• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
  2. Vol 3 (4), 2000
  3. 660-662
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2000 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 660-662
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2000.660.662
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Genetic Variation for Phosphorus Use in Wheat at Two Levels of Soil Applied Phosphorus

Yaseen M., S. Ahmad and T. Hussain

ABSTRACT


Wheat genotypes grown at control and adequate P levels differed markedly in their growth response. Growth response in terms of straw and grain yields was influenced by P application, genotype and their interaction. Relative reduction in grain yield ranged from none to 4%. Among all the genotypes Pervaz-94 showed response to P application. It was also observed that genotypes with high P concentration had low P uptake, low phosphorus use efficiency and hence low grain yield. Inqlab-91 and Chakwal-86 used phosphorus efficiently at both the P levels. Phosphorus efficient genotypes could be grown under low or little P fertilizer conditions.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation

How to cite this article

Yaseen M., S. Ahmad and T. Hussain, 2000. Genetic Variation for Phosphorus Use in Wheat at Two Levels of Soil Applied Phosphorus. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 3: 660-662.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2000.660.662

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2000.660.662

INTRODUCTION


Among cereals, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is the most abundantly grown crop for grain and dry fodder in Pakistan. It is staple food for majority of the country’s population. No doubt, some achievement in wheat production has been achieved but still its yield per hectare in the country is lower than many other wheat growing countries of the world (Anonymous, 1998a).

Imbalanced use of nutrients is one of the various constraints to self-sufficiency in wheat production in Pakistan (Anonymous, 1998b). Phosphorus after nitrogen is the key element for plant growth. Its availability is seriously affected due to alkaline calcareous nature of soils of Pakistan which is very much clear from its recovery efficiency, i.e., 15-20 percent (Zia et al., 1991). The remaining 80-85% phosphorus retains as fixed phosphorus in soil. On the other hand, P-use efficiency by wheat is only 11-20% (Zia et al., 1991). Phosphorus is a costly input and there is a need to improve its use efficiency to cut down the cost of production.

Low availability of P is one of the yield limiting factors (Ahmad et al., 1992; Gourley et al., 1993). Phosphorus fertilizers are applied to overcome the phosphorus deficiency. However, use of phosphatic fertilizer is not affordable by every farmer. This is the reason that most of the farmers applied this fertilizer at much less rates than the recommended level (Anonymous, 1998b). Agricultural scientists are focusing their attention to cutdown the cost of production and introducing low input technology. In this regard one of the supplementary approach is the identification/selection of P-efficient genotypes. It is well known that crop genotypes differ in P-use efficiency and in their ability to take up and utilize mineral elements (Clark and Duncan, 1991). Possibility of exploiting genotypic differences in absorption and utilization of P to obtain higher productivity on P-deficient soil has received considerable attention in recent years. The aim of this experiment is to screen out the P-efficient wheat cultivars under field conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


The experiment was carried out in P-deficient soil (8 mg kg–1) to determine the genetic variation for phosphorus use efficiency in wheat at two levels of soil applied phosphorus in the research area of Department of Soil Science, University of Agriculture Faisalabad. The experiment was laid out in split plot with four replications. The phosphorus levels were applied in main plots while crop genotypes in sub-plots. The phosphorus levels were control (zero P application) and 120 kg P2O5 ha–1 as single superphosphate. Nitrogen at 120 kg ha–1 as urea and potassium at 60 kg K2O ha–1 as KCl were applied according to recommended method. The crop was harvested on net plot size basis at maturity. Plants were separated into straw and grainand their weights were recorded. Ground plant material was digested and analyzed for phosphorus concentration and stress factor. For it 0.5 g of each sample was digested in 5 mL tri-acid mixture of nitric, sulphuric and perchloric acids (2:1:1) and phosphorus was determined by yellow colour method (Chapman and Pratt, 1961). Comparison among the cultivars was made following standard statistical procedures (Steel and Torrie, 1980).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Straw and grain yields of seven wheat genotypes were influenced by P level, genotype and two way interaction of P level and genotype. Except Blue silver, all the genotypes showed increase in straw to a varying extent with the increase in P supply. There was about 11% increase in wheat straw by increasing the P supply from nil to 120 Kg P2O5 ha–1. Maximum straw was yielded by Chakwal-86 at both the P levels (Table 1, 2). This genotype also showed the highest response to P application for straw production. Differential yielding potential of wheat genotypes showed existence of genetic variation among wheat genotypes. Maximum grain yield was produced at deficient P level. The difference in grain yield among genotypes was statistically significant. The grain yield of only Parvaz-94 increased with increase in P supply. Grain yields of Pb-96, Inqlab-91, Pb-85, Blue Silver, Fsd-83 and Chakwal-86 were higher at deficient P than at adequate P. These genotypes might have inverse response to P supply. Fageria and Barabosa-Filho (1982) reported existence of varietal differences for tolerance of P deficiency. Yaseen et al. (1998) also reported similar results where most of these genotypes behaved similarly.

Average grain yield of wheat genotypes differed significantly. The genotype Chakwal-86 produced maximum grain yield. This might be due to its later ability to obtain P from the soil. Such differences in wheat genotypes were also reported by El Bassam (1998).

Genotype x P level interaction was significant. At control P Chakwal-86 produced maximum while Parvaz-94 produced minimum grain yield among all the genotypes. At adequate P levels, Parvaz-94 appeared as P responsive genotype and produced maximum grain yield while minimum by Pb-85, Inqlab-91, Chakwal-86, Fsd-83, Blue Silver, Pb-96. These genotypes might be tolerant to P deficient conditions, have low P requirements or capable of using soil P efficiently. Data showed that Parvaz-94 was highly P responsive as its yield was increased with P supply. Dhillon and Deve (1993) reported increase in wheat grain yield and P uptake with increasing P supply.

Gourley et al. (1993) had the opinion that screening of cultivars for have stable produce in low P conditions may provide the best estimate of productivity in low P soil.

Table 1:Straw yield (kg ha–1) of seven wheat genotypes at control and adequate P levels
Image for - Genetic Variation for Phosphorus Use in Wheat at Two Levels of Soil Applied Phosphorus
Means sharing different letter(s) differ significantly at 5% level of probability

Table 2:Grain yield (kg ha–1) of seven wheat at control and adequate P levels
Image for - Genetic Variation for Phosphorus Use in Wheat at Two Levels of Soil Applied Phosphorus
Means sharing different letter(s) differ significantly at 5% level of probability

Table 3: Phosphorus stress factor (%) for grain of seven wheat genotypes
Image for - Genetic Variation for Phosphorus Use in Wheat at Two Levels of Soil Applied Phosphorus
Means sharing different letter(s) differ significantly at 5% level of probability

Table 4:
Phosphorus concentration (mg g–1) in grain of seven wheat genotypes at control and adequate P levels
Image for - Genetic Variation for Phosphorus Use in Wheat at Two Levels of Soil Applied Phosphorus
Means sharing different letter(s) differ significantly at 5% level of probability

Statistical analysis shows significant differences among wheat genotypes. Wheat genotypes having stress factor values with positive sign indicate dependence upon P supply where as genotypes values with negative sign having either low P requirement or efficient user of soil P. Stress factor for all the genotypes varied from -31.85 to 4.36% (Table 3).

Table 5: Phosphorus uptake (kg ha–1) by grain of seven wheat genotypes at control and adequate P levels
Image for - Genetic Variation for Phosphorus Use in Wheat at Two Levels of Soil Applied Phosphorus
Means sharing different letter(s) differ significantly at 5% level of probability

Table 6:
Phosphorus use efficiency in grain of seven wheat genotypes at control and adequate P levels
Image for - Genetic Variation for Phosphorus Use in Wheat at Two Levels of Soil Applied Phosphorus
Means sharing different letter(s) differ significantly at 5% level of probability

Maximum stress factor was found in Parvaz-94. This means that Parvaz-94 is a P responsive wheat genotype and is highly dependent on P supply compared to other wheat genotypes. The genotypes Fsd-83, Pb-85, Pb-96, Blue Silver and Inqlab-91 showed negative response to P supply for grain yield. These genotypes may be termed as P-efficient in terms of their relative grain yield under P deficient soil conditions. Minimum stress factor was observed in Chakwal-86. Therefore, Chakwal-86 may be termed as the most P efficient genotypes among all the genotypes tested in this study. Genotypic differences for relative reduction in grain yield at different P supply levels have also been reported by Siddique (1998) in wheat (Table 4).

Genotypes having higher P concentration showed lower uptake and vice versa. Higher uptake generally depicted higher grain yield and lower P uptake was due to dilution effect of higher growth (Table 5). Phosphorus uptake ranged from 3.26 to 5.10 kg ha–1 and 4.11 to 7.11 kg ha–1 at control and adequate P levels, respectively. Chakwal-86 absorbed statistically maximum P at control while Blue Silver absorbed minimum P among all the genotypes. High P uptake indicated high grain yield. Therefore genotypes with good absorption of P enhanced grain production.

It was influenced significantly by P level, genotype and their interaction. It was observed that wheat genotypes (except Blue silver) having higher P absorption in grain under P-deficient conditions had used phosphorus efficiently. Wheat genotypes Inqlab-91 and Chakwal-86 had produced the highest grain per unit P absorbed (Table 6).

The finding of the experiment showed that P efficient genotypes (Inq-91, Pb-96 and Pb-85) could be successfully grown on soils with low available P or where soil is replenished with little or no phosphorus.

REFERENCES


  1. Ahmad, N., M.T. Saleem and I.T. Twyford, 1992. Phosphorus research in Pakistan: A review. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Role of Phosphorus in Crop Production, July 15-17, 1992, National Fertilizer Development Center, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp: 59-92.

  2. Anonymous, 1998. Agricultural statistics of Pakistan 1997-1998. Govt. of Pakistan, Ministry of Food, Agricultural and Livestock Division, Economic Wing, Islamabad.

  3. Chapman, H.D. and P.F. Pratt, 1961. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters. Agriculture Science, University of California, Berkeley, Pages: 309.

  4. Clark, R.B. and R.R. Duncan, 1991. Improvement of plant mineral nutrition through breeding. Field Crops Res., 27: 219-240.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Dhillon, N.S. and G. Deve, 1993. Effects of P application and P uptake in pea millet-wheat rotation. J. Ind. Soc. Soil Sci., 41: 378-380.

  6. El Bassam, N., 1998. A concept of selection for 'low input' wheat varieties. Euphytica, 100: 95-100.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  7. Fageria, N.K. and M.P. Barabosa-Filho, 1982. Screening rice cultivars for tolerance to low levels of available soil phosphorus. Rev. Brasiluria Cienciado Solo, 6: 146-151.

  8. Gourley, C.J.P., D.L. Allan, M.P. Russelle and P.R. Bloom, 1993. Evaluation and improvements of a sand-alumina culture technique to screen plants for low phosphorus tolerance. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 57: 103-110.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Anonymous, 1998. akistan fertilizer related statistics. National Fertilizer Development Centre (NFDC), Islamabad, Pakistan.

  10. Siddique, M., 1998. Wheat genotypes response to deficiency and adequate phosphorus levels. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Soil Science, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.

  11. Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd Edn., McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780070609266, Pages: 633.
    Direct Link

  12. Yaseen, M., M.A. Gill, M. Siddique, Z. Ahmad, T. Mahmood and H. Rahman, 1998. Phosphorus deficiency stress tolerance and phosphorus utilization efficiency in wheat genotypes. Proceedings of the Symposium Plant Nutrition Management for Sustainable Agricultural Growth, (SPNMSAG'98), NFDC, Islamabad, pp: 211-215.

  13. Zia, M.S., M.A. Gill, M. Aslam and M.F. Hussain, 1991. Fertilizer use efficiency in Pakistan. Prog. Farm., 11: 35-38.

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved