Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Relative Merits of Homo and Heterospermic Bull Semen in Respect of Fertility



S.A. Azmal, M.R. Amin , P.C. Goswami , M.P. Mostari , M.S. Islam and R. Khatun
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

The experiment was conducted to compare the relative efficiency of homo and heterospermic insemination in respect of fertility judged by conception and calving rate. Spermatozoa from three different breeds of bull namely Holstein Friesian (HF), Red Chittagong (RC) and Sahiwal (SL) were mixed in equal number and preserved for 3 days and inseminated at different days. In this study 168 cows were inseminated and 42 of them were inseminated with heterospermic semen containing equal numbers of spermatozoa from a HF, a RC and a SL bull. After calving the paternity of calves was established by comparing coat colour and conformation. Difference between homo and heterospermic insemination on conception and calving rate was not significant (p>0.05). The heterospermic conception and calving rates were 80.95 ±0.07 and 64.29 ± 0.08%, with the homospermic rates being 66.67 ±0.04 and 50.79 ±0.04%, respectively. The conception and calving rate from heterospermic insemination was found insignificantly (p>0.05) different from that of homospermic insemination separately at first, second and third day of preservation. Conception rates of homo and heterospermic insemination at first day were 76.19 ±0.07 and 85.71 ±0.12%, respectively. The corresponding values at third day were 59.52 ±0.07 and 78.57 ±13%. Calving rate of homo and heterospermic insemination at first day were 57.14±0.08 and 64.29 ±0.13%, respectively. The corresponding values at third day were 45.24 ±0.08 and 64.29 ±0.13%. The numbers of offspring (12:8:7) sired by the three bulls (HF: RC:SL) after using heterospermic semen did not differ significantly from an assumed 1:1:1 ratio (χ2 = 1.55: p>0.05). The sex ratios among calves from heterospermic insemination (15♂ .12♀) also did not differ significantly (χ2 = 0.34: p>0.05) from 1:1. From the above results, it was concluded that heterospermic insemination did not however, show any significant superiority in conception and calving rate in cows compared to homospermic insemination. However, heterospermic insemination offers no apparent risk to co-operating farmers, since overall conception and calving rate were either numerically higher or at least equal to that obtainable from homospermic insemination.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

S.A. Azmal, M.R. Amin , P.C. Goswami , M.P. Mostari , M.S. Islam and R. Khatun , 2004. Relative Merits of Homo and Heterospermic Bull Semen in Respect of Fertility. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7: 1912-1917.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2004.1912.1917

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2004.1912.1917

REFERENCES

1:  Hess, E.A., T. Ludwick, H.C. Rickard and F. Ely, 1954. Some of the influences of mixed ejaculates upon bovine fertility. J. Dairy Sci., 37: 649-649.

2:  Maclaren, A. and D. Michie, 1954. Current trends of genetic research in hungary. Nature, 174: 390-391.
CrossRef  |  

3:  Beatty, R.A., 1956. Relation between genetic constitution of an offspring and weight of its litter-mates. Nature, 178: 48-49.
CrossRef  |  

4:  Napier, R.A.N., 1961. Fertility in the male rabbit: II. Variation in the percentage of eggs fertilized. J. Reprod. Fert., 2: 260-272.
CrossRef  |  

5:  Napier, R.A.N., 1961. Fertility in the male rabbit: III. The estimation of spermatozoa quality by mixed insemination and the inheritance of spermatozoan characters. J. Reprod. Fert., 2: 273-289.
PubMed  |  

6:  Beatty, R.A., G.H. Bennett, J.G. Hall, J.L. Hancock and D.L. Stewart, 1968. An experiment with heterospermic insemination in cattle. J. Reprod. Fert., 19: 491-502.
Direct Link  |  

7:  Stewart, D.L., R.L. Spooner, G.H. Bennett, R.A. Beatty and J.L. Hancock, 1974. A second experiment with heterospermic insemination in cattle. J. Reprod. Fert., 36: 107-116.
CrossRef  |  

8:  Beatty, R.A., 1970. The genetics of the mammalian gamete. Biol. Rev., 45: 73-117.
CrossRef  |  

9:  Edwards, R.G., 1955. Selective fertilization following the use of sperm mixtures in the mouse. Nature, 175: 215-216.
CrossRef  |  

10:  Beatty, R.A., 1960. The birth weight of rabbits born after heterospermic insemination. Genet. Res., 1: 39-49.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Kushner, K.F., 1954. The effect of heterospermic insemination in animals and its biological nature (translated). Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR Ser. Biol., 1: 32-52.

12:  Frappell, J.P. and G. Williams, 1956. A study of heterospermic insemination in cattle. Proc. 3rd Int. Cong. Anim. Reprod. Cambridge Sect., 1: 65-67.

13:  Lopyrin, A.I. and N.V. Loginova, 1955. The theory and practice of inseminating females with mixed semen. Usp. Sovr. Biol., 39: 212-212.

14:  Beatty, R.A., 1960. Fertility of mixed semen from different rabbits. J. Reprod. Fert., 1: 52-60.

15:  Boyd, H. and H.C.B. Reed, 1961. Investigation into the incidence and causes of infertility in dairy cattle. Fert. Variations Br. Vet. J., 117: 18-31.

16:  Almquist, J.O., 1954. Diluters of bovine semen: V.A. Comparison of heated milk and egg yolk citrate as diluters for semen from bulls of high and low fertility. J. Dairy Sci., 37: 1308-1315.

17:  Salisbury, G.W. and F.H. Flerchinger, 1967. Aging phenomena in spermatozoa: II. Estrus cycle length after successful insemination with spermatozoa of varying age. J. Dairy Sci., 50: 1679-1682.

18:  Shamsuddin, M., J.U. Ahmed, M.G.S. Alam and P.C. Modak, 1987. Effect of age of semen on conception rate in cattle under farm condition. Bangladesh Vet. J., 21: 51-58.

19:  Beatty, R.A., 1957. A pilot of experiment with heterospermic insemination in the rabbit. J. Genet., 55: 325-347.

20:  Gomes, W.R., 1977. Artificial Insemination. In: Reproduction in Farm Animals, Cole, H.H. and P.T. Cupps (Eds.). 3rd Edn., Academic Press, New York, San Fransisco, London

21:  Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780070609266, Pages: 633
Direct Link  |  

22:  Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran, 1980. Statistical Methods. 7th Edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp: 233-237

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved