Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Wheat Varietal Behavior in Hydroponic and Soil Culture Under Saline Conditions



M. Ahsan and D. Wright
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

The experiment was conducted to compare two systems (hydroponic and soil culture). Seven wheat varieties differing in salt tolerance were grown under saline conditions (100 mol m–3 NaCl) in these two systems. Ion contents (Na+, K+, CI‾, Ca2+ and Mg2+ ) in the fourth leaf were not correlated with ion contents in the flag leaf. There were few significant correlation coefficients between ion contents and grain weight per plant. Which suggests that ion contents in leaf sap may not be good indicators of salt tolerance in wheat. Linear correlation coefficients for grain yield, most of yield components and ion contents of seven wheat varieties between hydroponic and soil culture were non-significant. These results suggest that hydroponic culture system is independent from soil culture system.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

M. Ahsan and D. Wright, 1998. Wheat Varietal Behavior in Hydroponic and Soil Culture Under Saline Conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 1: 318-320.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.1998.318.320

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.1998.318.320

Introduction

Most studies of the effects of salinity on the physiology (Gorham et al., 1984) and yield of crop have been conducted using solution culture techniques (Ashraf and McNeilly, 1988) as they allow control over the amount and types of salt present and thereby facilitate comparative evaluations of speces and varieties. They also avoid potential confounding effects of salinity on soil structure. Hydroponic culture medium tend to be acid to facilitate availability and uptake of trace elements, especially iron, whereas most soils are more pH neutral and in many salt affected areas of the world, they are alkaline. Electrical Conductivity (EC) in solution culture is relatively constant, Whereas in soil it fluctuates temporally due to rain fall, temperature, irrigation and spatially due to variations in soil properties. Therefore if breeding and selection is to be done in solution culture there is a need to know that performance in this system correlates with the performance in soil culture. Very few studies have been conducted to investigate this. Storey (1995) reported that rates of net K+, Na+ and CI‾ uptake and transport of two genotypes of lime were substantially higher when grown in solution culture than when grown in sand culture. We have been unable to find any studies in the scientific literature comparing the ion uptake and yield of a range of contrasting wheat varieties under hydroponic and soil salinity.

Salt tolerant wheat varieties have lower Na+ and CI‾ contents and higher K+/Na+ ratio than salt susceptible ones (Wyn-Jones, 1981; Sastry and Prakash, 1993). However in most studies ion contents have been measured in leaves formed early in development and hence often during vegetative growth. Although, most of the carbohydrate in the grain is derived from photosynthesis by the flag leaf (Thorne, 1982). Hence a second objective of the experiment was to study the correlation between ion contents in fourth and flag leaves, and between these ion contents and yield using varieties known to differ in salt tolerance.

Materials and Methods

The experiment tested seven wheat varieties grown in two systems (Hydroponics and soil culture). The varieties included two salt tolerant (SARC-111 and LU26S) and two salt sensitive (Blue sliver and Bhawalpur-73) from Pakistan; a salt tolerant Indian Landrace (Kharchia-65) and a selection (KRL1-4) with increased salt tolerance derived from it (supplied by Dr. S. Quarrie, Cambridge Laboratory, Norwich, UK.) and a Dutch variety (Alexandria) of unknown tolerance. The experiment was conducted in a glass-house and supplementary lighting was used. Average temperature during the growth period was 25.9°C (maximum 37.8°C and minimum 14°C). Seeds of the seven wheat varieties were germinated on capillary matting in growth-room set at 18°C.

Seedlings were transplanted at two leaf stage into each system in pots 21×21×23 cm on 23-6-1994. Each pot contained sixteen plants in a 4×4 grid with plant-to-plant and row-to-row distances of 4 cm. There were three replicate pots of each variety in each system. A completely randomized design was used. In the hydroponic culture system, a modified Long Ashton Nutrient solution (Hewitt, 1966) was used in combination with Phostrogen (0-.5 g L–1, Phostrogen Ltd., Corwen, Clwyd, UK.) to supply macro and micro nutrients (Gorham et al., 1984). Salt stress was introduced in three increments over a period of 5 days, starting 6 days after transplanting. For the soil culture system (clay loam soil) was taken from a commercially cultivated fertile field that had been in a rotation of cereals and grass. It was sieved using 2 mm sieve to remove stones and placed in the pots. To create saline conditions two litres of 100 mol m–3 NaCI solution was applied twice a week to each pot.

To minitor salinity in the soil culture system three extra soil pots were prepared and watered in the same way as the experimental pots. Samples were taken regularly from these pots, usually before and one day after applying the saline water. Soil sample were air dried and the electrical conductivity (ECe) was determined using the method of Talsma (1968) and Loveday et al. (1972). On occasion when the soil was found dry and ECe was higher than 12 dS m–1, one liter water per pot was applied to decrease the ECe. The maximum ECH recorded during the growth period was 18.3 dS m–1 and the average ECe was 11.1 dS m–1. The EC in the hydroponic culture was 10 dS m–1.

The fully expended fourth and the flag leaves were sampled from two randomly selected plants per variety per pot. The leaves were rinsed quickly in distilled water and blotted dry with tissue paper. The samples were placed in Eppendorf tubes and stored in freezer set at -10°C. Cell sap was extracted by using the method of Gorham et al. (1984) and diluted with distilled water for the estimation of cations (Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+) using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Chlorides were measured with an ion selective electrode (Microprocessor lonalyzer/901).

The remaining plants (12 per pot) were harvested at maturity and main tiller height (cm), straw weight per plant (g), number of infertile and fertile spikelets per spike were recorded. Threshing was done by hand, number of grains per plant and grain weight per plant (g) were determined. Statistical analysis were performed by using the Minitab, SYSTAT statistical packages. Analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to assess significant differences (p < 0.05) between means of the wheat varieties. Linear correlation coefficients were computed among ion contents, yield and yield components.

Results and Discussion

The results of the experiment provided clear evidence that the performance of the varieties was affected by the system under which plants were raised. In the analysis of variance the variety×system interaction was significant for grain weight per plant (Table 1).

Table 1:Effects of variety x growing system on grain weight per plant in hydroponics and soil culture under saline conditions.
** = p < 0.01.

Grain weight per plant was significantly positively correlated with number of grain per plant in both systems. Number of grain weight per plant was also positively correlated with number of fertile spikelets per spike in hydroponic culture, but not in soil culture. There was negative correlation found between grain weight per plant and straw dry weight per plant in soil culture. There were very few linear correlation coefficients between ion contents and grain weight per plant. Mg2+ content were found to be significantly correlated with grain weight per plant in flag leaf in both systems. Grain weight per plant was positively correlated with K+ content and K+/Na+ ratio, and negatively correlated with Na+ and CI‾ contents in the fourth leaf, but not in the flag leaf in soil culture. system. None of these linear correlation coefficients were significant in the flag leaf (except in the case of K+ content) in hydroponic culture (Table 2).

There were very few significant correlation coefficients between ion contents in the fourth and flag leaves and non that were significant in both systems. Ion contents in the fourth leaf was correlated with ion contents in the flag leaf only in case of K+/Na+ ratio in soil culture and Na+ in hydroponic culture (Table 3). Ion contents in the fourth leaf were not correlated with ion contents in the flag leaf. Although the flag leaf is the most important contributing source of carbohydrate in grains (Thorne, 1982). In addition, the linear correlation coefficients between ion contents and grain weight per plant were significant only in case of the data for the fourth leaf in solution culture. These results cause doubt on the use of leaf ion contents as an indicator of salt tolerance. Similar results for wheat have been reported by Ashraf and McNeilly (1988) and they proposed that whole plant performance can be useful for assessment of salt tolerance. In contrast Salam et al. (1992) reported highly significant negative correlation coefficients between Na+, CI‾ and yield in wheat. They also reported high positive correlation coefficients between K+/Na+ ratio and yield. However, further experiments are required to establish the reasons why these apparently contrasting results have been found. Different research workers (Greenway and Munns, 1980; Kuiper et al., 1988; Weimberg and Shannon, 1988; Roy, 1991; Sastry and Prakash, 1993; Cramer et al., 1994) have suggested the use of different agronomic and physiological traits when screening crop plants for salt tolerance.

The linear correlation coefficients for Na+, K+, Cl‾ and Mg2+ contents of the seven wheat varieties between hydroponic and soil culture were found to be non significant except fourth leaf Ca2+ (r=0.874*) and flag leaf K+/Na+ ratio (r =0.933**). The linear correlation coefficients for grain weight per plant and most of yield components of the seven wheat varieties between hydroponic and soil culture were also found to be non significant, except straw weight per plant (r =0.829*) and number of infertile spikelets per spike (r =0.932**) (Table 4). Although linear correlation coefficients for straw weight per plant and number of infertile spikelets per spike were found significant and highly significant respectively, but they are not directly related to yield. However, it is concluded from the results that performance of genotypes in hydroponic culture is not correlated with the performance of genotypes in soil culture under saline conditions. Therefore, screening of genotypes for salt tolerance in hydroponic culture might be less useful.

Table 2:
Linear correlation coefficients between grain weight per plant and ion contents (mol m–3), K+/Na+ ratio in the fourth and flag leaves and various yield components of seven wheat varieties grown under saline conditions in hydroponics and soil culture systems.
NS = non-significant , * = significant, * = highly significant.

Table 3:
Linear correlation coefficients between Na+, K+, CI‾, Ca2+, Mg2+ contents (mol m–3) and K+/Na+ ratio in the fourth and flag leaves (data of seven wheat varieties from the soil and hydroponic culture systems) under saline conditions.
NS = non-significant, * = significant, ** = highly significant.

Table 4:Linear correlation coefficients between the values of ion contents (mol m–3), K+/Na+ ratio in the fourth and flag leaves and agronomic traits of seven wheat varieties recorded in hydroponic and soil culture systems.
NS = non-significant ,significant, *"= highly significant.
REFERENCES
1:  Ashraf, M. and T. McNeilly, 1988. Variability in salt tolerance of nine spring wheat cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 160: 14-21.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Cramer, G.R., G.J. Alberico and C. Schmidit, 1994. Salt tolerance is not associated with the sodium accumulation of two maize hybrids. Funct. Plant Biol., 21: 675-692.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

3:  Greenway, H. and R. Munns, 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., 31: 149-190.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Gorham, J., E. McDonnell and R.G.W. Jones, 1984. Pinitol and other solutes in salt-stressed Sesbania aculeata. Zeitschrift Pflanzenphysiologie, 114: 173-178.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  Kuiper, P.J.C., D. Kuiper and J. Schuit, 1988. Root functioning under stress conditions: An introduction. Plant Soil, 111: 249-253.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Loveday, J., H.J. Beatty and J.M. Norris, 1972. Comparison of Current Chemical Methods for Evaluating Irrigation Soils. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, ISBN: 064300033X, Pages: 19.

7:  Roy, P.K., 1991. Effect of salinity on variability and correlation in wheat seedlings. Ann. Arid Zone, 30: 61-63.

8:  Salam, A., J.R., Wyn, C.J., Gliddon and A. Scaife, 1992. Genetic Control of Salt Tolerance in Wheat (T. aestivum, L.). Proceedings of the 2nd Congress of the European Society Farming Agronomy Warwick UK., August 2-5, 1975, UK., pp: 132-133.

9:  Sastry, E.V.D. and V. Parkash, 1993. Effect of salinity on variation in Na+ and K+ contents in wheat seedlings. Ann. Arid Zone, 32: 257-259.

10:  Storey, R., 1995. Salt tolerance, ion relations and the effect of root medium on the response of citrus to salinity. Funct. Plant Biol., 22: 101-114.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Talsma, T., 1968. Soil Salinity, Part III. In: Environmental Studies of the Coleambally Irrigation Area and Surrounding Districts, Pels, S., M.E. Shannard and T. Talsma (Eds.). Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission, New South Wales, Sydney, pp: 35-48.

12:  Thorne, G.N., 1982. Distribution between parts of the main shoot and the tillers of photosynthate produced before and after anthesis in the top three leaves of main shoots of Hobbit and Maris Huntsman winter wheat. Ann. Applied Biol., 101: 553-559.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  Weimberg, R. and M.C. Shannon, 1988. Vigor and salt tolerance in 3 lines of tall wheatgrass. Physiologia Plantarum, 73: 232-237.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

14:  Wyn-Jones, R.G., 1981. Salt Tolerance. In: Process Limiting Plant Productivity, Johnson, C.B. (Ed.). Butterworths Press, London, pp: 272-291.

15:  Hewitt, E.J., 1966. Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition. 2nd Edn., Farnham Royal Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, UK., pp: 431-432.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved