• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology
  2. Vol 18 (3), 2023
  3. 104-111
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology

Year: 2023 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 104-111
DOI: 10.3923/jpt.2023.104.111
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Antibiotic Resistance Studies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Harbouring blaCTX-M-1-CTXM-82 and blaIMP-1/IMP-2 Encoding Genes from a Water Treatment Reservoir in South Eastern Nigeria

Okafor Collins Onyebuchi Okeke Okafor Collins Onyebuchi Okeke's LiveDNA, Ude Ibiam Ude Ude Ibiam Ude's LiveDNA, Ovia Kenneth Ndidi, Eromonsele Blessing Osose, Oduokpaha Godwin Edet, Adie Upekiema Francisca, Obasi David Chukwu Obasi David Chukwu's LiveDNA, Ani Peace Ani  Peace's LiveDNA, Ezeme-Nwafor Amarachukwu Chioma, Nwosu Mariagoretti Chimezie, Ezeme Udoakuchinyere Chimamanda and Iroha Ifeanyichukwu Romanus

ABSTRACT


Background and Objective: The detection of ARGs in drinking water systems in Nigeria is a serious wake-up call on the need for regular surveillance and control measures. This study was carried out to determine the presence of antibiotic-resistance genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from the Water Treatment Reservoir in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: A total of 70 samples of water were examined in this study. Bacteriological analysis of the test isolates was carried out using standard microbiology techniques. Antibiotic susceptibility studies of the test isolates were determined using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Isolates obtained were further identified and characterized by PCR analysis using 16S rRNA gene amplification. Results: A total of 56 (80%) isolates of Pseudomonas spp., were confirmed from 70 water samples tested. The isolates were resistant to imipenem (39.29%), ceftazidime (67.86%), ciprofloxacin (69.64%), ofloxacin (71.43%), ertapenem (83.93%) cefepime (85.71%), ticarcillin (89.29%), amikacin (89.29%), gentamicin (91.93%) and cefotaxime (92.86%) while showing complete resistant to amoxicillin\clavulanic acid, tobramycin, oxacillin and aztreonam (100%). The PCR analysis revealed that blaCTX-M-1-CTX-M-82 was present in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain F18 16S, Pseudomonas tolaasii strain ATCC 33618 16S, Pseudomonas mendocina strain Y20 16S and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain NA114 16S while blaIMP-1/IMP-2 gene was present only in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain F18 16S and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain NA114 16S. Conclusion: We, report the occurrence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas spp., harbouring Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase resistance genes from a water treatment reservoir in Nigeria.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation

How to cite this article

Okafor Collins Onyebuchi Okeke, Ude Ibiam Ude, Ovia Kenneth Ndidi, Eromonsele Blessing Osose, Oduokpaha Godwin Edet, Adie Upekiema Francisca, Obasi David Chukwu, Ani Peace, Ezeme-Nwafor Amarachukwu Chioma, Nwosu Mariagoretti Chimezie, Ezeme Udoakuchinyere Chimamanda and Iroha Ifeanyichukwu Romanus, 2023. Antibiotic Resistance Studies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Harbouring blaCTX-M-1-CTXM-82 and blaIMP-1/IMP-2 Encoding Genes from a Water Treatment Reservoir in South Eastern Nigeria. Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 18: 104-111.

DOI: 10.3923/jpt.2023.104.111

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jpt.2023.104.111

Search


INTRODUCTION


The detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa supports the general concern that organisms can act as a reservoir for resistance genes and spread antibiotic resistance to humans through water and food which may present a potential health risk to the public. Antimicrobial resistance has risen to all antibiotics introduced into general clinical practice in recent years and is likely to spread to any new antibiotics introduced in the future. The prevalence of antibiotic resistance in a developing country like Nigeria may represent a useful marker to monitor resistance genes because it can provide a good model for ecological studies concerning antimicrobial resistance1-4. The detection of ARGs in drinking water systems in Nigeria is a serious wake-up call on the need for regular surveillance and control measures which have been considered appropriate in other developed countries. This is the first time a study of this nature is been conducted in water treatment plants in Nigeria as a whole. Safe and portable drinking water is an inevitable factor for a robust healthy society, but clean water for drinking and domestic purpose remains inaccessible to 1.1 million people on a global scale2,5. In developing countries, sources of drinking water range from surface water, groundwater (such as well water and borehole water), spring water, saline water, bottled water and harvested rainwater. The presence of opportunistic and obligate pathogens such as Pseudomonas spp., Aeromonas spp., Klebsiella spp., Mycobacterium spp., Escherichia coli, Helicobacter spp., Salmonella spp. and Legionella spp., may increase the health risks associated with the consumption of water arises from these outlined sources6,7.

Antibiotic resistance is not restricted to nosocomial pathogenic or commensal microbes, but it is ubiquitous in the environment8. The environmental microbiome is considered to be the natural reservoir of potential antibiotic-resistance genes and has more diversity and novelty than ever expected8-10. Antibiotic resistance exists in ancient permafrost1,11,12, deep terrestrial sub-surfaces13, agriculture and animal husbandry and wastewaters3,6,14. Since most antibiotics originate from soil microbes, it is obvious that soil is a huge reservoir for antibiotic resistance8. The CTX-M β-lactamases originate from environmental Kluyvera species and quinolone resistance genes from Klebsiella pneumoniae4,15 showing the clear link from the environment to the clinic. Antibiotics have been used in animal farming and aquaculture as growth promoters, for prophylaxis and treatment of infections10,16,17. The use and misuse of antibiotics in the clinic, community and animal farming have resulted in the emergence and spread of resistant microbes through selection caused by the antibiotics.

Even sub-lethal antibiotic doses select and enrich antibiotic resistance in the environment18. The impact of increasing the use of antibiotics can be seen in archived soil samples where the resistance gene abundance increases from the 1940s to the present14. Previously, in the late 1960s bacteria began to show high resistance to penicillin in a threatening fashion. The resistance to penicillin was traced to beta-lactamase enzymes harboured by bacteria and these led to the development of beta-lactamase inhibitors (carbapenems) such as doripenem, panipenem, betamipron, biapenem, meropenem, ertapenem, imipenem-cilastatin and imipenem which is the chief among them with the broadest spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative19,20. It is quite unfortunate that bacterial pathogens that are resistant to this life-saving class of antibiotics have emerged. Antibiotic resistance genes are now considered environmental pollution and severe measures to prevent their further spread should be taken21. A Better understanding of reservoirs, as well as dissemination of Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARGs) is needed to curtail the resistance threat in the clinic and the environment1,22,23.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been found to display resistance or intermediate susceptibility to carbapenems, aminoglycosides, cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, which are commonly used anti-pseudomonal agents that have proved efficient in the treatment of the organism24-26. The development of new antibiotics or alternative therapeutic strategies for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections is urgently required for patients whose infections are resistant to conventional antibiotics. New antibiotics with novel modes of action, new routes of administration and resistance to modification by bacterial enzymes have been explored in recent years. Some of these newer antibiotics show excellent in-vitro antibacterial activity against some members of the genus such as P. aeruginosa as well as lower Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) compared to conventional antibiotics27-29.

However, owing to the rise of antibiotics resistance patterns in bacteria from both clinical, food and environmental organisms across the globe coupled with the identification of over sixty antibiotics resistance genes in Nigeria, more information on the reservoir organisms responsible for its spread via drinking water systems remain a challenge in developing economies, thus the need for this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Study area: This research work was carried out on the water treatment plant located at Ezillo, Ishielu Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Ishielu is a Local Government Area of Ebonyi State, Nigeria from September, 2020 through February, 2021. Ezillo town is the headquarters of Ishielu Local Government Area. Ishielu Local Government Area of Ebonyi State is bounded to the North by Benue State, to the South by Onicha Local Government and to the East by Ohaukwu and Ezza North Local Government and West by Enugu State. It has an area of 872 km2 and a population of 151, 048 at the 2006 National Census. Ishielu LGA has a tropical climate with an average relative humidity of 75% and may reach 80% during the rainy season. The area has annual rainfall between 2000 and 2500 mm and rainforest with atmospheric temperatures between 21 and 31°C. Two seasons are distinguishable in Ishielu LGA: A dry season (November to March) and a wet season (April and October). Ishielu Local Government Area lies on longitude 7°00 E and 8°00 and latitudes 4°45 and 6°17 N. The inhabitants of this area are mainly Igbo-speaking people who are actively engaged in various activities such as trading, craft, agriculture, government and public enterprises.

Sample collection and analysis: A total of 70 water samples were collected comprising 19, 18, 16 and 17 from the flocculation bed, sedimentation bed, filtration bed and filtration discharge pipes respectively for bacteriological analysis. The samples were cultured on nutrient agar on the same day of collection for further characterization.

The water samples collected from the Ezillo water treatment reservoir were analyzed and characterized using standard microbiological techniques which include re-culturing, Gram staining and biochemical and sugar fermentation tests. The pure cultures of the isolates were inoculated on cetrimide agar slants and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs for clear distinction of P. aeruginosa from other Pseudomonas spp. Other Pseudomonas spp., were characterized and identified using a combination of motility tests using the hanging drop method, colonial morphology, indole, methyl red, Voges Proskauer, citrate test, Gram stain reaction, smell, pyocyanin production on cetrimide agar, triple sugar Iron test for carbohydrate fermentation, oxidative-fermentation test, urease test, coagulase test and oxidase tests using standard microbiological procedures30,31.

The water samples collected were analyzed and characterized using standard microbiological techniques such as pure culture and Gram stain techniques. Further characterization of the isolates was done using biochemical and sugar fermentation tests. Pure culture of P. aeruginosa isolates was obtained using cetrimide agar at 37°C for 24 hrs whereas other Pseudomonas spp., were characterized using a combination of morphological examination and biochemical tests such as hanging drop method for motility, indole, methyl red, Voges Proskauer, citrate test, smell, pyocyanin production on cetrimide agar, triple sugar Iron test for carbohydrate fermentation, oxidative-fermentation test, urease test and catalase coagulase test30,31.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing: The following antibiotic disks: Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ciprofloxacin, (5 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), oxacillin (10 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), amikacin (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), tobramycin (30 μg) and ticarcillin (75 μg) were used in carrying out the antibiotic susceptibility test. The antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates was determined using the modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method31.

Molecular studies
Characterization of surface attachment genes: Isolates were tested for the presence of resistance genes by PCR analysis according to published procedures32. The oligonucleotide primers used for the PCR amplification/detection of used in this study CTX-M and IMP genes are F, TCTTCCAGAATAAGGAATCCC and R, CCGTTTCCGCTATTACAAA for CTX-M-1-CTX-M-82 with amplicon size of 900 bp and F, CGCAGCAGG GCA GTC and R, CAA AAG CGC AAC TTA CAA AC for IMP-1/IMP-2 with amplicon size of 250 bp33-36. The cycling conditions for PCR consisted of the following steps: Initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 36 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 55°C for 30 sec and elongation at 72°C for 45 sec. Followed by a final elongation step at 72°C for 7 min and hold temperature at 10°C forever.

RESULTS


Distribution of Pseudomonas spp., in water treatment plants in Nigeria: The distribution of the test isolates from the water treatment reservoir was shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Distribution of Pseudomonas spp., in water treatment reservoir in South Eastern Nigeria
Sample site
No. collected
No. positive (%)
Flocculation bed
19
17 (89.47)
Sedimentation bed
18
13 (72.00)
Filtration bed
16
12 (75.00)
Filtration discharge
17
14 (82.35)
Total
70
56 (80)
p-value
0.001


Table 2: Antibiotics susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated water treatment reservoir in Nigeria
Antibiotics
Disc potency (μg)
No. tested
No. susceptible (%)
No. resistant (%)
IPM
10
56
34 (60.71)
22 (39.29)
ETP
10
56
9 (16.07)
47 (83.93)
FEP
30
56
8 (14.29)
48 (85.71)
CAZ
30
56
18 (32.14)
38 (67.86)
CTX
30
56
14 (7.14)
42 (92.86)
AMC
30
56
0 (0.00)
56 (100.00)
TOB
10
56
0 (0.00)
56 (100.00)
TIC
75
56
6 (10.71)
50 (89.29)
OX
10
56
0 (0.00)
56 (100.00)
ATM
30
56
0 (0.00)
56 (100.00)
CN
30
56
5 (8.92)
51 (91.93)
AK
30
56
6 (10.71)
50 (89.29)
CIP
5
56
17 (30.36)
39 (69.64)
OFX
5
56
16 (28.57)
40 (71.43)
IPM: Imipenem, ETP: Ertapenem, FEP: Cefepime, CAZ: Ceftazidime, CTX: Cefotaxime, AMC: Amoxicillin, TOB: Tobramycin, TIC: Ticarcillin, OX: Oxacillin, ATM: Aztreonam, CN: Gentamicin, AK: Amikacin, CIP: Ciprofloxacin and OFX: Ofloxacin


Table 3: Multiple antibiotics resistance index (MARI) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, isolated from water treatment reservoir
Sample site MARI Resistance pattern
Flocculation bed 0.85 CTX, AMC, TOB, TIC, OX, ETP, FEP, CAZ, CN, AK, ATM and CIP
Sedimentation bed 0.71 ETP, FEP, CTX, AMC, TOB, TIC, OX, ATM, CN and AK
Filtration bed 0.64 CTX, AMC, ETP, TOB, TIC, OX, ATM, CN and AK
Filtration discharge 0.93 ETP, FEP, CTX, AMC, TOB, TIC, OX, ATM, CN, AK, CIP, OFX and CAZ
Mean±SD 0.78±0.13
p-value 0.002
ETP: Ertapenem, FEP: Cefepime, CAZ: Ceftazidime, CTX: Cefotaxime, AMC: Amoxicillin, TOB: Tobramycin, TIC: Ticarcillin, OX: Oxacillin, ATM: Aztreonam, CN: Gentamicin, AK: Amikacin, CIP: Ciprofloxacin and OFX: Ofloxacin


Table 4: BLAST results of selected sequenced organisms obtained from water samples
Isolate code Pairwise identity (%) NCBI accession E-value Identified organism
F10P2 76.10 KT005258 2.24E-48 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain NA114 16S
F17P2 83.30 NR_115613 1.36E-40 Pseudomonas tolaasii strain ATCC 33618 16S
Fd48P2 91.00 MH997639 0 Pseudomonas mendocina strain Y20 16S
F12P2 83.30 KX896753 3.04E-12 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain F18 16S
F19 90.50 MH997639 0 Pseudomonas mendocina strain Y20 16S

Data revealed that out of 19 water samples collected from the flocculation bed, 17 (89.47%) harboured Pseudomonas aeruginosa out of 18 water samples collected from the sedimentation bed, 13 (72%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa were isolated. A total of 12 (75%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated out of 16 water samples collected from the filtration bed while out of 17 water samples collected from the filtration discharge pipes 14 (82.35%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa, were isolated.

Antibiotics susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated water treatment plant in Nigeria: The antibiotic susceptibility of the test isolates from the water treatment reservoir was shown in Table 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to cefotaxime (7.14%), gentamicin (8.92%), amikacin (10.71%), ticarcillin (10.71%), cefepime (14.29%), ertapenem (16.07%), ofloxacin (28.57%), ciprofloxacin (30.36%),%), ceftazidime (32.14%) and imipenem (60.71%). The isolates were resistant to imipenem (39.29%), ceftazidime (67.86%), ciprofloxacin (69.64%), ofloxacin (71.43%), ertapenem (83.93%) cefepime (85.71%), ticarcillin (89.29%), amikacin (89.29%), gentamicin (91.93%), cefotaxime (92.86%), amoxicillin\clavulanic acid (100%), tobramycin (100%), oxacillin (100%) and aztreonam (100%).

The Multiple Antibiotics Resistance Index (MARI) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from the water treatment plant is shown in Table 3. The result shows that isolates from the flocculation bed, sedimentation bed, filtration bed and filtration discharge pipes had a MARI of 0.85, 0.71, 0.64 and 0.93, respectively.

Presence of antibiotic resistance genes in selected Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from water treatment reservoir: The blast result of ten selected isolates revealed that five among them were Pseudomonas species namely, Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain NA114 16S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain F18 16S, Pseudomonas tolaasii strain ATCC 33618 16S and two strains of Pseudomonas mendocina strain Y20 16S (Table 4).

Table 5: Antibiotic resistance genes encoded by test isolates obtained from water treatment reservoir
Test isolate Genes encoded
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain NA114 16S IMP-1/IMP-2
Pseudomonas tolaasii strain ATCC 33618 16S CTX-M-1-CTX-M-82
Pseudomonas mendocina strain Y20 16S CTX-M-1-CTX-M-82, IMP-1/IMP-2
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain F18 16S CTX-M-1-CTX-M-82, IMP-1/IMP-2
Pseudomonas mendocina strain Y20 16S CTX-M-1-CTX-M-82

Agarose gel electrophoresis result of PCR products of the antibiotic resistance genes revealed that CTX-M-1-CTX-M-82 was present in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain F18 16S, Pseudomonas tolaasii strain ATCC 33618 16S and Pseudomonas mendocina strain Y20 16S, while the IMP-1/IMP-2 gene was present in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain F18 16S and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain NA114 16S (Table 5).

DISCUSSION


Data in this study revealed that the occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the water treatment reservoir was high. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa test isolates also displayed high resistance to the antibiotics used for the study (Table 1-3). Three different species and four Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified in this study (Table 4). The CTX-M-1-CTX-M-82 genes and IMP-1/IMP-2 genes were present in Pseudomonas aeruginosa identified in this study (Table 5). Pseudomonas aeruginosa from water sources and nosocomial environment has been reported to show high multi-drug resistance to commonly used antibiotics according to published articles1,2,3,6,8,9. This resistance pattern has been traceable to some of the members of Pseudomonas spp., ability to harbour resistance genes and plasmid DNA1,31,36,37. These findings could be the reason for the organism’s ability to display multiple resistances to various commonly used antibiotics and its widespread pattern among isolates from both hospital and environmental systems. This is not only observed in Sub-Saharan Africa, where poor sanitation systems are the order of the day, it has also been observed in other countries outside Africa37,38. This high resistance of some Pseudomonas (especially P. aeruginosa) from the aquatic environment to antibiotics could be attributed to the misuse and overuse of antibiotics as well as the possession of drug-resistant plasmids by the organism. This stems from the possibility of bacteria pathogens acquiring antibiotic-resistant genes from members within and without the genera and species, thus creating pathotypes with new combinations of different virulence and resistance genes. This scenario will always arise due to selective pressure or overuse of antibiotics by humans or domestic animals and has contributed to a significant increase in antimicrobial resistance to specific antibiotics over a short time38-41.

The high antibiotic resistance displayed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in our studies to the group of penicillins (oxacillin and amoxicillin), monobactams (aztreonam) and carbapenems (imipenem and ertapenem) which are widely used beta-lactam antibiotics is indicative that the organism possesses both beta-lactamase enzymes and other resistant factors of which this study has confirmed. A scattered resistance among 81 carbapenem-resistant enteric bacteria isolated in the United Kingdom with transconjugants and transformants showed the small effect of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) enzymes against temocillin with OXA-48 together with NDM-1 showing clear resistance has been reported42. These report has become a public health concern in recent years as there seems to be a global increase in resistance to effective antibiotics used in the treatment of bacterial infections43-45. Pseudomonas spp., displaying Multiple Drug Resistance (MDR) to different classes of antibiotics used in this study is an ugly scenario that needs a quick approach to curtail the global increase of MDR among bacterial pathogens in water especially those with a nosocomial origin.

The presence of CTX-M-1-CTX-M-82 and IMP-1/IMP-2 encoding genes in bacteria isolated from water samples in this study potentially put the health of the community members who rely on these water sources at great inestimable jeopardy. These species when they infect the human system may lead to severe waterborne diseases46. The incidence of bacteria harbouring resistance genes in drinking water facilities as observed in this study might be a result of resistance genes being maintained within aquatic populations to protect bacteria from antimicrobial agents produced by other microflora in their environmental niche. The presence of a diversity of resistance genes might constitute a pool of resistance genes capable of moving among bacteria in the aquatic environment and possibly being transmitted to other pathogens in both food sources and nosocomial environments1,47,48. The diversity of ESBL-producing organisms in both treated and untreated water samples to their mode of transfer is becoming a current issue of importance across the globe. Antibiotic resistance genes that have been identified in Pseudomonas spp. and other bacteria from the aquatic environment in Nigeria and countries such as China, India, Portugal, Spain, Ireland, Cyprus, Germany, Finland and Norway have been reported49. The genes detected include blaCTX-M-27, tet (A), sul1, bla TEM and aph (3") (c), aadE, strA, strB, tetA, sulII, intl1 and Tn916. these genes were detected from river sediment, drinking water treatment systems and finished treated water. In the nosocomial environment, genes such as blaTem, blaOXA, blaCTX-M-15, blaVim, blaGes, blaVeb, blaDIM, AmpC and Efflux pump genes encoding MexA, B-oprM, Mex C, D-oprJ, Mex X, Y-oprN, oprD, nfxB, MexR and class A group of ESBLs such as TEM, SHV, CTX-M, PER, VEB, GES and IBC families prevalent among P. aeruginosa has also been reported50. Even the Class D, OXA-type ESBL enzymes in P. aeruginosa harbouring MBL genes such as IMP, VIM, SPM, GIM and recently reported DIM families have been reported from nearly all regions of the globe50-54.

The detection of ARGs in drinking water systems in Nigeria is a serious wake-up call on the need for regular surveillance and control measures which have been considered appropriate in other developed regions. This situation can pose a high possibility of dissemination of resistance determinants within the water systems from one bacterium to the other and possibly to clinical isolates in some instances. These findings emphasize the importance of rapid and accurate detection of these resistance genes to ensure appropriate infection control and the importance of continued surveillance programs in the general environment. Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes supports the general concern that Pseudomonas species can act as a reservoir for the resistance genes and its spread to humans through water and food chain and may present a potential health risk. In recent times, antimicrobial resistance has risen to all antibiotics introduced into general clinical practice and is likely to arise to any new antibiotics introduced in the future. It is imperative to consider what can be done to minimize the development and transfer of antibiotic resistance gene clusters.

CONCLUSION


This study has shown that water samples obtained from water treatment plants harboured Pseudomonas spp. It was observed that the rate of contamination was high in the various treatment units. The result obtained from the antibiotic susceptibility profile of isolates showed multiple resistance to gentamicin, amikacin, ticarcillin, cefotaxime, cefepime, ceftazidime, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin\clavulanic acid, tobramycin, oxacillin, ofloxacin and aztreonam and imipenem. Data on multiple antibiotic resistance profiles of bacterial isolates revealed that there has been an indiscriminate use of the antibiotics tested. The result of PCR analysis revealed that the isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa harboured resistance genes.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT


This study discovered the presence of antibiotic resistance genes responsible for multi-drug resistance patterns from drinking water sources in Ebonyi State, South Eastern Nigeria. This suggests that there exists a high degree of disproportionate use of antibiotics in clinical, agricultural and environmental practices within the region. The finding in our study on the presence of ARGs in drinking water treatment plants provides insight into and effective assessment of the potential risk of ARGs in drinking water treatment systems at the catchment scale. This study will help to develop effective algorithms for rapid and accurate detection of these resistance genes to ensure appropriate infection control and the importance of continued surveillance programs in the general environment.

REFERENCES


  1. Okafor, C.O.O., I.R. Iroha, I.U. Ude, S.C. Onuoha and C. Ejikeugwu et al., 2022. Drug resistance profile of biofilm forming Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from aquatic environment in South Eastern Nigeria. Environ. Challenges, Vol. 8.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  2. Okeke, O.C.O., I.I. Romanus, N.I. Anthony, A. Nnabuife, E. Obehi and O.S. Chijindu, 2015. Antimicrobial resistance pattern of coliform bacteria isolated from sachet and borehole waters sold in Abakaliki metropolis of Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Int. J. Innovation Sci. Res., 16: 526-532.
    Direct Link

  3. Maes, S., T. Vackier, S.N. Huu, M. Heyndrickx and H. Steenackers et al., 2019. Occurrence and characterisation of biofilms in drinking water systems of broiler houses. BMC Microbiol., Vol. 19.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Chika, E., I. Ifeanyichukwu, O. Benigna, O.O. Loveday and E. Stanley et al., 2017. Emerging multidrug resistant metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) positive Klebsiella species from cloacal swabs of poultry birds. J. Bacteriol. Parasitol., Vol. 8.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Anversa, L., R.C.A. Stancari, M. Garbelotti, L. da Silva Ruiz and V.B.R. Pereira et al., 2019. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in public water supply. Water Pract. Technol., 14: 732-737.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Kekeç, Ö., B. Gökalsın, İ. Karaltı, F.E. Kayhan and N.C. Sesal, 2016. Effects of chlorine stress on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm and analysis of related gene expressions. Curr. Microbiol., 73: 228-235.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  7. Ude, I.U., I.B. Moses, C. Okoronkwo, K. Ovia and C. Okafor et al., 2021. Phytochemical properties and antimicrobial activity of Buchholzia coriacea and Psychotria microphylla leaf extracts on bacterial pathogens isolated from aquatic environments in Nigeria. J. Med. Plants Res., 15: 232-240.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  8. Etebu, E. and I. Arikekpar, 2016. Antibiotics: Classification and mechanisms of action with emphasis on molecular perspectives. Int. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Res., 4: 90-101.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Munita, J.M. and C.A. Arias, 2016. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Spectrum, Vol. 4.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. Onuoha, S.C., N.F. Oko, V.M. Agah, I. Okorafor and C.O. Okafor, 2020. Antibiotic susceptibility study of Salmonella species isolated from poultry farms in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Int. J. Biol. Pharm. Allied Sci., 9: 481-493.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Iroha, I.R., I.U. Ude, C. Okoronkwo, K. Ovia, C.O.O. Okafor and S.O. Akuma, 2020. Comparative assessment of physicochemical characteristics, metal levels and anion contents of water from different aquatic environments in Ebonyi State. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res., 29: 22834-22865.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  12. D'Costa, V.M., C.E. King, L. Kalan, M. Morar and W.W.L. Sung et al., 2011. Antibiotic resistance is ancient. Nature, 477: 457-461.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. Brown, M.G. and D.L. Balkwill, 2009. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria isolated from the deep terrestrial subsurface. Microb. Ecol., 57: 484-493.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Auerbach, E.A., E.E. Seyfried and K.D. McMahon, 2007. Tetracycline resistance genes in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants. Water Res., 41: 1143-1151.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  15. Czekalski, N., E.G. Díez and H. Bürgmann, 2014. Wastewater as a point source of antibiotic-resistance genes in the sediment of a freshwater lake. ISME J., 8: 1381-1390.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  16. Walsh, F. and B. Duffy, 2013. The culturable soil antibiotic resistome: A community of multi-drug resistant bacteria. PLoS ONE, Vol. 8.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  17. Baquero, F., J.L. Martinez and R. Cantón, 2008. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 19: 260-265.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  18. Cabello, F.C., 2006. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: A growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ. Microbiol., 8: 1137-1144.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  19. Roca, I., M. Akova, F. Baquero, J. Carlet and M. Cavaleri et al., 2015. The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: Science for intervention. New Microbes New Infect., 6: 22-29.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  20. Kraemer, S.A., A. Ramachandran and G.G. Perron, 2019. Antibiotic pollution in the environment: From microbial ecology to public policy. Microorganisms, Vol. 7.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Knapp, C.W., S.M. McCluskey, B.K. Singh, C.D. Campbell, G. Hudson and D.W. Graham, 2011. Antibiotic resistance gene abundances correlate with metal and geochemical conditions in archived scottish soils. PLoS ONE, Vol. 6.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Papp-Wallace, K.M., A. Endimiani, M.A. Taracila and R.A. Bonomo, 2011. Carbapenems: Past, present, and future. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 55: 4943-4960.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  23. Andersson, D.I. and D. Hughes, 2012. Evolution of antibiotic resistance at non-lethal drug concentrations. Drug Resist. Updates, 15: 162-172.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. Wellington, E.M.H., A.B.A. Boxall, P. Cross, E.J. Feil and W.H. Gaze et al., 2013. The role of the natural environment in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Lancet Infect. Dis., 13: 155-165.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  25. Miranda, C.D., A. Tello and P.L. Keen, 2013. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in finfish aquaculture environments. Front. Microbiol., Vol. 4.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  26. Weiner, L.M., A.K. Webb, B. Limbago, M.A. Dudeck and J. Patel et al., 2016. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: Summary of data reported to the national healthcare safety network at the centers for disease control and prevention, 2011-2014. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol., 37: 1288-1301.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  27. El Solh, A.A. and A. Alhajhusain, 2009. Update on the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 64: 229-238.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  28. Walkty, A., H. Adam, M. Baxter, A. Denisuik and P. Lagacé-Wiens et al., 2014. In vitro activity of plazomicin against 5,015 gram-negative and gram-positive clinical isolates obtained from patients in Canadian hospitals as part of the CANWARD study, 2011-2012. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 58: 2554-2563.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  29. Cigana, C., F. Bernardini, M. Facchini, B. Alcalá-Franco and C. Riva et al., 2016. Efficacy of the novel antibiotic POL7001 in preclinical models of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 60: 4991-5000.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  30. Okeke, O.C.O., N.I. Anthony, A.N. Bernard, E.O. Eugene and O.S. Chijindu, 2015. Presence of multi drug resistant coliform bacteria isolated from biofilm of sachet and borehole waters sold in Abakaliki metropolis, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 4: 59-64.
    Direct Link

  31. Iroha, I.R., E.S. Amadi, A.E. Oji, A.C. Nwuzo and P.C. Ejike-Ugwu, 2010. Detection of plasmid borne extended spectrum beta lactamase enzymes from blood and urine isolates of gram-negative bacteria from a University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. Curr. Res. Bacteriol., 3: 77-83.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Talukdar, P.K., M. Rahman, M. Rahman, A. Nabi and Z. Islam et al., 2013. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors and genetic diversity of Escherichia coli isolates from household water supply in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PLoS ONE, Vol. 8.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  33. da Silva Filho, L.V.F., J.E. Levi, C.N.O. Bento, S.R.T. da Silva Ramos and T. Rozov, 1999. PCR identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and direct detection in clinical samples from cystic fibrosis patients. J. Med. Microbiol., 48: 357-361.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  34. Sturenburg, E., M. Lang, M.A. Horstkotte, R. Laufs and D. Mack, 2004. Evaluation of the microscan ESBL plus confirmation panel for detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in clinical isolates of oxyimino-cephalosporin resistant Gram-negative bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 54: 870-875.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  35. Akaniro, I.R., C.E. Oguh, K.A. Kafilat, I. Ahmed and C.C. Ezeh, 2019. Physicochemical properties, bacteriological quality and antimicrobial resistance profile of isolates from groundwater sources in Ile-Ife suburbs, Southwest Nigeria. J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol., 13: 58-65.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  36. Moghadam, R.N., F. Roodbari, M.N. Nasab, D. Mansouri and S.Z. Mirbagheri et al., 2018. The frequency of VIM 2, 3, 9, 11 and VIM all among metallo-beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Ilam Univ. Med. Sci., 26: 43-52.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  37. Shahid, M., A. Malik and Sheeba, 2003. Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains harbouring R-plasmids and AmpC β-lactamases isolated from hospitalised burn patients in a tertiary care hospital of North India. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 228: 181-186.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  38. Brown, E.E.F., A. Cooper, C. Carrillo and B. Blais, 2019. Selection of multidrug-resistant bacteria in medicated animal feeds. Front. Microbiol. Vol. 10.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  39. Livermore, D.M., M. Warner, S. Mushtaq, M. Doumith, J. Zhang and N. Woodford, 2011. What remains against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae? Evaluation of chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, colistin, fosfomycin, minocycline, nitrofurantoin, temocillin and tigecycline. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 37: 415-419.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  40. Patel, G. and R.A. Bonomo, 2011. Status report on carbapenemases: Challenges and prospects. Expert Rev. Anti-infective Ther., 9: 555-570.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  41. Onuoha, S., F. Oko, C. Okafor and K. Ovia, 2022. Multidrug resistant vibrio species isolated from abattoir and aquaculture environment in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Int. J. Appl. Biol., 6: 1-11.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  42. Fretin, D., A.M. Whatmore, S. Al Dahouk, H. Neubauer and B. Garin-Bastuji et al., 2008. Brucella suis identification and biovar typing by real-time PCR. Vet. Microbiol., 131: 376-385.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  43. Schmidt, A.S., M.S. Bruun, J.L. Larsen and I. Dalsgaard, 2001. Characterization of class 1 integrons associated with R-plasmids in clinical Aeromonas salmonicida isolates from various geographical areas. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 47: 735-743.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  44. Bouki, C., D. Venieri and E. Diamadopoulos, 2013. Detection and fate of antibiotic resistant bacteria in wastewater treatment plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 91: 1-9.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  45. Lu, J., Z. Tian, J. Yu, M. Yang and Y. Zhang, 2018. Distribution and abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in sand settling reservoirs and drinking water treatment plants across the Yellow River, China. Water, Vol. 10.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  46. Murugan, N., J. Malathi, K.L. Therese and H.N. Madhavan, 2018. Application of six multiplex PCR's among 200 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for the detection of 20 drug resistance encoding genes. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci., 34: 79-88.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  47. Queenan, A.M. and K. Bush, 2007. Carbapenemases: The versatile β-Lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 20: 440-458.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  48. Rawat, D. and D. Nair, 2010. Extended-spectrum ß-lactamases in gram negative bacteria. J. Global Infect. Dis. 2: 263-274.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  49. Lu, S.Y., Y.L. Zhang, S.N. Geng, T.Y. Li and Z.M. Ye et al., 2010. High diversity of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in an urban river sediment habitat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 76: 5972-5976.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  50. Adesoji, A.T., A.A. Ogunjobi, I.O. Olatoye and D.R. Douglas, 2015. Prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes among multi-drug resistant bacteria from selected water distribution systems in Southwestern Nigeria. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob., Vol. 14.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  51. Pärnänen, K.M.M., C. Narciso-da-Rocha, D. Kneis, T.U. Berendonk and D. Cacace et al., 2019. Antibiotic resistance in European wastewater treatment plants mirrors the pattern of clinical antibiotic resistance prevalence. Sci. Adv., Vol. 5.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  52. Karami, N., F. Nowrouzian, I. Adlerberth and A.E. Wold, 2006. Tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli and persistence in the infantile colonic microbiota. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother., 50: 156-161.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  53. Yang, H., S.H. Wei, J.L. Hobman and C.E.R. Dodd, 2020. Antibiotic and metal resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from pig slaughterhouses in the United Kingdom. Antibiotics, Vol. 9.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  54. Kim, S., J. Hu, R. Gautom, J. Kim, B. Lee and D.S. Boyle, 2007. CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases, Washington State. Emerging Infect. Dis., 13: 513-514.
    CrossRefDirect Link

Search


Related Articles

Detection of Plasmid Borne Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase Enzymes from Blood and Urine Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacteria from a University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved