|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Phenology and Yield of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) at Different Sowing Dates |
|
A.B. Sharangi
and
A. Roychowdhury
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
In order to study the effects of sowing dates on phenology and yield of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.), an experiment was conducted during 2010-2012 based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in HRS, Mondouri, BCKV, India. Six sowing dates included 5th November (D1), 12th November (D2), 19th November (D3), 26th November (D4), 3rd December (D5) and 10th December (D6). The results showed that a delay in sowing from November 5 to December 10 decreased plant height, number of primary branches per plant, days to 50% germination, days to flower initiation, days to 50% flowering and days to fruit maturity significantly. The 5th November exhibited significant improvement in yield attributes namely numbers of umbels per plant (25.58), umbellets per umbel (6.85), seeds per umbel (30.55), test weight (12.61 g), seed weight per plant (6.85 g) and seed yield ha-1 (1098.33 kg ha-1).
|
|
|
|
|
Received: November 14, 2013;
Accepted: February 27, 2014;
Published: May 19, 2014
|
|
INTRODUCTION
Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.), an annual herbaceous plant of Apiaceae
family, is one of the important seed spices occupying a prime position throughout
the globe to add taste, flavour and pungency in various food items. Moreover,
it is a frequent ingredient in the preparation of Ayurvedic medicines and is
a traditional home therapy for different ailments viz., rheumatism, joint pain,
gastrointestinal complaints, flatulence (Said et al.,
1996), indigestion, insomnia, convulsions, anxiety, loss of appetite (Emamghoreishi
et al., 2005), etc. Coriander is a tropical crop and generally sown
in the winter season for seed production.
Time of sowing is crucial for crop for the vegetative growth and ultimate expressions
of yield. Any early or late sowing may hamper the growth, yield as well as quality
of the crop. Time of planting controls the crop phenological development along
with efficient conversion of biomass into economic yield (Khichar
and Niwas, 2006). In case of coriander, early sowing leads to early flowering
but may be vulnerable to damage in case of extreme cold and frost. On the other
hand late sowing affected the growth as well as yield and quality in an adverse
way. Meena and Malhotra (2006) reported that early
sowing and selection of less susceptible variety proved a suitable component
for the management of aphid on coriander. Gujar et al.
(2005) reported from an experiment that the maximum values were recorded
for all the characters when the seeds were sown on 10 October followed by 25
October. Standardizations of time of sowing with due consideration to the different
growth stages of crop, therefore, is an important area which need due intervention.
There are several research efforts on this crop by many workers on date of sowing
(Mirshekari et al., 2011; Soleimani
et al., 2011; Moosavi et al., 2012;
Moosavi, 2012; Yildirim and Gok,
2012; Moniruzzaman et al., 2013), as well
as on other aspects viz., water, nutrient and weed management, leaf cutting,
allelopathic weed control, etc. (Datta et al., 2008;
Singh et al., 2000; Nagar
et al., 2009; Tripathi et al., 2009;
Rajaraman et al., 2010; Sharangi,
2011; Sharangi et al., 2011) for standardization
of agrotechniques towards enhanced production and quality. Among all these,
date of sowing is still considered as one of the important area to be taken
care of in this regard. However, most of the findings on dates of sowing are
local in nature and very few findings are sufficient to be conclusive, in general.
With this in view an investigation on the effect of date of sowing was carried
out for identifying the best date of sowing towards the highest seed production
of coriander.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Field experiments were conducted on coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.)
during 2010-11 and 2011-12 at The Horticultural Research Station, Mondouri,
BCKV (Agricultural University), India. BCKV is located at the east of India
at 23.5° North latitude, 89° East longitude having an average altitude
of 9.75 m above mean sea level. The climate is sub-tropical humid. The soil
was sandy clay loam with a pH of 7. In the present investigation coriander was
sown in six different dates namely D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6 in both the years.
The respective dates were 5th November, 12th November, 19th November, 26th November,
3rd December and 10th December. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized
block design with three numbers of replications and 18 number of treatment combination
in the plots of 2x1.5 m size. Observations on growth parameters including phenology
viz., plant height (cm), number of branches, duration from sowing to first flower
initiation (days), duration from sowing to 50% flower initiation (days), duration
from sowing to first fruit initiation (days), duration from sowing to fruit
maturity (days) and yield attributing parameters viz., number of umbels per
plant, number of umbllets per plant, number of seeds per umbel, test weight
(g), seed yield per plant (g), seed yield per plot (g), seed yield (kg ha-1),
etc. were recorded. The statistical analysis was done by using SAS 9.3 and MS
Excel (Daniels XL Toolbox Version
4.01) software.
RESULTS
Growth attributes: The results obtained from the study showed significant
variation with different dates of sowing with regard to growth attributes like
plant height at 30 DAS (5.60-11.67 cm), at 60 DAS (17.99-27.18 cm), at 90 DAS
(66.27-81.20 cm) and at harvesting stage (83.36-95.76 cm) (Table
1). Moreover, number of primary branches (6.26-8.04), days to 50% germination
(7.94-12.28 days), days to flower initiation (56.56-68.56 days), days to 50%
flowering (66.50-80.61 days) and days for fruit maturity (126.17-142.56 days)
were also highly influenced by sowing dates (Table 2). It
is clear that a delay in sowing from November 5 to December 10 decreased plant
height, number of primary branches per plant, days to 50% germination, days
to flower initiation, days to 50% flowering and days to fruit maturity significantly.
Yield attributes: The results with regard to yield attributes (Table
3, 4 and Fig. 1) such as number of umbellets
per umbel (4.68-6.85), number of umbel per plant (15.38-25.58), number of seeds
per umbel (21.24-30.55), test weight (12.16-12.61), seed weight per plant (4.07-6.85
g) and seed yield ha-1 (607.33-1098.33 kg ha-1) showed
significant variation with different dates of sowing.
Table 1: |
Influence of date of sowing on growth parameters of coriander |
 |
Y1: 2010-11, Y2: 2011-12, P: Pooled, NS: Non significant.
Means with the same letter (s) in each column had no significant difference
at 5% level. D1: 5th November, D2: 12th November, D3: 19th November, D4:
26th November, D5: 3rd December and D6: 10th December |
Table 2: |
Influence of date of sowing on growth parameters of coriander |
 |
Y1: 2010-11, Y2: 2011-12, P: Pooled, NS: Non significant.
Means with the same letter (s) in each column had no significant difference
at 5% level. D1: 5thNovember, D2: 12th November, D3: 19th November, D4:
26th November, D5: 3rd December and D6: 10th December |
Table 3: |
Influence of date of sowing and Irrigation (Main effects)
on yield attributes of coriander |
 |
Y1: 2010-11, Y2: 2011-12 and P: Pooled. Means with the same
letter (s) in each column had no significant difference at 5% level. D1:
5th November, D2: 12th November, D3: 19th November, D4: 26th November, D5:
3rd December and D6: 10th December |
Table 4: |
Influence of date of sowing on yield attributes of coriander |
 |
Y1: 2010-11, Y2: 2011-12, P: Pooled, NS: Non significant.
Means with the same letter (s) in each column had no significant difference
at 5% level. D1: 5th November, D2: 12th November, D3: 19th November, D4:
26th November, D5: 3rd December and D6: 10th December |
|
Fig. 1: |
Effect of dates of sowing on seed yield
of coriander. The different alphabets (a-e) indicate significant difference
at 5% level as calculated through Duncans multiple test |
The earliest date of sowing i.e. (D1) 5th November exhibited significant improvement
in yield attributes namely number of umbels per plant, (25.58), umbellets per
umbel (6.85), seeds per umbel (30.55), test weight (12.61 g), seed weight per
plant (6.85 g) and seed yield ha-1 (1098.33 kg ha-1).
Relationship between number of primary branches and plant height with number
of umbels per plant, seeds per umbel, seed yield and test weight: A positive
linear relationship was obtained between number of primary branches and each
of number of umbels per plant, seeds per umbel, seed yield and test weight (Fig.
2a-d). They were found to be highly significant (with
correlation coefficient values, r = 0.96**, 0.99**, 0.93** and 0.98**, respectively).
The positive relationship indicated that each of number of umbels per plant,
seeds per umbel, seed yield and test weight increased with the increase in number
of primary branches.
|
Fig. 2(a-d): |
Relationship between number of primary branches with (a) No.
of umbels plant-1, (b) Seeds umbel-1, (c) Seed yield
and (d) Test weight |
The linear equations (y = 4.764x-14.04, R2 = 0.934; y = 5.070x-10.40,
R2 = 0.988; y = 227.2x-829.3, R2 = 0.868; y = 0.226x+10.73,
R2 = 0.959, respectively) stated that for every increase in the number
of primary branches, a respective increase to the tune of about 5,5,227 kg ha-1
and 0.22 g in number of umbels per plant, seeds per umbel, seed yield and test
weight were found. The values of coefficient of determinations (R2 s) indicated
that about 93.4, 98.8, 86.8 and 95.9% increases in number of umbels per plant,
seeds per umbel, seed yield and test weight were due to higher number of primary
branches.
Similarly a positive linear relationship was obtained between plant height
and each of number of umbels per plant, seeds per umbel, seed yield and test
weight (Fig. 3a-d). They were found to be
highly significant (with correlation coefficient values, r = 0.94**, 0.91**,
0.89** and 0.93**, respectively). The positive relationship indicated that each
of number of umbels per plant, seeds per umbel, seed yield and test weight increased
with the increase in plant height. The linear equations (y = 0.755x-48.05, R2
= 0.883; y = 0.762x-42.87, R2 = 0.839; y = 35.42x-2396, R2
= 0.792; y = 0.035x+9.186, R2 = 0.87, respectively) stated that for
every centimeter increase in plant height, a respective increase to the tune
of about 0.75, 0.76, 35 kg ha-1 and 0.79 g in number of umbels per
plant, seeds per umbel, seed yield and test weight were found.
|
Fig. 3(a-d): |
Relationship between plant height (cm) at harvest with (a)
No. of umbels plant-1, (b) Seeds umbel-1, (c) Seed
yield and (d) Test weight |
The values of coefficient of determinations (R2s) indicated
that about 88.3, 83.9, 79.2 and 87.0% increases in number of umbels per plant,
seeds per umbel, seed yield and test weight were due to higher plant heights.
DISCUSSION
Date of sowing is an important management factor for almost all seed spices
including coriander. Change in sowing time leads to significant change in weather
microclimate (Fig. 4-6) and subsequently
the performance of the crop.
|
Fig. 4: |
Meteorological data pertaining to temperature |
|
Fig. 5: |
Meteorological data pertaining to relative humidity |
|
Fig. 6: |
Meteorological data pertaining to rainfall |
In addition, the physical environment has profound influence on growth, biomass
partitioning and ultimately the yield of coriander. Temperature, humidity, rainfall
and other meteorological factors may individually or collectively limit the
plant growth and production. Time of sowing controls the crop phenological development
along with efficient conversion of biomass into economic yield (Khichar
and Niwas, 2006). In a study on the effects of date of sowing, Rassam
et al. (2007) found that with the delay in sowing from March 30 to
April 29, plant height of coriander decreased, significantly. Also, delayed
dates of sowing resulted in decreased plant height of different wheat cultivars
(Subhan et al., 2004), mungbean (Malik
et al., 2006), Thai hemp (Sengloung et al.,
2009), plant height and number of umbrella per plant of black cumin (Sadeghi
et al., 2009), coriander (Carrubba et al.,
2006) and fennel (Moosavi, 2011; Ayub
et al., 2008), plant height, number of branches per plant, number
of capsules per plant and number of capsules per branch of Sesame (Sarkar
et al., 2007). The significant decrease in morphological traits associated
with the delay in sowing can be related to higher temperatures that the plants
at the later sowing dates experienced which limited their growing period and
assimilate-building because of the early maturity of plants. Thus, the plants
did not have adequate opportunity for photosynthesis and in turn their height
and branch-bearing capacity decreased. Better vegetative growth expressed by
plant height in earlier date of sowing is perhaps due to more favourable temperature
and more sunshine reaching the crop during its growth period (Pan
et al., 2003). Datta et al. (2008)
also found an increase in plant height as well as increasing trend in number
of primary and secondary branches per plant in early sown plants in black cumin.
Majumder et al. (2011) also found the similar
trend in black cumin. Gujar et al. (2005) also
are in agreement with the early sowing. Singh et al.
(2005) too found higher umbellets per umbel, in the 30 October sowing compared
to the 15 and 30 November sowings in fennel. Ehteramian (2003)
studied the effect of sowing date for cumin and opined that delayed sowing date
decreased seed weight and the number of umbels per plant. Bhadkariya
et al. (2007) also found that the maximum number of seeds per umbel,
in earlier sowing. A similar finding was reported by Sadeghi
et al. (2009) in black cumin. Higher seed yields can be explained
by higher above ground biomass, the No. of umbels per plant, the number of seed
per umbels and plant height (Zolleh et al., 2009).
These results are in correspondence with Chaudhari et
al. (1995) who reported that sowing date had significant effects on
seed yield. The highest seed yield (2.47 g plant-1, 9.83 q ha-1),
1000 seed weight (11.28 g) were obtained from earlier sowing. Baswana
et al. (1989) opined that lower yield in delayed sowing was due to
insufficient time for vegetative growth as the plant entered the reproductive
phase at a faster rate.
Seed yield per plant was reported to be strongly and positively correlated
with plant height (r = 0.99**) at genotypic level (Kassahun
et al., 2013). The direct effect of plant height on seed yield per
plant was positive and comparatively high (0.44). Positive direct effect of
plant height on seed yield was also reported by Jindla
et al. (1985) in coriander. Correlation and path coefficient analysis
by Singh et al. (2006) in coriander indicated
that umbels of plants and branches of plant were the most important traits as
they exerted positive direct effect on seed yield. Singh
and Singh (2013) found the maximum genotypic coefficient of variability
(18.39%), broad sense heritability (93.5%) and genetic advance over mean (36.60%)
for umbels/plant. Seed yield was positively associated with several characters
such as plant height, number of primary branches plant, number of secondary
branches plant, number of umbels plant, number of umbellets plant, number of
seeds umbel and umbel diameters. Carrubba et al.
(2006) reported that the plant height of coriander was tightly associated
with yield and with all yield determinants; the correlation coefficient between
plant height and number of umbels per plant was highly significant. Phenotypic
correlations of grain yield per plant were highly significant and positive with
umbellets per plant, umbels per plant, number of effective branches, straw yield
per plant, number of primary branches, plant height, number of grains per umbellet
and harvest index (Bhandari and Gupta, 1991).
The study showed a significantly influential effect of date of sowing on growth
and yield of coriander. The results revealed that coriander sown on 5th November
is found to obtain higher seed yield which means early winter season. Consequently,
the findings may suggest farmers and agricultural researchers to carefully consider
the date of sowing which appears to be a challenging task in the context of
global climatic scenario. However for better understanding reliability and validation,
such studies may be conducted for several years taking into account the microclimatic
factors of the particular locality.
|
REFERENCES |
1: Sarkar, M.N.A., M. Salim, N. Islam and M.M. Rahman, 2007. Effect of sowing date and time of harvesting on the yield and yield contributing characters of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) seed. Int. J. Sustainable Crop Prod., 2: 31-35. Direct Link |
2: Malik, M.A., M.F. Saleem, A. Asghar and R.A.F. Ishaq, 2006. Effect of sowing dates and planting patterns on growth and yield of mungbean (Vigna radiate L.). J. Agric. Res., 44: 139-146. Direct Link |
3: Ayub, M., M.A. Nadeem, A. Tanveer, M. Tahir, M.T.Y. Saqib and R. Nawaz, 2008. Effect of different sowing methods and times on the growth and yield of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill). Pak. J. Bot., 40: 259-264. Direct Link |
4: Baswana, K.S., M.L. Pandita and S.S. Sharma, 1989. Response of coriander to dates of planting and row spacing. Indian J. Agron., 34: 355-357.
5: Bhadkariya, S.K., A. Gupta, A. Bobade, B.S. Kasana and L.S. Tomar, 2007. Effect of different times of sowing on growth, yield and seed quality of coriander (Corriandrum sativum L.) cv. CIMPO S-33. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, 22: 229-232. Direct Link |
6: Bhandari, M.M. and A. Gupta, 1991. Variation and association analysis in coriander. Euphytica, 58: 1-4. CrossRef | Direct Link |
7: Carrubba, A., R. la Torre, F. Saiano and G. Alonzo, 2006. Effect of sowing time on coriander performance in a semiarid Mediterranean environment. Crop Sci., 46: 437-447. CrossRef | Direct Link |
8: Chaudhari, S.M., S.M. Kharche and U.T. Desai, 1995. Effects of sowing dates on seed production in coriander. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 20: 139-139.
9: Datta, S., A.N. Dey and S. Maitra, 2008. Effect of sowing time on growth and yield of black cumin (Nigella sativaL.) under Terai zone of West Bengal. J. Med. Aromat. Plant Sci., 30: 31-33.
10: Ehteramian, K., 2003. The effects of different levels of nitrogen fertilizer and plant dating on cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) in Kooshkak region in the Fars province. M.Sc. Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
11: Emamghoreishi, M., M. Khasaki and M.F. Aazam, 2005. Coriandrum sativum: Evaluation of its anxiolytic effect in the elevated plus-maze. J. Ethnopharmacol., 96: 365-370. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
12: Gujar, S.M., A.D. Warade, A. Mohariya and D.H. Paithankar, 2005. Effect of dates of sowing and nitrogen levels on growth, seed yield and quality of coriander. Crop Res. Hisar, 29: 288-291.
13: Jindla, L.N., T.H. Singh, A. Rang and M.L. Bansal, 1985. Genetic variability and pathcoefficient analysis in coriander. Crop Improv., 12: 133-136.
14: Kassahun, B.M., G. Alemaw and B. Tesfaye, 2013. Correlation studies and path coefficient analysis for seed yield and yield components in Ethiopian coriander accessions. Afr. Crop Sci. J., 21: 51-59. Direct Link |
15: Khichar, M.L. and R. Niwas, 2006. Microclimatic profiles under different sowing environments in wheat. J. Agromet, 8: 201-209.
16: Majumder, C., A. Pariari, G. Saha and S. Khan, 2011. Studies on phenological and yield parameters of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) as influenced by macro and micro climate. Proceedings of the International Conference on Preparing Agriculture for Climate Change, February 6-8, 2011, Ludhiana, Punjab, India, pp: 427-428
17: Meena, S.S. and S.K. Malhotra, 2006. Effect of sowing time, nitrogen and plant growth regulators on green leaf yield of coriander. Haryana J. Hortic. Sci., 35: 310-311.
18: Mirshekari, B., J. Hamidi and A.R. Zadeh, 2011. Phenology and yield of cumin at different sowing dates and planting patterns. J. Food Agric. Environ., 9: 385-387. Direct Link |
19: Moniruzzaman, M., M.M. Rahman, M.M. Hossain, A.S. Karim and Q.A. Khaliq, 2013. Effect of sowing dates on year round production of foliage of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). Bangladesh J. Agric. Res., 38: 29-39. CrossRef | Direct Link |
20: Moosavi, S.G.R., M.J. Seghatoleslami and M.H. Zareie, 2012. The effect of planting date and plant density on morphological traits and essential oil yield of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci., 4: 496-501. Direct Link |
21: Moosavi, S.G.R., 2011. Effects of different sowing dates and plant densities on yield and agronomic traits of fennel, isabgol and roselle in Birjand, Iran. Final Report of Research Design in Islamic Azad University, Birjand Branch, Birjand, Iran.
22: Nagar, R.K., B.S. Meena and R.C. Dadheech, 2009. Effect of weed and nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). Indian J. Weed Sci., 41: 183-188.
23: Pan, S., R. Chatterjee, M. Bhattacharya, A. Pariari, A.B. Sharangi and P.K. Chattopadhyay, 2003. Response of some cultivars of coriander Coriandrum sativum L. to different dates of sowing. South Indian Hortic., 51: 249-253.
24: Rajaraman, G., P. Paramaguru, P. Aruna and I.P. Sudagar, 2010. Effect of fertigation on quality in coriander. Asian J. Hortic., 5: 114-116. Direct Link |
25: Rassam, G.A., M. Naddaf and F. Sefidkan, 2007. Effects of sowing date and plant density on seed yield and yield components of Pimpinella anisum. Res. Sci. J. Iran. Ministry Agric., 20: 127-133.
26: Said, H.M., A. Saeed, L.A. D'Silva, H.N. Zubairy and Z. Bano, 1996. Medicinal Herbal: A Textbook for Medical Students and Doctors. Vol. 1, Hamdard Foundation Pakistan, Pakistan, pp: 1-82
27: Sadeghi, S., A. Rahnavard and Z.Y. Ashrafi, 2009. Study importance of sowing date and plant density affect on black cumin (Cuminum carvi) yield. Bot. Res. Int., 2: 94-98. Direct Link |
28: Sengloung, T., L. Kaveeta and W. Nanakorn, 2009. Effect of sowing date on growth and development of thai hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.), 43: 423-431. Direct Link |
29: Moosavi, S.G.R., 2012. Yield and yield components of Coriandrum sativum L. as affected sowing date and plant density. Tech. J. Eng. Applied Sci., 2: 88-92. Direct Link |
30: Sharangi, A.B., 2011. In search of allelopathy from common alliaceae crops for managing weeds in coriander: An overview. Int. J. Agric. Res., 6: 209-217. CrossRef | Direct Link |
31: Sharangi, A.B., R. Chatterjee, M.K. Nanda and R. Kumar, 2011. Growth and leaf yield dynamics of cool season coriander as influenced by cutting and foliar nitrogen application. J. Plant Nutr., 34: 1762-1768. CrossRef | Direct Link |
32: Singh, D., U.K. Jain, S.S. Rajput, V. Khandelwal and K.N. Shiva, 2006. Genetic variation for seed yield and its components and their association in coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) germplasm. J. Spices Aromat. Crops, 15: 25-29. Direct Link |
33: Singh, J., Y.S. Malik, K.K. Thakral and C.P. Mehla, 2000. Effect of sowing time, nitrogen levels and leaf cuttings on green and seed yield of coriander. Haryana J. Hortic. Sci., 29: 225-228. Direct Link |
34: Singh, S., G.S. Buttar and S.P. Singh, 2005. Fennel response to sowing dates and row spacings. Haryana J. Agron., 21: 202-203.
35: Singh, S.J. and S.K. Singh, 2013. Genetic variability analysis in coriander (Coriandrum sativum Linn.). J. Spices Aromatic Crops, 22: 81-84. Direct Link |
36: Soleimani, B., M. Khosh-Khui and S. Ramezani, 2011. Planting date effects on growth, seed yield, essential oil content and chemical composition of ajowan. J. Applied Biol. Sci., 5: 7-11. Direct Link |
37: Subhan, F., A. Nazir, M. Anwar, N.H. Shah, M. Siddiq, I. Ali, J. Rahman and T. Sajjad, 2004. Response of newly developed wheat cultivars/advance lines to planting dates in the central agro-ecological zone of NWFP. Asian J. Plant Sci., 3: 87-90. CrossRef | Direct Link |
38: Tripathi, M.L., S.K. Trivedi and R.P. Yadav, 2009. Effect of irrigation and nutrient levels on growth and yield of coriander (Coriandrum sativum). Indian J. Agron., 54: 454-458. Direct Link |
39: Yildirim, B. and N. Gok, 2012. Effect of sowing date and varieties on essential oil ratio and essential oil components of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) in van ecological condition. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 11: 1925-1929.
40: Zolleh, H.H., S. Zolleh, S. Bahraminejad, G. Maleki, and A.H. Papzan, 2009. Response of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) to sowing date and plant density. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 5: 597-602. Direct Link |
|
|
|
 |