|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Lipid Profile of Women Using Oral Contraceptive Pills |
|
F. Naz,
S. Jyoti,
N. Akhtar,
M. Afzal
and
Y.H. Siddique
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
Oral Contraceptives (OCs) are the most popular type of birth
control pills. The study was designed to examine the biochemical changes which
occur due to the use of oral contraceptive pills (OCs). The study was based
on the questionnaire for having the information of any reproductive history
fasting, age, health, nature of menstrual cycle, bleeding, disease etc and blood
profiling for biochemical analysis of the women includes High Density Lipoprotein
Cholesterol (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), Total Cholesterol
(TC) and Triglycerides (TG). Lipid profiling was carried out by using a commercially
available diagnostic test kits. SPSS was used to analyze the data. The results
showed statistically significant differences among users of OCs compared to
non-users. Total cholesterol (242.92±2.842 mg dL-1), HDL-C
(58.65±1.098 mg dL-1), LDL-C (115.84±1.266 mg dL-1)
and triglycerides (105.56±2.341 mg dL-1) were significantly
higher compared to the Non-users (Total cholesterol 218.49±1.762, HDL-C
48.17±0.543, LDL-C 100.32±0.951 and triglycerides 83.77±2.299
mg dL-1). The result suggests that OCs increase the level of High
Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
(LDL-C), Total Cholesterol (TC) and Triglycerides (TG).
|
|
|
|
|
Received: November 04, 2012;
Accepted: January 01, 2013;
Published: March 04, 2013
|
|
INTRODUCTION
From the last few decades, world is facing the most serious problem that is
population explosion. Contraception method is used worldwide for over birth
control or unwanted pregnancies. Many workers have suggested that the use of
contraceptives is beneficial but also have some side effects too. The researchers
believe that the widespread use of hormonal contraceptive provides an opportunity
for assessing the influence of estrogens and progesterone on various biochemical
parameters among users. Synthetic progestins not only have genotoxic potential
(Siddique and Afzal, 2004; 2005a;
Siddique et al., 2005a, b;
2006a, b) but are also vulnerable
to various types of cancer (Siddique and Afzal, 2008;
Siddique and Afzal, 2005b). It was found that the bone
formation was significantly decreased in women taking oral contraceptive pills
(Garnero et al., 1995). Some remarkable findings
are well documented by workers which showed that oral contraceptives are involved
in many diseases such as, myocardiac infraction and carcinogenicity (Obisesan
et al., 2002; Tzankova et al., 2010;
Naz et al., 2012). An increase in the risk for
ischemic stroke in women taking oral contraceptives has been reported (Thorvaldsen
et al., 1995; Vessey et al., 1984;
WHO, 1996) and other studies showed that oral contraceptives
also increases the risk for venous thromboembolism (Farmer
and Lawrenson, 1998; Weiss, 1999; Westhoff,
1998; Rosing and Tans, 1999; Kemmeren
et al., 2001). The relationship between oral contraceptive users
and the risk for breast cancer remains controversial. Most studies suggests
no overall risk or a slight increased risk of breast cancer in women using oral
contraceptives (Anonymous 1986; Marchbanks
et al., 2002; Brinton et al., 1998;
Hankinson et al., 1997). It has been reported
that the serum total cholesterol is significantly higher among oral contraceptive
users as compared to non users (Nawrot et al., 2003).
The mode of action depends upon the formulation of pills. The pills possibly
inhibits ovulation by the formation of pituitary luteinizing hormone that renders
the cervical mucus hostile to sperm penetration. The oral contraceptive pills
are the combination of different concentrations of estrogen and progestin. In
our present study the composition of the oral contraceptive taken by the women
was: Ethinyl Estradiol (EE2) (0.03 mg) and Levonorgestrel (0.15 mg).
In the present study an attempt has been made to investigate the possible effects
of Oral Contraceptives (OCs) among users on High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
(HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), Total Cholesterol (TC)
and Triglycerides (TG).
MATERIALS AND METHODS Sample size: The subjects for the study were married women of low income group to a total of 100 participants from Malkhan Singh Hospital and Jawahar lal Nehru medical college of Aligarh city, who were of 21 to 40 years of age, from which 55 women were taking combined oral contraceptives preferring after 8-10 days of withdrawl period and 45 non-users healthy married women who were not taking any oral contraceptive. A random sampling were performed and the women taking the oral contraceptive continuous for the three months were included for the comparison to non-users. A written consent was obtained from the subjects for taking their blood samples. The detailed questionnaire included some issues about fasting, age, health history, nature of menstrual cycle, bleeding, disease, etc. Blood sampling and processing: In morning as overnight fasting of user and non-user women, about 4 mL blood was collected in vacutainer tube with clot activator from each women in study sample. The serum samples were obtained by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 15 min and the sera were stored at -20°C and analyzed within three days. Blood parameters analysis: The analysis of lipid profile of High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL-C), Low-Density Lipoprotein LDL-C, cholesterol and triglycerides were carried out using a commercially available diagnostic system test kits (Crest Biosystems kits, India). Statistical analysis: The obtained data were analyzed by using a software statistical package SPSS version 16.0. Students t- test was also used to differentiate between two numerical data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of the present study suggest that the oral contraceptive users have higher level of total Cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C and triglycerides as compared to non-users. As shown in the Table 1, the mean values of Cholesterol (242.92±2.842), HDL-C (58.65±1.098), LDL-C (115.84±1.266) and triglycerides (105.56±2.341 mg dL-1) were significantly higher among users as compared to the non-users (total Cholesterol 218.49±1.762, HDL-C 48.17±0.543, LDL-C 100.32±0.951 and triglycerides 83.77±2.299 mg dL-1) (Fig. 1).
It has been observed that the LDL-C and HDL-C increase is prone to have stroke
and myocardial infarction in women taking oral contraceptives (Wynn
et al., 1966). The present study supports the earlier studies on
lipid profiles on cholesterol (Emokpae et al., 2010;
Abdel-Barry et al., 2011). Elevated serum levels
of lipids are probably the most important biochemical risk factors for atherosclerosis.
In the liver triglyceride synthesis is enhanced by estrogen and inhibited by
androgen and these triglycerides are partly brought into the circulation as
low-density lipoproteins. When a contraceptive pill containing an estrogen and
a progestogen is introduced, the resultant effect is not predictable. The clinical
significance of this observation is supported by the fact that atherosclerosis
begins early in life and is accelerated in the presence of high cholesterol
and serum triglycerides (Newman et al., 1991).
Contraceptive steroids having a combination of an estrogen and progestin or
only progestin are effective and reversibly regulate fertility. Combined oral
contraceptives affects a variety of metabolic factors including hemostatic variables
and estrogen-sensitive liver proteins and these effects can be modulated by
the type of estrogen and progestin in a given combination (Sitruk-Ware
and Nath, 2011). The estrogen component of OCs has been reported to increase
the production of Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) and High Density Lipoprotein
(HDL) but reduce the level of low density lipoprotein (Sitruk-Ware,
2006).
Table 1: |
Lipid profile of oral contraceptive (OC) users and non-users
women |
 |
Values are as Mean±SE, ap<0.05 significant
with respect to non-users |
|
Fig. 1: |
Lipid profile of oral contraceptive users and non-users |
The reduction in the doses of Levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol containing contraceptives
from 30-20 μg (EE) and that of 150-100 μg (levonorgestrel) resulted
in the less adverse effect on the lipid profile and have been suggested to lower
the incidence of thrombosis as compared to other EE based contraceptives (Skouby
et al., 2005). OCs containing levonorgestrel was associated with
an almost four times higher risk of venous thrombosis as compared to non-users
(Van Hylckama Vlieg et al., 2009). The intake
of 100 μg levonorgestrel with 20 μg ethinyl estradiol to 28 women
whom were at the risk of pregnancy shows a little change in lipid profile as
compared to higher dose oral contraceptive preparation (Young
and DelConte, 1999). Despite the changes in lipid profile among users of
higher dose oral contraceptive agents, there is little and no effect on the
long term risk artherogenic cardiovascular disease (Stampfer
et al., 1990). The status of elevated serum triglyceride level may
be an independent predictor of coronary heart disease as ethinyl estradiol increases
hepatic secretion of triglyceride rich lipoprotein (Avins
et al., 1989; Schaefer et al., 1983).
The progestin component of the OC may oppose this increase. The injectable oral
contraceptives have also been reported to increase the levels of triglycerides,
total cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in the serum (Godsland
et al., 1990).
CONCLUSION The lipid profile depends on the brand of OCs or duration of their use. The users in our present study were taking OCs of ethinyl estradiol (0.03 μg), levonorgestrel (0.5 μg). The increase in the lipid profile may be attributed to their responsiveness to the drug. However, the long term effects were not taken into account in the present study, but still there is a need of a detailed study taking the various life style factors into the consideration. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors are thankful to University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi for the award of project entitled: Biochemical and Cytogenetic effects of Oral Contraceptives among women of different reproductive histories {F.No. 39-582/2010(SR)} to Dr. Yasir Hasan Siddique, Department of Zoology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh.
|
REFERENCES |
1: Abdel-Barry, J.A., M.S. Flafl, L.M. Al-Namaa and N.A. Hassan, 2011. Lipoprotein changes in women taking low-dose combined oral contraceptive pills: A cross-sectional study in Basra, Iraq. East. Mediterr. Health J., 17: 684-688. PubMed |
2: Avins, A.L., R.J. Haber and S.B. Hulley, 1989. The status of hypertriglyceridemia as a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Clin. Lab. Med., 9: 153-168. PubMed |
3: Brinton, L.A., D.R. Brogan, R.J. Coates, C.A. Swanson, N. Potischman and J.L. Stanford, 1998. Breast cancer risk among women under 55 years of age by joint effects of usage of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy. Menopause, 5: 145-151. PubMed |
4: Emokpae, M.A., P.O. Uadia and H.B. Osadolar, 2010. Effect of duration of use of hormonal contraceptive pills on total lipid and lipoproteins in Nigerian women. Int. J. Pharm. Bio. Sci., 1: 1-5.
5: Farmer, R.D. and R.A. Lawrenson, 1998. Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolic disease: The findings from database studies in the United Kingdom and Germany. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol., 179: S78-86. PubMed |
6: Garnero, P., E. Sornay-Rendu and P.D. Delmas, 1995. Decreased bone turnover in oral contraceptive users. Bone, 16: 499-503. PubMed | Direct Link |
7: Godsland, I.F., D. Crook, R. Simpson, T. Proudler and C. Felton et al., 1990. The effects of different formulations of oral contraceptive agents on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. N. Engl. J. Med., 323: 1375-1381. CrossRef | PubMed |
8: Hankinson, S.E., G.A. Colditz, J.E. Manson, W.C. Willett, D.J. Hunter, M.J. Stampfer and F.E. Speizer, 1997. A prospective study of oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer (Nurses Health Study, United States). Cancer Causes Control., 8: 65-72. PubMed |
9: Kemmeren, J.M., A. Algra and D.E. Grobbee, 2001. Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: Meta-analysis. Br. Med. J., 323: 131-134. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
10: Marchbanks, P.A., J.A. McDonald, H.G. Wilson, S.G. Folger and M.G. Mandel et al., 2002. Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 346: 2025-2032. CrossRef |
11: Nawrot, T.S., E.D. Hond, R.H. Fagard, K. Hoppenbrouwers and J.A. Staessen, 2003. Blood pressure, serum total cholesterol and contraceptive pill use in 17-year-old girls. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prevention Rehab., 10: 438-442. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
12: Naz, F., S. Jyoti, M. Afzal and Y.H. Siddique, 2012. Biochemical effects of oral contraceptive among users: A review. Int. J. Pharmacol., 8: 314-320. Direct Link |
13: Newman, W.P., W. Bao, W. Wattigney and G.S. Berenson, 1991. Autopsy studies in United States children and adolescents. Relationship of risk factors to atherosclerotic lesions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 623: 16-25. CrossRef | PubMed |
14: Obisesan, K.A., F.A. Adenaike, M.A. Okunlola and A.A. Adenaike, 2002. Effect of oral contraceptives on total serum proteins, albumin, globulin and cholesterol levels in Ibadan, Nigeria. West Afr. J. Med., 21: 197-199. Direct Link |
15: Anonymous, 1986. Oral-contraceptive use and the risk of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 315: 405-411. CrossRef | PubMed |
16: Rosing, J. and G. Tans, 1999. Effects of oral contraceptives on hemostasis and thrombosis. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol., 180: S375-382. PubMed | Direct Link |
17: Schaefer, E.J., D.M. Faster, L.A. Zec, F.T. Lindgren, H.B. Brewer Jr. and R.I. Levy, 1983. The effects of estrogen administration on plasma lipoprotein metabolism in premenopausal females. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 57: 262-267. PubMed |
18: Siddique, Y.H. and M. Afzal, 2004. Evaluation of genotoxic potential of synthetic progestin chlormadinone acetate. Toxicol. Lett., 153: 221-225. PubMed | Direct Link |
19: Siddique, Y.H. and M. Afzal, 2005. Genotoxic potential of cyproterone acetate: A possible role of reactive oxygen species. Toxicol. In vitro, 19: 63-68. PubMed | Direct Link |
20: Siddique, Y.H., T. Beg and M. Afzal, 2005. Antigenotoxic effects of ascorbic acid against megestrol acetate-induced genotoxicity in mice. Hum. Exp. Toxicol., 24: 121-127. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
21: Siddique, Y.H., T. Beg and M. Afzal, 2005. Genotoxic potential of ethinylestradiol in cultured mammalian cells. Chem. Biol. Interact., 151: 133-141. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
22: Siddique, Y.H. and M. Afzal, 2005. Protective role of allicin and L-ascorbic acid against the genotoxic damage induced by chlormadinone acetate in cultured human lymphocytes. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 43: 769-772. PubMed | Direct Link |
23: Siddique, Y.H., T. Beg and M. Afzal, 2006. Protective role of nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) against norgestrel induced genotoxic damage. Toxicol. In Vitro, 20: 227-233. Direct Link |
24: Siddique, Y.H., G. Ara, T. Beg and M. Afzal, 2006. Effect of vitamin C on cyproterone acetate induced genotoxic damage in mice. Res. J. Biol. Sci., 1: 69-73. Direct Link |
25: Siddique, Y.H. and M. Afzal, 2008. A review on the genotoxic effects of some synthetic progestins. Int. J. Pharmacol., 4: 410-430. CrossRef | Direct Link |
26: Sitruk-Ware, R. and A. Nath, 2011. Metabolic effects of contraceptive steroids. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord., 12: 63-75. CrossRef | PubMed |
27: Sitruk-Ware, R., 2006. New progestagens for contraceptive use. Hum. Reprod. Updatet, 12: 169-178. PubMed | Direct Link |
28: Skouby, S.O., J. Endrikat, B. Dusterberg, W. Schmidt and C. Gerlinger et al., 2005. A 1-year randomized study to evaluate the effects of a dose reduction in oral contraceptives on lipids and carbohydrate metabolism: 20 microg ethinyl estradiol combined with 100 microg levonorgestrel. Contraception, 71: 111-117. CrossRef | PubMed |
29: Stampfer, M.J., W.C. Willett, G.A. Colditz, F.E. Speizer and C.H. Hennekens, 1990. Past use of oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis in the context of the nurses health study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 163: 285-291. PubMed | Direct Link |
30: Thorvaldsen, P., K. Asplund, K. Kuulasmaa, A.M. Rajakangas and M. Schroll, 1995. Stroke incidence case fatality and mortality in the WHO MONICA project. World Health Organization monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease. Stroke, 26: 361-367. PubMed |
31: Tzankova, V., V. Petrov and N. Danchev, 2010. Impact of oral contraceptives and smoking on arterial and deep venous thrombosis: А retrospective case-control study. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Eq., 24: 2026-2030. Direct Link |
32: Van Hylckama Vlieg, A., F.M. Helmerhorst, J.P. Vandenbrouck, C.J.M. Doggen and F.R. Rosendaal, 2009. The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: Results of the MEGA case-control study. BMJ, Vol. 339 10.1136/bmj.b2921
33: Vessey, M.P., M. Lawless and D. Yeates, 1984. Oral contraceptives and stroke: Findings in a large prospective study. Br. Med. J., 289: 530-531. PubMed | Direct Link |
34: Weiss, G., 1999. Risk of venous thromboembolism with third-generation oral contraceptives: A review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 180: 295-301. PubMed | Direct Link |
35: Westhoff, C.L., 1998. Oral contraceptives and thrombosis: An overview of study methods and recent results. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 179: S38-S42. PubMed |
36: WHO, 1996. Haemorrhagic stroke, overall stroke risk, and combined oral contraceptives: Results of an international, multicentre, case-control study. Lancet, 348: 505-510. CrossRef |
37: Wynn, J.W., J.W. Doar and G.L. Mills, 1966. Some effects of oral contraceptives on serum-lipid and lipoprotein levels. Lancet, 2: 720-723. PubMed |
38: Young, R.L. and A. DelConte, 1999. Effects of low-dose monophasic levonorgestrel with ethinyl estradiol preparation on serum lipid levels: A twenty-four month clinical trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 181: S59-S62. CrossRef |
|
|
|
 |