Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

The Effect of Aeration, Agitation and Light on Biohydrogen Production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides NCIMB 8253



S. Za`imah Syed Jaapar, M.S. Kalil and N. Anuar
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Photo fermentation is a biological process that can be applied for hydrogen production. The process is environmental friendly which is operated under mild conditions using renewable resources. In order to increase yield of H2 produced by Rhodobacter sphaeroides, some experimental factors that may enhance H2 production were studied. The effect of operating parameters including agitation, aeration and light on hydrogen production using R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 was investigated. Rhodobacter sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 was grown in 100 mL serum bottle containing growth medium with maliec acid as the sole organic carbon source. The cultures were incubated anaerobically at 30°C with tungsten lamp (100 W) as the light source (3.8 klux) and argon gas was purged for maintaining anaerobic condition. The results show that maximum hydrogen produced was higher (54.37 mL) in static culture with 69.98% of H2 in the total gas compared with shake culture (11.57 mL) with 57.86% of H2. By using static culture, H2 produced was five times higher compared with non-static in both aerobic and anaerobic condition. It was found that growth and H2 production with fluorescent lamp showed better results than growth and H2 production with tungsten light.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

S. Za`imah Syed Jaapar, M.S. Kalil and N. Anuar, 2009. The Effect of Aeration, Agitation and Light on Biohydrogen Production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides NCIMB 8253. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 12: 1253-1259.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2009.1253.1259

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2009.1253.1259
 

INTRODUCTION

Biological hydrogen production can be carried out through photo- and dark-fermentation processes. Hydrogen production by dark fermentation is relatively well known technology and carried out under anaerobic conditions by certain bacterial species, i.e., Clostridium and Enterobacter. A wide range of substrates from sugar to complex carbohydrates or biomass to waste materials, i.e., domestic or agricultural residues and wastewater can be used for H2 production using dark fermentation. However, H2 evolution by dark-fermentation has been treated with little attention, while hydrogen evolution by photosynthetic microorganisms has been extensively studied. Photo-fermentation is performed by anaerobic, photoheterothrophic bacteria like Rhodobacter or Rhodopseudomonas in the presence of light by using organic acids, i.e., acetic and butyric acids, as substrate for hydrogen production (Kapdan et al., 2009).

Photosynthetic bacteria are favorable for biological hydrogen production due to their high conversion efficiency and versatility in the substrates they can utilize (Koku et al., 2002). This is mainly because of their high theoretical conversion yields, lack of O2-evolving activity which causes problems of O2 inactivation of different biological systems, ability to use wide spectral light energy and, ability to consume organic substrates from wastes (Fascetti et al., 1998). Photosynthetic bacteria can produce hydrogen at the expense of solar energy and small-chain organic acids as electron donors. The conversion efficiency of light energy to hydrogen, with the supply of an appropriate carbon source, is the key factor for hydrogen production by biological systems. Photosynthetic bacteria produce hydrogen from organic compounds by an anaerobic light-dependent electron transfer process (Barbosa et al., 2001).

Two enzymes namely nitrogenase and hydrogenase play an important role for biohydrogen production in these bacteria. Photo fermentation by Purple Non-Sulfur (PNS) bacteria is a major field of research through which the overall yield for biological hydrogen production can be improved significantly by optimization of growth conditions and immobilization of active cells (Basak and Das, 2007). Rhodobacter sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 used in this study is a PNS bacteria which is capable of producing molecular hydrogen under anaerobic conditions by photofermentation of organic acids. PNS bacteria evolve molecular H2 catalyzed by nitrogenase under nitrogen-deficient conditions using light energy and reduced compounds (organic acids). Basak and Das (2007) reported that the overall biochemical pathways for the photo fermentation process can be expressed as follows (Das and Iu, 2001). Ferredoxin (Fd) acts as electron carrier in presence of nitrogenase in the cell membrane:

(1)

The nitrogenase enzyme also catalyses the evolution of H2, particularly in the absence of N2. Akkerman et al. (2002) showed that the overall reaction for conversion of the organic substrate (acetate at the example below) into hydrogen demands energy and this is obtained from light.

(2)

The nitrogenase enzyme is also highly sensitive to oxygen, inhibited by ammonium ions or inhibited at high N/C ratio. Therefore, the process requires ammonium limited and oxygen free conditions (Kapdan and Kargi, 2006). This explains why bioreactors must usually operate under anaerobic conditions free of N2, with illumination and limiting concentrations of nitrogen sources. Matsunaga et al. (2000) reported that the theoretical value of H2 production was calculated from:

(3)

and 6 mol of molecular hydrogen can be produced per mole of L-malate under anaerobic conditions. Therefore, maximum hydrogen production from 15 mmol of L-malate is 90 mmol. Small amounts of L-malate are utilized by respiration. One mole of L-malate is necessary for the uptake of 3 mol O2 to produce 36 mol of ATP:

(4)

These bacteria use enzyme nitrogenase to catalyze nitrogen fixation for reduction of molecular nitrogen to ammonia (Akkerman et al., 2002):

(5)

Nitrogenase has interesting property that it can evolve hydrogen simultaneously with nitrogen reduction and it is the key enzyme that catalyzes hydrogen gas production by photosynthetic bacteria (Kapdan and Kargi, 2006). Stressful concentrations of nitrogen are therefore required for H2 evolution (Gadhamshetty et al., 2008).

Unlike nitrogenase, hydrogenase enzyme in photo-fermentative bacteria is an uptake hydrogenase which utilizes H2 gas and therefore is antagonistic to nitrogenase activity (Kapdan and Kargi, 2006). This enzyme was able to take up H2 at low partial pressures, reducing a relatively high potential electron acceptor (at the level of the NAD/NADH couple or even FAD/FADH), but producing little or no measurable hydrogen (Das and Iu, 2001). Uptake hydrogenase activity should be limited for enhanced H2 gas production (Kapdan and Kargi, 2006). These photo heterotrophic bacteria have been investigated for their potential to convert light energy into H2 using waste organic compounds as substrate (Levin et al., 2004). Among species of photosynthetic bacterium, R. sphaeroides (formerly known as Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides) has been studied most widely for hydrogen production (Fang et al., 2006). In this study we are reporting the effect of operational parameters that will affect the growth and hydrogen production by R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 including aeration, agitation and light.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental site: This research project was conducted at the Biotechnology Pilot Plant Lab., Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia and was carried from February 2007 until May 2009.

Microorganism: Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 was obtained from NCIMB Limited, Scotland in freeze-dried culture form. The bacteria were activated by rehydration of dried cultures with a sterile liquid rich medium (medium 27) and transferred at least 3 times until they were activated. Activated cultures were transferred continuously into new growth medium which was modified Biebl and Pfennig medium (Eroglu et al., 1999; Koku et al., 2003) aerobically to keep them active. For long term reserved the active cultures were keep in glycerol stock (-29°C) and for short term they were keep in agar plate (4°C). For H2 production experiment, the bacteria were activated anaerobically. After 72 h incubation at 30°C (anaerobic), the culture was transferred into modified Biebl and Pfennig growth medium and incubated for 48 h at 30°C. Then culture was used to inoculate the hydrogen production medium. The amount of 10% v/v inoculum was used throughout this project except otherwise stated.

Culture condition: Growth of R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 was carried out in modified medium of Biebl and Pfennig. The modified medium of Biebl and Pfennig contains Maliec acid (7.5 mM) as the organic carbon source and sodium glutamate (10 mM) as the nitrogen source (Koku et al., 2003). Solid agar medium was prepared by adding 20 g agar Bacteriological No. 1 into 1 L modified medium of Biebl and Pfennig. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 6.82 with 1 M sodium hydroxide solution. The liquid culture medium used for the hydrogen production was similar to the growth medium except that the concentrations of malate and glutamate were 15 and 2 mM, respectively (Koku et al., 2003). Both medium were sterilized at 121°C for 15 min in an autoclave before being used.

The bacterium was grown in liquid medium anaerobically at 30°C with 100 W tungsten lamp (3.0 -3.8 kLux) or 30 W fluorescent lamp (4 lamps) with light intensity of 3.8-4.5 klux. Argon or nitrogen gas was used to create anaerobic conditions (Kalil et al., 2003; Dogrusoz et al., 2004). The bacterium that was grown in modified of Biebl and Pfennig medium agar was incubated in anaerobic jar with light intensity of 3.0-3.8 klux at 30°C with tungsten lamp (100 W) as the light source.

Hydrogen fermentation: Hydrogen gas production experiments were done in batch culture systems using 100 mL serum bottle containing 100 mL medium with 10% v/v inoculum. The temperature was maintained at 30°C under the illumination of a tungsten lamp (100 W) with light intensity of 3.8 klux. For all hydrogen production experiments, the reactor was flushed with pure argon in order to create an anaerobic atmosphere. After flushing with argon, 10% v/v inoculum of the pre-activated bacteria (in minimal medium of Biebl and Pfennig) was transferred into the hydrogen production medium. During the experiments, the evolved gas was collected and measured volumetrically in a measuring cylinder (Fig. 1) using method modified from Pang (2005) which was classical quantitative method (Standard Method-American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, 1989).

Analysis: Growth of the culture in liquid medium was monitored by measuring the Optical Density (OD) at 660 nm using a Thermo Spectronic UV-visible spectrophotometer (Model: Genesys 10 UV). A relationship of cells dry weight and OD was obtained by plotting a graph of OD versus cell dry weight. It was found that an optical density of 1.0 at 660 nm corresponded to a cell density of 0.341 g dry weight per liter culture.

The volume fraction of H2 in the gas produced was analyzed using a SRI 8610C GC, USA series Gas Chromatograph (GC) equipped with a packed column (length 2 m, internal diameter 2.1 mm, mol sieve 13X, 60-80 mesh) and a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 25 mL min-1. Oven and detector temperatures were 50 and 150°C, respectively. A volume of 1 mL gas samples were taken using 1 mL gas tight syringe and the samples were injected into the GC immediately. The actual volume of hydrogen gas produced was obtained by multiplying the percentage of H2 gas measured by the GC with the total volume of gas collected.


Fig. 1:

A schematic diagram of hydrogen gas production by R. sphaeroides

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Effect of agitation: The effect of agitation on H2 production was studied in two sets of culture, incubated at two different ways, one with shaking and the other without shaking. Results in Table 1 show the percentage of H2, volume of H2 and rate of H2 production in both static and shake culture. More hydrogen is produced in the static culture which is 5 times higher than the amount produced in the shake culture. The maximum amount of hydrogen produced in shake culture was only 11.57 mL while in the static culture was 54.37 mL. However, the time taken for H2 produced to reach its maximum value was longer than the shake culture. The yield of H2 produced also higher in the static culture and almost five times higher than shake culture.

Figure 2a and b show the profile of total gas and H2 produced in both static and shake cultures. In the static culture gas produced increase linearly until 168 h incubation. In the shake culture the rate of gas production reaches stationary phase after 48 of incubation. These results was opposite with what Kim et al. (1982) found in his experiment. He reported that the cells had the tendency to flocculate. The flocculation would retard hydrogen production because of the decrease in the efficiency of light absorption. This usually happen in a large scale hydrogen production. Our experiments were carried out in small scale cultures with 100 mL medium and there was no flocculation occurred.

Other explanation on low H2 produced in the shake culture may be due to stirring will increase the tendency of H2 to be used in second stage of metabolism to produce other products. Kemavongse and Prasertsan (2008) reported the optimum agitation speed for growth of Rhodobacter sphaeroides U7 was 300 rpm while it was 200 rpm for poly-β-hydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production under aerobic condition. Hoekema et al. (2002) reported that it is clear that pneumatic agitation at 6.66 l/L/min with nitrogen or argon inhibits bacterial growth and at any flow rate ranging from 0.33 to 6.66 l/L/min, respectively. The extremely low flow rate of 0.33 l/L/min already inhibited growth completely, which made shear stress as an explanation for the absence of growth improbable. Moreover, all bacteria from the Rhodospirillaceae family are contained by a cell wall (Zhu et al., 2001) that offers protection against shear stress. Results show that this operational parameter such as agitation will affect the H2 production by R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253. Therefore, hydrogen production using this bacterium should be carried out in static condition rather than shake condition especially for small scale culture.


Fig. 2:

Hydrogen production by R. sphaeroides in static and shake cultures; (a) volume of total gas produced and (b) volume of H2 produced



Table 1:

H2 production from different culture conditions

Table 2:

H2 production in different culture conditions

*AN-AN = Anaerobic growth and Anaerobic H2 fermentation, *AN-AE = Anaerobic growth and Aerobic H2 fermentation, *AE-AN = Aerobic growth and Anaerobic H2 fermentation, *AE-AE = Aerobic growth and Aerobic H2 fermentation

Fig. 3:

Total volume of gas mixture produced by R. sphaeroides using different culture conditions for H2 production

Effect of aeration: The effect of the aerobic and anaerobic culture condition was also studied. Figure 3 shows the trends of various conditions used for growth and H2 production. The results in Table 2 shows that the highest volume of hydrogen produced (32.06 mL H2) was achieved when both culture for inoculum and H2 production were incubated in anaerobic condition (YH2/S = 160.30 mL g-1). However, when the inoculum was prepared in aerobic condition and H2 fermentation in anaerobic condition the yield of H2 (YH2/S) decreased to 112.92 mL g-1 and the value of YH2/S, 54.71 mL g-1 was obtained when the inoculum was grown in anaerobic and H2 fermentation was in aerobic condition. The lowest yield of H2 (YH2/S, 46.22 mL g-1) was obtained when both inoculum and H2 fermentation were prepared in aerobic condition.

Figure 3 shows the trends of total mixture gas produced by R. sphaeroides. Results indicated that when the inoculum was grown aerobically and H2 production was carried out anaerobically the highest volume 63.60 mL of gas mixture was achieved but percentage of H2 (Table 2) in the mix gas produced was only 35.51% compared to when both culture for inoculum and H2 production were incubated in anaerobic condition. This result shows that R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 produced higher yield of H2 in anaerobic condition and this parameter also give big impact to H2 production and we found that this is one of the important parameters.


Fig. 4:

Total H2 production by different light sources

Effect of light sources: Fluorescent and tungsten lamp were used as the light sources for R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 growth and H2 production. The effects of both light sources on growth and H2 production by R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 were also studied. The light intensities used in this study were around 3.0-4.0 klux by tungsten and 3.8-4.5 klux by fluorescent depends on the distance of the culture to the light source. The 4000 lux was found to be equivalent to 270 W m-2 and to 1370 μmol photons m-2 sec (photosynthetically active radiation) (Uyar et al., 2007).

Figure 4 shows that light source from fluorescent gives (about 8 times) higher total volume of gas compared to tungsten. This trend was same to other two graphs which show the % of H2 (Fig. 5) and the total of H2 (Fig. 6) gas produced. All these trends proved that light source from fluorescent give better results compared to tungsten. This study only reporting on the effects of two different light sources not on the light intensities, wavelength and illumination protocol as reported by Uyar et al. (2007).

Tungsten lamps are a convenient light source but they contain infrared light to a great extent. Infrared light over 1000 nm is not only useless for photo biological hydrogen evolution but it also heats the culture suspension (Nakada et al., 1999).


Fig. 5:

Total % of H2 produced by R. sphaeroides using different light sources



Fig. 6:

Total H2 produced by R. sphaeroides using different light sources

Uyar et al. (2007) have studied the effect of light intensities, wavelength and illumination protocol on the growth and hydrogen production by R. sphaeroides O.U. 001 using 150 W tungsten lamp. It was found that lack of infrared light (750-950 nm wavelengths) decreased photo production of hydrogen by 39%. The results showed that the rate of hydrogen production increased up to 33 ml/L/h with increasing light intensity and reached saturation at around 270 W m-2 (Uyar et al., 2007), compared to our results, the highest rate of H2 production under fluorescent illumination was 29.26 ml/L/h and under tungsten lamp was 0.32 ml/L/h. These results were lower than that obtained by Uyar et al. (2007), which utilized a different R. sphaeroides strain (R. sphaeroides O.U.001). However, the R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 also has a great potential to be H2 producer under suitable parameters.

Another factor evaluated was the effect of different illumination protocols on the growth and hydrogen production. It was observed that illumination after inoculation stimulates hydrogen production, increases substrate conversion efficiency and hydrogen production rate. There was no hydrogen produced during the dark periods. This result shows us that R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 produced higher yield of H2 under fluorescent illumination compared to tungsten lamp and this parameter also one of the important parameters that affect H2 production.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that growth and H2 production of R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 was affected by some environmental parameters. H2 production by R. sphaeroides NCIMB 8253 should be carried out in static culture under anaerobic condition with fluorescent lamp as the light source for maximum yield. This work is still in the middle stage and will focus many other factors, i.e., inoculum age and size, media, pH, carbon and nitrogen source, light intensities, effect of NH4+ and malate consumption as this bacterium has the bright potential in biological hydrogen production. Once the optimum parameters achieved, this research will be proceed in larger scale using 7L photo bioreactor.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors are grateful and would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), Malaysia, for funding this research project under Science Fund grant 02-01-02-SF0176.

REFERENCES
1:  Akkerman, I., M. Janssen, J. Rocha and H.R. Wijffels, 2002. Photobiological hydrogen production: Photochemical efficiency and bioreactor design. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 27: 1195-1208.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Barbosa, M.J., J.M.S. Rocha, J. Tramper and R.H. Wijffels, 2001. Acetate as a carbon source for hydrogen production by photosynthetic bacteria. J. Biotechnol., 85: 25-33.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

3:  Basak, N. and D. Das, 2007. The prospect of Purple Non-Sulfur (PNS) photosynthetic bacteria for hydrogen production: The present state of the art. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 23: 31-42.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Das, D. and T.N. Veziroglu, 2001. Hydrogen production by biological processes: A survey of literature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 26: 13-28.
CrossRef  |  

5:  Dogrusoz, N., U. Gunduyz and M. Yucel, 2004. Transcriptional analysis of hydrogenase genes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U.001. Masters Thesis, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. Middle East Technical University, Turkey.

6:  Eroglu, I., K. Aslan, U. Gunduz, M. Yucel and L. Turker, 1999. Substrate consumption rates for hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides in a column photobioreactor. J. Biotechnol., 70: 103-113.
CrossRef  |  

7:  Fang, H.H.P., H. Zhu and T. Zhang, 2006. Phototrophic hydrogen production from glucose by pure and co-cultures of Clostridium butyricum and rhodobacter sphaeroides. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 31: 2223-2230.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

8:  Fascetti, E., E. D'Addario, O. Todini and A. Robertiello, 1998. Photosynthetic hydrogen evolution with volatile organic acid derived from the fermentation of source selected municipal wastes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 23: 753-760.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

9:  Gadhamshetty, V., A. Sukumaran, N. Nirmalakhandan and M.T. Myint, 2008. Photofermentation of malate for biohydrogen production: A modeling approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 33: 2138-2146.
CrossRef  |  

10:  Hoekema, S., B. Martijn, M. Janssen, J. Tramper and H.W. Rene, 2002. A Pneumatically Agitated and at-Panel Photobioreactor with Gas Re-Circulation: Anaerobic photoheterotrophic cultivation of a purple non-sulfur bacterium. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 27: 1331-1338.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Kalil, M.S., Y. Pang, Y. Sadazo, A.R. Rakmi and M. Wan, 2003. Direct fermentation of palm oil mill effluent to acetone-butanol-ethanol by solvent producing clostridia. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 6: 1273-1275.
Direct Link  |  

12:  Kapdan, K.I., F. Kargi, R. Oztekin and H. Argun, 2009. Bio-hydrogen production from acid hydrolyzed wheat starch by photo-fermentation using different Rhodobacter sp. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34: 2201-2207.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  Kemavongse, K. and P. Prasertsan, 2008. Poly-β-hydroxyalkanoate production by halotolerant Rhodobacter sphaeroides U7. World J. Microbiol Biotechnol., 24: 2073-2085.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

14:  Kim, J.S., H. Yamauchi, K. Ito and H. Takahashi, 1982. Selection of a photosynthetic bacterium suitable for hydrogen production in outdoor cultures among strains isolated in the seoul, taegu, sendai and bangkok areas. Agric. Biol. Chem., 46: 1469-1474.
Direct Link  |  

15:  Koku, H., I. Eroglu, U. Gunduz, M. Yucel and L. Turker, 2002. Aspects of the metabolism of hydrogen production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 27: 1315-1329.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Koku, H., I. Eroglu, U. Gunduz, M. Yucel and L. Turker, 2003. Kinetics of biological hydrogen production by the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U. 001. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 28: 381-388.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Levin, D., L. Pitt and M. Love, 2004. Biohydrogen production: Prospects and limitations to practical application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 29: 173-185.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Matsunaga, T., T. Hatano, A. Yamada and M. Matsumoto, 2000. Microaerobic hydrogen production by photosynthetic bacteria in a double-phase photobioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 68: 647-651.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Nakada, E., S. Nishikata, Y.Asada and J. Miyake, 1999. Photosynthetic bacterial hydrogen production combined with fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 24: 1053-1057.
CrossRef  |  

20:  Uyar, B., I. Eroglu, M. Yucel, U. Gunduz and L. Turker, 2007. Effect of light intensity,wavelength and illumination protocol on hydrogen production in photobioreactors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 32: 4670-4677.
CrossRef  |  

21:  Pang, W.K., 2005. Production of acetone-butanol-ethanol-hydrogen from palm oil mill effluent throughout anaerobic fermentation with Clostridium acetobutylicum NCIMB13357. Masters Thesis, Masters Thesis, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

22:  Zhu, H., T. Wakayama, Y. Asada and J. Miyake, 2001. Hydrogen production by four cultures with participation by anoxygenic phototrophic bacterium and anaerobic bacterium in the presence of NH4+. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 26: 1149-1154.
CrossRef  |  

23:  Kapdan, I.K. and F. Kargi, 2006. Bio-hydrogen production from waste materials. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 38: 569-582.
CrossRef  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved