Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

The Haphazard Wooden Material Converted to Healthy MDF Product



Mehmet Akgul, Birol Uner, Suleyman Korkut and Osman Camlibel
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

During machining of wood and wood composites materials, fine particles and dusts are created. These minute wooden materials can easily be carried out to human lungs by air and can cause serious health problem. Even though this material is too fine and created in huge amount, it can be stored and used as raw material in wood composite industry. The addition of wood dust into MDF contents can improve the physical and mechanical properties of the products. Small particles can fill the spaces between fiber and act as matrix material to improve adhesion properties. However, the addition of dust into MDF receipt decreased bending strength, internal bond values and MOE. In contrast, these mechanical strengths meet the standard values and fulfill the requirements.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Mehmet Akgul, Birol Uner, Suleyman Korkut and Osman Camlibel, 2007. The Haphazard Wooden Material Converted to Healthy MDF Product. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10: 607-611.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.607.611

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2007.607.611

INTRODUCTION

The demands for forest products are increasing with increase in population. This need is rising the pressure on the natural resources. The lack of raw material and environmental concern leads to search for new sources. As a result of that different wood composites are produced to imitate solid wood. In order to produce these composites materials, small diameter wood, juvenile wood, twigs and agricultural products are utilized. During production, each process generates some fine dust and small particles. In addition to that, other wood using industries propagate huge amount of dust during sanding and converting wood to product. These minute wooden materials can easily be carried to human lungs by air and can cause serious health problem. Wood dust can cause sinonasal cancer, asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, chronic bronchitis and dermitis (Palmqvist and Gustafsson, 1999; Holmstrom et al., 1991; Herbert et al., 1994; Hossini et al., 2001; Carton et al., 2002). It is also waste material to be discarded for the wood products industry and usually these materials utilized in burner to generate energy or utilized in gardening as plant bed. However, these dust/small particles can be utilized in production to obtain smooth surface of the board and/or improve the bonding ability of the material produced from it.

Adhesion and material combination is an important phenomena in composite production. Adhesion is related to surface phenomena that attaches different material together (Pocious, 1997). Particle or dust can have a dimension from a few nanometers to millimeters (Renliang, 2002). Concerning the size of tiny particles and dust, these material will have large specific surface area. Particles with high specific surface area lead to many significant interfacial phenomena, such as surface interaction with the surrounding medium and neighboring particles. As a consequence, adhesion bond can be strong as much interaction occurs between the surfaces. Therefore, particle size and distribution can affect the adhesion properties of material. Small particle can easily fill the space, have high surface area to bond and provide better adhesion and effect the mechanical properties of the assembled products. According to Nemli, wood dust addition to particleboard cake about 10% improved thickness swelling, internal bond and decreased the static bending and modulus of elasticity of particleboard produced from Alnus glutinosa subsp. Barbata (Nemli, 2003). In other research, addition of different size of polymeric fluff to medium density fiberboard improved significantly the thickness swelling, internal bond strength (Shi et al., 1999). Even though this change may be due to polymeric material properties, small particle size may improve interfacial phenomena and mechanical properties. According to Groom et al. (1999) the addition of fines to MDF receipt decreased the mechanical properties.

As the demand for MDF is rapidly growing, the fine sawdust presents an ever increasing cost and environmental liability to the manufacturers. The dust is too fine and voluminous to be easily handled, stored and transported. It also reduces formaldehyde emission and renders hazardous effect to human. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the small particle effect on the mechanical and physical properties of MDF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials: The raw materials for the study consisted of industrial wood (Pinus sylvestris L., Fagus orientalis and Quercus robur L.-Quercus petraea L.) which were collected from the West Black Sea Region (Düzce), and different part of Turkey.

In order to assemble MDF board, the following ingredient were added to the fiber furnish. These ingredient were 1% wax (Polisan, Gebze, Turkey), 0.8% NH4Cl (Polisan, Gebze, Turkey) as hardener and 11% urea-formaldehyde (Polisan, Gebze, Turkey) resin. The urea formaldehyde resin specifications were given in Table 1.

Methods: Medium Density Fiberboard furnish were manufactured at Divapan Integrated Wood Company located in Duzce, Turkey.

The chips having an average dimension of 20 by 25 by 5 mm were produced from low-quality roundwood. Raw material was converted into fiber furnish in an Asplund defibrator using a steam pressure of 7.8 bar at a temperature of 175°C for 3.5 min.

MDF panels were made from dust and industrial wood furnishes (Pinus sylvestris L., Fagus orientalis and Quercus Robur L.- Quercus petraea Lieble) in various wood fiber/dust contents (100:0, 95:5, 90:10, 80:20 and 70:30) based on the ovendry weight at a set specific gravity. The panel manufacturing experimental design is outlined in Table 2. Firstly, the fibers produced from industrial wood and dust (from sanding and MDF cut) was mixed and fiber mat was prepared. Secondly, fiber mat was pressed with pressure of 25 kg cm-2 at 150°C for 6 min. Panel MDF produced in laboratory having dimension of 50x50x2 cm. were conditioned at 20±2°C and 65±5% of relative humidity to the moisture content of 12%. Finally, edges of the boards were trimmed to the final dimension of 48x48x2 cm.

In order to determine the physical and mechanical properties of each panel, density, thickness swelling at 2 and 24 h soaking period, bending strength, modulus of elasticity and internal bond strength were tested and compared according to standard TS 64-5, EN622-5 (1999). The density determination was performed with TS EN-323, (1999) (Turkish standard-extended), thickness swelling test at 2 and 24 h were performed according to EN 319, (1993a).

Table 1:

The properties of urea-formaldehyde resin (UF)


Table 2:

MDF produced from the furnish from industry and fine particles

The bending strength and modulus of elasticity (MOE) were evaluated according to TS-EN 310 (1999) (Turkish standard-extended). The experiments were carried out with Universal test machine (Imal mobiltemp shc22 model ib400). Tension strength parallel to the plane, Janka hardness perpendicular to the plane were determined according to EN 317 (1993b) and ASTM D 1037-78 (1994) standards. The average of 20 measurements was recorded. All data were evaluated by using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan mean separation tests.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The density of manufactured MDF panel has shown in Table 3. Each panel mean density difference was not significant due to production of set specific gravity. These panels were utilized to determine physical and mechanical properties of MDF.

Fiberboard is utilized in different environment as part of furniture such as in kitchen, bathroom, living room etc. These environments may carry different moisture contents and each material due to structural properties can absorb water. As a result of that, water causes to change dimensions of the board. Therefore, the thickness swelling becomes important character to determine in end products. The thickness swelling properties of the panels were given in Table 4. The panel made from industrial fiber has showed the least thickness swelling for 2 and 24 h tests. Extending soaking time in water significantly increased the swelling which is parallel to the increased amount of dust content (Table 4). Small particle size improves the specific surface area and leads to more contact with moisture and increases the absorbed water content.

Table 3:

The density of manufactured MDF panel

a Standard deviation n: sample size


Table 4:

Thickness swelling properties of MDF

* Number in parentheses represents the standard deviation


Table 5:

Mechanical properties of MDF

* Number in parentheses represents the standard deviation

Duncan test shows the relationship among the means. Means with the same letter are least significantly different at alpha 99% confidence level (Table 4).

The addition of dust, fine particles may also affect the mechanical properties of the MDF and these properties are usually defined as the strength and resistance to deformation (Haygreen et al., 1989). According to Eroglu and Usta, mechanical properties of MDF are affected by the raw material properties and production methods (Eroğlu and Usta, 2000). Fresh material can give better mechanical properties whereas the raw material that was stored in for a long time shows lower mechanical properties. In addition to that, MDF made from softwood fiber has higher mechanical properties than MDF made from hardwood fiber. In production, extending steaming period in termomechanical refining reduces the bending strength.

In order to determine the effect of dust content on mechanical properties of MDF, internal bond strength, bending strength and Janka Hardness were tested (Table 5).

The highest internal bond strength was obtained from industrial fiber. However, there were no significant difference detected for the mean values of internal bond strength with different fine particle contents. In contrast to that, bending strength and Modulus of elasticity showed significant change (Fig. 1-2).

Fig. 1:

The effect of fine dust addition on bending strength


Fig. 2:

Effect of dust content on MOE

Increasing the amount of short material in the receipt significantly decreased the bending strength (Fig. 1). According to standard (EN622-5 1997), bending strength should be at least 20 N mm-2. The highest bending strength was 39.61 N mm-2 and this value was obtained from board made from industrial fiber. Dust content 5 and 10% in board is not statically different. However, further addition of dust in mixture was negatively affecting the bending strength. This could be due to the fiber properties. Virgin long fiber had better bending strength than short fiber. Virgin fiber was also beaten to have better bonding ability. Fibrillation causes to improve fiber-to-fiber contact. Therefore, the weakness of the board was due to the lack of fiber length, resulting in low fiber aspect ratios and ultimately poor physical interlocking and fiber-to-fiber contact. In contrast, all panels were met the requirement in standards.

Medium density fiber boards contains fine materials were generally well consolidated. However, its modulus of elasticity was significantly affected by the addition of dust (p = 0.01). Statistically, least significant difference among the board with different dust contents were given in Table 6.

Table 6:

Modulus of elasticity (N mm-2)

The modulus of elasticity and mechanical properties inversely correlated to dust loading (Fig. 2).

Measuring hardness is the way of showing how surface of the board will resist abrasion and scratching. Wood particles are converted to fiber with refining and these fiber blended with resin and hot pressed to form MDF board. After formation of the board, individual wood elements cannot be identified. During heat treatment, strength properties were developed, however, at the same time, deterioration of fiber take places. Addition of dust increase the interfacial phenomena between fiber and the particle, fill the spaces between fibers and improve the surface and adhesion properties. However, the addition of dust into the prescription significantly reduced the surface hardness and this change was not altered too much when adding more dust. The highest surface hardness was obtained with industrial fiber. This could be due to the aspect ratio of fiber. Nonfibrous fine dust may reduce the bonding ability of the fiber and surface hardness of the material.

CONCLUSIONS

The demand for forest products increasing with increase in population. The lack of raw material and environmental concern leads to search for new resources. The potential of waste material has received considerable attention in recent years. Utilization of fine wood dust in MDF production is possible. Addition of wood dust into MDF contents can change the physical and mechanical properties of the products. Thickness swelling was increased. This could be due to improved surface area. However, bending strength, internal bond strength, MOE and Janka hardness within the range of standards required. This shows that wood dust can be used in panel products.

REFERENCES
1:  ASTM D-1037-78, 1994. Standard Methods of Evaluating the Properties of Wood-Base Fiber and Particle Panel Materials. The American Society For Testing and Materials, USA.

2:  Carton, M., M. Goldberg and D. Luce, 2002. Occupational exposure to wood dust. Health effects and exposure limit values. Rev. Epidemiol. Sante. Publique., 50: 159-178.
Direct Link  |  

3:  EN 317, 1993. Particleboards and fiber boards, determination of tensile strength perpendicular to plane of the board. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.

4:  EN 319, 1993. Particleboards and fiber boards, determination of swelling in thickness after immersion in water. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.

5:  EN 622-5, 1997. Fibre boards. Specifications. Requirements for dry process boards. European Standardization Committee, Brussell.

6:  Erolu, H. and M. Usta, 2000. Lif levha üretim teknolojisi-fiberboard production technolgy. K.T.Ü. Genel Yayn No. 200, Orman Fakültesi Yayn No. 30 Trabzon.

7:  Groom, L., L. Mott and S. Shaler, 1999. Relationship between fiber furnish properties and structural performance of MDF. Proceedings of the 33rd International Particleboard/Composite Materials Symposium Proceedings Apr. 13-15, Pullman, Washington USA.

8:  Haygreen, J.G. and J.L. Bowyer, 1989. Forest Products and Wood Science: An Introduction. 2nd Edn., Iowa State University Press, USA., pp: 213.

9:  Herbert, F.A., P.A. Hessel, L.S. Melenka, K. Yoshida and M. Nakaza, 1994. Respratory consequences of exposure to wood dust and formaldehyde of workers manufacturng orented strand board. Arch. Environ. Health, 49: 465-470.
Direct Link  |  

10:  Holmstrom, M., G. Rosen and B. Wilhelmsson, 1991. Symptoms, airway physiology and histology of workers exposed to medium-density fiber board. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 17: 409-413.
Direct Link  |  

11:  Hossini, C.H.L., O.L. Hossini, A.E. Rahhali, C. Verger and D. Tripodi et al., 2001. Occupational respiratory hazards among exposed workers to wood dust in the handicraft joineries and cabinet-maker workshops. Rev. Des. Maladies Respiratoires, 18: 615-622.

12:  Nemli, G., 2003. Effects of some manufacturing factors on the properties of particleboard manufactured from alder (Alnus glutinosa subsp. Barbata). Turk. J. Agric. For., 27: 99-104.
Direct Link  |  

13:  Pocious, A.V., 1997. Adhesion and Adhesives Technology: An Introduction. Hanser Publishers, Munich.

14:  Renliang, X., 2002. Particle Characterization: Light Scattering Methods Particle Technology Series. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.

15:  Shi, S.Q., D.J. Gardner and J.Z. Wang, 1999. Effect of the addition of polymeric fluff to wood furnish on the mechanical and physical properties of wood fiberboard. Forest Prod. J., 49: 32-38.
Direct Link  |  

16:  TS EN 323, 1999. Wood-Based Panels-Determination of Density. TSE, Ankara.

17:  TS 64-5, EN622-5, 1999. Fibreboards-Specifications-Part 5: Requirements for Dry Process Boards (MDF). TSE, Ankara.

18:  TS EN 310, 1999. Ahşap Esasl Levhalarn Eilme Direncive Eilmede Elastikiyet Modulu-Wood based panels bending strength and Modulus of Elasticity. Turkish Standard Institute, Ankara.

19:  Palmqvist, J. and S.I. Gustafsson, 1999. Emission of dust in planing and milling of wood. Holz Als Roh-Und Werkstoff, 57: 164-170.
Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved