Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Effect of Saline Irrigation on Biomass Yield and Mineral Composition of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under Greenhouse Conditions



Saad F. Al-Shammary
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

A greenhouse experiment was carried out to determine the effect of saline irrigation on biomass yield, protein, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) composition of four barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in a pot experiment. Mean biomass yield (drymatter) decreased significantly with increasing irrigation water salinity. The drymatter yield ranged between 56.1 g per pot (Qatifi) with water EC of 2.85 dS m-1 to 11.5 g per pot (Gusto) with water EC of 15.95 dS m-1. The trend of biomass yield reduction among various cultivars (drymatter) was Gusto > Alkharji > Haili > Qatifi. Overall sequence of salt tolerance for different barley cultivars was Qatifi > Haili > Alkharji > Gusto. Mean protein contents ranged between 14.5-29.5% (Qatifi), 16.12-20.3% (Haili), 15.5-21.3% (Gusto) and 16.3-22.7% (Alkharji) among various barley cultivars receiving waters of different salinities. Mean concentration of different macro-elements in barley plants were 0.15-0.27% P, 2.2-4.6% K, 0.9-2.9% Na, 0.41-0.99% Ca and 0.31-0.82% Mg. The concentration of protein, sodium, calcium and magnesium increased while that of phosphorus and potassium decreased in barley plants increasing salinity of irrigation water. A comparison among different cultivars indicated that irrigation waters with EC of 13.75 dS m-1 and above reduced biomass yield to a significant level. In conclusion, there is an excellent potential for reasonable production of barley as forage crop containing appreciable protein contents and other essential mineral elements with irrigation water of EC upto 9.72 dS m-1 provided 15-20% extra water above crop water consumptive use is applied as leaching requirements to control soil salinity.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Saad F. Al-Shammary , 2005. Effect of Saline Irrigation on Biomass Yield and Mineral Composition of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under Greenhouse Conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 8: 776-780.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2005.776.780

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2005.776.780

REFERENCES
1:  Ministry of Agriculture and Water, 1990. Agriculture Statistical Year Book. Vol. 7, National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies, Saudi Arabia.

2:  Heakal, M.S., A.S. Modaihsh, A.S. Mashhady and A.I. Metwally, 1990. Combined effects of leaching fraction salinity and potassium content of waters on growth and water use efficiency of wheat and barley. Plant Soil, 125: 177-184.
Direct Link  |  

3:  Koszanski, Z. and S. Karczmarczyk, 1985. Use of saline water for irrigation of spring barley and oats. Zeszyty-Naukowi-Akademii-Rolniczej-w-Szczecinie-Rolnictwo, 36: 95-105.

4:  Wilczek, M. and M. Cwintal, 1994. The influence of sprinkler irrigation with mine water on yield and macro-element content in cereals. Biuletyn-Instytutu-Hodowli-i-Aklimatyzacji-Roslin, 190: 39-46.

5:  Essa, T.A., 2002. Effect of salinity stress on growth and nutrient composition of three soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 188: 86-93.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Pal, B., S. Singh and H. Singh, 1984. Barley yield under saline water irrigation. Plant Soil, 81: 221-228.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

7:  Ghoulam, C., A. Foursy and K. Fares, 2002. Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environ. Exp. Bot., 47: 39-50.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Wang, D., J.A. Poss, T.J. Donovan, M.C. Shannon and S.M. Lesch, 2002. Biophysical properties and biomass production of elephant grass under saline conditions. J. Arid Environ., 52: 447-456.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

9:  Banuelos, G.S., A. Zayed and B. Mackey, 2002. Growth of faba bean irrigated withsaline drainage water. J. Plant Nutr., 25: 1101-1114.
Direct Link  |  

10:  Bashour, I.I., A.S. Al-Mashhady, J.D. Prasad, T. Miller and M. Mazroa, 1983. Morphology and composition of some soils under cultivation in Saudi Arabia. Geoderma, 29: 327-340.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Al-Zeid, A.A., E.U. Quintana, M.I. Abu-Khate, M.N. Nimiah, F.H. Al-Samerai and I.I. Bashour, 1988. Guide for crop irrigation requirements in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Ministry of Agriculture and Water, Riyadh.

12:  Page, A.L., R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeney, 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. 2nd Edn., Amercen Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI., USA.

13:  United State Salinity Laboratory Staff, 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Hand Book, No. 60, pp: 89-90.

14:  Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran, 1973. Statistical Methods. 6th Edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.

15:  Iyengar, E.R.R., J. Chikara and P.M. Sutaria, 1984. Relative salinity tolerance of barley varieties under semi-arid climate. Trans. Indian Soc. Desert Technol., 9: 27-33.

16:  Abdul, K.S., F.M. Alkam and M.A. Jamal, 1988. Effects of different salinity levels on vegetative growth, yield and its components in barley. ZANCO, 1: 21-32.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved