Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Transformation of Morinda citrifolia Via Simple Mature Seed Imbibition Method



J.J. Lee, S. Ahmad and H.A. Roslan
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Morinda citrifolia, is a valuable medicinal plant with a wide range of therapeutic properties and extensive transformation study on this plant has yet been known. Present study was conducted to establish a simple and reliable transformation protocol for M. citrifolia utilising Agrobacterium tumefaciens via direct seed exposure. In this study, the seeds were processed by tips clipping and dried and subsequently incubated in inoculation medium. Four different parameters during the incubation such as incubation period, bacterial density, temperature and binary vectors harbouring β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene (pBI121 and pGSA1131), were tested to examine its effect on transformation efficiency. The leaves from the treated and germinated seedlings were analysed via Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), histochemical assay of the GUS gene and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Results of the study showed that Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 with optical density of 1.0 and 2 h incubation period were optimum for M. citrifolia transformation. It was found that various co-cultivation temperatures tested and type of vector used did not affect the transformation efficiency. The highest transformation efficiency for M. citrifolia direct seed transformation harbouring pBI121 and pGSA1131 was determined to be 96.8% with 2 h co-cultivation treatment and 80.4% when using bacterial density of 1.0, respectively. The transformation method can be applied for future characterization study of M. citrifolia.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

J.J. Lee, S. Ahmad and H.A. Roslan, 2013. Transformation of Morinda citrifolia Via Simple Mature Seed Imbibition Method. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 16: 1913-1921.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.1913.1921

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2013.1913.1921
 
Received: March 08, 2013; Accepted: March 28, 2013; Published: September 16, 2013



INTRODUCTION

Plant genetic transformation is an approach used to introduce foreign gene in plants (Chawla, 2002). Techniques in plant transformation have been widely established. Among others, the most frequently utilised methods are the Ti-system of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Mohamed et al., 2006; Gonzalez et al., 2008; Ogaki et al., 2008; Yasmeen et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2009a, b), microinjection of DNA (Evans, 2006), polyethylene glycol mediated DNA uptake (Mathur and Koncz, 1998), the use of plant virus vectors (Scholthof et al., 1996; Nagl et al., 2005) and particle bombardment of naked DNA or plasmids into plant organs and protoplasts (Ueki et al., 2008). Traditionally, plant transformation have successfully utilised the tissue culture method but the drawback in using tissue culture-based transformation is the possibility of increased contamination in nutrient-rich media and somaclonal variation in transgenic plants due to the long exposure with growth hormones. Feldman and Marks (1987) have successfully used Arabidopsis thaliana seeds to generate transgenic plants. Subsequently, Bechtold et al. (1993) developed the widely used in planta transformation method to deliver foreign gene into plants. The direct seed transformation utilising A. tumefaciens is a method that bypasses the tissue culture method which is tedious, time-consuming and prone to contaminations and variations (Slater et al., 2005; Yasmeen et al., 2009). A. tumefaciens is a natural target of dicotyledonous plants. Since, its introduction, direct seed transformation has been applied to various plants, such as A. thaliana (Feldman, 1995), Zea mays (Wang et al., 2007) and Brassica napus (Song et al., 2009). Transformation of A. thaliana was conducted using pre-imbibed seeds in a co-cultivation medium containing fresh log phase A. tumefaciens culture (Feldman, 1995) whereas in maize, the transformation was conducted using germinating seedlings with cut wounds at the apical meristem (Wang et al., 2007).

Morinda citrifolia originated from the division Magnoliophyta, class Magnoliopsida, order Rubiales and family Rubiaceae. It is a small evergreen tree, native to the Southeast Asia and Australian region (Nelson, 2006) with the variety bracteata indigenous to Malaysia and Indonesia. The plant is usually 3-10 m tall and has the advantages in that it thrives on non-fertile, acidic or alkaline soils and can withstand adverse environmental conditions such as wind, fire, drought and flooding (Nelson, 2006). There are three main varieties of M. citrifolia; citrifolia, bracteata and ‘Potteri’, depending on the area of distribution (Nelson, 2006). The leaf morphology varies from elliptic, rounded or long and strap-like (McClatchey, 2002) with deep vein while the flowers grow in ovoid to globose head containing 5 stamens and the corolla is white in colour (Nelson, 2006). The fruit is green in colour until it reaches maturity which then turns yellowish and fruiting occurs throughout the year. The seeds are triangular in shape and reddish brown in colour with air chambers in the seed structure (Wang et al., 2002). Previous studies have shown that M. citrifolia has medicinal properties such as antibacterial (Zaidan et al., 2005), antitumor (Bui et al., 2006) and antioxidative (Zin et al., 2006) from various plant parts such as root, fruit and leaf.

The main aim of this study was to develop a simple protocol for the genetic transformation of M. citrifolia. To the best of our knowledge and after extensive searches conducted via published article databases, we could not find articles on the transformation of M. citrifolia. The plant was selected for this transformation work because of its characteristics such as fruiting all year round and each fruit contains many seeds which would be beneficial for transformation work. Apart from that, the plant could also withstand harsh growing environment which enable easy growing of the plant in tropical countries such as Malaysia. This would be the first report of transformation for the plant which can serve as a model plant to be used for tropical countries. For those reasons, we applied a modified pre-imbibed seed transformation method on M. citrifolia and undertaken optimization of the transformation parameters that includes; incubation period, bacterial density and temperature. Two binary vectors were used for the transformation experiments. Putative transformants were analysed to determine the incorporation of the T-DNA region into plant genomic DNA and the expression of transgenes were also characterized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material: Mature M. citrifolia Linn. var bracteata fruits were obtained from the nursery located at the Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. The fruits were processed to collect the seeds for transformation.

Agrobacterium strain, plasmids and culture: The Agrobacterium used for transformation was a nopaline Agrobacterium strain, LBA4404 (gift from Caddick, The University of Liverpool) that carries a binary vector either pGSA1131 (Arabidopsis Biological Resource Centre, ABRC) or pBI121 (ABRC). The binary vectors were transformed into LBA4404. Both the pGSA1131 and pBI121 contained β-glucuronidase (GUS) under transcriptional control of a 35S Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV 35S) promoter. The pGSA1131 harbours a coding region for herbicide resistance (Bar gene) while the pBI121 carry the selectable marker Neomycin phosphotransferaseII (NtpII) (Matsumoto and Fukui, 1998). The Agrobacterium carrying each of the binary vectors were cultured on Luria Bertani broth media containing rifampicin (50 μg mL-1) (PhytoTechnology LaboratoriesTM, Kansas) supplemented with either the antibiotic chloramphenicol (35 μg mL-1) (DUCHEFA, Europe) for pGSA1131, or kanamycin (100 μg mL-1) (Sigma, United Kingdom) for pBI121. The Agrobacterium was grown overnight at 28°C with vigorous shaking at 200 rpm. The cells were then spun down and resuspended in inoculation solution prior to infiltration.

M. citrifolia seed imbibition method: The processed seeds were firstly subjected to surface sterilization treatment using 95% (v/v) ethanol (Scharlau, European Union) and washed several times in sterile distilled water. The seeds were then scarified by clipping the tip end of the seeds and air dried for 1 h in a laminar flow prior to imbibition. Prepared seeds were then subjected to imbibition with inoculation medium [0.5X Murashige and Skoog medium (Sigma, United Kingdom), 0.5 g L-1 of 2-N-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (MES) (J.T. Baker, USA), 5% (v/v) sucrose (Amresco, USA), 0.03% (v/v) Silwet L-77 (Lehle Seeds, USA), adjusted to pH 5.7]. The Agrobacterium containing either pGSA1131 or pBI121 was resuspended in the inoculation medium. Bacterial density of the Agrobacterium suspension in inoculation medium was determined to be OD600 = 0.5-1.0. The seeds were then co-cultivated with Agrobacterium suspension with gentle shaking at 130 rpm for 30 min, 1, 2 h and 1 day. Ten seeds were transformed for each parameter tested. The seeds were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium at two temperature parameters of 23°C (room temperature) and 28°C. After co-cultivation, the inoculation medium was removed and seeds were left at room temperature. The planted seeds were then placed on germination soil bedding and were allowed to grow under natural conditions for 3 weeks. Forty wild type seeds were also randomly selected to be planted on soil as controls.

Genomic DNA isolation: Leaves from the four-leaf stage seedlings were surface sterilized and used to extract genomic DNA individually via., either a rapid DNA extraction method (Roslan, 1999) or using commercial kit, GF-1 Plant DNA Extraction kit (Vivantis, Malaysia).

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR): All PCR was conducted using GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega, USA) (400 μm dNTPs, 3 mM MgCl2 and 2X reaction buffer at pH 8.5) following standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer. PCR was performed on plant DNA extracted from a four-leaf seedling using primers specific to GUS reporter gene and selectable marker for each binary vector. The DNA of putative seedlings transformed with Agrobacterium containing pGSA 1131 was analysed using GUS- and Bar-specific primers namely GUSe (F:5'-CCCCAGATGAAC ATGGCATCG-3', R:5'-GATCCCCATCAAAGAGATCGCT-3') and Bar-3 (F:5'-ATGAGCCCAGAACGACGCC-3', R:5'-ATCTCGGTGACGGGCAGG-3'), respectively. Meanwhile, for putative transformants generated from Agrobacterium containing pBI121, the GUS- and NptII-specific primers, GUS (F:5'-CATGTCGCGCAAAC TGTAAC-3', R:5'-AATCGCCTGTAAGTGCGCTTG-3') and NptII (F:5'-GCATACGCTTGATCCGGCTAC-3', R:5'-TGATATTCGGCAAGCAGGCAT-3'), were used in the PCR analysis. For the detection of Agrobacterium contaminants, the primers specifically target for the virulence gene was used, VirA-F (5'-TCTACGGTCATG GTCCACTAGACG-3') and VirA-R (5'-TGCTGCTCAACT GCTACGCCAGCT-3') (Mohamed et al., 2004). PCR was performed using a Biorad MyCycler PCR machine (Biorad, USA) with thermal cycling conditions of one cycle of 94°C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 59°C for 1 min, 72°C for 2 min and a 5 min final extension at 72°C. The amplified PCR products were separated in 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide.

GUS histochemical assay: GUS histochemical assay was performed to detect the expression of reporter gene according to the method described by Jefferson et al. (1987) with modification in the incubation time. The thick cuticle layer underneath the leaves samples were removed via multiple treatments with chloroform before immersing the samples in X-Gluc solution [0.1 M sodium phosphate (Chemika, Switzerland; J.T. Baker, Malaysia), 2 mM of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid (Fermentas, USA), 1 mM potassium ferricyanide (Chemical Reagents, China), 1 mM potassium ferrocyanide (Farco, Hong Kong), 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma, USA), 10 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (J.T. Baker, Mexico) and 20% (v/v) methanol (HmbG Chemicals, Hong Kong)]. The sample mix was incubated overnight at 37°C. On the next day, the sample was soaked several times in 70% ethanol with gentle agitation and left overnight at room temperature. The blue staining was visually detected using light microscope.

GUS fluorometric assay: The quantitative measurement of GUS activity was conducted via fluorometric assay (Jefferson et al., 1987). The leaf of a putative seedling was surface sterilized using 70% ethanol and ground in liquid nitrogen. GUS extraction buffer [50 mM sodium phosphate at pH 7.0, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma, USA) and 1 g L-1 sodium lauryl sarcosine) (ICN Biomedicals Incorporated, Germany)] was then added, mixed and centrifuged to collect the supernatant. The total protein content of the crude extract was measured using the method described by Bradford (1976). The crude protein was mixed with equal volume of MUG (4-methyl-umbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide) (Sigma, United Kingdom) solution prepared by adding 1 mM MUG to GUS extraction buffer. The reaction mixture was incubated for two h at 37°C under dark condition and the reaction was stopped by adding 0.2 M sodium carbonate solution (HmbG Chemicals, Hong Kong). The assay was then analysed using Ultrospec® 1100 pro spectrophotometer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, USA) at two wavelengths; 365 nm excitation and 455 nm emission. The concentration of the fluorescence emission was determined by comparing with a standard concentration of MU (4-methylumbelliferone). The GUS activity was expressed in mmol of MU/min/μg of total protein.

GUS expression study: RNA was extracted via CTAB (cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) (Amresco, USA) method (Zeng and Yang, 2002) and the first strand cDNA was synthesized using RevertAidTM Moloney Murine Leukimia Virus Reverse Transcriptase (M-MuLV RT) (Fermentas, USA) and an oligo(dt)-anchor primer (5'-GACTCGAGTCGACACGATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT-3'). The first strand cDNA was then used as template in PCR analysis to detect the presence of GUS transcripts and selectable markers.

Calculation of transformation efficiency: The transformation efficiency was determined using diagnosis DNA PCR result and sample size was based on the number of germinated seedlings from particular parameter tested and successfully transformed seedlings. The effect of each variable was statistically calculated using One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to determine the significance of each variable of a parameter on the transformation efficiency.

RESULTS

Direct seed transformation: Two bacterial densities, 0.5 and 1.0, were tested in the co-cultivation that resulted in 34.0 and 80.3% transformation efficiency using pBI121 for bacterial density 0.5 and 1.0, respectively. Meanwhile, transformation using Agrobacterium containing pGSA 1131 with bacterial density 0.5 and 1.0 gave a result of 76.2 and 80.4%, respectively. Statistical calculation using One-way ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference of the transformation efficiency resulted from varied parameter based on 5% significance level.

The transformation efficiency of varying temperature for pBI121 was 71.9% (room temperature) and 82.0% (28°C) and for pGSA 1131, a transformation efficiency of 79.4% (RT) and 78.0% (28°C) were calculated. The results showed that the transformation of M. citrifolia using Agrobacterium containing either pBI121 or pGSA1131 did not vary much and no significant difference was detected based on 5% significance level.

Transformation of M. citrifolia utilizing Agrobacterium harbouring pBI121 with co-cultivation periods of 0.5, 1, 2 and 24 h resulted in 84.3, 66.7, 96.8 and 79.1% transformation rate. Meanwhile transformation using Agrobacterium containing pGSA1131 gave a transformation frequency of 77.7, 78.4, 72.2 and 75.3%, respectively. One-way ANOVA analysis result showed there was no significance difference on the transformation efficiency when the incubation period was varied when based on 5% significance level.

Analysis of T-DNA integration: The PCR method was carried out to detect the incorporation of T-DNA region via., amplification of the GUS and Bar from pGSA1131 and GUS and NptII from pBI121. The PCR products were then subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis analysis and the expected size for amplification product were determined to be of the expected sizes of 400, 600 bps (GUS and Bar in pGSA 1131), 600 and 200 bps (GUS and NptII in pBI121), respectively (Fig. 1, 2). Additionally, the transformants were also screened for Agrobacterium virulence gene to eliminate the possibility of Agrobacterium contamination in the transformed seeds (Fig. 3).

GUS histochemical and fluorometric assay: A total of 182 putative seedlings were analysed with GUS histochemical staining. The seedlings were firstly screened to harbour the T-DNA via., PCR using primers specific to GUS and selectable marker genes. Results of the stained leaf sample showed a non-uniform distribution of GUS activity detected by the blue colour deposition on the vein system primarily along the base of the petiole (Fig. 4). Two putatively transformed seedlings were found to produce blue coloration. A subsequent fluorometric assay was conducted to measure GUS activity in the two leaves samples that showed results on GUS histochemical assay. The quantitative measurements of the leaves samples via fluorometric assay are presented in Table 1. The measured specific expressed GUS activities of both leaves were approximately the same which were 9.92x10-10 and 6.44x10-10 mmol/min/μg, respectively.

Reporter gene expression study: The gene expression study of GUS was conducted on several positive putative transformants samples from the initial diagnostic PCR of reporter and selection genes, including the samples that did not produce blue coloration in the histochemical assay.

Table 1: Specific GUS activity of two transformed seedlings (A1 and B1) showing blue colour deposits in the vascular bundle. GUS activity was calculated as mmol/min/μg protein

Fig. 1(a-b): Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% w/v) of PCR products from putatively transformed seedlings containing binary vector pBI121. Lane M is 100 bps DNA ladder (Seegene), (a) Lane 1-8 are PCR products using GUS primer (~600 bps) and (b) lane 1-8 are PCR products using NptII primers (~200 bps). Lane 9 in both row is the positive control using DNA from pBI121 and lane 10 is the negative control (wild type M. citrifolia DNA)

Fig. 2(a-b): Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% w/v) of PCR products from putatively transformed seedlings harbouring binary vector pGSA1131. Lane M is the 100 bps DNA ladder (Seegene) (a) Lane 1-11 are PCR products using GUSe primers (~400 bps) and (b) lane 1-11 are PCR products using Bar-3 primer (~600 bps). Lane 12 in both rows is the positive control using DNA from pGSA1131 and lane 13 is the negative control (wild type M. citrifolia DNA)

Fig. 3: Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% w/v) of virulence gene PCR of some of the putatively transformed seedlings. Lane 1-7 are DNA sample of putative transgenic seedlings containing GUS and selectable marker. No amplicons were detected using virulence gene primers except for lane 3 which was determined later to be artefact (data not shown)

Fig. 4(a-b): (a) GUS histochemical assay. Staining conducted on leaf sample from putatively transformed seedlings containing pBI121 and (b) pGSA1131, Arrow indicates the blue colour deposits along the vascular bundle near the leaf petiole

Fig. 5(a-b): Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% w/v) of RT-PCR assay using GUS-specific primers from putatively transformed seedlings. Lane M is 100 bps DNA ladder (Seegene) (a) Lane 1-7: cDNA samples of seedlings transformed with pGSA1131, Lane 8: Negative control and (b) Lane 1-8: cDNA samples of seedlings transformed with pBI121, Lane 9: Negative control

Table 2: Morphological description of selected putatively transformed and wild type seedlings that were verified via., PCR
GUSe and Bar-3 primers-primers specific for pGSA1131, GUS and NptII primers-primers specific for pBI121

Seven putative transformants were selected from seeds transformed with pGSA1131 and eight putative transformants transformed using pBI121. Controls were included in the RT-PCR using DNA derived from wild type and non-transformed plants. The RT-PCR assay of the putative transformant samples showed variable intensity of banding patterns for GUS gene amplification that indicated differential expression of the GUS gene in each transformant (Fig. 5).

Morphological observations of putative transformants: Morphological differences were also observed in several putative transformants that could be the result of random integration of the T-DNA region into plant genome. Table 2 lists the descriptions of morphological changes observed in transformed plants as compared with the wild type. The wild type leaf has the following characters; large, simple, dark green, shiny, deeply veined, opposite leaf arrangement.

DISCUSSION

The scarified seeds were slightly desiccated via., air drying before co-cultivation with Agrobacterium (Urushibara et al., 2001). This desiccation process helped in increasing T-DNA delivery and subsequent cell recovery (Cheng et al., 2003). A total of 2180 seedlings were germinated, in which three parameters were analysed to optimize the A. tumefaciens-mediated seed transformation; bacterial density, co-cultivation temperature and incubation period. It was reported that the bacterial density has significant impact on transformation efficacy, unrelated to the Agrobacterium strains used for the transformation (Gao et al., 2009). However, our research study found that there is no significance difference in transformation efficiency of M. citrifolia with varying bacterial density parameter. The result showed that the optimum optical density for M. citrifolia transformation was 1.0 for both binary vectors used.

Incubation temperature during co-cultivation was also analysed in which previous studies have shown that T-DNA delivery was thermo-sensitive due to the temperature dependent regulation of the virulence regulon (Dillen et al., 1997). We tested two temperatures, room temperature (RT, approximately 23°C) and 28°C. The study result indicated that varying temperatures during co-cultivation step did not affect the transformation efficiency and that transformation can be conducted at temperatures above 25°C as mentioned by Gonzalez et al. (2008) and Jakubowski et al. (2003).

The co-cultivation period had been shown by Jabeen et al. (2009) to affect the transformation efficiency. Four co-cultivation periods were selected; 0.5, 1, 2 and 24 h. Although, no significant impact on the transformation efficiency was detected, the work indicated that the optimal co-cultivation period was between 1 and 2 h. The co-incubation of the Agrobacterium with M. citrifolia seeds was conducted with gentle agitation that facilitates Agrobacterium growth and allow homogenous distribution of Agrobacterium in the inoculation medium (Gonzalez et al., 2008). Incubation at 24 h showed decreased transformation with prolonged co-cultivation period that could cause Agrobacterium overgrowth and eventually has detrimental effects on plant cell recovery (Sreeramanan et al., 2008).

Previous seed transformation work conducted by several research groups on plant species such as in Z. mays (Wang et al., 2007) and Hibiscus sabdariffa (Gassama-Dia et al., 2004) produced transformation efficiencies of 29 and 60%. Whereas Katavic et al. (1994) had performed that in planta transformation of A. thaliana using germinated seedlings with removed inflorescence shoots reported approximately 4.31 and 15.97% transformation frequency. Meanwhile, another type of seed transformation, the fruit inoculation, conducted by Ahmad and Mirza (2005) in which the incubation periods were varied, produced 25 and 23% transformation rate with 72 and 96 h incubation periods, respectively. A comparison of the reported transformation rate of other plant species seemed to indicate that the seed transformation for M. citrifolia is an efficient transformation method.

Several limitations are noted for the plant transformed namely in the non-use of antibiotics. Although, the seeds were not treated with antibiotics to eliminate the Agrobacterium after co-cultivation process, nevertheless plants transformed with the binary vectors were analysed via PCR using primers specifically to detect for virulence gene from Agrobacterium (Nain et al., 2005). Positive PCR amplification result indicated that the T-DNA region from pGSA1131 and pB1121, had integrated into the plant genome. PCR-positive putative transformants on transgene integration were then selected for further histochemical, fluorometric and expression studies.

The deposition of GUS assay indicated that the integration of the T-DNA in the transformed plant was in the region that is specific to the vascular bundle along the petiole. However, GUS histochemical assay that were conducted in other putative transformants did not yield satisfactory results (data not shown). This might be because the T-DNA was integrated into different cell types where the GUS activity was not detectable or expressed at an extremely low level (Jefferson, 1987).

The seedlings that did not produce blue colouration in the GUS histochemical assay were also tested for transgene expression via., reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) to detect the expression of GUS at low levels, since the PCR technique can detect very low levels of gene expression (Cha and Thilly, 1995). The differential expression patterns of GUS in RT-PCR further supports the histochemical assay finding that putatively transformed seedlings indeed harbour the T-DNA but expressions in the seedlings were very low to be detected via histochemical assay.

Previous T-DNA insertional mutations studies in Solanum lycopersicum L. (Yasmeen et al., 2009), Malus micromalus (Zhang et al., 2006) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) had shown that transformants caused morphological changes such as wrinkled or curled leaves, shorter height and other phenotypic changes that were similar to the changes observed on putative transgenic seedlings of M. citrifolia. Nevertheless, further analyses are still required for this study.

CONCLUSION

Direct seed transformation using Agrobacterium mediated method is a reliable method for transformation of M. citrifolia without much difference in the type of vector used. Histochemical assay produced blue staining along the vascular bundle. Nevertheless, the method requires further modification to analyse for other transformants. GUS transcript analysis showed that the reporter gene is expressed in the transformants with different levels of expression. Co-cultivation of seeds with Agrobacterium at optimal conditions has shown to produce high transformation efficiency based on the optimised conditions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research was supported by Fundamental Research Grant Scheme FRGS/01(07)/648/2007(13).

REFERENCES
1:  Ahmad, M. and B. Mirza, 2005. An efficient protocol for transient transformation of intact fruit and transgene expression in Citrus. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 23: 419-420.
CrossRef  |  

2:  Bechtold, N., J. Ellis and G. Pelletier, 1993. In planta agrobacterium mediated gene transfer by infiltration of adult Arabidopsis thaliana plants. C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris) Life Sci., 316: 1194-1199.
Direct Link  |  

3:  Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 72: 248-254.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Bui, A.K.T., A. Bacic and F. Pettolino, 2006. Polysaccharide composition of the fruit juice of Morinda citrifolia(Noni). Phytochemistry, 67: 1271-1275.
CrossRef  |  

5:  Cha, R.S. and W.G. Thilly, 1995. Specificity, Efficiency and Fidelity. In: PCR Primer: A Laboratory Manual, Dieffenbach, C.W. and G.S. Dveksler (Eds.). Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, USA., pp: 39.

6:  Chawla, H.S., 2002. Introduction to Plant Biotechnology. 2nd Edn., Science Publishers Inc., USA., pp: 171-172.

7:  Cheng, M., T. Hu, J. Layton, C.N. Liu and J.E. Fry, 2003. Desiccation of plant tissues post-agrobacterium infection enhances T-DNA delivery and increases stable transformation efficiency in wheat. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant, 39: 595-604.
CrossRef  |  

8:  Dillen, W., J. de Clercq, J. Kapila, M. Zambre, M. van Montagu and G. Angenent, 1997. The effect of temperature on Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer to plants. Plant J., 12: 1459-1463.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

9:  Evans, T.C., 2006. Transformation and Microinjection. In: WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology, The C. elegans Research Community (Eds.). University of Colorado, USA.

10:  Feldman, K.A., 1995. Seed Transformation in Arabidopsis thaliana. In: Gene Transfer to Plants, Potrykus, I. and G. Spangenberg (Eds.). Springer, New York, pp: 11-18.

11:  Feldmann, K.A. and M.D. Marks, 1987. Agrobacterium mediated transformation of germinating seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana: A non-tissue culture approach. Mol. Gen. Genet., 208: 1-9.
Direct Link  |  

12:  Gao, N., W. Shen, Y. Cao, Y. Su and W. Shi, 2009. Influence of bacterial density during preculture on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 98: 321-330.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  Gassama-Dia, Y.K., D. Sane and M. N'Doye, 2004. Direct genetic transformation of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 3: 226-228.
Direct Link  |  

14:  Gonzalez, R.G., D.S. Sanchez, Z.Z. Guerra, J.M. Campos and A.L. Quesada et al., 2008. Efficient regeneration and Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of recalcitrant sweet potato (Ipomea batatas L.) cultivars. Asia Pacific J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol., 16: 25-33.
Direct Link  |  

15:  Jabeen, N., B. Mirza, Z. Chaudhary, H. Rashid and M. Gulfraz, 2009. Study of the factors affecting Agrobacterium mediated gene transformation in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) cv. Riogrande using rice chitinase (CHT-3) gene. Pak. J. Bot., 41: 2605-2614.
Direct Link  |  

16:  Scholthof, H.B., K.B.G. Scholthof and A.O. Jackson, 1996. Plant virus gene vectors for transient expression of foreign proteins in plants. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 34: 299-323.
CrossRef  |  

17:  Jakubowski, S.J., V. Krishnamoorthy and P.J. Christie, 2003. Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB6 protein participates in formation of VirB7 and VirB9 complexes required for type IV secretion. J. Bacteriol., 185: 2867-2878.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Jefferson, R.A., 1987. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: The GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 5: 387-405.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Jefferson, R.A., T.A. Kavanagh and M.W. Bevan, 1987. GUS fusions: Beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J., 6: 3901-3907.
Direct Link  |  

20:  Katavic, V., G.W. Haughn, D. Reed, M. Martin and L. Kunst, 1994. In planta transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet., 245: 363-370.
CrossRef  |  

21:  Mathur, J. and C. Koncz, 1998. PEG-Mediated Protoplast Transformation with Naked DNA. In: Methods in Molecular Biology: Arabidopsis Protocols, Martinez-Zapater, J. and J. Salinas (Eds.). Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, pp: 267-276.

22:  Matsumoto, S. and M. Fukui, 1998. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer to tea plant (Camellia sinensis) cells. Jpn. Agric. Res. Quart., 32: 287-292.
Direct Link  |  

23:  McClatchey, W., 2002. From polynesian healers to health food stores: Changing perspectives of Morinda citrifolia (Rubiaceae). Integr. Cancer Ther., 1: 110-120.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

24:  Mohamed, S., R. Boehm, P.C. Binsfeld and H. Schnabl, 2004. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of two high oleic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) genotypes: Assessment and optimization of important parameters. Helia, 27: 25-40.
CrossRef  |  

25:  Mohamed, S.H., R. Boehm and H. Schnabl, 2006. Stable genetic transformation of high oleic Helianthus annuus L. genotypes with high efficiency. Plant Sci., 171: 546-554.
CrossRef  |  

26:  Nagl, N., I. Atanassov, K. Roussanov, S. Paunovich, A. Atanassov and L. Kovachev, 2005. Construction of plant transformation vectors carrying beet necrotic yellow vein virus coat protein gene (I)-transformation vectors. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip., 2: 80-86.

27:  Nain, V., R. Jaiswal, M. Dalal, B. Ramesh and P.A. Kumar, 2005. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of transgenic plants contaminated by Agrobacterium. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 23: 59-65.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

28:  Nelson, S.C., 2006. Morinda citrifolia (noni). Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. http://www.agroforestry.net/tti/Morinda-noni.pdf.

29:  Ogaki, M., Y. Furuichi, K. Kuroda, D.P. Chin, Y. Ogawa and M. Mii, 2008. Importance of co-cultivation medium pH for successful Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Lilium x formolongi. Plant Cell Rep., 27: 699-705.
CrossRef  |  

30:  Roslan, H.A., 1999. A chemically inducible gene expression system for use in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Liverpool, UK.

31:  Slater, A., N. Scott and M. Fowler, 2005. Plant Biotechnology: The Genetic Manipulation of Plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK., pp: 55-66.

32:  Song, L., D.G. Zhao, Y.J. Wu and X.E. Tian, 2009. A simplified seed transformation method for obtaining transgenic Brassica napus plants. Agric. Sci. China, 8: 658-663.
CrossRef  |  

33:  Sreeramanan, S., B. Vinod, S. Sashi and R. Xavier, 2008. Optimization of the transient Gusa gene transfer of Phalaenopsis violacea orchid via Agrobacterium tumefaciens: An assessment of factors influencing the efficiency of gene transfer mechanisms. Adv. Natural Applied Sci., 22: 77-88.
Direct Link  |  

34:  Ueki, S., B. Lacroix, A. Krichevsky, S.G. Lazarowitz and V. Citovsky, 2008. Functional transient genetic transformation of Arabidopsis leaves by biolistic bombardment. Nat. Protoc., 4: 71-77.
CrossRef  |  

35:  Urushibara, S., Y. Tozawa, M. Kawagishi-Kobayashi and K. Wakasa, 2001. Efficient transformation of suspension-cultured rice cells mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Breed. Sci., 5: 33-38.
Direct Link  |  

36:  Wang, J., Y. Sun and Y. Li, 2007. Maize (Zea mays) genetic transformation by co‐cultivating germinating seeds with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Biotechnol. Applied Biochem., 46: 51-55.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

37:  Xu, L., U. Najeeb, W.Q. Shen, G. Jilani, M. Rasheed and W.J. Zhou, 2009. Establishment of Agrobacterium-mediated Bt gene transformation system in mat rush (Juncus effusus L.). Pak. J. Bot., 41: 2615-2624.
Direct Link  |  

38:  Xu, J., Y.Z. Wang, H.X. Yin and X.J. Liu, 2009. Efficient Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Malus zumi (Matsumura) Rehd using leaf explant regeneration system. Electron. J. Biotechnol., Vol. 12. 10.2225/vol12-issue1-fulltext-4

39:  Yasmeen, A., B. Mirza, S. Inayatullah, N. Safdar, M. Jamil, S. Ali and M.F. Choudhry, 2009. In planta transformation of tomato. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 27: 20-28.
CrossRef  |  

40:  Zaidan, M.R., A. Noor Rain, A.R. Badrul, A. Adlin, A. Norazah and I. Zakiah, 2005. In Vitro screening of five local medicinal plants for antibacterial activity using disc diffusion method. Trop. Biomed., 22: 165-170.
PubMed  |  

41:  Zeng, Y. and T. Yang, 2002. RNA isolation from highly viscous samples rich in polyphenols and polysaccharides. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 20: 417a-417e.
Direct Link  |  

42:  Zhang, Z., A. Sun, Y. Cong, B. Sheng, Q. Yao and Z.M. Cheng, 2006. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the apple rootstock Malus micromalus Makino with the RolC gene. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant, 42: 491-497.
CrossRef  |  

43:  Zin, Z.M., A.A. Hamid, A. Osman and N. Saari, 2006. Antioxidative activities of chromatographic fractions obtained from root, fruit and leaf of Mengkudu (Morinda citrifolia L.). Food Chem., 94: 169-178.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

44:  Wang, M.Y., B.J. West, C.J. Jensen, D. Nowicki, C. Su, A.K. Palu and G. Anderson, 2002. Morinda citrifolia (Noni): A literature review and recent advances in noni research. Acta Pharmacol. Sin., 12: 1127-1141.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved