Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Forecasting Adult Populations of Helicoverpa armigera on Chickpea Using Pheromone Trap



Khalique Ahmed and Feeroza Khalique
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Chickpea pod borer, H. armigera infestation forecasting models revealed that 4th March ± 6 days, 13th April ± 4 days and 7th June ± 16 days were calculated to be the predicted dates for start, peak and end of trap catch populations respectively according to Calendar date method. Similarly, by Degree-day accumulation method, 181.2 ± 39.7, 480 ± 85.5, and 1379.6 ± 319.3 degree-days were calculated as to be the predicted degree-days for start, peak and end of trap catch populations respectively. In April 1999, insect peak population was seen on 14th April (fallen in agreement within the range of the calendar date model) and accordingly the plant protection measures were adopted.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Khalique Ahmed and Feeroza Khalique , 2002. Forecasting Adult Populations of Helicoverpa armigera on Chickpea Using Pheromone Trap. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5: 830-834.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2002.830.834

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2002.830.834

REFERENCES

1:  Ahmed, K., A.S. Qureshi and F. Khalique, 2000. Effect of environmental factors on pheromone trap catches of chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Huebn.) from 1983 to 1998. Proc. Pak. Acad. Sci., 37: 227-237.

2:  Ahmed, K., A.S. Qureshi and F. Khalique, 2000. Influence of temperature regimes on pheromone trap catch population of chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Huebn.) from 1983 to 1998. Proc. Pak. Acad. Sci., 37: 239-252.

3:  Ahmed, K., F. Khalique, M. Afzal and B.A. Malik, 1996. Pulses entomology report. Pakistan Agriculture Research Council, National Agricuture Research Center.

4:  Anonymous, 1998. Agricultural statistics of Pakistan. Ministry of Agricultural, Government of Pakistan.

5:  Anonymous, 1998. Pulses Programme Annual Technical Report. Crop Sciences Institute, National Agricultural Research Center, Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp: 107-109

6:  Baker, P.B., A.M. Shelton and J.T. Andalaro, 1982. Monitoring of diamond back moth in cabbage with pheromones. J. Econ. Entomol., 75: 1025-1028.

7:  Bues, R., M. Hmimina, S. Poilout and R. Gabarra, 1989. Different stages of pupal diapause and overvintering strategy in Heliothisarmigera (Hubn.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Applied Entomol., 104: 376-386.

8:  Coop, L.B., R.J. Drapek, B.A. Croft and G.C. Fisher, 1992. Relationship of corn earworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) pheromone catch and silking to infestation levels in Oregon sweet corn. J. Econ. Entomol., 85: 240-245.

9:  Dent, D.R., 1985. Population Studies of Heliothis Armigera (Huebn.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Through the Analysis and Interpretation of Light and Pheromone Trap Catches and Larval Counts: A Report of Work (Departmental Progress Report 18, Pulse Entomology). ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, pp: 1-153

10:  Harris, M.K., J.G. Millar and A.E. Knutson, 1997. Pecan nut case bearer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) sex pheromone used to monitor phenology and effective range of traps. J. Econ. Entomol., 90: 983-987.

11:  Hoffman, C.J. and T.J. Dennehy, 1989. Phenology, movement and within-field distribution of the grape berry moth, Endopiza viteana (Clemens) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in New York vineyards. Can. Entomol., 121: 325-335.

12:  Izquierdo, J.I., 1996. Helicoverpa armigera (Huebner) (Lepidopetra: Noctuidae) Relationship between captures in pheromone traps and egg counts in tomato and carnation crops. J. Applied Entomol., 120: 281-290.

13:  Latheef, M.A., J.A. Witz and Jr. J.D. Lopes, 1991. Relationship among pheromone trap catches of male corn earworm male moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), eggs numbers and phenology in corn. Can. Entomol., 123: 271-281.

14:  Nesbitt, B.F., P.S. Beevor, D.R. Hall and R. Lester, 1980. (Z)-9-Hexadecenal: A minor component of the female sex pheromone of Heliothis armigera (Hubner.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 27: 306-308.

15:  Palaniswamy, P., B. Galka and B. Timlick, 1990. Phenology and distribution level of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Huebn.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in southern Manitoba. Can. Entomol., 122: 1211-1220.

16:  Pawar, C.S., S. Sithanantham, V.S. Bhatnagar, C.P. Srivastava and W. Reed, 1988. The development of pheromone trapping of Heliothis armigera at ICRISAT, India. Trop. Pest Manage., 34: 39-43.

17:  Potter, D.A. and G.M. Timmons, 1983. Forecasting emergence and flight of the lilac borer (Lepidoptera:Sessiidae) based on pheromone trapping and day-degree accumulations. Environ. Entomol., 12: 400-403.

18:  Schouest, L.P. Jr. and T.A. Miller, 1994. Automated pheromone traps show male pink bollwrom (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) mating response is dependent on weather conditions. J. Econ. Entomol., 87: 965-974.

19:  Silverstein, R.M., 1981. Pheromones: Background and potential for use in insect pest control. Science, 213: 1326-1332.

20:  Srivastava, C.P. and R.P. Srivastava, 1995. Monitoring of Helicoverpa armigera (Huebn.) by pheromone trapping in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Applied Entomol., 119: 607-609.

21:  Thorpe, K.W., L.R. Richard and A.L. Barbra, 1993. Relationship between gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) pheromone trap catch and population density: Comparison to trap baited with 1 and 500 Fg (+)-disparlure lures. J. Econ. Entomol., 86: 86-92.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved