45% at day 7 of the
challenge which were comparable or even better than the commercial probiotic.
The lower percentages of shrimp survival in T1 and T2 after 3 days of the challenge
were because some shrimps were dead during molting.
DISCUSSION
Low cost medium formulation for spore productions of Bacillus KKU02
and KKU03: Bacillus spores have been reported as probiotic uses
both in human and animal from a lot of scientists (Hoa
et al., 2001; La Ragione et al., 2001;
Casula and Cutting, 2002; La Ragione
and Woodward, 2003; Hong et al., 2005; DArienzo
et al., 2006; Hong et al., 2008; Cutting,
2011). Bacillus KKU02 and KKU03 were reported earlier in using as
probiotic in giant freshwater shrimp (Deeseenthum et al.,
2007). In order to extend the shelf life of these 2 Bacillus isolates,
their spore forms were investigated. In order to use spores as probiotic for
feeding shrimp, mass production of spore must be considered, including cheap
medium formulation for spore production. Thailand has a lot of cheap agricultural
products which could be used for bacteria cultivation. Four abundant agricultural
products which were sweet potato, cassava root, rice and sticky rice, were tested
in order to obtain the best substrate for spore productions of Bacillus
KKU02 and KKU03. Fortunately, cassava which was the cheapest agricultural substrate,
was the optimum substrate for our Bacillus spore productions. This could
be seen from the obtained spore concentrations which were comparable to those
obtained from the Nutrient broth. The control group which contained only dextrose,
showed the lowest spore number, possibly because of the limitation of carbon
source.
Some minerals, such as calcium magnesium and manganese, have been reported
in enhancing spore formulation of some Bacillus sp. (Amaha
et al., 1956; Curran, 1958, Kolodziej
and Slepecky, 1964; Cote and Gherna, 1999; Monteiro
et al., 2005; Dechmahitkul et al., 2007;
Omer, 2010). In our previous studies, MgSO4 and (NH4)2SO4
were used as mineral and nitrogen sources in culturing Bacillus KKU 02
and KKU 03 (Deeseenthum et al., 2007). Thus, these
2 compounds were tested by adding in the cassava medium for spore production.
The results showed that the spore concentration was increased 1.7 times, compared
to the medium without supplementation.
The concentration of carbon source was also important in spore production.
Kang et al. (1992) reported that when glucose
higher than 200 g L-1, Bacillus thuringienesis could not produce
its spore. The concentration of cassava in the spore production medium was,
thus, examined. The results showed that reducing the cassava to 100 g L-1
could still get the spore concentration equivalent to when 200 g L-1
were used.
Thus the optimum conditions for spore production of Bacillus KKU02 and KKU03 were cassava 100 g L-1, dextrose 20 g L-1,
MgSO4 0.1 g L-1 and (NH4)2SO4 2.0 g L-1.
Giant freshwater prawn production using spore of Bacillus KKU02 and
Bacillus KKU03 as probiotic: Water qualities, such as pH, %DO, the
amount of ammonium, hardness and alkalinity, had some effects on shrimp growth
(Armstrong et al., 1976; New,
1990; Boyd and Zimmerman, 2000). Water in the culture
tanks was changed once a week in order to make sure that water had no effect
on the death and could be used for culturing shrimps. The results showed that
water quality during shrimp cultivation was in the acceptable range. Thus, growth
performance of the cultured shrimps was affected by the studied Bacillus
probiotic.
After feeding shrimps with probiotic, both in vegetative cells and spore forms
of Bacillus KKU02 and KKU03 it was found that the weight of the shrimps
was significantly higher than feeding only the commercial feed, as shown in
Fig. 4, although the shrimp length in all treatments, except
in T3, was not significantly different. In addition, the mixed cultures, both
live cells and spore forms, exhibited the better results than using pure spore
cultures and the commercial probiotic. These results were similar to our previous
report when live cells were used (Deeseenthum et al.,
2007). This was possibly because the mixed probiotic Bacillus sp.
enhanced nutrients utilization in shrimps, as these 2 isolates of Bacillus
could produce amylase and protease (Deeseenthum et al.,
2007). Moreover, these results also indicated that the spore forms of these
two isolates of Bacillus gave the same results when the vegetative cells
were used. Thus, the spore of these 2 Bacillus isolates could also be
used as probitics. The pure Bacillus spore of both stains, in addition,
showed the equivalent obtaining weight to the commercial probiotic treatment.
These results indicated that our Bacillus stains had a high potential
for commercialization.
Challenge test of the treated giant freshwater prawn after raring for 90
days: The survival of probiotic fed shrimps was enhanced after challenging
with A. hydrophila, especially in the mixed culture, confirming
the advantages of probiotic use. This was possibly because of the immune stimulation
or pathogen growth inhibition by the probiotic Bacillus sp. which was
reported by a number of investigators (Sakai et al.,
1995; Itami et al., 1998; Moriarty,
1998; Rengpipat et al., 2000; Bachere,
2003; Vaseeharan and Ramasamy, 2003; Balcazar
et al., 2006; Pandiyan et al., 2013).
The low survival of shrimps in the pure spore cultures of Bacillus KKU02
(T1) and KKU03 (T2) after 3 days of challenge was possibly because the shrimps
accidentally molted during the challenge test. The molting shrimps were easily
attacked by the healthy shrimps and easily to be infected by the pathogen. The
mixed culture, both live (T3) and spore (T4) forms, showed the highest percentage
of survival which was better than the commercial probiotic (T6). These results
confirmed that our mixed Bacillus culture had a high potential in commercial
use. However, more aspects in using these two isolates of Bacillus, such
as the safety and production cost, have to be studied further.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank the Office of the Higher Education Commission,
Thailand for supporting by grant fund under the program Strategic Scholarships
for Frontier Research Network for the Join Ph.D. Program Thai Doctoral degree
for this research, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University and Agricultural Biotechnology
Research Center for Sustainable Economy, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University,
Khon Kaen, Thailand, for the financial support of this research. Thank you to
the Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Khon Kaen University
and the Fermentation Research Center for Value Added Agricultural Products,
Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand and the Department of Environmental
Science, Faculty of Science, Udon Thani Rajabhaj University, Udon Thani, Thailand
for providing facilities for this research.
|
REFERENCES |
1: Amaha, M., Z.J. Ordal and A. Touba, 1956. Sporulation requirements of Bacillus coagulans var. Thermoacidurans in complex media. J. Bacteriol., 72: 34-41. Direct Link |
2: Armstrong, D.A., M.J. Stephenson and A.W. Knight, 1976. Acute toxicity of nitrite to larvae of the giant Malaysian prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquaculture, 9: 39-46. CrossRef |
3: Austin, B., L.F. Stuckey, P.A.W. Robertson, I. Effendi and D.R.W. Griffith, 1995. A probiotic strain of Vibrio alginolyticus effective in reducing diseases caused by Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio ordalii. J. Fish Dis., 18: 93-96. CrossRef |
4: Bachere, E., 2003. Anti-infectious immune effectors in marine invertebrates: Potential tools for disease control in larviculture. Aquaculture, 227: 427-438. CrossRef | Direct Link |
5: Balcazar, J.L., I. de Blas, I. Ruiz-Zarzuela, D. Cunningham, D. Vendrell and J.L. Muzquiz, 2006. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet. Microbiol., 114: 173-186. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
6: Bly, J.E., S.M.A. Quiniou, L.A. Lawson and L.W. Clem, 1997. Inhibition of saprolegnia pathogenic for fish by Pseudomonas fluorescens. J. Fish Dis., 20: 35-40. CrossRef |
7: Boyd, C. and S. Zimmerman, 2000. Grow-Out Systems-Water Quality and Soil Management. In: Freshwater Prawn Culture-The Farming of Macrobrachium rosenbergii, New, M.B. and W.C. Valenti (Ed.). Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK., pp: 221-238.
8: Cartman, S.T. and R.M. La Ragione, 2004. Spore Probiotics as Animal Feed Supplements. In: Bacterial Spore Formers: Probiotics and Emerging Applications, Ricca, E., A.O. Henriques and S.M. Cutting (Eds.). Horizon Bioscience, Norfolk, UK., ISBN: 9781904933021, pp. 155-161.
9: Casula, G. and S.M. Cutting, 2002. Bacillus probiotics: Spore germination in the gastrointestinal tract. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 68: 2344-2352. CrossRef | Direct Link |
10: Cote, R. and R.L. Gherna, 1999. Medium Formulation and Design, E. Coli and Bacillus Spp. In: Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technology: Fermentation, Biocatalysis and Bioseparation, Flickinger, M.C. and S.W. Drew (Eds.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA., ISBN: 9780471138228, pp: 1676-1683.
11: Curran, H.R., 1958. The Mineral Requirements for Sporulation. In: Spores, Halverson, H.O. (Ed.). American Institute of Biological Sciences, Washington, DC., USA., pp: 1-9.
12: Cutting, S.M., 2011. Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiol., 28: 214-220. CrossRef | PubMed |
13: D'Arienzo, R., F. Maurano, G. Mazzarella, D. Luongo, R. Stefanile, E. Ricca and M. Rossi, 2006. Bacillus subtilis spores reduce susceptibility to Citrobacter rodentium-mediated enteropathy in a mouse model. Res. Microbiol., 157: 891-897. PubMed |
14: Dechmahitkul, W., C. Youkong, K. Poomputra, S. Akeprathumchai and P. Mekvijitsaeng, 2007. Study on media formulation and production process of Bacillus subtilis spores for animal probiotics. KMUTT Res. Dev. J., 30: 251-259. Direct Link |
15: Deeseenthum, S., V. Leelavatcharamas and J.D. Brooks, 2007. Effect of feeding Bacillus sp. as probiotic bacteria on growth of giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii de Man). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 1481-1485. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
16: Gatesoupe, F.J., 1994. Lactic acid bacteria increase the resistance of turbot larvae, Scophthalmus maximus, against pathogenic Vibrio sp. Aquat. Living Resour., 7: 277-282. CrossRef | Direct Link |
17: Gram, L., J. Melchiorsen, B. Spanggaard, I. Huber and T.F. Nielsen, 1999. Inhibition of Vibrio anguillarum by Pseudomonas fluorescens AH2, a possible probiotic treatment of fish. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 65: 969-973. Direct Link |
18: Hoa, T.T., L.H. Duc, R. Isticato, L. Baccigalupi, E. Ricca, P.H. Van and S.M. Cutting, 2001. Fate and dissemination of Bacillus subtilis spores in a murine model. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 67: 3819-3823. CrossRef |
19: Hong, H.A., L.H. Duc and S.M. Cutting, 2005. The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 29: 813-835. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
20: Hong, H.A., J.M. Huang, R. Khaneja, L.V. Hiep, M.C. Urdaci and S.M. Cutting, 2008. The safety of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus indicus as food probiotics. J. Appl. Microbiol., 105: 510-520. PubMed |
21: Itami, T., M. Asano, K. Tokushige, K. Kubano and A. Nakawaga et al., 1998. Enhancement of disease resistance of kuruma shrimp, Penaeus japonicus, after oral administration of peptidoglycan derived from Bifidobacterium thermophilum. Aquaculture, 164: 277-288. CrossRef |
22: Kang, B.C., S.Y. Lee and H.N. Chang, 1992. Enhanced spore production of Bacillus thuringiensis by fed-batch culture. Biotechnol. Lett., 14: 721-726. CrossRef |
23: Kolodziej, B.J. and R.A. Slepecky, 1964. Trace metal requirements for sporulation of Bacillus megaterium. J. Bacteriol., 88: 821-830. Direct Link |
24: La Ragione, R.M., G. Casula, S.M. Cutting and M.J. Woodward, 2001. Bacillus subtilis spores competitively exclude Escherichia coli O78:K80 in poultry. Vet. Microbiol., 79: 133-142. CrossRef | Direct Link |
25: La Ragione, R.M. and M.J. Woodward, 2003. Competitive exclusion by Bacillus subtilis spores of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis and Clostridium perfringens in young chickens. Vet. Microbiol., 94: 245-256. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
26: Monteiro, S.M., J.J. Clemente, A.O. Henriques, R.J. Gomes, M.J. Carrondo and A.E. Cunha, 2005. A procedure for high-yield spore production by Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol. Prog., 21: 1026-1031. CrossRef |
27: Moriarty, D.J.W., 1998. Control of luminous Vibrio species in penaeid aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture, 164: 351-358. CrossRef | Direct Link |
28: New, M.B., 1990. Freshwater prawn culture: A review. Aquaculture, 88: 99-143. CrossRef |
29: Omer, A.M., 2010. Bioformulations of bacillus spores for using as biofertilizer. Life Sci. J., 7: 124-131. Direct Link |
30: Pandiyan, P., D. Balaraman, R. Thirunavukkarasu, E.G.J. George, K. Subaramaniyan, S. Manikkam and B. Sadayappan, 2013. Probiotics in aquaculture. Drug Invet. Today, 5: 55-59. CrossRef |
31: Rengpipat, S., S. Rukpratanporn, S. Piyatiratitivorakul and P. Menasaveta, 2000. Immunity enhancement in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) by a probiont bacterium (Bacillus S11). Aquaculture, 191: 271-288. CrossRef |
32: Sakai, M., T. Otubo, S. Atsuta and M. Kobayashi, 1995. Enhancement of resistance to vibriosis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), by oral administration of Clostridium butyricum bacterin. J. Fish Dis., 18: 187-190. CrossRef | Direct Link |
33: Sanders, M.E., L. Morelli and T.A. Tompkins, 2003. Sporeformers as human probiotics: Bacillus, Sporolactobacillus and Brevibacillus. Compre. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 2: 101-110. CrossRef | Direct Link |
34: Smith, P. and S. Davey, 1993. Evidence for the competitive exclusion of Aeromonas salmonicida from fish with stress-inducible furunculosis by a fluorescent pseudomonad. J. Fish Dis., 16: 521-524. CrossRef | Direct Link |
35: Vaseeharan, B. and P. Ramasamy, 2003. Control of pathogenic Vibrio spp. by Bacillus subtilis BT23, a possible probiotic treatment for black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Lett. Applied Microbiol., 36: 83-87. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
36: Westerdahl, A., J.C. Olsson, S. Kjelleberg, P.L. Conway, 1991. Isolation and characterization of turbot (Scophtalmus maximus)-associated bacteria with inhibitory effects against Vibrio anguillarum. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 57: 2223-2228. Direct Link |
|
|
|
 |