Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

In vitro Efficacy for Some Local Antimicrobial Products Against E. coli K12



Azizollah Ebrahimi, Abdolkarim Zamani Moghadam , Mostafa Shakhse Niaie and Farzaneh Nikookhah
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro activity of a number of antimicrobial agents (Sultrim, Oxytetracycline, enrofloxacin and florfenicol) produced by different Iranian manufacturers against E. coli K12. Comparison of the MICs of reference antimicrobials with Disk Diffusion (DD) results of different products made by Iranian manufacturers revealed that all products of tested antimicrobials seem to be in synergy with their reference MIC evaluation. Present data indicate that E. coli K 12 is resistant to Enrofloxacin (MIC value of 6.25 μg mL-1) by both MIC and DD evaluation.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Azizollah Ebrahimi, Abdolkarim Zamani Moghadam , Mostafa Shakhse Niaie and Farzaneh Nikookhah , 2007. In vitro Efficacy for Some Local Antimicrobial Products Against E. coli K12. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10: 4570-4572.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.4570.4572

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2007.4570.4572

INTRODUCTION

Microorganisms have developed unlimited resistance to antibiotics since their introduction into clinical practice. The emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains among these organisms has resulted in a major public health concern worldwide (Mosland et al., 2006).

Essentially there are two methods of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST): Agar diffusion methods and antimicrobial dilution tests. Quantitative methods include agar dilution and broth dilution and the commercially available E-test Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) strips. The MIC is the minimum inhibitory concentration of antibiotic that inhibits growth of the organism (King and Brown , 2001). Qualitative methods include disk diffusion test which is a qualitative method since the organism is classified as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) to the antibiotic (NCCLS, 1997). Several antimicrobials, such as sultrim, oxytetracycline, enrofloxacin and florfenicol are manufactured by different Iranian companies.

Since some of these products are exported to regional countries, to have an idea about the quality and performance of these products, the current study was undertaken to evaluate the susceptibilities of E. coli K12 to 5 reference antimicrobial agents as control, using MIC method and their products produced by Iranian manufacturers using the disk diffusion method (NCCLS, 1997).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted through October 2006 to March 2007 in Microbiology Lab. of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Shahrekord University in Shahrekord, Iran.

The minimum inhibitory concentration was selected as the reference method for this study (Saiman et al., 1999).

Sultrim, oxytetracycline, enrofloxacin and florfenicol from different manufacturers were the agents assayed. (Table 1).

The following drugs were obtained from ICN biochemical's (sulfadiazine + trimetoprime = sultrim, oxytetracycline), glaxo (enrofloxacin) and padtanteb (florfenicol). The MICs of these drugs were assayed and used as control for their relative products. MICs were determined by a two- fold serial dilution method using Mueller-Hinton broth according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendations (NCCLS, 1997). One milliliter of 200 μg mL-1 concentration of each drug was added to first serial tubes of tested antimicrobials. The MIC endpoint was the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that completely visibly inhibited the growth of E. coli K12 in a tube.

For disk diffusion, concentrations were in accordance with the NCCLS (1997) recommendations. The ranges of concentrations tested by the disks for each of the tested drugs were 23.75, 30, 5 and 30 μg for Sultrim, oxytetracycline, enrofloxacin and florfenicol, respectively.

The same concentrations were used for relative products of mentioned antimicrobials produced locally.

Testing strain was E. coli RTCC 2310 (K12) from Razi institute incubated over night in TSB (Tryptonic Soy Broth), at 37 degree centigrade and then adapted with 0.5 McFarland turbidity, adjusted to final concentration of 1.5x108 colony-forming units mL-1 according to Carter and Chengappa (1991) method.

The plates were then incubated for 20 h at 37°C after which interpretation was performed using a ruler for measuring inhibition diameters according to the criteria recommended by NCCLS (2002a).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

MIC of the E. coli K12 to tested antimicrobials for Sultrim, Oxytetracycline, Enrofloxacin and Florfenicol were 1.5625, 0.7812, 6.25 and 3.125 μg mL-1 respectively. Based on these MICs E. coli K12 was resistant to Enrofloxacin but sensitive to others. Zone diameter of reference Enrofloxacin (21 mm) and its products (19- 21 mm) are very near and are near optimum. For sultrim, oxytetracycline and florfenicol zone diameter of reference drugs were 18, 25 and 24 mm respectively, while for their products ranges between 17-20, 22-26 and 22-24 mm, respectively. For Sultrim products these results seems to be the optimum but for others are linear across the range. The results for disk diffusion of these drugs and their products are summarized in Table 1, as it appeared the results for DD of the above antimicrobials and their local products are just as the results of MICs of reference drugs.

The aim of this study was to compare the reference group of antimicrobials and their locally produced products against E. coli K12 a representative of gram negative bacteria to have an idea about the quality and performance of these products.

Animal species-bacterial pathogen breakpoints and zone interpretive criteria for in vitro susceptibility testing were as outlined in the NCCLS (2001).

Our data indicate that E. coli K12 is resistant to enrofloxacin (MIC value of 6.25 μg mL-1) by both MIC and DD evaluation. No remarkable difference between reference and local products of this drug were observed. It therefore seems likely that the reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones of this bacteria is sufficient to allow it to survive antibiotic challenge in chickens or animal infections.

Based on MIC of reference florfenicol (3.125 μg mL-1) and DD inhibition zone diameter (NCCLS, 2002b) of related products (22-24 mm), Table 1, tested E. coli was sensitive to this synthetic antibiotic and florfenicol commercial products seem to have acceptable anti E. coli effect. However there are no approved NCCLS breakpoints for MIC of E. coli currently available, the resistance breakpoint of Florfenicol for other gram negative bacteria (i.e., Pasteurella multocida) is suggested from 8 μg mL-1 (David et al., 2000) to 0.12-4 μg mL-1 (Sung et al., 2005). In an earlier study, Rajaian et al. (2003) examined the concentration of active ingredient of several common veterinary antimicrobial products by disk diffusion method using Staphylococcus aureus as tested bacteria. They reported high quality of oxytetracycline products from Iranian manufacturer and 10 to 100% impurities in other antimicrobial products. In this study the data for Oxytetracycline products are in across the range and so in agree with that study but for other products are not in agree. There are some differences between susceptibilities of E. coli and S. aureus to different antimicrobials and this can be one explanation for this difference.


Table 1: Tested antimicrobial agents by disk diffusion method (NCCLS, 2002), their purity and relative sources
S = Sensitive, NS = Non Sensitive

In our study E. coli K12 was used as a representative of gram negative bacteria, however all gram negative bacteria have not the same antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, more over this pattern for gram positive bacteria may be completely different. So a complete study on some gram positives and some other gram negative bacteria is essential to achieve a satisfying idea about these products. But as a pilot study we can conclude that, all products of tested antimicrobials seem to be in synergy with their reference MIC evaluation against E. coli K12 and can be supposed to be reliable.

REFERENCES
1:  Carter, G.R. and M.M. Chengappa, 1991. Essentials of Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology. 4th Edn., Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp: 81-90, 150-163.

2:  White, D.G., C. Hudson, J.J. Maurer, S. Ayers and S. Zhao et al., 2000. Characterization of chloramphenicole and florfenicol resistance in Escherichia coli associated with bovine diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol., 38: 4593-4598.
Direct Link  |  

3:  King, A. and F.J.D. Brown, 2001. Quality assurance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disk diffusion. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 48: 71-76.
Direct Link  |  

4:  Moland, E.S., N.D. Hanson, J.A. Black, A. Hossain, W. Song and K.S. Thomson, 2006. Prevalence of newer β-lactamases in gram-negative clinical isolates collected in the United States from 2001 to 2002. J. Clin. Microbiol., 44: 3318-3324.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  NCCLS, 1997. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically. 4th Edn., National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA., USA.

6:  NCCLS, 2001. Development of in vitro Susceptibility Testing Criteria and Quality Control Parameters for Veterinary Antimicrobial Agents. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.

7:  NCCLS, 2002. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. 6th Edn., National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.

8:  NCCLS., 2002. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals: Approved Standard. 2nd Edn., National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA., USA., ISBN-13: 9781562384616, Pages: 86.

9:  Rajaian, H., J. Jalaee and M. Khaledi, 2003. Evaluation of antibiotics used in veterinary practice by microbiological assay method. Iran. J. Vet. Res., 2: 154-158.
Direct Link  |  

10:  Saiman, L., S. Burns, J. Whittier, M. Krzewinski, S. Erwin, Marshall and R.N. Jones, 1999. Evaluation of reference dilution test methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol., 37: 2987-2991.
Direct Link  |  

11:  Shin, S.J., S.G. Kang, R. Nabin, M.L. Kang and H.S.Yoo, 2005. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of florfenicol against bacteria isolated from bovine and porcine respiratory disease. Vet. Microbiol., 106: 73-77.
Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved