Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Varietal Resistance of Cotton Against Earias spp.



G.H. Abro, T.S. Syed and Z.A. Dayo
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Studies were carried out on varietal resistance of cotton against Earias spp. during cropping season 1999. The seeds of 12 cotton varieties viz., Green Red Okra, Qalandri, Red Okra-VI, Red Okra (Insect Resistant), AENS-1/82 VIII, Red Okra, TH-228/87, AENS-10/87, TH-3/83, Reshmi, AEC-78 13/89 and TH-41/83 were sown on April 22, 1999 in a completely randomized design with strip cropping, each strip measuring 20 x 35 feet with nine rows of each variety. Observations on infestation of Earias spp. were started 67 days after sowing and continued till complete disappearance of pest from the crop. Observations were taken at random at weekly interval from 20 plants. The results revealed that there was no significant difference of infestation amongst cotton varieties under present investigation. The minimum and the maximum infestation of 1.79 and 2.38% was recorded on Red Okra-VI and Green Red Okra varieties of cotton, respectively. The results also indicated that there was no significant effect of minimum and maximum temperature on percent infestation of Earias spp., whereas relative humidity had a significant (P<0.05) effect on infestation.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

G.H. Abro, T.S. Syed and Z.A. Dayo, 2003. Varietal Resistance of Cotton Against Earias spp.. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 6: 1837-1839.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2003.1837.1839

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2003.1837.1839

INTRODUCTION

Cotton is one of the most sensitive to pest attack and chemically intensive among all field crops. Cotton is cultivated on an estimated 3% of the total cultivated area in the world, but uses about 25% of all insecticides consumed in agriculture. About 50% of the present cotton yields in world are attributable to the use of agrochemicals (ICAC, 1998). Pests are such a serious threat to cotton production that economic yields are almost impossible to achieve without chemical control and plant protection operations have become the crucial aspect of production practices.

Pesticides use on cotton has increased in recent years in Asia and more pesticides are applied to cotton than any other crop (IIBC, 1977). The majority of farmers in Pakistan are small holders and their dependence on pesticides have had serious consequences for their health and well being (Poswel and Williamson, 1998). Dependence on pesticides has increased in recent years and almost 50% of cotton farmers spray their crops up to 7 times per growing season yet do not realize higher yields. This dependence of farmers on pesticides increases the cost of production of cotton crop and it is estimated that about 20% or more of the total cost of production is spent on pesticides (Jones, 1984).

The yield of cotton in Pakistan is low as compared with other cotton producing countries of world and production potential of crop is reduced by insect pest infestation (Ali, 1983). Ghouri (1980) reported a loss of about 20% in yield incurred from bollworm pests. Ahmed (1980) stated that cotton crop is most susceptible to bollworms which inflict heavy damage that may vary from year to year but generally cause 30-40% yield reduction. Chang et al. (2002) screened different strains and varieties of cotton against bollworms and reported that damage to different genotypes ranged between 3.8 to 12.6%.

Spotted bollworm, Earias insulana (Boisd.) and Earias vittella (Fab.) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) are very serious polyphagous pest insects on many economic crops distributed in North Africa, India, Pakistan and many other countries of the world (Arain, 1974). Earias spp., were first recognized as pest of cotton in 1905 (Lefroy, 1909). Earias spp., remain active through out the year on cotton and other alternate host plants (Abdul Nasr et al., 1973; Faseli, 1977; Siddiqui et al., 1986). Alternate host plants play important role in the carryover of Earias spp. (Arif and Attique, 1990). Among bollworms species, Earias spp. are more abundant on cotton in Sindh as compared with other bollworm species (Leghari and Kalroo, 2002).

Host plant resistance is one of the eco-friendly and hazardless methods of pest control. A number of genetic characters are now available to cotton breeders for insect resistance such as nectariless, high gossypol, fregobract, hairiness and okra leaf etc. (El-Zik and Thaxton, 1989; Jenkins, 1986; Wilson and George, 1982). Ilango and Uthamasamy (1989) observed that gossypol content of cotton is known to be deleterious to bollworms, declined with boll age but was consistently higher in resistant variety. This, together with the higher total phenolics and crude fibre content in resistant variety was thought to contribute to greater resistance. Similarly, Ratan (1994) reported that genotypes which had highest gossypol gland density also had the lowest incidence of bollworms. Apart from this, host plant resistance is also compatible with other control measures such as chemical and biological control methods and can be utilized in the integrated pest management (IPM) of cotton for realizing the yield potential of cotton crop. In the present study different cotton varieties were evaluated for their resistance against spotted bollworm, Earias spp., under field conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present studies on the varietal resistance of cotton against Earias spp. under field conditions were carried out at Integrated Pest Management Section, ARI, Tando Jam during the cropping season 1999. The seeds of 12 cotton varieties viz., Green Red Okra, Qalandri, Red Okra- VI, Red Okra (Insect Resistant), AENS-1/82 VIII, Red Okra, TH-228/87, AENS-10/87, TH-3/83, Reshmi, AEC-78 13/89 and TH-41/83 were sown on April 22, 1999 in a completely randomized design with strip cropping. Each strip measuring 20 X 35 feet with 9 rows of each variety.

Observations on infestation of cotton by Earias spp. were started 67 days after sowing of crop. For recording observations, 20 plants were selected at random from each variety and healthy and infested bolls by Earias spp. were recorded and the percent infestation was calculated for each variety. Observations were taken at weekly intervals till the harvesting of the crop. The data recorded were statistically analysed for significant differences in infestation on different varieties of cotton by LSD range test (Le Clerg et al., 1962).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results reveal that the pest started its appearance in the field in the fourth week of June and continued its activity till harvest of the crop in the end of September. Earias spp. activity remained generally low during the experimental period and the infestation ranged in between 1.0 and 5.38% on different varieties during different dates (Table 1).

The minimum and maximum infestation of Earias spp. on different varieties of cotton recorded are: 1.43 and 3.84% on Green red okra on July 6 and August 10; 1.40 and 2.70% on Qalandri on July 20 and August, 30; 1.0 and 3.15% on Red okra-VI on June 29, July 6 and August 10; 1.0 and 3.76 on Red okra (Insect resistant) on July 6 and July 20; 1.00 and 3.00% on cotton variety AENS-1/82 VII on June 29, August 30 and July 20. Similarly the infestation of Earias spp., on the remaining varieties of cotton remained in the same range. On overall mean infestation basis cotton variety Red okra-VI and Green Red Okra were found the most and the least resistant varieties with 1.79 and 2.38% infestation, respectively under present study.

The statistical analysis of data showed that there was no significant difference in between infestation means of different varieties. However, the analysis of variance of infestation data on different dates indicated a significant difference in infestation on different dates during present studies (Table 1).

Further studies carried out to ascertain the effect of minimum and maximum temperature and relative humidity on the infestation of Earias spp. on different cotton varieties indicated that there was no significant effect of minimum and maximum (y=0303+0.053x; r=0.227; P>0.05) and (y=0.568+0.042x, 3=0.241; P>0.05) temperature on infestation, while relative humidity had a significant (y=0.362+0.036x, r=0.51, P<0.05) effect on infestation of Earias spp. on different cotton varieties.

Earias spp. is an important pest of cotton causing damage to fruiting bodies and shadding of squares, flowers and bolls. Bughio et al. (1987) reported that Earias spp. caused more abscission of squares and bolls than P. gossypiella. Dhawan et al. (1990) reported that Earias spp., were the cause of the loss of 12.5 to 16.6% of shed buds, 0.9 to 2.5% of flowers and 7.9 to 9.5% of bolls. The impact of pest population depends on planting date and crop development, Earias spp. first population (infestation) peak appeared in August first fortnight (August 10) and the second one on the September 3, almost 20 days after first peak.

Table 1:Percent infestation of Earias spp. on different varieties of cotton in field

Similar observations are recorded by Baloch et al. (1990) and Qureshi and Ahmed (1991). As has been observed in the present study, the higher relative humidity caused higher incidence of Earias spp. Similar observations were recorded by Khurana and Verma (1990) who reported that a maximum temperature of 36.3°C coupled with a mean RH of 64.8% resulted in a comparatively high incidence (20.0%) of Earias spp. in cotton. Further, it has been recorded that the relative abundance of E. vittella on cotton and okra showed its preference for more humid microclimate as these crops are irrigated (Arif and Attique, 1990).

REFERENCES
1:  Abdul-Nasr, S.M., M. Megahed and A.A.M. Mabrouk, 1973. A study on the host plants of the spiny bollworm, Earias insulana (Boisd.) other than cotton and maize (Lepidoptera: Arctuidae). Bull. Entomol. Soc. Egypt., 56: 151-161.

2:  Ali, S., 1983. Guidance for farmers. Pak. Agric., 4: 5-6.

3:  Arain, N., 1974. Studies on the incidence and relative abundance of different species of bollworms at Tandojam. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan.

4:  Arif, M.I. and M.R. Attique, 1990. Alternative hosts in carryover of Earias insulana (Boisd.) and Earias vittella F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. Cottons, 34: 91-96.

5:  Baloch, A.A., R.A. Soomro, M.A. Leghari and M.W. Sanjrani, 1990. Studies on economic injury levels of insect pests of cotton. Turk. Entomol. Dergisi, 14: 131-148.

6:  Bughio, A.B., T. Hussain, Z.A. Qureshi, 1987. Role of pinkbollworm and spotted bollworms in the abscisson of squares and bolls in cotton. Proc. Pak. Cong. Zool., 7: 99-104.

7:  Chang, M.S., M.A. Chang, A.R. Lakho and G.H. Tunio, 2002. Screening of newly developed cotton strains at Mirpurkhas against bollworm complex. Sindh Balochistan J. Plant Sci., 4: 135-139.

8:  Dhawan, A.K., G.S. Simwat and A.S. Sidhu, 1990. Square shedding due to bollworms in different varieties of Gossypium arboreum. J. Res. Punjab, Agric. Univ., 27: 606-610.

9:  Faseli, M.D., 1977. Investigations on the biology, ecology and control of Earias insulana (Boisd.). Entomol. Phytopath. Appliq., 43: 39-54.

10:  Ghouri, A.S.K., 1980. Role of DDT in pest control. Pak. Times Suppl., 9: 4-9.

11:  ICAC., 1998. Organic cotton production IV. International Cotton Advisory Committee, pp: 3-7.

12:  IIBC, 1997. Technical assistance completion report for RETA 5514 (Integrated Pest Management in Cotton). IIBC Malaysia Regional Station, pp: 17.

13:  Ilango, K. and S. Uthamasamy, 1989. Biochemical and physical bases of resistance to bollworms complex in cotton varieties. Madras Agric. J., 76: 73-76.

14:  Khurana, A.D. and A.N. Verma, 1990. Comparative damage caused by bollworms and yield of seed cotton during a dry and wet year in Haryana. J. Insect Sci., 3: 180-182.

15:  Lefroy, H.M., 1909. Spiny bollworm, Earias insulana (Boisd.) and spotted bollworm, Earias vittella (F.). Bull. Agric. Res. Pusa, 2: 3-9.

16:  Leghari, M.A. and A.M. Kalroo, 2000. Screening of insecticides against spotted bollworm Earias sp. of cotton crop. Sindh Balochistan J. Plant Sci., 4: 71-73.

17:  Qureshi, Z.A. and N. Ahmed, 1991. Monitoring seasonal population fluctuation of spotted and spiny bollworms by synthetic sex pheromones and its relationships to boll infestation in cotton. J. Applied Entomol., 112: 171-175.

18:  Ratan, R., 1994. Relation of gossypol gland density with bollworm incidence and yield in tree cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 64: 691-696.

19:  Wilson, F.D. and B.W. George, 1982. Effects okra-leaf, frego-bract and smooth-leaf mutants on pink bollworm damage and agronomic properties of cotton. Crop Sci., 22: 798-801.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

20:  Ahmed, Z., 1980. Incidence of major cotton pests and diseases in Pakistan with special reference to pest management. Proceedings of the International Consultation on Cotton Production Research with Focus on the Asian Region, November 17-21, 1980, Manila, Philippines, pp: 156-179.

21:  Siddiqui, I.A., K.I. Malik and M. Ahmed, 1986. Relative infestation of bollworms in abutilon, okra and cotton in lower Sindh, Pakistan. Proc. Pak. Cong. Zool., 5: 221-223.

22:  Poswel, A. and S. Williamson, 1998. Slepping off the cotton pesticide trademill: Preliminary findings from a farmer participatory cotton IPM training project in Pakistan. CABI Bioscience Centre Pakistan, pp: 8.

23:  Le Clerg, E.L., W.H. Leonard and A.G. Clark, 1962. Field Plot Technique. Burgess Publishing Company, Minneapolis, USA., pp: 373.

24:  El-Zik, K.M. and P.M. Thaxton, 1989. Genetic Improvement for Resistance for Pests and Stresses in Cotton. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA., pp: 191-224.

25:  Jenkins, J.N., 1986. Host plant resistance: Advances in cotton. Proceeding of Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference, (BCPRC'86), Memphis, T.N., USA., pp: 34-41.

26:  Jones, K.R., 1984. Commercial breeding-midsouth. Proceeding of Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conferencess, (BCPRC'84), USA., pp: 83-86.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved