Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Evaluation of Operation of Submerged Aerated Filters in Wastewater Treatment and Excess Sludge Production



Mohammad A. Baghapourm and Ibrahim Jabbari
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to evaluate the SCOD removal efficiency in submerged biological aerated filters (BAFs) and subsequently to assess the relationship between the specific surface area (Ss) and Excess Sludge Production (ESP) rate in such filters. Accordingly, four filters with different porosity and specific surface (647, 295, 175 and 136 m2 m-3) have been loaded with synthetic wastewater based on low fat dry milk powder with COD of 1500 mg L-1 in different hydraulic retention time (8, 4, 2, 1 and 0.5 h). In this study, it was shown that specific surface increase of the filters initially increases the efficiency of the filters and after a certain value, the filter efficiency remains uncharged or decreases, as in HRT of 8 h the SCOD removal efficiency of filters 1 and 2 (Ss = 647 m2 m-3 and Ss = 295 m2 m-3) were 89.8 and 91% at VOL of 3.195 and 3.727 kg COD m-3 d-1, respectively. Also, the results showed that in all the filters, the production rate of suspended sludge increases inversely with the hydraulic retention time and the media with higher porosity (90.5%) produced less suspended sludge (8-57 g m-3) despite having lower efficiency in the SCOD removal.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Mohammad A. Baghapourm and Ibrahim Jabbari , 2007. Evaluation of Operation of Submerged Aerated Filters in Wastewater Treatment and Excess Sludge Production. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10: 3039-3047.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.3039.3047

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2007.3039.3047

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the Activated Sludge Process (ASP) dominates the biological treatment of municipal wastewater (Eckenfelder and Grau, 1998; Metcalf and Eddy, 2003). Excess sludge has to be properly treated prior to final disposal, even thought the cost of sludge treatment is extremely high, accounting for up to 60% of the total operating cost in a wastewater treatment plant (Canales and Poles, 1994; Barker and Dold, 1996). The ultimate disposal of excess sludge generally includes land spreading, landfill, incineration and sea disposal (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003). It has been suggested that within the framework of sustainable development, the disposal problem may be solved by minimizing excess sludge production at the source (Roeleveld et al., 1997).

In this way, growth of controllable predators (Lee and Welander, 1996; Rensink and Rulkens, 1997), additional anaerobic/anoxic stages (McClintock et al., 1992; Barker and Dold, 1996) and ozone induced biodegradation (Yasui et al., 1996; Sakai et al., 1997) have been tested at either laboratory or pilot scale. Result show that although excess sludge production can be significantly reduced, the quality of final effluent often deteriorates due to the inherent limitations of conventional gravity clarifiers.

To overcome such limitations, application of submerged Biological Aerated Filters (BAFs) in wastewater treatment has been intensified in the recent years (Rusten, 1984; Pujol et al., 1992; Smith et al., 1992; Canler and Perret, 1994). Operating loads reported in the literature for BAF systems vary widely, BAFs with fixed bed and dense media can treat volumetric loads, approximately between 5 and 10 kg COD m-3 d-1 (Pujol et al., 1992; Canler and Perret, 1994). Among different references, a greater disparity is found among reported hydraulic load applied in comparison to reported volumetric load applied, depending on the support material used and the particular objectives of the BAF system (Mann and Stephenson, 1997; Belgiorno and DeFeo, 2003; Xie et al., 2004).

For the effect of pore size of filter on the suspended solids removal efficiency, investigations have been carried out among them the work of Martin (Martin, 1996) could be referred to in which the rate of bacterial filtration has been studied.

In a theoretical study, Benthack and Bonvin (2001) tried to work out the optimum operation of bioreactors with fixed bed using numerical analysis. In this research also, the effect of specific surface of filter media on the efficiency and sludge production is not taken into account in the modeling. In some experimental researches, it has been tried to control the thickness of the biological layer (Biofilm) and prevent clogging and filter decrease of efficiency by increasing the rate of aeration and also adding chemical substances such as hypochlorite (Osorio and Hontoria, 2001).

Biological aerated filters, due to the nature of the treatment scheme have been invaluable help in reduction of sludge and consequently in reduction of treatment cost (Fujimoto, 1993) and also, the treatment of high strength wastewater (Westerman, 2000; Galvez et al., 2006). It should be mentioned that commercial types of submerged aerated filters as Biofor and Biostir have been being manufactured and used in the last 10 years in the United States (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003). However, little attention has been paid to the production rate of the suspended sludge and its relation with the physical specifications of filter.

With regard to the fact that in aerated treatment systems, the rate of sludge production is very high and it is the case for submerged biological aerated filters as well, research on the rate of suspended sludge production as excess sludge in this kind of filters looks necessary. So, in the present study, using a physical model in a pilot scale, the effect of specific surface of submerged BAF media and hydraulic retention time on the efficiency and the amount of suspended sludge production in this kind of filters was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Setup of biological filters: The physical model in this research was setup in the hydraulic laboratory of school of health in the town of Shiraz (Iran) on spring of 2006. The model consisted of 4 PVC pipes of 147 mm inside diameter and 1m height included the free height. Total volume of each pipe was 11.9 L. For filling the cylinders, pieces of 10, 20, 32 and 40 mm pipe with height the same as their diameters were used. The cylinders were filled with these pipe pieces up to 70 cm of their height to form the porous media of the filters. In Fig. 1, schematically, the model is shown and in Table 1, physical specifications of the model are presented.

In the model at the heights of 35 and 70 cm, from the bottom of the porous media sampling points were maintained. Aeration was done from the bottom of the cylinders by diffusers placed upside down. The amount of injected air was chosen such that oxygen would not be a limiting factor for biological growth.

For feeding the bioreactors, synthetic wastewater of 1500 mg L-1 COD was used which was made using low fat dry milk powder and tap water. pH fluctuation were controlled using 0.5 normal Sodium Bicarbonate. Synthetic wastewater was injected into the reactors from bottom by dosing pumps and its temperature was controlled in the reservoir by an electric heater on 30±0.2°C.


Table 1: Physical specifications of the reactors
1Total Volume, 2Solid Phase Volume, 3Void Volume, 4Porosity, 5Totuosity, 6Specific Surface of Filter Media

Fig. 1: Schematic figure of the physical model

In all the phases of the experiments, the reactors were operated with upflow condition.

Startup and system operation: For operation of the system, the cylinders were filled with synthetic wastewater of 1000 mg L-1 COD, then, they were seeded by aerobic bacteria collected from the activated sludge system of the domestic wastewater treatment plant. Then, the air compressors were turned on and the reactors started to wok in a batch condition. The bacterial adaptation stage took about 25 days. During this time, the wastewater inside the reactors was changed 4 times and at the end of this period, thickness of the biological layer (Biofilm) in each reactor reached about 200 μm.

During this time, reduction of SCOD (Soluble Chemical Oxygen Demand) was measured daily. The result of the measurement would be presented in the corresponding section. For the study of the effect of Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT) on the efficiency of the filters, wastewater with strength of 1500 mg L-1 was injected into the reactors with various discharges which corresponded to different hydraulic retention times.

In all situations, 9 L min-1 air was compressed into the columns. In Table 2, the operation scheme of the reactors for 5 situations using discharge adjustment for setting the required hydraulic retention time is presented. After the microbial adaptation reached, the reactors stated to operate with a hydraulic retention time of 8 h and since the porosities of the reactors porous media were different, 4 dosing pumps were used separately.

Sampling at the maintained sampling points was carried out regularly and when any column reached a steady state from the viewpoints of soluble COD and outflow VSS, volume of biofilm was measured and the thickness of the biological layer in each column was estimated having the specific surface of filter media.

It should be noted that almost in all the references, among them reference (Rusten, 1984), it is confirmed that the criterion for submerged filters design is the rate of volumetric loading on the filter media and the rate of substrate removal is obtained from the hyperbolic relations such as the Eq. 1.

(1)

In this Equation, rCOD is the rate of the substrate removal, rmax is the maximum rate of the substrate removal, BCOD is the organic load per unit volume of the filter and k is the constant of half velocity. All the parameters are in kg SCOD m-3 d-1.


Table 2: Discharge of the reactors (L h-1)

Table 3: Volumetric loading of the reactors in kg SCOD m-3 d-1

Table 4: Surface loading of reactors in g SCOD m-2 d-1

In Table 3 and 4, the amount of surface and volumetric loadings during the experimental time are presented.

Experiments: The measured parameters in this research were SCOD, VSS, pH, DO and temperature. The first two parameters, the filter efficiency in substrate removal and excess sludge production could be obtained in any run and with a specified hydraulic retention time. pH and DO measurements were carried out randomly. These two parameters were included in the list for measurement just to be sure about proper operation of the system and stability of the reactors. The temperature of the synthetic wastewater was controlled and fixed in the reservoir on 30±0.2°C using an electric heater equipped with a sensitive electrode.

It should be noted that in the whole time of the experiments, the synthetic wastewater was not needed to be cooled. All the experiments were carried out based on the standard methods (Standard Methods, 1998).

Measurement method of the biofilm thickness: For measurement of biological layer thickness formed on porous media of the columns, the difference between the initial volume and porous volume (Vv) was divided by specific surface of each filter. It should be mentioned that at the end of each run, at the steady state, the reactors were washed using clean water in such a way that the outflow waste from the reactor would be clear and then the new porosity was measured and used in the computations.


Fig. 2: Mass balance diagram

It should also be noted that the water velocity for washing was kept low enough so that, the above-mentioned layer is not washed out.

Theoretical model: Before description of the experimental results, in a theoretical discussion a model is developed in which the computation of the amount of sludge production in the reactors are illustrated using the mass balance equation. In Fig. 2 the key parameters of mass balance are shown.

(2)

(3)

In these equations, Ci and Ce are the concentration of substrate in the bioreactor, in the inflow wastewater and in the outflow wastewater, respectively in kg SCOD m-3, Qi and Qe are the inflow and outflow discharge of the reactors, respectively in m3 d-1, V is the reactor volume in m3, X is the biomass concentration in the reactor in kg VSS m-3, Xi and Xe are biomass concentration at entrance and exit of the reactors, respectively, Rg is the net rate of bacterial growth in kg VSS m-3 d-1, Rs is the rate of substrate consumption in kg SCOD m-3 d-1 and t is time in day. If we assume the reactor is in a perfect mixing condition and that the discharge of waste is free of sludge or biological mass, equations 4 and 5 could written as

(4)

(5)

In should be kept in mind that in submerged filters Xe is the total of suspended and attached biological mass.

If we assume Y0 is the observed yield coefficient and contains the endogenous respiration (Metcalf and eddy, 2003), relation between Rs and Rg could be written as


Table 5: Kinetic parameters and operating conditions (Xing et al., 2003)

(6)

(7)

In the above equations, Y is the maximum yield coefficient in kg VSS kg COD-1, kd is the endogenous decay coefficient, d-1 and SRT is the sludge retention time, d. In the submerged aerated filters, active volume in the reactor is equal to the porous space of the filter. As a result, Based on this volume, hydraulic retention time is computed as

(8)

In Table 5, operation conditions and microbial kinetics are presented.

Sludge concentration in other systems, also, could be computed using mass balance concept. This concentration in activated sludge process and in membrane bioreactors could be obtained using the following equations, respectively.

(9)

(10)

The term Csup represents the substrate concentration in sludge supernatant, kg SCOD m-3 and SRT is the sludge retention time, d. In both schemes (activated sludge and membrane bioreactor) Excess Sludge Production (ESP) could be calculated as (Xing et al., 2003)

(11)

And by substitution of X from Eq. 8 and 9 in Eq. 10, ESP for activated sludge process and membrane bioreactor is obtained from the following equations, respectively.

(12)

(13)

As it was already mentioned, for reducing and minimizing the amount of suspended sludge in submerged filters, microbial storage capacity should be increased and the SRT should be increased as much as possible. So, the problem could be kept on by increasing the SRT to the very high values and then Eq. 9 could be written as

(14)

If the limit of Eq. 14 is computed, the following equation would be obtained.

(15)

It is worth mentioning that from Eq. 15, for X a value is obtained, however, it does not mean that biological mass would get out of biofilter, but X, in this equation, indicates concentration of attached biological mass and is the result of dividing the mass of this biological mass by the total volume of the reactor.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The most important parameters monitored in the experiments were soluble COD and VSS (Table 6-8). For brief and clearer explanation, the results of SCOD and VSS exiting from the employed biological filters in this study, versus the hydraulic retention time are presented in Table 6 and 7. It should be mentioned that the COD of the inflow wastewater in all situation was 1500 mg L-1.

Returning to Eq. 1, it can be rewritten in the form of

(16)

The values of BCOD and rCOD could be obtained from the following equations.

(17-1)

(17-2)

Table 9 and Fig. 3 show that in all the reactors, the efficiency of the filter in removal of soluble substrate decreases with hydraulic retention time. Using equations 17-1 and 17-2 and Table 6, values of rCOD could be computed for various situations.


Table 6: SCOD exiting from the reactors in steady state (g m-3)

Table 7: VSS exiting from the reactors in steady state (g m-3)

Table 8: pH of the reactors in steady state at 30°C

Table 9: SCOD removal efficiency in reactors at 30°C (%)

Fig. 3: Variations of SCOD percentage removal with hydraulic retention time

Fig. 4: Organic loading of reactor 2 in 30°C

Table 10: Volumetric load and removal of SCOD in reactors at 30°C

Table 11: Coefficients k and rman of the reactors in 30°C

These values have been presented in Table 10. By taking the Eq. 16 in a linear form, coefficients k and rmax could be extracted. Table 11 shows the values of these coefficients.

Substituting the values in Table 11 in Eq. 1, diagrams in Fig. 4-7 are obtained. Moreover, each filter possesses a limited ultimate strength of soluble substrate removal in volumetric loading which is independent from the hydraulic retention time. The values of this ultimate strength, rmax, are presented in Table 11.

In a multi-variable analysis, the relation between specific surface, porosity, temperature and pH with the efficiency of each filter could be investigated. However, in the present study, taking temperature and pH as constants, these parameters are discarded from the model for simplicity.

Porosity also controls only the time-steps between two backwashes of a filter, so, in a one variable analysis, Fig. 7.


Fig. 5: Organic loading of reactor 1 in 30°C

Fig. 6: Organic loading of reactor 3 in 30°C

Organic loading of reactor 4 in 30°C with non-linear regression models using the software Curve Expert, the best model with highest regression was selected. The exponential model has shown the highest regression in all the hydraulic retention times mentioned in the previous table.


Fig. 8: Relation between specific surface and efficiency for retention time of 8 h

Table 12: Values of constants a and b in the power relation between filter specific surface and efficiency

The related model has a structure in the form of the following equation

(18)

In Eq. 18, x and y indicate the specific surface of the filter media in m2.m-3 and removal efficiency in percent, respectively and a and b are the constants of the equation. In Table 12, values of a and b are presented for specified hydraulic retention times. In Fig. 8, the exponential relation 18 has been plotted for hydraulic retention time of 8 h.

Using the graphs in Fig. 4-8, submerged aeration filters could be designed and used. Graphs in Fig. 4-7 could be used for organic loading and graph in Fig. 8 could be used for selection of specific surface of the filter media. The results in Table 7, show the outflow VSS of the reactors.

This outflow sludge is, in fact, the excess sludge, the value of which should be minimized in submerged aeration filters. Inspecting these results, the Harris model with a one-variable non-linear regression showed a good regression for the results in this table. Structure of this model is shown in the form of the following equation.

(19)


Fig. 9: Outflow VSS from reactor 1

Fig. 10: Outflow VSS from reactor 2

Fig. 11: Outflow VSS from reactor 3

In this Eq., x is the hydraulic retention time and y is the outflow VSS from the reactor. In Fig. 9-12 the regression of this model on the results in Table 7 is shown. As it is seen, the model shows a good regression of the observe results.


Fig. 12: Outflow VSS from reactor 4

So, in a reactor with a specified specific surface, the amount of outflow VSS could be estimated.

In Eq. 15, if the hydraulic retention time is inclined to infinity, the amount of outflow sludge would tend to zero and in this equation also, with a zero hydraulic retention time, the outflow sludge concentration would theoretically be infinity. Anyway, for more accurate prediction, these values would change with making parameters such as temperature a variable; however, their rates would remain constant.

CONCLUSIONS

In a general review, it could be noticed that the submerged aeration filters have very good efficiency in removal of organic substances, in low hydraulic retention times as well as in high retention times (about 1 h). Table 9 indicates the fact that increase in specific surface of porous media of the submerged biological filters helps moderately for increase in efficiency of these filters and then, the strength of the filter in removal of organic substances remains constant and it may even decrease.

It was, also, observed that the reactor No. 2 with a specific surface of 300 m2 m-3 in all the situations (from the viewpoint of hydraulic retention time) is better that other ones and showed acceptable results and reactor 1 had lower efficiency compared to reactor No. 2 despite having higher specific surface. It should be noted that reactor No. 2 showed more suitable operation compared to reactor No.1 with similar loading.

On the other hand, the rate of loading on these filters compared to other treatment method was very high and reactor No. 2 showed 74.4% efficiency with loading rate of 202.05 g SCOD m-2 day-1, while exerting such a loading had not been experienced in other experimental researches such as Xing et al. (2003), Osorio (Osorio and Hontoria, 2001) and Wang (Wang, 2005) works and even in some other cases loading less than this value caused failure of the proposed treatment method.

With the obtained results in section of organic substances removal, use of submerged filter No. 2 in industrial wastewater treatment, probably very strong wastewater, would be appropriate due to low required volume and high efficiency.

From the view point of excess sludge, also, as it was presented in Table 7, the highest amount of excess sludge production was related to reactor No. 1 and with hydraulic retention time of 0.5 h. The minimum amount of excess sludge production was related to reactor No. 3 with hydraulic retention time of 8 h while the minimum level of suspended solids in Wang's work has been acquired at HRT of 14 h.

Reactor No. 2 produced 55 mg L-1 excess sludge with hydraulic retention time of 1 h which is a proper value for organic loading of 29.807 kg SCOD m-3 day-1.

REFERENCES
1:  Barker, P.S. and P.L. Dold, 1996. Sludge production and oxygen demand in nutrient removal activated sludge system. Water Sci. Technol., 34: 43-50.

2:  Belgiorno, V. and G. De Feo, 2003. Combined carbonaceous removal and nitrification with biological aerated filters. Environ. Sci. Health, A38: 2147-2156.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

3:  Benthack, C. and D. Bonvin, 2001. An optimal strategy for fixed-bed bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 72: 34-40.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Canales, A.P. and J.L. Poles, 1994. Decreased sludge production strategy for domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol., 30: 97-106.

5:  Canler, J.P. and J.M. Perret, 1994. Biological aerated filters: Assessment of the process based on 12 sewage treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol., 29: 13-22.

6:  Eckenfelder, W.W. and P. Grau, 1998. Activated Sludge Process Design and Control: Theory and Practice. 2nd Edn., Technomic, Lancaster, Pa.

7:  Fujimoto, H., 1993. Suspended solids removal in a biological aerated filter. Jpn. Sewage Works Assoc., 30: 62-71.

8:  Galvez, A., M. Zamorano, E. Hontoria and A. Ramos, 2006. Treatment of landfill leachate wiyh aerated and non-aerated submerged biofilters. Environ. Sci. Health, A41: 1129-1144.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

9:  Lee, N.M. and T. Welander, 1996. Reducing sludge production in aerobic wastewater treatment through manipulation of the ecosystem. Water Res., 30: 1781-1790.
Direct Link  |  

10:  Mann, A.T. and T. Stephenson, 1997. Modelling biological aerated filters for wastewater treatment. Water Res., 31: 2443-2448.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Michael, J.M. and L. Bruce, 1996. Scaling bacterial filtration rates in different sized porous media. Environ. Eng., 122: 407-415.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

12:  McClintock, S.A., V.M. Pattarkine and C.W. Randall, 1992. Comparison of yields and decay rates for a biological nutrient removal process and a conventional activated process. Water Sci. Technol., 26: 2195-2198.

13:  Metcalf and Eddy Inc., 2003. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. 4th Edn., McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd., New York.

14:  Osorio, F. and E. Hontoria, 2001. Optimization of bed material height in a submerged biological aerated filters. Environ. Eng., 127: 974-978.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

15:  Pujol, R., J.P. Canler and A. Iwema, 1992. Biological aerated filters: An attractive and alternative biological process. Water Sci. Technol., 26: 693-702.

16:  Rensink, J.H. and W.H. Rulkens, 1997. Using metazoa to reduce sludge production. Water Sci. Technol., 36: 171-179.

17:  Roeleveld, P.J., A. Klapwijk, P.G. Eggels, W.H. Rulkens and W. Van Strakenburg, 1997. Sustainability of municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol., 35: 221-228.

18:  Rusten, B., 1984. Wastewater treatment with aerated submerged biological filters. WPCF. J., 56: 424-430.

19:  Sakai, Y., T. Fukase and H. Yasui, 1997. An activated sludge process without excess sludge production. Water Sci. Technol., 36: 136-170.

20:  Smith, A.J. and P.J. Hardy, 1992. High-rate sewage treatment using biological aerated filters. J. Instn. Water and Environ. Manage., 6: 179-193.
Direct Link  |  

21:  Standard Method, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th Edn., American Public Health Association, USA.

22:  Buzelin, L.O.S., S.C. Amico, J.V.C. Vargas and J.A.R. Parise, 2005. Experimental development of an intelligent refrigeration system. Int. J. Refrigeration, 28: 165-175.
Direct Link  |  

23:  Westerman, P.W., J.R. Bicudo and A. Kantardjieff, 2000. Upflow biological aerated filters for the treatment of flushed swine manure. Bioresour. Technol., 74: 181-190.
Direct Link  |  

24:  Xie, E., Q. Wang, G. Song and H.I. Ogawa, 2004. Upflow biological filtration with floating filter media. Proc. Biochem., 39: 767-772.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

25:  Chuan-Hong, X. and W. Wei-Zhong, 2003. Excess sludge production in membrane bioreactors: A theoretical investigation. Environ. Eng., 129: 291-297.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

26:  Yasui, H., K. Nakamura and S. Sakuma, 1996. A full-scale operation of a novel activated sludge process without excess sludge production. Water Sci. Technol., 34: 395-404.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved