|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Response of Rice Advance Line PB-95 to Potassium Application in Saline-sodic Soil
|
|
Shahzada Munawar Mehdi,
Muhammad Sarfraz
and
Mudassar Hafeez
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the response of rice crop to potassium fertilization in saline-sodic soil during 2005. Soil samples were collected before transplanting of rice crop and analysed for physical and chemical properties of the soil. In this experiment five rates of K2O (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 kg ha-1) were applied in the presence of basal doses of N and P2O5 i.e., 110 and 90 kg ha-1, respectively. Whole of P, K and ½ of N were applied at the time of rice transplanting. Twelve and half kg ha-1 ZnSO4 was also applied 15 days after rice transplanting. The remaining half of N was applied 30 days after rice transplanting. The system of layout was Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications. The net plot size was 6x4 m. Fertilizer sources of NPK were urea, TSP and SOP, respectively. Rice salt tolerant line PB-95 was used as test crops. The data of growth parameters and yield was recorded and samples of paddy and straw were collected treatment-wise and analysed for N, P and K contents. Soil samples after harvesting the crop were also collected, processed and analysed for the changes in the extractable soil K. The results showed that increasing rates of potassium fertilizer increased the number of tillers m-2, plant height (cm), 1000-paddy weight and paddy as well as straw yield significantly. Maximum paddy (3.24 t ha-1) and straw (3.92 t ha-1) yields were obtained in T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1) which was at par with T4 (75 kg K2O ha-1). With increasing rates of potassium fertilizer, concentration of potassium in paddy and straw increased significantly. After harvesting the crop, the extractable potassium contents of soil increased from that of the original soil. It was concluded from the results that there was an increase of 30.65% in paddy over control by applying potassium (100 kg K2O ha-1) in saline-sodic soil.
|
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION Soil salinity is indeed a global problem posing a major threat towards the sustainability of agriculture in the world. According to an estimate (El-Ashry et al., 1985) salinity is seriously limiting crop production on 20 million hectare in the world. Out of 79.61 million hectare of geographic area of Pakistan, 6.67 million hectare, including about 18.4% of canal commanded area, is salt affected and is confined almost exclusively to the Indus plain. About 56% of the salt affected soils of Pakistan are saline-sodic (Soil Survey of Pakistan, 1989).
Pakistan falls under arid and semi-arid climate. High evapotranspiration and
low rainfall are responsible for inadequate leaching of salts and consequently
the accumulation of salts in the root zones. Sodium becomes a dominant cation
in soil solution and on the exchange complex due to the precipitation of calcium
and magnesium. High salinity levels lead to Na and Cl toxicity accompanied by
the potassium deficiency in soil (Muhammad, 1983). Chhabra (1983) reported that
barren sodic soils in the Indo-Gangetic region, contained high amounts of available
K (upto 400 kg K2O ha-1) due to the dominance of illite
in their clay fraction. Due to this no response to applied K was observed. He
also reported that plant grown under high salinity might show potassium deficiency
due to anagonistic effect of Na+ and Ca+ on K+
absorption and /or disturbed Na+/K+ or Ca++/K+
ratio. Under such conditions application of potassium fertilizer may give increased
plant yield. Din et al. (2001) conducted a pot experiment at salinity
levels of 1.6, 6.0 and 12 dS m-1 with 50 mg kg-1 K2SO4
as soil application and 0.5% K2SO4 soultion as foliar
spray on rice. He concluded that foliar and soil application of K increased
significantly the number of tillers plant-1, plant height, number
of grains plant-1, paddy and straw yield and grain to straw ratio
in saline conditions. He also found that with foliar and soil application of
potassium, the concentration of N and P increased in rice shoot and straw in
saline conditions. He also found that foliar application of K increased the
K+ concentration in rice shoot and straw compared to soil application.
As a major part of Pakistani soils is saline-sodic. So particularly in such
soils Na competes with K and reduces its uptake and causes potassium deficiency
(Carden et al., 2003). In plant cells maintaining cytosolic K in an environment
with a high Na concentration is a key factor in determining the ability to tolerate
salinity (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999). As the function of potassium in plants
as an osmotically active cation and its involvement in controlling the water
household gives balanced fertilization with potash the unique opportunity to
improve the tolerance of plants to salinity, drought and frost. So potassium
is one of the most important nutrients for rice production in many areas of
Asia and in southeast Chaudhary (1989), Farooq (1989) and Hassan et al.
(2001) reported that salinity adversely affected the tillering capacity, plant
height, paddy and straw yield and paddy to straw ratio. A significant increase
in the sterility percentage with progressive increase in salinity was also observed.
Aslam (1987) reported that Na, Ca, Cl and osmotic pressure of shoot sap increased
while K and Mg concentration in the sap decreased with increasing concentration
of NaCl salt in the root medium. Similar trend in the concentration of Na, Ca,
Mg and Cl was observed for the root sap. He further reported that tolerant cultivar
maintained lower concentration of Na and Cl in younger leaves than fully expanded
older leaves.
Bansal et al. (1993) found a significant and positive interaction of N and K on grain and straw yield of rice. Application of 100 mg and 60 mg K kg-1 proved to be the optimum dose. N and K application influenced nutrient composition of both grain and straw at harvest. A lot of work has been done on potassium effects on different crops in normal soils, but a little information is available regarding K fertilization effects on K/Na ratio and paddy yield increase in salt affected soils. Keeping in view the above facts, the present study was planned to evaluate the role of potassium fertilization in paddy and straw yield improvement in saline-sodic soil. MATERIALS AND METHODS The research reported in this study was carried out at the experimental area of Soil Salinity Research Institute, Pindi-Bhattian during the year 2005.
A field experiment was conducted to study the response of rice crop to potassium
fertilization in saline-sodic soil. A composite soil sample was collected before
the transplanting of rice from the experimental field. The soil was air-dried,
ground, mixed and passed through a 2 mm sieve and analyzed for physical and
chemical characteristics (Table 1). In this experiment there
were five treatments i.e., 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 kg K2O ha-1.
The system of lay out was Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications.
The net plot size was 6x4 m. The fields were plowed thoroughly for seedbed preparation
and divided into 15 plots. New advance rice salt tolerant line PB-95 was transplanted
as test crop. Canal water was used for irrigation. A basal dose of nitrogen
and phosphorus at the rate of 110 and 90 kg ha-1 was applied, respectively.
The sources of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were urea, TSP and SOP, respectively.
The whole of P, K and ½ of N were applied at the time of rice transplanting.
Twelve and half kg ha-1 ZnSO4 was applied 15 days after
transplanting. Five kilogram Furadon (granular) ha-1 was applied
25 days after transplanting to control insect attack. The remaining ½
of N was applied 30 days after rice transplanting. The crop was harvested at
maturity and growth parameters i.e., Plant height (cm), Productive/fertile number
of tillers per m2, 1000 grain weight (g) and paddy and straw yield
(t ha-1) data were recorded. Paddy and straw samples were collected.
The samples were oven dried ground and analyzed for potassium concentration.
After harvesting of crops, composite soil samples were taken from each plot
and analyzed for extractable potassium.
All the soil and plant analysis was done according to the methods given in Hand book No. 60 (US Salinity Lab. Staff, 1954) except texture by Moodie et al. (1959), total nitrogen by Jackson (1962), available phosphorus by Watanabe and Olsen (1965). All the data was statistically analysed by using RCBD and treatment means were compared by least significant difference test (Steel and Torrie, 1980). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The soil was sandy loam in texture, saline-sodic, very low in organic matter
and P and adequate in K (Table 1). The yield of crop is the
estimation of all the yield components, of which the number of tillers per unit
area is one of the most important components as high number of tillers per unit
area reflects a good crop stand. The data in Table 2 indicated
that the average number of productive tillers increased significantly with the
application of potassium fertilizer.
Table 1: |
Physical and chemical characteristics of soil before transplanting
of rice |
 |
Table 2: |
Effect of potassium application on growth and yield of rice
crop |
 |
Figures having the same letter are nonsignificant at 5% level
of probability, LSD = Least Significant Difference |
The minimum number of tillers (156) was found in T1 (control) where no potassium
fertilizer was applied. Maximum numbers of productive tillers (248) were found
in T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1) and it was followed by T4, T3
and T2 where 75, 50 and 25 kg K2O ha-1 was applied respectively.
Treatment T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1) and T4 (75 kg K2O
ha-1) were statistically at par. The increased response of rice to
increasing levels of K application in this sodic soil was due to antagonistic
interaction between Na and K. High salinity levels lead to Na toxicity accompanied
by potassium deficiency (Mehdi et al., 2001) and thus higher rates of
K2O up to 75 kg ha-1 increased number of productive tillers.
Plant height is an other important growth parameter. The results showed that
plant height increased significantly with the application of potassium fertilizer
(Table 2). The plant height was increased upto 50 kg K2O
ha-1. The treatments T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1),
T4 (75 kg K2O ha-1) and T3 (50 kg K2O ha-1)
were statistical significantly different from each other. Further increase in
K rates could not increase the plant height. Many research workers reported
that plants remain stunted in salt-affected soils because of low fertility status
of such soils. These results are in agreement with the findings of Anonymous
(1982), Farooq (1989), Din et al. (2001), Mehdi et al. (2001)
and Hassan et al. (2001) in salt-affected soil. These are in line in
normal soil by Janardan and Singh (2000). The 1000 paddy weight is one of the
most important components of the yield. Heavier the paddy, the greater will
be the yield. The data indicated that 1000 paddy weight was increased significantly
by the application of potassium in saline sodic soil (Table 2).
Maximum paddy weight was recorded in T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1),
which was significantly higher than all other treatments. The increase in 1000-grain
weight was due to the positive effect of K on paddy yield under saline-sodic
soil conditions. Actually K has significant role in starch synthesis and in
grain development (Mengal, 1982) thus its adequate supply showed a profound
effect in producing heavier paddy (Gulshad, 1985, Niazi et al., 1992;
Singh, 2005). These results are similar to those reported by Farooq (1989),
Niazi et al. (1992), Mehdi et al. (2001), Hassan et al.
(2001) and Din et al. (2001).
The paddy and straw yield was increased significantly by the application of potassium in saline sodic soil. Maximum paddy and straw yield was recorded in T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1) and minimum in control where no potassium was applied. All the treatments differed significantly from each other. Maximum paddy (3.24 t ha-1) and rice straw yield (3.92 t ha-1) was observed in T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1) which was at par with T4 (75 kg K2O ha-1) and followed by T3 (50 kg K2O ha-1) and T2 (50 kg K2O ha-1). All the treatments were statistically different from each other except T4. Lowest yield in T1 (control) was due to salinity sodicity in the rooting zone and low fertility status with respect to NPK. There are many causes of low yield under saline-sodic conditions and were discussed earlier by various workers including Chhabra (1983) and Muhammad (1986). According to them high salinity sodicity levels lead to potassium deficiency due to antagonistic effect of Na on potassium absorption or disturbance of Na/K ratio. Actually K has significant role in starch synthesis and in grain development (Mengal, 1982) thus its adequate supply showed a profound effect in producing more paddy and straw yield (Gulshad, 1985, Niazi et al. 1992; Singh, 2005). These results are in accordance with the findings of Anonymous (1982), Chhabra (1985), Gulshad (1985), Farooq (1989), Fageria et al. (1990), Niazi et al. (1992), Mehdi et al. (2001), Hassan et al. (2001) and Din et al. (2001). The data regarding the effect of potassium application on the concentrations of K in paddy is given in Table 3. Minimum K conc. (0.31 %) in paddy was observed in T1 (control) while maximum K conc. (0.36 %) was found in T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1) followed by T4 (75 kg K2O ha-1), T3 (50 kg K2O ha-1) and T2 (25 kg K2O ha-1) nonsignificant and significantly over control. The increase in potassium concentration of paddy with potassium fertilizer treatments might be due to higher uptake of K by plants (Chhabra, 1983; Muhammed, 1986). These results are in line with those reported by Anonymous (1982), Muhammed (1986), Fageria et al. (1990), Niazi et al. (1992), Hussain et al. (1992) Mehdi et al. (2001) and Din et al. (2001). Similar results were reported in normal soils by Bansal et al. (1993), Janardan and Singh (2000), Jeegadeeswari et al. (2001) and Hong and GuangHuo (2004) in normal soils.
Analysis of variance showed that concentrations of K in straw (Table
3) increased significantly. Minimum K conc. (1.12%) in rice straw was observed
in T1 (control) while maximum K conc. (1.22%) was found in T5 (100 kg K2O
ha-1) followed by T4 (75 kg K2O ha-1), T3 (50
kg K2O ha-1) and T2 (25 kg K2O ha-1).
Treatments T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1) and T4 (75 kg K2O
ha-1) were statistically non-significant to each other and significant
over control (T1). The increase in potassium concentration of rice straw with
potassium fertilizer treatments might be due to higher uptake of K by plants
(Chhabra, 1983; Muhammed, 1986). These results are in line with those reported
by Anonymous (1982), Muhammed (1986), Fageria et al. (1990), Niazi et
al. (1992), Hussain et al. (1992), Mehdi et al. (2001),
Hassan et al. (2001) and Din et al. (2001) in salt affected soil.
Table 3: |
Effect of potassium application on K concentrations (%) in
rice paddy and straw |
 |
Figures having the same letter are nonsignificant at 5% level
of probability, LSD = Least Significant Difference |
Table 4: |
Extractable potassium in soil after harvest |
 |
Figures having the same letter are nonsignificant at 5% level
of probability, LSD = Least Significant Difference |
The results showed that maximum extractable soil potassium (133 mg kg-1)
was found in T5 (100 kg ha-1) followed by T4 (75 kg ha-1),
T3 (50 kg ha-1) and T2 (25 kg ha-1) (Table
4). Minimum extractable potassium (107 mg kg-1) was found in
T1 (control). All the treatments were statistically significant to each other
and over control.
Saline soils are generally medium to high in available potassium (Sharma et al. 1968) but plants grown under high salinity may show K deficiency due to antagonistic effect of Na: K or disturbed Na: K ratio (Chhabra, 1983). In T5 (100 kg K2O ha-1) maximum extractable potassium was found because here maximum potassium fertilizer was applied. The original level of extractable K in soil was 110 ppm and after rice harvest, analysis showed 107 ppm extractable K in the control plots. Similar results were found by Azam (1993) and Mehdi et al. (2001). From the present study it is concluded that rice yield can be increased by applying potassium at the rate of 75 kg K2O ha-1 in saline sodic soils.
|
REFERENCES |
Anonymous, 1982. Inducing salt tolerance in crops by potassium fertilization. Ten Years of NIAB. Nuclear Inst. Agric. Biol., Faisalabad, Pakistan, pp: 79-81.
Aslam, M., 1987. Mechanism of salt tolerance in rice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Azam, M., 1993. Management of P and K in a salt affected field. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Bansal, S., U. Shahid and S. Mahatim, 1993. Effect of nitrogen and potassium nutrition on yield and critical levels of potassium in rice. J. Potassium Res., 9: 338-346.
Carden, D.E., D.J. Walker, T.J. Flowers and A.J. Miller, 2003. Single cell measurements of the contributions of cytosolic Na+ and K+ to salt tolerance. Plant Physiol., 131: 676-683. Direct Link |
Chaudhary, M.T., 1989. Intravarietal selection for salt tolerance in rice. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Agricultur, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Chhabra, R., 1983. Principles governing fertilization in salt-affected soils. Fertil. Ind. Ann. Rev. Ind., 2: 147-159.
Din, C., S.M. Mehdi, M. Sarfraz, G. Hassan and M. Sadiq, 2001. Comparative efficiency of foliar and soil application of K on salt tolerance in rice. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 4: 815-817. CrossRef | Direct Link |
El-Ashry, M.T., J.V. Schilfgaarde and S. Schiffman, 1985. Salinity pollution from irrigated agriculture. J. Soil Water Conserv., 40: 48-52.
Fageria, N.K., R.J. Wright, V.C. Baligor and J.R.P. Carvaho, 1990. Under rice response to potassium fertilization on a Brazilian oxisil. Fertilizer Res., 21: 141-147.
Farooq, M., 1989. Role of foliar application of potassium to rice for increasing its salt tolerance. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Agricultur, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Gulshad, M.K., 1985. Differential response of K2SO4 and KCl on wheat and rice under different salinity levels. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Agricultur. Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Hassan, G., M. Sadiq, M. Jamil, S.M. Mehdi and A. Sattar, 2001. Comparative performance of rice varieties/lines in ameliorated and non-ameliorated soils. Int. J. Biol., 3: 286-288. Direct Link |
Hong, H. and W. GuangHuo, 2004. Nutrient uptake and use efficiency of irrigated rice in response to potassium application. Pedosphere, 14: 125-130. Direct Link |
Hussain, K., S.M. Mehdi, J. Iqbal, M.S. Dogar and M.H.K. Niazi, 1992. Response of rice and wheat to K application in saline soils. Proceedings of the 4th National Congress Soil Science Abstract, May 24-26, 1992, Soil Science Society of Pakistan, pp: 73-74.
Jackson, M.L., 1962. Soil Chemical analysis Practical. Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA.
Janardan, S. and C.M. Singh, 2000. Effect of potassium application in rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Ind. J. Agron., 45: 12-20.
Jeegadeeswari, P.V., P.S.S. Kumar and K. Kumaraswamy, 2001. Potassium balance and uptake under continuous cropping of rice in an Alfisol. Crop Research (Hisar)., 22: 194-200. Direct Link |
Maathius, F.J.H. and A. Amtmann, 1999. K nutrition and Na toxicity: The basis of cellular K/Na ratios. Ann. Bot., 84: 123-133.
Mehdi, S.M., C. Din, G. Hassan, M. Sarfraz, M. Sadiq and A. Iqbal, 2001. Comparative efficiency of potassium application methods on rice production under saline conditions. Sci. Int., 13: 171-177.
Mengal, K., 1982. Factors and processes affecting potassium requirement of crops. Potash Rev., 16: 1-12.
Moodie, D.C., H.W. Smith and R.A. McCreery, 1959. Laboratory manual of soil fertility. Department of Agronomy, State College of Washington, Pullman, pp: 31-39.
Muhammed, S., 1983. Effect of Na+/Ca+ and Na+/K+ ratios in saline and saline-sodic soils on growth, normal nutrition and salt tolerance of some rices. Terminal reports, submitted to IRRI Las Banos, Philippines.
Muhammed, S., 1986. Effect of Na/Ca and Na/K ratios in saline and saline-sodic soils on growth, normal nutrition and salt tolerance of some rices. Terminal Reports, Submitted to IRRI Las Banos, Phillipines.
Niazi, K., S.M. Mehdi, T. Mahmood and J. Iqbal, 1992. Potassium fertilizer use efficiency in sodic soils. Proceedings of the 4th Natl. Congress. Soil Science Abst., Soil Salinity Res. Inst, 1992, Pindi Bhattian, pp: 73-73.
Sharma, D.L., V.B. Moghe and C.M. Mathur, 1968. Salinity and alkalinity problems and fertility status of soil of Pali district (Rajastan). J. Ind. Soc. Soil Sci., 16: 263-269.
Singh, K.N., 2005. Major nutrient management for sustaining rice-wheat productivity in reclaimed sodic soils. Proceeding of the International Conference on Soil, Water and Environmental Quality-Issues and Strategies, Organized by Indian Society Soil Science, January 28-February 1, 2005, IARI, New Delhi, India, pp: 255-.
Soil Survey Staff, 1989. Reconnaissance Soil Survey Reports. Soil Survey Pakistan Lahore, Pakistan.
Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780070609266, Pages: 633.
U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff, 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Handbook No. 60, United State Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., USA., Pages: 160.
Watanabe, F.S. and S.R. Olsen, 1965. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 29: 677-678. CrossRef | Direct Link |
|
|
|
 |