Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Influence of GA3 and MH and Their Time of Spray on Dry Matter Accumulation and Growth Attributes of Soybean

Md. Shahidur Rahman , Nashirul Islam Md. Abu Tahar and M. Abdul Karim
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

A study was conducted to investigate the effect of plant growth regulators on dry matter production and growth attributes of soybean. Plants of soybean Cv. PB-1 were sprayed three times (T1 = spray at 15 DAS, T2 = spray at 30 DAS and T3 = spray at 45 DAS) with two concentrations (100 and 200 ppm) of Gibberellic Acid (GA3) and Maleic Hydrazide (MH). The results of the experiment revealed that significant variations exist with the time of application in respect of dry matter production in root, stem, leaf and total dry matter per plant and growth attributes like Leaf Area Index (LAI), Crop Growth Rate (CGR), Relative Growth Rate (RGR) and Net Assimilation Rate (NAR). CGR and NAR were increased up to 80 DAS and thereafter decreased due to maturity with respect of time of spray and concentration of growth regulators. However, LAI and RGR were maximized at 100 and 60 DAS, respectively. T2 produced the highest root, stem, leaf and total dry matter, LAI, CGR, RGR and NAR followed by T3 and T1 produced the least of them. All growth regulators had positive effect in dry matter production and growth of soybean over non-sprayed control plants. GA3 was more effective than MH. However, 100 ppm GA3 had the most regulatory effect to enhance root, stem, leaf and total dry matter, LAI, CGR, RGR and NAR followed by 200 ppm GA3. 200 ppm MH was least effective among the treatments. Interaction between T2C3 (spray at 30 DAS x 100 ppm GA3) brought about the best improvement in dry matter production and growth of soybean.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

Md. Shahidur Rahman , Nashirul Islam Md. Abu Tahar and M. Abdul Karim , 2004. Influence of GA3 and MH and Their Time of Spray on Dry Matter Accumulation and Growth Attributes of Soybean. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7: 1851-1857.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2004.1851.1857


1:  Rahman, L., 1982. Cultivation of Soybean and its Uses. City Press, Dhaka, pp: 5-7.

2:  FAO, 1981. Production Year Book. Vol. 50, Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, pp: 110-112.

3:  Pando, S.B. and G.C. Srivastava, 1985. Physiological studies on seed set in sunflower III: Significance of dwarfing the plant size using growth regulator. Ind. J. Plant Physiol., 28: 72-80.

4:  Stowe, B.B. and T. Yamaki, 1957. The history and physiological action of the gibberellins. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 8: 181-181.

5:  Atal, C.K. and J.K. Sethi, 1961. Increase fibre content in hemp by application of gibberellines. Curr. Sci., 30: 177-177.

6:  Deotale, R.D., V.G. Maske, M.V. Sorte, B.S. Chimurkar and A.Z. Yeme, 1998. Effect of GA3 and IAA on morpho-physiological parameters of soybean. J. Soils Crops, 8: 91-94.

7:  Maske, V.G., R.D. Deotale, N.V. Sorte, H.B. Goramnager and C.N. Chore, 1998. Influence of GA3 and NAA on growth and yield contributing parameters of soybean. J. Soils Crops, 8: 20-21.

8:  Mehetre, S.S. and S.K. Lad, 1995. Effect of foliar applications of growth substances on growth and yield of soybean. Soybean Genet. Newslett., 22: 132-134.

9:  Rahman, S., N. Islam, A. Tahar and M.A. Karim, 2004. Influence of GA3 and MH and their time of spray on morphology, yield contributing characters and yield of soybean. Asian J. Plant Sci., 3: 602-609.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Hunt, R., 1978. Plant Growth Analysis: Studies in Biology. Edward Arnold Ltd., London, pp: 67.

11:  Russel, D.F., 1986. MSTAT-C Package Programme. 1st Edn., Department of Crop and Soil Science, Michigan State University, USA.

12:  Suma Bai, D.I., A.T. Abraham and S.T. Mercy, 1987. Hormonal influence on crop performance in green gram. Legume Res., 10: 49-52.

13:  Cors, F. and A. Falisse, 1987. The effect of growth regulators on two spring legumes, protein peas and field beans. Mededelingen Facul. Landbouwwetenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent., 52: 1259-1266.

14:  Khan, N.A., H.R. Ansari and R. Samiullah, 1998. Effect of gibberellic acid spray during ontogeny of mustard on growth, nutrient uptake and yield characteristics. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 181: 61-63.
Direct Link  |  

15:  Calsiz, D.O., L.V. Fernandez and M.H. Inchausti, 2001. Maleic hydrazide effects on tuber yield, sprouting characteristics and French fry processing quality in various potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars grown under Argentinian conditions. Am. J. Potato Res., 78: 119-128.

16:  Khan, M.A.H., 1981. The effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on the pattern of growth and development in rice and mustard. Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen.

17:  Nirmal, S.V., B.P. Deore and R.C. Patill, 1994. Effect of growth substances on yield and yield contributing traits in onion. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 19: 136-137.

18:  Brar, Z.S. and M. Singh, 1983. Effect of plant growth regulators on biomass and productivity of cotton. Indian J. Ecol., 10: 254-259.

19:  Koller, H.R., W.E. Nyquist and I.S. Chorvsh, 1970. Growth analysis of the soybean communities. Crop Sci., 10: 407-412.

20:  Haloi, B. and B. Baldev, 1986. Effect of irrigation on growth attributes in chickpea when grown under different dates of sowing and population pressure. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 29: 14-27.

21:  Pandey, R.K., M.C. Saxena and V.B. Singh, 1978. Growth analysis of black gram genotypes. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 48: 466-473.

22:  Pandey, R.K. and V.B. Singh, 1980. Vegetative growth of dry matter production and seed yield of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Res., 3: 1-6.

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved