Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Leaf Epidermal Anatomy of Medicinal Grasses of Islamabad, Attock and Mirpur (Azad Kashmir)

M. Ishtiaq Chaudhary , Abdul Samad Mumtaz and Mir Ajab Khan
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Abaxial and adaxial leaf epidermal anatomy of four related species having morphological resemblances have been studied. These taxa showed variation in short and long cells, silica bodies, macro and micro hair, presence or absence of stomata and shape of subsidiary cells. Most of these characters are diagnostic and have been used for making keys. Hence, on the basis of leaf epidermal anatomy we can distinguish among Cymbopogon citrates (DC.) Stapf, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pars, Panicum summatrense Roeth ex Roem & Schult and Viteveria zizanoides (L.) Nash.

Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

M. Ishtiaq Chaudhary , Abdul Samad Mumtaz and Mir Ajab Khan , 2001. Leaf Epidermal Anatomy of Medicinal Grasses of Islamabad, Attock and Mirpur (Azad Kashmir). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 4: 1466-1469.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2001.1466.1469


1:  Brown, D., 1984. Prospects and limits of phytolith key for grasses in central United States. J. Archeol. Sci., 11: 221-243.

2:  Clark, J., 1960. Preparation of leaf epidermis for topographic study. Stain Technol., 35: 35-39.

3:  Ellis, R.P., 1976. A procedure for standardizing comparative leaf anatomy in the Poaceae 1. The leaf-blade as viewed in transverse section. Bothalia, 12: 65-109.

4:  Metcalfe, C.R., 1960. Anatomy of Monocotyledons 1: Gramineae. Clarendon Press,. Oxford, UK.

5:  Mulholland, S.C., 1989. Phytolith shape frequencies in North Dakota grasses: A comparison to general patterns. J. Archeol. Sci., 16: 489-511.

6:  Onawunmi, G.O., W.A. Yiska and E.O. Ogunlana, 1984. Microbiology section B. Bacteriology, 12: 279-286.

7:  Piperno, D.R. and D.M. Peasall, 1998. The silica bodies of tropical american grasses: Morphology, taxonomy and implications for grass systematics and fossil phytolith identification. Smithsonian Contrib. Bot., 85: 1-40.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Prat, H., 1948. General features of the epidermis in Zea mays. Ann. Mossouri Bot. Garden, 35: 341-351.
Direct Link  |  

9:  Prat, H., 1951. Histophysiological gradients and plant organogenesis: Part 1. Bot. Rev., 14: 603-643.

10:  Siddique, M., A. Budduruzaman and W. Hussain, 1994. Medicinal plants of Utter Pardesh. Fitote rapa, 65: 3-6.

11:  Stace, C.A., 1980. Plant Taxonomy and Biosystematics. Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd., London, pp: 81-84.

12:  Thomasson, J.R., M.E. Nelson and R.J. Zakrzawski, 1986. A. fossil grass (Gramineae-Chloridoideae) from the Miocene, with Krantz anatomy. Science, 233: 876-878.

13:  Twiss, P.C., E. Suess and R.M. Smith, 1969. Morphological classification of grass phytoliths. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 33: 109-115.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved