Research Article
 

Biological Effects of Gamma Irradiation and its Modulation with Gibberellic Acid in M1 Generation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)



Muhammad R. Khan, Afsari S. Qureshi and Syed A. Hussain
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Dry seeds of three chickpea genotypes having different seed coat colours viz; Noor 91 (white), Punjab 91 (brown) and C 141 (black) were treated at 40, 50 and 60 Kr separately and with gibberellic acid (GA3) for studying the effects on 100-seed weight, grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, days to flowering and maturity in M1 generation. Highly significant (p<0.01) variation within genotypes, treatments and also for their interaction was observed for all the characters. Statistically higher 100-seed weight was observed with the combine treatment in the three genotypes as compared with gamma irradiation. Combine treatment normalized the grain yield in Noor 91, while decreased in Punjab 91 however, stimulation was recorded at 40 and 50 Kr in C 141. Stimulation in biological yield was recorded at 40 Kr with the combine treatment in Noor 91 and C141. Harvest index decreased with gamma irradiation in the three genotypes while, stimulation was recorded in C 141. Days to flowering and maturity increased with gamma irradiation however, with combine treatment these values were reduced.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Muhammad R. Khan, Afsari S. Qureshi and Syed A. Hussain, 2000. Biological Effects of Gamma Irradiation and its Modulation with Gibberellic Acid in M1 Generation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 3: 993-995.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2000.993.995

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2000.993.995
 

Introduction

Mutation breeding is now widely used for inducing genetic changes and creation of new genetic resources, particularly in crops that are not easily amenable to improvement through conventional techniques (Awan, 1991). It is well established that mutagenic agents are effective for inducing genetical changes in treated population (Kalia and Gupta, 1988a, b). Notwithstanding, little natural variability in chickpea for conspicuous morphological and physiological characters, several workers have attempted for induction of mutation using either physical or chemical mutagens for evolving new genotypes (Hassan and Khan, 1991; Shamsuzzaman and Shaik, 1991). Radiation, therefore, appears to be a useful tool in plant breeding and genetics. The primary objectives of mutation are to enhance mutation frequency, widen the mutation spectrum and realize directed mutagenesis.

Gamma radiation in combination with other chemical mutagens is applied for widening the frequency and mutation spectrum for extra genetic variability. Effect of gamma radiation is changed with the radio protective effect of gibberellic acid. It has been established that the impaired growth due to gamma irradiation can be restored by exogenous application of gibberellic acid. Gibberellic acid serves manifold growth related functions in plants by enhancing replication, transcription and different enzymatic systems (Zhebrak, 1989; Ali and Ansari, 1989; Arora et al., 1989). It brightens the scope for increasing both the frequency and spectrum of mutation. Therefore, it was planned to determine the effectiveness of gamma irradiation and efficiency of gibberellic acid to modulate the radio sensitivity for various morphological characters.

Materials and Methods

Dry seeds were exposed to gamma irradiation at doses of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 90 and 110 Kr to 1000 seeds for each treatment in three genotypes at Nuclear Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA), Peshawar. A part of the irradiated seeds after one hour of soaking under continuous aeration, were subjected to 0.5 mM aqueous solution of gibberellic acid for 16 hours with constant shaking. Non irradiated seeds soaked in water were kept as control in the case. After treatment seeds were washed in running tap water and then were dried on blotting paper. On the basis of seedling performance doses of 40, 50 and 60 Kr were selected for inducing genetic variability on large scale. Treated along with control seeds were sown in split plot design with three replications at Barani Agriculture Research Institute (BARI) Chakwal in 1995 to raise the M1 generation. Data on 20 consecutive plants from the middle row was appropriately recorded for various characters.

Results and Discussion

The analysis of variance for the effect of different doses of gamma irradiation separately and with the post mutagenic application of gibberellic acid on various plant characteristics in M1 population of chickpea is presented in Table 1. It indicates highly significant variation within genotypes and treatments for all characters. The genotype-treatment interaction was also highly significant for all the characters. It reflects highly inconsistency in sensitivity of genotypes for all the characters across various treatments.

100-seed weight decreased significantly with an increase in gamma irradiation (Table 2). In the previous research, similar observations for this character was recorded in chickpea (Rao, 1988), in mungbean (Khan, 1984) and in Pennisetum (Aslam et al., 1985). However, heavier seeds were produced with the application of GA3. This increase in 100-seed weight may be due to the radio protective effects of GA3 and enhancement of template activity. The grain yield reduced significantly at various levels of irradiation. Similar results for this character was obtained in various crops; in chickpea (Mahto et al., 1989), in lentil (Eser et al., 1991; Tripathi and Dubey, 1992), in Pennisetum (Aslam et al., 1985), in Cajanus cajan (Kumar and Sinha, 1989) and in Phaseolus vulgaris (Svetleva and Dimeva, 1991). However, with the application of GA3 grain yield increased significantly at 40 and 50 Kr and decreased at 60 Kr. Grain yield decreased significantly or non-significantly with gamma irradiation in the three genotypes as compared to their respective controls. However, the response of genotypes varied greatly at different doses. Genotypic differences due to various gamma irradiation were also observed by Mahto et al. (1989) in chickpea and Aslam et al. (1985) in Pennisetum. Application of GA3 had changed the effects of gamma irradiation significantly in the three genotypes except at 60 Kr in Punjab 91 indicating the possibility of increasing the variability for grain yield in chickpea.

Both the mutagenic treatments decreased the biological yield significantly as compared to their respective controls.

Table 1: Mean of Squares for different characters of M1 generation in chickpea genotypes.
Image for - Biological Effects of Gamma Irradiation and its Modulation with Gibberellic Acid in M1 Generation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)
** 0.01 probability highly significant

Table 2: Effect of gamma irradiation separately and with gibberellic acid on various characters in M1 generation of three chickpea genotypes.
Image for - Biological Effects of Gamma Irradiation and its Modulation with Gibberellic Acid in M1 Generation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

The irregular response of biological yield with gamma irradiation may be due to the kind and extent of biological damage, while the consistent decrease in biological yield may be accounted for the protective and repairing activity of GA3. Table 2 showed that in the three genotypes biological yield decreased inconsistently at various gamma irradiation dosages. Post mutagenic application of GA3 significantly changed the biological effects of gamma irradiation either in positive or negative direction. This suggests that the treatment of GA3 could be useful for inducing extra variability.

Gamma irradiation decreased the harvest index significantly with both treatments as compared to their respective controls. Contrary to this, Yousaf et al. (1991) have recorded little variation in harvest index percentage under different gamma irradiation in lentil. The change in the results might be due to different genotypes and places of experimentation. However, application of GA3 significantly increased the harvest index percent at 40 and 50 Kr by modulating the effects of gamma irradiation.

Highly significant interaction between genotype and treatment indicate varied response of harvest index towards the various doses of gamma irradiation. Gamma irradiation decreased the harvest index differently at all the treatments in the three genotypes as compared to control. However, with the application of GA3 stimulation in harvest index over control was recorded in C141 genotype. The results of the present study further reveal that the application of GA3 has changed the effects of gamma irradiation, which might increase the variability for this character in chickpea.

Gamma irradiation significantly and progressively increased the number of days to 50 percent flowering at various levels of irradiation as compared to control. Late flowering in M1 generation as compared to control have also been reported in pea (Khan et al., 1990; Amjad et al., 1993), french bean (Svetleva and Petkova, 1992). However, a non-significant delay in flowering with gamma irradiation was reported by Yousaf et al. (1991) in lentil. However, post mutagenic treatment with GA3 decreased the time to 50 percent flowering.

Highly significant interaction of varieties and doses indicate that the response of varieties to various levels of irradiation is quite variable. The results show a relative delay in 50 percent flowering over control in the three varieties. Application of GA3 reduced the number of days to 50 percent flowering at different intensities of gamma irradiation. This decrease in time could be due to the repairing process of GA3, which might bring the population to a physiological state for early flowering.

Gamma rays consistently delayed in crop maturity with an increase of radiation intensity as compared to control. The results obtained in this study are in line with those of Hassan et al. (1988) in wheat, Tripathi and Dubey (1992) in lentil and Kumar et al. (1993) in pea. Post mutagenic application of GA3 decreased the time to crop maturity.

A linear increase in time to crop maturity was recorded with gamma irradiation in the three genotypes as compared to control. However, with GA3 treatment less number of days were taken to maturity at various levels of irradiation in the three genotypes. The application of GA3 modulated the effects of gamma irradiation either in positive or negative direction. This may leads to the induction of new genetic variation for different characters and widens the germplasm pool. In a breeding programme extent of genetic variability is more important than the total variability. Post mutagenic application of GA3 may prove to be useful in widening the genetic spectrum and consequently the selection of new genotypes with better genetic architecture in regards with the yield improvement in chickpea.

REFERENCES

  1. Ali, H.A. and S. Ansari, 1989. Effect of indole-3-acetic acid and Kinetin on germination, seedling growth and some biochemical constituents in gamma irradiated seeds of chickpea. Pak. J. Bot., 21: 283-289.
    Direct Link  |  


  2. Amjad, M., R. Rahim, A. Ali and M. Ayyub, 1993. Variation in growth characteristics of pea under the influence of gamma irradiation. Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 30: 102-104.
    Direct Link  |  


  3. Arora, R., N. Maherchandani and S. Uppal, 1989. Modulation of gamma irradiation effects in wheat by growth regulators. Ann. Biol. Ludhiana, 5: 109-113.


  4. Aslam, R.M., K.A. Siddiqui and A. Sharif, 1985. Effect of gamma rays on growth and seed index of Pennisetum americanum. Pak. J. Bot., 17: 61-67.
    Direct Link  |  


  5. Awan, M.A., 1991. Use of induced mutations for crop improvement in Pakistan. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Contribution of Plant Mutation Breeding to Crop Improvement, June 18-22, 1991, Vienna, Austria, pp: 67-72


  6. Eser, D., Z. Sagel, M.I. Tutluer, H. Peskircioglu and A.S. Atilla, 1991. The effect of gamma radiation doses on some characters in M1 generation of large seeded type green lentil pul-11 cultivar. Turk. J. Nucl. Sci., 18: 5-15.
    Direct Link  |  


  7. Hassan, S., I. Ali, T. Muhammad and S.A. Shah, 1988. Effect of gamma rays and sodium azide (NaN3) on morphogical characteristics of wheat. Nucleus, 25: 19-22.


  8. Hassan, S. and I. Khan, 1991. Improvement in chickpea production through induced mutations. Int. Chickpea Newslett., 25: 12-13.


  9. Kalia, N.R. and V.P. Gupta, 1988. Differential radiosensitivity in microsperma and macrosperma lentils. Lens Newslett., 15: 5-8.


  10. Kalia, N.R. and V.P. Gupta, 1988. Induced polygenic variation in lentils. Lens Newslett., 16: 8-16.


  11. Khan, I.A., 1984. Quantitative variation induced by r-rays EMS and HZ. in mungbean. Can. J. Genet. Cytol., 26: 492-496.


  12. Khan, A.S., N. Ali and T. Mohammad, 1990. Radiation effect of the morphological characters on pea (Pisum sativum L.). Sarhad J. Agric., 6: 389-392.
    Direct Link  |  


  13. Kumar, P. and S.S.N. Sinha, 1989. Effect of gamma radiation on plant attributes in two cultivars of Cajanus cajan and two species of Moghania. Legume Res., 12: 115-122.


  14. Mahto, R.N., M.D.E. Haque and R. Prasad, 1989. Biological effects of gamma rays in chickpea. Indian J. Pulses Res., 2: 97-101.


  15. Rao, S.K., 1988. Gamma ray induced morphological and physiological variations in Cicer arietinum L. Indian J. Bot., 11: 29-32.
    Direct Link  |  


  16. Shamsuzzaman, K.M. and M.A.Q. Shaik, 1991. Early maturing and higher seed yielding chickpea mutants. Mutation Breeding Newslett., 37: 4-5.


  17. Svetleva, D. and D. Dimeva, 1991. Effect of separate and combine treatment with N.allyl-N-nitrosourea and gamma rays on variants in some quantitative characters in Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) Savi. Genetika-i-Selektsiva, 24: 177-182.


  18. Svetleva, D. and S. Petkova, 1992. Association between changes in the M1 and mutability in the M2 in the french bean variety 564 after combine treatment with gamma radiation and Nallyl-N-nitrosourea. Genetika-i-Selektsiva, 25: 254-260.


  19. Tripathi, A. and D.K. Dubey, 1992. Effects of separate and simultaneous application of gamma rays and N-nitroso-N-methyl urea on germination, growth, fertility and yield of two lentil varieties. Lens Newslett., 19: 9-13.


  20. Yousaf, H., Raziuddin and H. Ahmad, 1991. Morphology and chemical studies of irradiated lentil (Lens culinaris Med.). Sarhad J. Agric., 7: 361-368.


  21. Zhebrak, E.A., 1989. An evaluation of antiradiation activity of some growth regulators after chronic gamma irradiation of plants. Nauchno Tekhnicheskii Byulleten Vsesoyuznogo Ordena Lenina-I-Ordena Druzhby-N-Arodov Nauchno Issledo 187: 13-17.


  22. Kumar, S., Vandana and D.K. Dubey, 1993. Studies on the effect of gamma rays and diethyl sulfate (DES) on germination, growth, fertility and yield in faba bean (Vicia faba). FABIS Newslett., 32: 15-18.
    Direct Link  |  


©  2023 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved