Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Comparison of Metabolizable Energy Values of Roughages Determined by Regression Equations Using in vivo and in vitro Parameters



Hulya Ozkul , Yilmaz Sayan , Muazzez Polat and Tulug Capci
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to compare the Metabolizable Energy (ME) values of some roughages which were calculated from regression equations using in vivo and in vitro parameters and to determine the most suitable regression equations using in vitro parameters. For this purpose, in vivo ME values and in vitro Crude Nutrients (CN), Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF), Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF), Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL), enzyme soluble/insoluble organic matter (ELOS/EULOS) and 24 h Gas Production (GP) amounts of 40 roughages were used. In the study, in vitro ME values of roughages were calculated by regression equations where in vitro parameters were used and these results were compared with their in vivo ME values. According to the obtained results, in vitro ME values were estimated more better with equations where, NDF or especially ADF was used than with equations where, CN or ADL was used. Besides, the prediction was improved in regression equations which were constituted by the combination of crude nutrients and ELOS/EULOS or combination of crude nutrients and GP. However, it can be suggested that, using of ADF instead of Crude Fiber (CF) in equations would be more correct.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Hulya Ozkul , Yilmaz Sayan , Muazzez Polat and Tulug Capci , 2005. Comparison of Metabolizable Energy Values of Roughages Determined by Regression Equations Using in vivo and in vitro Parameters . Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 8: 696-700.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2005.696.700

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2005.696.700

REFERENCES
1:  Menke, K.H. and W. Huss, 1975. Animal Nutrition and Feeds. Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany.

2:  GFE, 1991. Leitlinien fur die bestimmung der verdaulichkeit von rohnahrstoffen an wiederkauern. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 65: 229-234.

3:  Kirchgessner, M. and R.J. Kellner, 1977. Zur schatzung der umsetzbaren energie von grun-und rauhfutter mit einfachen kenndaten. (Estimation of the metabolizable energy of forages with easy-to-determine criteria). Tierphysiol. Tierernahrng. Futtermittelkde, 34: 276-281.

4:  Mika, V., C. Paul, E. Zimmer and W. Kaufmann, 1981. Various methods for the determination of in vitro digestibility of green forage. Tierphysiol. Tierernahrg. Futtermittelkde, 45: 132-141.

5:  Menke, K.H. and H. Steingass, 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev., 28: 7-55.
Direct Link  |  

6:  Iantcheva, N., H. Steingass, N. Todorov and D. Pavlov, 1999. A comparison of in vitro rumen fluid and enzymatic methods to predict digestibility and energy value of grass and alfalfa hay. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 81: 333-344.
Direct Link  |  

7:  Sayan, Y., H. Ozkul, A. Alcicek, L. Coskuntuna, S.S. Onenc and M. Polat, 2004. Comparison of the parameters using for determination of metabolizable energy value of the roughages. J. Agric. Fac. Ege Univ., 41: 167-175.

8:  TSE, 1991. Hayvan Yemleri-metabolik Enerji Tayini-kimyasal Metot. Turk Standartları Enstitusu, Ankara, Turkey.

9:  Kirchgessner, M., R.J. Kellner, F.X. Roth and K. Ranfft, 1977. Estimation of the feed values with crude fiber and cell wall fractions determined by detergent analyses. Landwirtsch. Forsch, 30: 245-250.

10:  Kirchgessner, M. and R.J. Kellner, 1981. Estimation of feed values of forages with cellulase method. Landwirtsch. Forsch, 34: 276-281.

11:  GFE, 1998. Ausschuss fur bedarfsnormen der gesellschaft fur ernahrungsphysiologie. (Nutritient requirements of ruminants). Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol., 7: 141-149.

12:  SAS Institute, 1989. SAS Users Guide Statistics. Version 6, SAS Institute, Cary, NC., pp: 943.

13:  DLG, 1991. DLG-Futterwerttabellen Fur Wiederkauer. DLG Verlag, Frankfurt, Germany.

14:  NRC, 1988. Nutritient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 6th Edn., National Academic Science, Washington, DC., pp: 158.

15:  Lee, M.J., S.Y. Hwang and P.W.S. Chiou, 2000. Metabolizable energy of roughages in Taiwan. Small Rumin. Res., 36: 251-259.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Aerts, J.V., D.L. Brabander, B.G. Cottyn and F.X. Buysse, 1977. Comparison of laboratory methods for predicting the organic matter digestibility of forages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 2: 337-349.

17:  Schwarz, F.J., U. Heindl, E.J. Pex and M. Kirchgessner, 1996. Estimation of the metabolizable and net energy of maize silages for sheep and cattle using the nutrient content and the cellulose method. Agribiol. Res., 49: 157-168.

18:  Alcicek, A., F. Sevgican, Y. Oayan, T. Capci and H. Ozkul, 1997. Comparison of the parameters using for determination of metabolizable energy value of the roughages. J. Agric. Fac. Ege Univ., 34: 41-48.

19:  Getachew, G., E.J. de Peters and P.H. Robinson, 2004. In vitro gas production provides effective method for assessing ruminant feeds. California Agric., 58: 54-58.

20:  Getachew, G., P.H. Robinson, E.J. DePeters and S.J. Taylor, 2004. Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 111: 57-71.
CrossRef  |  

21:  AFRC, 1992. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animal: Protein technical committee on responses to nutrients. Nutr. Abstr. Rev., 62: 785-835.

22:  Goering, H.K. and P.J. van Soest, 1970. Forage Fibre Analyses: Agriculture Handbook No. 379. USDA, Washington, DC., pp: 829-835.

23:  Kamalak, A., O. Canbolat, Y. Gurbuz, O. Ozay and E. Ozkose, 2004. Variation in metabolizable energy content of forages estimated using in vitro gas production technique. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 7: 601-605.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

24:  Schoner, F.J. and E. Pfeffer, 1985. Estimation of the energy content of forage. 1. Cell-wall-fractions of the forage fiber analyses. Das Wirtschaftseig Futter, 31: 80-86.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved