Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Phylogenetic Analysis of Cucumis sativus Using RAPD Molecular Markers



Somrudee Onto, Nittaya Laosat, Wannipa Suksawat, Siam Popluechai, Prapassorn D. Eungwanichayapant and Ekachai Chukeatirote
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

In this study, the phylogenetic relationships among twelve lines of Cucumis sativus were studied using Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. A modified CTAB DNA extraction protocol was introduced to obtain genomic DNA from young leaves. Of forty random primers tested, only fifteen primers were able to successfully amplify all genomic DNA samples and the results obtained were interpreted based on total and polymorphic scores. A total of 187 bands were produced in which 144 (~77%) were polymorphic. Additionally, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the UPGMA analysis. Based on the results, the cucumbers examined could be divided into two major subgroups in which the similarity values were between 0.67-0.93.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Somrudee Onto, Nittaya Laosat, Wannipa Suksawat, Siam Popluechai, Prapassorn D. Eungwanichayapant and Ekachai Chukeatirote, 2008. Phylogenetic Analysis of Cucumis sativus Using RAPD Molecular Markers. Journal of Plant Sciences, 3: 105-110.

DOI: 10.3923/jps.2008.105.110

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jps.2008.105.110

INTRODUCTION

Identification of plant cultivars is essential not only to trace for their phylogenetic relationship but also to provide useful information for agricultural business. For example, the identified best cultivars giving highest yields or able to tolerate drought can be used to promote agricultural industry and subsequently for breeding programmes. Traditionally, plant diversity has been evaluated using morphological (tree height and canopy shape), chemical (essential oil compositions) and biochemical (isozymes) markers (Hickey, 1973; Ochocka et al., 2002; Cogolludo-Agustin et al., 2000). These approaches have their limitations and often produce unreliable results for specific differentiation. This is due to various kinds of external factors such as temperature, humidity and light which can alter plant phenotypes investigated by these systems (Bradshaw, 1965). In the past decade, a number of studies have introduced molecular markers to differentiate plant cultivars. These DNA-based techniques such as randomly amplified polymorphic DNA and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) are widely used since they are not influenced by environment and thus surpassing the drawbacks generated by phenotypic plasticity (Williams et al., 1990; Vos et al., 1995). The RAPD technique in particular is a simple and rapid means which can be used to detect polymorphic DNA sequences. The polymorphic DNAs are initially amplified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) using arbitrary oligonucleotide primers and subsequently separated by gel electrophoresis. The pattern of amplified DNA fragments is then determined for genetic relationship based on appropriate algorithm developed.

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown in most temperate countries is one of the leading commercial vegetables in the global market ranking fourth after tomato, onion and cabbage (Tatlioglu, 1993). It is estimated that more than a million hectares of cucumbers were planted worldwide, yielding approximately 23 million metric tons of fresh product (Pitrat, 1999). Many countries have the intensive improvement programmes for cucumbers and thus generating several cucumber cultivars in response to specific environment as well as consumer preference. As a result, various kinds of hybrid cucumbers are available and although they often differ in morphology, their genetic base particularly to the commercial lines is not that heterogenous (Staub and Meglic, 1993). For cucumbers, genetic markers prove to be useful for cultivar characterisation including the use of isozymes (Staub and Meglic, 1993; Meglic and Staub, 1996), RFLP (Dijkhuizen et al., 1996) and RAPD (Horejsi and Staub, 1999). This study was performed as a part of cucumber breeding programme to evaluate the genetic diversity among indigenous cucumber cultivars preserved at Almatha Seeds, Co., Ltd., Thailand by using the RAPD technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant Materials
Twelve lines of cucumber obtained as seeds from the Almatha Seeds, Co., Ltd., Thailand were grown during June-October 2005 in the experimental field of Mae Fah Luang University. They were given the codes as follows: ASC-01 (No. 1), ASC-03 (No. 2), ASC-04 (No. 3), ASC-05 (No. 4), ASC-06 (No. 5), ASC-11 (No. 6), ASC-12 (No. 7), ASC-13 (No. 8), ASC-14 (No. 9), ASC-16 (No. 10), ASC-17 (No. 11) and ASC-19 (No. 12).

DNA Extraction
The young leaves of cucumbers were used to extract genomic DNA using the modified method of Agrawal et al. (1992). Leaves were initially placed in a mortar and ground into fine powder in liquid nitrogen. The powder was then quickly transferred to the centrifuge containing 500 μL of DNA extraction buffer (2% CTAB, 1.4 M NaCl, 20 mM EDTA pH 8.0 and 0.2% mercaptoethanol) and incubated at 65°C for 1 h. The suspension was subsequently extracted with equal volume of chloroform: Isoamyl alcohol (24:1) and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected to a new microfuge tube and the DNA was precipitated by addition of one volume of cold isopropanol and incubated at -20°C for 30 min. After centrifugation, the DNA pellet was resuspended in 500 μL of RNase buffer (10 mMTris-HCl pH 8.0, 15 mM NaCl). 2 μL of RNase A (10 mg mL-1) was added and the DNA suspension was incubated at 37°C for 1h. The resulting solution was then extracted once with 400 μL of phenol: chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and once with 500 μL of chloroform: Isoamyl alcohol (24:1) followed by ethanol precipitation and dissolved in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0). The DNA samples were then used directly or stored at -20°C until required.

DNA Analysis by RAPD Technique
The RAPD analyses were carried out using forty random primers (Operon Technologies, USA). For PCR, a reaction of 15 μL volume was prepared consisting of 200 μM of dNTPs, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.3 U Taq DNA polymerase, 5 pmol of each primer and 50 ng of DNA template. Thermal profile conditions were as follows: initial denaturation 10 min at 95°C, 40 cycles of 1 min at 93°C, 1 min at 37°C, 1.2 min at 72°C, with a final elongation of 5 min at 72°C. Amplification products were subsequently separated on 1.5% agarose gel with ethidium bromide staining.

Data Analysis
The DNA profiles generated were scored as discrete variables using 1 to indicate presence and 0 to indicate absence of a band. The data recorded were then used to calculate using the NTSYS-pc programme version 2.01e (Rohlf, 1990). A phylogenetic tree was then constructed using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetical averages (UPGMA) as described by Sneath and Sokal (1973).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In this present paper, we used RAPD analysis to investigate the relationship of twelve C. sativus cultivars. The genomic DNA extracted from their young leaves was shown to be high quality and thus ready to use as templates. For RAPD, the establishment of PCR conditions is required to ensure reliable and reproducible results. The optimum amplification was determined and presented as follows: 50 ng of template DNA, 2.5 mM of MgCl2, 200 μM of dNTPs, 5 pmol of primers and 0.3 U of Taq enzyme in the 15 μL reaction mixture; such an optimum condition was best in generating the RAPD profiles (data not shown).

For preliminary screening, forty primers were used and it was found that only fifteen primers with a 60-70% GC content could successfully amplify all genomic DNA samples. The cucumber cultivars examined produced a total of 187 bands in which 144 (~77%) were polymorphic suggesting high genetic diversity among these tested cultivars. The amplified products were then categorised based on their size ranging from 438 to 11,600 bp and the numbers of bands produced ranged from 6 using OPC-19 and OPC-20 primers to 18 using OPA-12 primer (Table 1). It should also be noted that of the fifteen primers employed, there were only two primers producing the distinct bands for individual cucumber cultivars: OPA-18 for ASC-16 (No. 10) and OPA-04 for ASC-11 (No. 6) (Fig. 1).

The data obtained were then used to determine the genetic relationship of these cucumbers. Based on Nei’s method (Nei and Li, 1979), the similarity values were calculated by scoring the total number and the polymorphic DNA number of bands produced with each primer. Similarity indexes ranged from 0.67 between ASC-04 and ASC-17 to 0.93 between ASC-03 and ASC-11 (Table 2). In addition, the results from the UPGMA cluster analysis were performed and used to construct the phylogenetic tree and showed as a dendogram in Fig. 2. As shown, there were two discernable clusters; the first contained solely the cucumber line ASC-17 whereas the rest formed the second group with higher genetic diversity.

RAPD analysis has proved to be a rapid, inexpensive and useful tool for assessing phylogenetic relationships in plant species. Particularly to Cucumis spp., various experiments have showed that the RAPD technique is appropriate for determining intra-genera relationship (Staub et al., 1997; Horejsi and Staub, 1999). In addition, it is also used successfully to reveal genetic diversity among African C. sativus (Mliki et al., 2003). This present study has been performed in which our results confirmed the valuable use of RAPD markers in Thai C. sativus cultivars developed by the Almatha Seeds, Co., Ltd. The data obtained are also expected to be important as genetic markers and useful for cucumber improvement programme.

Table 1: Primers used for Cucumis sativus identification by RAPD and the number of bands produced. Only fifteen arbitrary primers that successfully amplified all genomic DNA samples are given; they produced 187 bands in total

Table 2: Similarity matrix from twelve lines of C. sativus generated from Nei’s method (Nei and Li, 1979). The sample numbers from 1 to 12 are given according to the cucumber cultivars (see Materials and Methods)

Fig. 1: Representative of RAPD profiles from the genomic DNA of C. sativus generated by primers OPA-04 (a) and OPA-18 (b). Lane M, Lambda DNA digested with PstI; lane 1-12, sample numbers of cucumber cultivars

Fig. 2: Dendogram of C. sativus cultivars based on UPGMA cluster analysis of RAPD data generated by fifteen random primers

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to acknowledge the Almatha Seeds, Co., Ltd. (Thailand) for cucumber seeds supply.

REFERENCES
1:  Agrawal, G.K., R.N. Pandey and V.P. Agrawal, 1992. Isolation of DNA from Choerospondias asillaris leaves. Biotech. Biodiv. Lett., 2: 19-24.

2:  Bradshaw, A.D., 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet., 13: 115-155.
Direct Link  |  

3:  Cogolludo-Agustin, M.A., D. Agundez and L. Gil, 2000. Identification of native and hybrid elms in Spain using isozyme markers. Heredity, 85: 157-166.
Direct Link  |  

4:  Dijkhuizen, A., W. Kennard, M.J. Havey and J.E. Staub, 1996. RFLP variability and genetic relationships in cultivated cucumber. Euphytica, 90: 79-87.
CrossRef  |  

5:  Hickey, L.J., 1973. Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Am. J. Bot., 60: 17-33.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

6:  Horejsi, T. and J.E. Staub, 1999. Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 46: 337-350.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

7:  Meglic, V. and J.E. Staub, 1996. Genetic diversity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): II. An evaluation of selected cultivars released between 1846 and 1978. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 43: 547-558.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

8:  Mliki, A., J.E. Staub, S. Zhangyong and A. Ghorbel, 2003. Genetic diversity in African cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) provides potential for germplasm enhancement. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 50: 461-468.
Direct Link  |  

9:  Nei, M. and W.H. Li, 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 76: 5269-5273.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Ochocka, J.R., M. Asztemborska, D. Sybilska and W. Langa, 2002. The determination of enantiomers of terpenic hydrocarbons in essential oils obtained from the species of Pinus and Abies. Pharm. Biol., 40: 395-399.
Direct Link  |  

11:  Pitrat, M., M. Chauvet and C. Foury, 1999. Diversity, history and production of cultivated cucurbits. Acta Hortic. (ISHS), 492: 21-28.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

12:  Rohlf, F.J., 1990. NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 1.60, Applied Biostatistics Inc., New York.

13:  Sneath, P.H.A. and R.R. Sokal, 1973. The Principals and Practice of Numerical Classification. Rewwman, W.H. and Co., San Francisco.

14:  Staub, J.E. and V. Meglic, 1993. Molecular genetic markers and their legal relevance for cultivar discrimination: A case study in cucumber. HortTechnology, 3: 291-300.
Direct Link  |  

15:  Staub, J.E., J. Box, V. Meglic, T.F. Horejsi and J.D. McCreight, 1997. Comparison of isozyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA data for determining intraspecific variation in Cucumis. Genet. Res. Crop Evol., 44: 257-269.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Tatlioglu, T., 1993. Cucumber Cucumis sativus L. In: Genetic Improvement of Vegetable Crops, Kalloo, G. and B.O. Bergh (Eds.). Pergamon Press Ltd., Tarrytown, New York, pp: 197-234.

17:  Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans and T. van de Lee et al., 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res., 23: 4407-4414.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Williams, J.G.K., A.R. Kubelik, K.J. Livak, J.A. Rafalski and S.V. Tingey, 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res., 18: 6531-6535.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved