Antibacterial Activity and Sub-chronic Toxicity Studies of Vitellaria paradoxa Stem Bark Extract
This study was designed to assess the antibacterial activity of stem bark extract of Vitellaria paradoxa and its effect on haematological and biochemical parameters. The aqueous and ethanol extracts of stem bark of Vitellaria paradoxa at a concentration of 50 mg mL-1 were tested on clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pyogenes using agar well-dilution method. The 12 mg kg-1 b.wt. of the ethanol extract was administered for 28 days to a group of rats to assess its effects on the hematological indices, serum levels of creatinine and urea and activities of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The LD50 of the ethanol extract was determined to be 115 mg kg-1 b.wt. in mice. All the bacteria were susceptible except Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pyogenes that showed resistance to both aqueous and ethanol extracts. Ethanol extract was observed to exhibit more antibacterial activity at equivalent dose compared to aqueous extract. All hematological parameters were not significantly altered except the platelet count which was significantly (p<0.05) reduced. Serum levels of creatinine, urea, ALT, AST and ALP were significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated rats compared with control.
Received: April 10, 2012;
Accepted: July 04, 2012;
Published: September 14, 2012
The discovery of sulphonamide antibiotics in 1930s and penicillin in 1940s
resulted in a dramatic reduction in fatality rates associated with bacterial
infections (Butler and Buss, 2006). This breakthrough
in the treatment of bacterial infections prompted a concerted effort at searching
for more novel antibiotics during the following three decades and this search
has produced many of the antibacterial drugs that are of clinical importance
today, many of which are of natural product origin (Walsh
and Wright, 2005). However, the recent global emergence of bacteria that
are totally or almost totally resistant to available antibiotics is a big challenge
because treatment options for infected patients are becoming more and more limited.
This has necessitated a continuous search for new antibacterial drugs to replace
those ones to which bacteria have developed resistance (Walsh
and Amyes, 2004). Many antibacterial agents are available in nature for
the treatment of systemic infections. Medicinal plants constitute good source
of active agents for this purpose and many plants extracts have been reported
to possess various antimicrobial activities (Nawel et
Vitellaria paradoxa (Sapotaceae) is a plant of African origin whose
leaves, root, fruits and stem bark have been used in the treatment of various
infections such as wound infections, skin diseases, diarrhea, dysentery, helminths
and other gastrointestinal tract infections (Soladoye et
al., 1989). This plant flourishes in Savanna zones of Nigeria. It is
known as Shea-butter tree in English, Kadanya in Hausa, Okwuma
in Igbo and Emi in Yoruba languages. Stem bark of Vitellaria
paradoxa showed significant antifungal effect against clinical isolates
of Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Epidermophyton floccosum,
Microsporum audouinii and Trichophyton mentagrophytes (Ahmed
et al., 2009). The bark is used to suppress cough and also to treat
leprosy (Ferry et al., 1974). The root of the
Vitellaria paradoxa when used as chewing stick has been found to be useful
in the treatment of oral infection (Ndukwe et al.,
2005). Phytochemical screening of the stem bark extracts of the plant revealed
the presence of carbohydrates, alkaloids, saponins, tannins and cardiac glycosides
(El-Mahmood et al., 2008). In line with the need
to search for more effective and safe antibacterial drugs and to justify the
traditional use of Vitellaria paradoxa in the treatment of infectious
diseases, this study was designed to assess the toxicological effects of ethanol
extract and the antibacterial activities of both ethanol and aqueous extracts
of the stem bark of Vitellaria paradoxa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collection of plant materials: Samples of the stem bark of Vitellaria paradoxa were collected in April from the Permanent Site Campus of the University of Ilorin, Nigeria. The stem bark samples were authenticated at the Herbarium Unit of the Department of Plant Biology, University of Ilorin, Nigeria where voucher specimen was deposited. The study was conducted between April, 2011 and July, 2011.
Animals: Healthy Swiss mice (20-25 g) and albino Wistar rats (180-200
g) used in the study were obtained from the Animal House of the College of Health
Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria. They
were maintained under standard laboratory conditions of humidity (40-60%), temperature
(21±1°C) and light (12/12 h light/dark cycle). The animals were acclimatized
for one week, fed on rat pellets (Livestock Feeds PLC, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria)
and allowed free access to drinking water ad libitum. They were fasted
overnight before the experiment was carried out. All conditions of animal use
were as approved by United States National Institute of Health (NIH) guide for
Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and in accordance with the recommendation
of IASP (Zimmermann, 1983).
Preparation of the plant extracts: The stem bark of V. paradoxa was air-dried under shade to constant weight for 14 days and the dried materials were chopped into small pieces using a pestle and mortar and then pulverized into powdery form using an electric blender. One hundred grams of the powdered plant material was soaked in 500 mL of distilled water or 95% ethanol in separate 1.5 L sterile conical flasks at room temperature. These were subjected to uniform agitation in a shaker water bath for 48 h. The content was then filtered with a piece of muslin cloth and then Whatman filter paper (No. 1). The filtrates were evaporated to dryness and the resultant extracts were packed in separate clean dry bottles and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C until use. The yields of aqueous and ethanol extracts are 0.6 and 0.8%, respectively.
Collection and identification of bacteria: The clinical isolates of
E. coli, K. pneumonia, P. mirabilis, E. faecalis, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa
and S. pyogenes were collected in peptone water from the Microbiology
Laboratory of Nigeria Institute of Medical Research, Lagos, Nigeria Preliminary
identification of the test organisms were carried out in the Microbiology Laboratory
of LAUTECH Teaching Hospital, Osogbo, Nigeria. The organisms were stored on
Nutrient agar slants in a refrigerator (2-8°C). Purity of the cultures was
checked at regular intervals as described by Acheampong
et al. (1988).
Determination of antimicrobial activity: Antimicrobial activities of
aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Vitellaria paradoxa were carried out
using the agar well diffusion method (Vanden Berghe and Vlietnck,
1991). The bacterial strains grown on nutrient agar at 37°C for 18 h
were suspended in a saline solution (0.9%, w/v) NaCl and adjusted to a turbidity
of 0.5 McFarland standard (108 CFU mL-1). To obtain the
inocula, these suspensions were diluted 100 times in Muller Hinton broth to
give 106 colony forming units (CFU) mL-1. Standardized
inoculum of each test bacterium was spread onto nutrient agar plates so as to
achieve even growth and the plates were allowed to dry. Discs were obtained
using Whatman filter paper (No. 1). They were prepared by punching and then
put in vials-bottles and sterilized in an oven at 150°C for 15 min. Thereafter
the discs (9 mm diameter) were aseptically bored into the solid nutrient agar
using a sterile cork borer. The test solutions of extracts at concentration
of 50 mg mL-1 were then introduced into each of the designated discs
on each plate while ensuring that no spillage occurred. Sparfloxacin at a concentration
of 5 μg mL-1 (Solidum Pharmaceuticals, Nigeria) was used as
a positive control and distilled water as negative control. The plates were
left at room temperature for 1 h, allowed to diffuse into the medium, turned
upside-down and thereafter incubated at 37°C for 24 h in an incubator. Clear
zones of inhibition were observed. Activity of each extract was tested in triplicate
and the diameters of zones of inhibition were measured in millimeter.
Acute toxicity test: The ethanol extract of V. paradoxa was tested
because of its higher antibacterial activity against all the bacteria considered.
Mice were divided into six groups of six animals each. The extract was administered
to mice in groups 2-6 in single oral doses of 20, 40, 80, 160, 320 and 640 mg
kg-1 b. wt., respectively by intra gastric gavage using oral cannula
(a feeding needle). The control group (group 1) received an equal volume of
distilled water as vehicle. Observations of toxic symptoms were made and recorded
within 24 h after administration of the extract. Behavioral parameters and mortality
were monitored closely for the initial 2 h and thereafter for 24 h. Lethal dose
in fifty per-cent of the total population (LD50) was interpolated
using Lorke (1983) method.
Effects on hematological and biochemical parameters: Ten albino Wistar
rats were used for the study. They were randomly divided into 2 groups of 5
rats each. Group 1 served as the control and received normal saline (5 mL kg-1).
Group 2 was treated with 12 mg kg-1 of the extract for 28 days. All
drugs were administered orally. On the 29th day, rats were anaesthetized in
a glass chamber containing cotton wool soaked in diethyl ether and blood samples
were collected by cervical decapitation into clean lithium heparin bottles.
The blood samples were centrifuged for 5 min and the supernatant plasma was
subsequently used for the assay of biochemical parameters while whole blood
was used for hematological assays. An automated hematologic analyzer (Sysmex
KX-21, Japan) was used to analyze the hematological parameters of Hemoglobin
(Hb), Packed Cell Volume (PCV), Red Blood Cell (RBC), Hematocrit (HCT), Mean
Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) and Mean Corpuscular
Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), White Blood Cell (WBC), neutrophils, lymphocytes
and platelets. AST, AL, ALP, serum urea and creatinine levels were determined
as described by Toro and Ackermann (1975).
Statistical analysis: All data were expressed as Mean±SEM and statistically analyzed by Students t-test at 95% confidence limit.
Oral dosing of 20, 40, 80, 160, 320 and 640 mg kg-1 of the ethanol extract resulted in different percentage death of the rats as shown below (Table 4). LD50 was calculated as 115 mg kg-1 from a curve of log dose vs. %response. Behavioral changes observed include reduced motor activity, increased breathing rate and abdominal writhes.
Both aqueous and ethanol extracts demonstrated antimicrobial activity against five out of the seven bacteria strains but ethanol extract demonstrated higher antibacterial activity especially on K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis and S. aureus. P. aeruginosa and S. pyogenes were completely resistant to both extracts. These results are presented in Table 1.
Following the treatment of rats with ethanol extract of V. paradoxa for 28 days, ALP, ALT, AST, creatinine and urea plasma levels of the treated rats increased significantly (p<0.05) compared with the control (Table 2). There was no significant difference between the control and test groups in the haematological indices tested except the platelets which significantly decreased in the test group (Table 3).
|| Antibacterial activity of stem bark extract of Vitellaria
|Value are represents Mean±SEM for three trials, na:
Non-measurable zone of inhibition, ap<0.05 compared with negative
control which has no antibacterial activity
|| Effects of stem bark ethanol extract of Vitellaria paradoxa
on biochemical parameters in rats
|Values are Mean±SEM (n = 5), ap<0.05
compared with control
|| The effects of stem bark ethanol extract of Vitellaria
paradoxa on haematological parameters in rats
|Values are Mean±SEM (n = 5), *p<0.05 compared with
|| Acute toxicity of ethanol extract of Vitellaria paradoxa
Ethanol extract of V. paradoxa exhibited inhibitory effect on the growth
of E. coli, K. pneumonia, P. mirabilis, E. faecalis and S. aureus
but not on P. aeruginosa and S. pyogenes. The organisms that are
susceptible to the extract are known to cause many life-threatening diseases
such as meningitis, endocarditis urinary tract infections and gastrointestinal
tract infections among others (Adebayo and Ishola, 2009).
So the extract could be a good alternative in the treatment of these infectious
diseases. S. aureus exhibited the highest sensitivity followed by E.
faecalis. This is an indication that Gram-positive bacteria are more susceptible
to the antimicrobial effect of V. paradoxa than Gram-negative bacteria.
This is consistent with previous studies on other medicinal plants (Ceylan
and Fung, 2004; Lopez et al., 2005). The
significant differences in the outer layers of Gram-negative and Gram-positive
bacteria may be responsible for this observation. The resistance of Gram-negative
bacteria towards antimicrobial agents is related to the hydrophilic surface
of their outer membrane which is rich in lipopolysaccharide molecules, presenting
a barrier to the penetration of numerous antibiotic molecules (Shan
et al., 2007). It is also associated with the enzymes in the periplasmic
space, which are capable of breaking down the molecules introduced from outside
(Russel, 1991). Gram-positive bacteria lack this outer
coating and cell wall. Therefore the cell wall of Gram-positive organisms is
more prone to destruction by antibacterial agents. However it should be noted
that the extract also exerted some moderate activity on Gram-negative bacteria
used for the study except in P. aeruginosa in which it was completely
devoid of activity. The sensitivity of K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis
and E. coli to the extract agrees with the work of El-Mahmood
et al. (2008). Ethanol extract of the plant has higher antibacterial
effect than water extract. This is probably because ethanol extracted more of
the phytochemical constituents of the plant that are responsible for its antibacterial
Phytochemical studies of stem bark of V. paradoxa revealed the presence
of alkaloids, tannins, saponins, steroids and carbohydrates (Ndukwe
et al., 2007). These bioactive compounds are likely responsible for
the antimicrobial activity of the plant against the organisms (Ndukwe
et al., 2005). There was significant increase in the plasma levels
of ALT, AST and ALP of rats treated with ethanol extract of the plant for 28
days. Increase in the levels of these enzymes is an indicator of tissue damage
and altered membrane permeability (Kolawole et al.,
2011). Damage to liver, kidney, bone and small intestine may increase the
level of ALP in blood (Adedapo et al., 2007).
Increase in creatinine and urea levels is an indication of injury to the kidney
(Aliyu et al., 2007).
The platelets count in the treated rats was significantly lower (p<0.05)
than that of the control. Platelets are involved in the regulation of clotting
when there is injury to the blood vessel walls. When platelet count is low,
clot retraction is deficient and there is poor contraction of ruptured vessels
(Ganong, 2002) which results in increasing bleeding tendency
after a minor injury.
This work has demonstrated that Vitellaria paradoxa stem bark extract possesses broad spectrum antibacterial activity against some clinical isolate of pathogenic bacteria. The finding justifies the use of the plant in traditional treatment of wounds, leprosy, oral infection and other infectious diseases and therefore has promising potential to provide lead molecules for the development of novel antibacterial drugs. The study also showed that prolonged administration of the plant extract at high doses may adversely affect the functions of some vital organs. Further study of the plant is necessary to isolate the active principles and determine the mechanism of action.
Acheampong, Y.B., M.A. El-Mahmood and P.F. Olurinola, 1988.
The antibacterial properties of the liquid antiseptic TCP. Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 50: 183-186.Direct Link |
Adebayo, E.A. and R.O. Ishola, 2009.
Phytochemical and antimicrobial screening of the crude extracts from the root, stem bark and leaves of Bridelia ferruginea
. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8: 650-653.Direct Link |
Adedapo, A.A., M.O. Abatan and O.O. Olorunsogo, 2007.
Effects of some plants of spurge family on the haematological and biochemical parameters of rats. Vet. Archiv., 77: 29-38.Direct Link |
Ahmed, R.N., A. Sani and O.O. Igunnugbemi, 2009.
Antifungal profiles of extracts of Vitellaria paradoxa
(Shea-Butter) bark. Ethnobotanical Leaflets, 13: 679-688.Direct Link |
Aliyu, R., A.H. Adebayo, D. Gatsing and I.H. Garba, 2007.
The effects of ethanolic leaf extract of Commiphora Africana
(Burseraceae) on rat liver and kidney functions. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 2: 373-379.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Butler, M.S. and A.D. Buss, 2006.
Natural products-the future scaffolds for novel antibiotics? Biochem. Pharmacol., 71: 919-929.PubMed |
Ceylan, E. and D.Y.C. Fung, 2004.
Antimicrobial activity of spices. J. Rapid Methods Automat. Microbiol., 12: 1-55.CrossRef |
El-Mahmood, A.M., J.H. Doughari and N. Ladan, 2008.
Antimicrobial screening of stem bark extracts of Vitellaria paradixa
against some enteric pathogenic microorganisms. Afr. J. Pharm., 2: 89-94.Direct Link |
Ferry, M.P., M. Gessain and R. Gessain, 1974.
Vegetative Propagation of Shea, Kola and Pentadesma. Cocoa Res. Inst. Ghana Ann. Rep., 1987/88: 98-100.
Ganong, W.F., 2002.
Review of Medical Physiology. 20th Edn., Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, Medical Publishing Division, London, pp: 414-417
Kolawole, S.O., O.T. Kolawole and M.A. Akanji, 2011.
Effects of aqueous extract of Khaya senegalensis
Stem Bark on biochemical and hematological parameters in rats. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 6: 602-607.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Lopez, P., C. Sanchez, R. Batlle and C. Nerin, 2005.
Solid- and vapor-phase antimicrobial activities of six essential oils: Susceptibility of selected foodborne bacterial and fungal strains. J. Agric. Food Chem., 53: 6939-6946.CrossRef | PubMed |
Lorke, D., 1983.
A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing. Arch. Toxicol., 54: 275-287.CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
Nawel, H., R.B. Ammar, W. Afef, K. Soumaya and M. Amor et al
Antibacterial and antimutagenic activity of extracts and essential oil from (Tunisia) Pistacia lentiscus
. Toxicol. Envir. Chem., 87: 567-573.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Ndukwe, K.C., I.N. Okeke, A. Lamikanra, S.K. Adesina and O. Aboderin, 2005.
Antibacterial activity of aqueous extracts of selected chewing sticks. J. Contemp. Dent. Prac., 6: 86-94.PubMed | Direct Link |
Ndukwe, I.G., J.O. Amupitan, Y. Isah and K.S. Adegoke, 2007.
Phytochemical and antimicrobial screening of the crude extracts from the root, stem bark and leaves of Vitellaria paradoxa
. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 6: 1905-1909.Direct Link |
Shan, B., Y.Z. Cai, J.D. Brooks and H. Corke, 2007.
The in vitro
antibacterial activity of dietary spice and medicinal herb extracts. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 117: 112-119.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Soladoye, M.O., S.S. Orhiere and B.M. Ibimode, 1989.
Ethnobotanical study of two indigenous multipurpose plants in the Guinea savanna of Kwara state - Vitellaria paradoxa
and Parkia biglobosa
. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Conference of the Ecological Society of Nigeria, August 14, 1989, Forestry Research Institute, Ibadan, Pages: 13-
Toro, G. and P.G. Ackermann, 1975.
The Practical Clinical Chemistry. 1st Edn., Little Brown and Co., Boston, USA
Van den Berghe, D.A. and A.J. Vlietinck, 1991.
Screening Methods for Antibacterial and Antiviral Agents from Higher Plants. In: Methods in Plant Biochemistry, Dey, P.M. and J.B. Harborne (Eds.). Academic Press, London, UK., pp: 47-69
Walsh, C.T. and G. Wright, 2005.
Introduction: Antibiotic resistance. Chem. Rev., 105: 391-393.
Walsh, F.M. and S.G. Amyes, 2004.
Microbiology and drug resistance mechanisms of fully resistant pathogens. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 7: 439-444.PubMed |
Zimmermann, M., 1983.
Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain, 16: 109-110.CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
Russel, A.D., 1991.
Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to non-antibiotics: Food additives and food and pharmaceutical preservatives. J. Applied Bacteriol., 71: 191-201.CrossRef |