Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Serological Evidence of Echinococcosis in Municipality Workers in United Arab Emirates



Doaa Moustafa Sultan, Seyed Mahmoud Sadjjadi and Naglaa Raafat AbdRaboh
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Echinococcosis is an important public health problem in many parts of the world. High prevalence is found in the middle East as well as Arabic North Africa. Among all available serological assays, the use of highly purified antigens improves the sensitivity of these assays and the use of immunoblot is a powerful confirmatory technique. The present study was carried out to assess the prevalence of echinococcosis using ELISA assay as a screening test in some areas of United Arab Emirates and evaluate the sensitivity of purified antigen B (AgB). A total of 1651 serum samples were collected and tested for the presence of anti-Echinococcus antibodies using enzyme linked immnunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western Blot (WB) analysis as confirmatory test. The prevalence of cystic echinococcosis was 0.6% among the studied population. No significant difference was found neither between genders, nor different nationalities. The sensitivity of purified AgB based ELISA was 90% in comparison to 70% with commercial ELISA kit with reference to the confirmatory Western blot.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Doaa Moustafa Sultan, Seyed Mahmoud Sadjjadi and Naglaa Raafat AbdRaboh, 2016. Serological Evidence of Echinococcosis in Municipality Workers in United Arab Emirates. Research Journal of Parasitology, 11: 33-40.

DOI: 10.3923/jp.2016.33.40

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jp.2016.33.40
 
Received: March 21, 2016; Accepted: April 22, 2016; Published: September 15, 2016



INTRODUCTION

Echinococcosis is an important public health problem in many parts of the world. Human echinococcosis is caused by infection with the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus. Human AE occurs worldwide in association with herding, within which the main dog-sheep cycle for E. granulosus is important (Schantz et al., 1995). However, human Alveolar Echinococcosis (AE) due to Echinococcus multilocularis is a much rarer parasitic infection occurs in several regions of the Northern Hemisphere, including the United States, Europe, central Asia, Siberia, Japan and China (Kern et al., 2003).

High parasite prevalence is found in the middle East as well as Arabic North Africa (Abdel-Hafez and Kamhawi, 1997; Eckert et al., 2001; Battelli et al., 2002; Romig, 2003). Both cystic and alveolar echinococcosis has been reported from these regions. However, cystic echinococcosis is more prevalent and has been reported from all countries in the middle East and Arabic North Africa. Alveolar echinococcosis is less prevalent and has been reported only from Iran, Turkey, Iraq and Tunisia (Sadjjadi, 2006).

In the middle East, echinococcosis data from all countries including Cyprus, Turkey, Iran, Levant Countries, Persian Gulf and Oman sea littoral countries were reviewed by Sadjjadi (2006). Iran and Turkey are known as endemic areas of E. multilocularis. Alveolar echinococcosis is also endemic in Turkey, it occurs in the Eastern Anatolian region (Altintas, 1998). However, it seems that the disease is found in Iraq as well. Studies in the Northern part of Iran (Ardabil province) revealed during a period of 3.5 years, 37 human cases of AE were diagnosed in various hospitals, most of them in the Ardabil province. Total cumulative reported case number is 202 between 1980 and 1998 (Zariffard and Massoud, 1998). The first documented human case of E. multilocularis in the liver from Iraq was a 40 years old female farmer from Zakho in the North of Iraq who had never traveled outside his native country (Al-Attar et al., 1983).

Cystic hydatid disease is endemic in Kuwait. An estimated incidence rate of 3.6/100,000 has been reported by Dar and Alkarmi (1997). The E. granulosus is endemic in Oman, although with a low prevalence. In Oman, echinococcosis has been reported both from human and camel (Idris et al., 1999). A nationwide survey has not been conducted in United Arab Emirates, however, it could be suggested that there is endemic foci of the disease in the country. Echinococcosis is found especially in rural areas, where sheep and cattle are raised (Mandell et al., 2000; Kammerer and Schantz, 1993).

The disease affects mainly liver. Nevertheless, the disease might well spread to more unusual sites, such as lungs and brain. The location is mostly hepatic (75%) and pulmonary (15%) and only 10% of the cysts occur in the rest of the body (Cook and Manson, 1996). It may develop in almost any part of the body (Sadjjadi et al., 2013). Symptom presentations are varied and nonspecific. The diagnosis is most often arrived at when radiographic studies show space-occupying lesions of internal organs, bone or brain (Kilciler et al., 2006; Sadjjadi et al., 2013).

Diagnosis and quantification of Echinococcus granulosus infection in human and animal hosts are centralized to feasible control (Kamel et al., 2006). Clinical features of the disease are highly variable and depend on organs involved, size of cysts and their sites within the affected organ. Complications caused by rupture of cysts and subsequent immunologic reactions (Torcal et al., 1996). It has been reported that the detection of specific IgG1 and IgG4 serum antibodies to echinococcosis can enhance the specificity of ELISA (Khalilpour et al., 2014). Immunoblotting is used as a confirmatory test for excluding cross-reactivity in positive sera or in assessment of the screening test results (Liance et al., 2000).

There was no clear data regarding the approximate prevalence of echinococcosis in United Arab Emirates (UAE). So the present study was aimed to assess the prevalence of echinococcosis using ELISA assay as a screening test in some areas of UAE. The results were also evaluated by Western blot analysis as a reference confirmatory test.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants and serum samples: This study was carried among 1651 healthy individuals, 206 (12.5%) females with mean of age 33.3±7.8 and 1445 (87.5%) males with mean of age 33.6±8.4. After seeking the approval of the ethical committee of research in the Department of Clinic and Community Medicine of Dubai Municipality, a consented data of patients including age, sex and nationality was recorded and blood samples were collected from patients attending the Clinic of Dubai Municipality between 2013 and 2015. Sera were stored at -20°C until use for primary ELISA screening (Table 1).

Echinococcus ELISA screening test: Serum samples were tested for the presence of anti-Echinococcus antibodies using enzyme linked immnuno-sorbent assay (ELISA), commercially available kits (Diagnostic automation company-USA-Cat# 8202-3) for detection of IgG antibodies against Echinococcus were used to screen all the test samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Table 1: Proportion of participants by nationality and occupation

Then positive and quasi-positive samples were subjected to ELISA using lab purified antigen B (AgB) using the following procedure.

Preparation of hydatid cyst fluid: Hydatid Cyst Fluid (HCF) of Echinococcus granulosus was collected from cysts developed in the liver and the lung of sheep. To remove the protoscoleces and large particles, HCF was centrifuged at 1000×g for 30 min. Protein content of the sample was determined by Bradford protein assay (Bradford, 1976).


Preparation of AgB: The antigen was prepared from HCF as originally described by Oriol et al. (1971) briefly 100 mL of HCF was dialyzed overnight against 5 mM acetate buffer (pH 5) at 4°C. The samples were centrifuged at 50,000×g for 30 min to remove the albumin. The supernatant was removed and the pellet was dissolved in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 8). Saturated ammonium sulfate was used to remove the globulin from the sample. Finally the sample was boiled in a water bath for 15 min and centrifuged at 50000×g for 60 min to isolate antigen B (AgB), which is heat stable antigen. The AgB is a highly immunogenic molecule a characteristic that underpins its value in sero-diagnosis.

Blood collection: Blood samples were collected on EDTA and plasma were separated by centrifugation. Collected plasma was given a reference number, aliquoted and stored at -80°C until tested by ELISA using the procedure followed by Sadjjadi et al. (2007) with minor modification.

Echinococcus Western blot analysis: Western Blotting (WB) of the positive samples was performed and results were interpreted according to the instructions of manufacturer using WB IgG commercial kits (Cat# 17-318 LDBIO diagnostics company, Lyon-France).

This was followed by immune-blotting using crude antigen B extract followed by using commercial kit to confirm and compare the results according to the following procedure.

Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed by the method of Laemmli (1970) utilizing a crude E. granulosus antigen B preparation. Briefly, antigens were solubilized in sample buffer (900 mM tris-HCl [pH 8.45], 12% glycerol, 4% SDS and 0.005% phenol red) in the presence of 5% (vol/vol) 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma). Antigen concentrations ranging from 25-500 g per minigel (8.3 cm wide) were separated on SDS-15% polyacrylamide gels. Antigens were electrophoresed by mini-vertical gel two electrophoresis cells (APELEX).

Each gel included a set of low or high pre-stained molecular size standards (Bio-rad). Antigens were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes by electroblotting (Mini trans-blot electrophoretic transfer cell, APELEX) in transfer buffer (25 mM tris-HCl, 193 mM glycine, 10% methanol [pH 8.3]) for 1 h at 300 mA. Blots were blocked with 0.5% casein in tris-buffered saline (TBS) (20 mM tris, 150 mM NaCl [pH 7.6]), washed with TBS and then cut into 2 mm strips. Strips were incubated with 1:100 dilutions of patient sera in TBS for 45 min, washed with TBS 3 times, incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human immunoglobulin G (Sigma), diluted 1:10,000 in TBS for 45 min and washed 3 times with TBS. All incubations were performed at room temperature on a rotator shaker. Antibody reactivity was visualized with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate and toluidinium-nitrobluetetrazolium substrate (BCIP/NBT) substrate solution. Figure 1 shows the presence of one band at 7 kDa and one band at 26-28 kDa is indicative of the presence of Ecchinococcus specific antigen in serum (Schagger and Jagow, 1987; Liance et al., 2000).

RESULTS

Results of the screening by ELISA kit: As compared to negative and positive controls, samples with absorbance ≤0.3 were considered negative and absorbance ≥0.5 is considered positive and it was that considered absorbance 0.31-0.49 are equivocal, accordingly the results of test showed 48 samples with high absorbance >0.3 (8 samples ≥0.5 and 40 samples 0.31-0.49).

Results of confirmatory commercial Western Blot (WB): All the 48 samples with high absorbance were subjected to WB and the confirmed positive samples were 10 (7 out of the positive = true positive and 3 out of the equivocal samples = false negative).

Fig. 1(a-c):
Immunoblot analysis of ELISA positive samples using commercial kit, echinococcosis sera specifically recognize antigens with molecular sizes below 30 kDa. The presence of one band at 7 kDa and one band at 26-28 kDa is indicative of the presence of Echinococcus-specific IgG in serum. From left to right lane 16a, 17b and 20c are positive control, lanes 3a, 14a, 18b, 21b and 11c are positive samples, the specific bands are pointed using arrows

Table 2:Frequency of positive population detected by Western blotting as compared to ELISA kit screening test
CI 95%: Confidence interval 95%

Table 3:
Frequency of positive population detected by Western blotting as compared to ELISA test using purified antigen B
CI 95%: Confidence interval 95%

Table 4:
Frequency of positive population as confirmed by Western blotting in relation to the nationality and gender
n: Number

The frequency of positive population detected by Western blotting as compared to ELISA screening is shown in Table 2.

Results of ELISA and WB performed using antigen B: The laboratory prepared antigen B was used to repeat ELISA on the 48 high absorbance samples and the result was positive in 16 samples, those samples included 9 true positive as compared to WB, with 1 false negative (Table 3). The same antigen was used to repeat confirmatory WB and the results were identical to the kit but with weaker signal shown as fainter bands (Fig. 2).

Seroprevalence of Ecchinococcus as confirmed by WB analysis: From the 1651 studied subjects, the prevalence of echinococcosis was 0.61% (10/1651) among the studied population (Table 2 and 3). No significant difference of positivity could be detected regarding gender, nationality or occupation (Table 4 and 5).

Fig. 2:
Immunoblot analysis of ELISA positive samples using antigen B extract, the presence of one band at 7 kDa and/or one band at 26-28 kDa is indicative of the presence of Echinococcus-specific IgG in serum, the specific bands are pointed using arrows, *26 kDa and **28 kDa bands

Table 5:Frequency of positive population confirmed by Western blotting in relation to occupation
n: Number

DISCUSSION

Echinococcosis/hydatidosis is one of the most important zoonotic diseases in the world. Hydatidosis is caused in humans by ingestion of food contaminated with the egg of the cestodes genus Echinococcus excreted in the feces of infected dogs (Bresson-Hadni et al., 1994), the larvae invade various organs through portal system to liver, which is the most common site followed by lungs and other tissues (Handa et al., 2004) and causing pressure effects and high risk of rupture (Eckert and Thompson, 1997).

High parasite prevalence is found in the middle East as well as Arabic North Africa (Anderson et al., 1997). The situation of echinococcosis in middle East including Cyprus, Turkey, Iran, Levant countries, Persian Gulf and Oman sea littoral countries are reviewed (Sadjjadi, 2006), however, there was lack of data from UAE. In the present study, 10 positive samples out of 1651 screened population sample (0.61%) was found. In a study on 1000 people from nomadic tribe of Southern Iran, the prevalence of hydatidosis had been reported 5.4% using ELISA and CIE (Saberi-Firouzi et al., 1998).

Moreover, a prevalence of echinococcosis in Turkey was 8.9 and 10.1% of 483 cases by ELISA and IHA, respectively (Ozkol et al., 2005). Cystic echinococcosis is endemic in Syria, mainly in Southern and Northeastern provinces. Most of data concerning humans is from case reports (Abdel-Hafez and Kamhawi, 1997). Cystic echinococcosis is endemic in Kuwait with an estimated incidence rate of 3.6/100,000 has been reported by Dar and Alkarmi (1997). Furthermore in Oman hydatid disease has been reported in a very low level 1 in 306 in humans. In addition, a study that was done in Kurdistan-Iraq stated that among total of 17598 patients admitted to the surgical department, 0.846% of which were found to be infected with cystic echinococcosis and about 6.3/100,000 persons among Erbil population (Saida and Nouraddin, 2011).

The gender prevalence in our study showed higher prevalence in males. However, other studies revealed a higher prevalence among females than males, in Kashan area in Iran the overall prevalence rate was 2.4% with 85 patients including 47 females and 38 males (Arbabi and Hooshyar, 2006). Furthermore in Iraq the seroprevalence was 62.4 and 37.6% in females and males respectively in 149 cases (Saida and Nouraddin, 2011).

Hydatidosis is diagnosed mainly through serological investigations, which are used for confirmation of radiological finding (Anderson et al., 1997; Dreweck et al., 1997). The serological test includes ELISA, complement fixation test, indirect immunofluorescence co-antibody test, immuno-electrophoresis and immuno-blotting (Gottstein et al., 1995; Eris et al., 2009). The ELISA is the most widely used, it quantitatively determine IgG antibodies against E. granulosus and E. mutilocularis in human serum (Garcia, 2001). However, recent reports showed a higher sensitivity using IgG4 investigation (Khalilpour et al., 2014). Immunoblotting is used as a confirmatory test in assessment of screening test results (Khalilpour et al., 2014). An efficient commercially available immunoblot kit has been manufactured (Ito et al., 1993) for detection of echinococcosis. The AgB is 160 kDa polymeric lipoprotein has been investigated by many researchers, they reported the reliability of using native antigen B for sero-diagnosis of echinococossis with sensitivity range between 50-92% (Oriol et al., 1971; McVie et al., 1997).

In a previous study conducted by Sadjjadi et al. (2007), the ELISA system using native AgB was proved to be more specific than commercially used ELISA kit for detection of human hydatosis with sensitivity 92.5% and specificity 97.3%, these findings were supported by the results of the present study that has shown 90% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity using native AgB in comparison to 70 and 90% sensitivity and 99.8% specificity using the commercial ELISA kit.

Echinococcus infections are among the more dangerous helminthic diseases in humans. Efforts have been made to identify and purify Echinococcus species-specific antigens for application in ELISAs and immunoblots. However, it is difficult to obtain sufficient amounts of these antigens for extensive use (Williams et al., 1971). Due to the presence of different strains in different areas (Yanagida et al., 2012), specific antigens based on the prevalent strains should be provided for serodiagnosis.

The present study was carried out in order to: (1) Assess the prevalence of echinococcosis using ELISA assay as a screening test in some areas of United Arab Emirates, (2) Evaluate a commercially available immunoblot for serological diagnosis of Echinococcus infections and (3) Evaluate the sensitivity of purified antigen B (AgB).

The high sensitivity of the commercial Echinococcus Western blot IgG for Echinococcus genus diagnosis, compared to the AgB Western blot used in the present study should first be emphasized. The sensitivity of the commercially available immunoblot appears slightly higher than that of the immunoblots with purified antigen B, since it detected 10 ELISA positive samples compared to 6 samples. However, this result remains to be confirmed with sera from patients from different geographic foci, since biochemical strain diversity may occur, especially within the species E. granulosus (Sandhu et al., 2009).

On the basis of the present results and of the simplicity of the method, it can be proposed as a general strategy for immunodiagnosis of echinococcosis that the commercial Echinococcus Western blot IgG be performed either as a confirmatory test for a positive screening test result or as a first-line diagnostic test when suggestive clinical manifestations or imaging data are available.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of positive serology for Echinococcus is significantly low in comparison to other regions of middle East and that the use of purified antigen B increases the specificity, but further study with different concentrations is needed to evaluate sensitivity. The point of weakness was the multiethnic demographic nature of UAE and the lack of follow up of screened patients.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The study was funded by Medical Research Fund (MRF) unit, Dubai Medical College, Dubai, UAE: grant No. 89-5345 From SUMS, Shiraz, Iran. Collection of samples was supported by Dr. Ruqaia El Bastaki, Head of Department of Clinic and Community Medicine of Dubai municipality-Dubai, UAE.

REFERENCES
1:  Al-Attar, H.K., B. Al-Irhayim and M.J. Al-Habbal, 1983. Alveolar hydatid disease of the liver: First case report from man in Iraq. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol., 77: 595-597.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

2:  Altintas, N., 1998. Cystic and alveolar echinococcosis in Turkey. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol., 92: 637-642.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

3:  Anderson F.L., H. Ouhelli and M. Kashani, 1997. Compendium on Cystic Echinococcosis in Africa and in Middle Eastern Countries with Special Reference to Morocco. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, Pages: 345.

4:  Arbabi, M. and H. Hooshyar, 2006. Survey of echinococcosis and hydatidosis in Kashan region, Central Iran. Iran. J. Public Health, 35: 75-81.
Direct Link  |  

5:  Battelli, G., A. Mantovani and A. Seimenis, 2002. Cystic echinococcosis and the Mediterranean region: A long-lasting association. Parassitologia, 44: 43-57.
PubMed  |  

6:  Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 72: 248-254.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

7:  Bresson-Hadni, S., J.J. Laplante, D. Lenys, P. Rohmer and B. Gottstein et al., 1994. Seroepidemiologic screening of Echinococcus multilocularis infection in a European area endemic for alveolar echinococcosis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hygiene, 51: 837-846.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

8:  Cook, G.C. and P.M. Manson, 1996. Tropical Diseases. 20th Edn., Saunders, Philadelphia, pp: 1494-1501.

9:  Dar, F.K. and T. Alkarmi, 1997. Public health aspects of cystic echinococcosis in the Arab countries. Acta Tropica, 67: 125-132.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Dreweck, C.M., C.G. Luder, P.T. Soboslay and P. Kern, 1997. Subclass-specific serological reactivity and IgG4-specific antigen recognition in human echinococcosis. Trop. Med. Int. Health, 2: 779-787.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

11:  Eckert. J., P.M. Schantz, R.B. Gasser, P.R. Torgerson, A.S. Bessonov and S.O. Movsessian, 2001. Geographic Distribution and Prevalence. In: WHO/OIE Manual on Echinococcosis in Humans and Animals: A Public Health Problem of Global Concern, Eckert, J., M.A. Gemmell, F.X. Meslin and Z.S. Pawlowski (Eds.). World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris, pp: 100-142.

12:  Eckert, J. and R.C.A. Thompson, 1997. Intraspecific variation of Echinococcus granulosus and related species with emphasis on their infectivity to humans. Acta Tropica, 64: 19-34.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

13:  Eris, F.N., C. Akisu and U. Aksoy, 2009. Evaluation of two ELISA and two indirect hemagglutination tests for serodiagnosis of pulmonary hydatid disease. Korean J. Parasitol., 47: 427-429.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

14:  Garcia, L.S., 2001. Diagnostic Medical Parasitology. 4th Edn., ASM Press, Washington, DC., ISBN: 9781555812003, pp: 386-388.

15:  Gottstein, B., A. D'Alessandro and R.L. Rausch, 1995. Immunodiagnosis of polycystic hydatid disease/polycystic echinococcosis due to Echinococcus vogeli. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hygiene, 53: 558-563.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

16:  Idris, M.A., A. Ruppel, H. Gehrig-Feistel, A.S. Alansari, A.K. Al-Rejaibi, M.H. Tageldin and K. El-Sinary, 1999. The seroprevalence of cystic hydatidosis in Oman. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol., 93: 259-263.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Ito, A., M. Nakao, H. Kutsumi, M.W. Lightowlers, M. Itoh and S. Sato, 1993. Serodiagnosis of alveolar hydatid disease by Western blotting. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hygiene, 87: 170-172.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

18:  Kamel, M.M., K.M. Maher, I. Rabia, A.H. Helmy, A.I. El-Adawi, M.A. Mousa and A.M. Mahgoub, 2006. A Con A-purified hydatid glycoprotein fraction effectively diagnoses human hydatidosis. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 36: 945-958.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Kammerer, W.S. and P.M. Schantz, 1993. Echinococcal disease. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am., 7: 605-618.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

20:  Kern, P., K. Bardonnet, E. Renner, H. Auer and Z. Pawlowski et al., 2003. European echinococcosis registry: Human alveolar echinococcosis, Europe, 1982-2000. Emerging Infect. Dis., 9: 343-349.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

21:  Khalilpour, A., S.M. Sadjjadi, Z.K. Moghadam, M.H. Yunus, N.D. Zakaria, S. Osman and R. Noordin, 2014. Lateral flow test using Echinococcus granulosus native antigen B and comparison of IgG and IgG4 dipsticks for detection of human cystic echinococcosis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hygiene, 91: 994-999.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

22:  Kilciler, M., S. Bedir, F. Erdemir, H. Coban, B. Sahan and Y. Ozgok, 2006. Isolated unilocular renal hydatid cyst: A rare diagnostic difficulty with simple cyst. Urologia Internationalis, 77: 371-374.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

23:  Laemmli, U.K., 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227: 680-685.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

24:  Liance, M., V. Janin, S. Bresson-Hadni, D.A. Vuitton, R. Houin and R. Piarroux, 2000. Immunodiagnosis of Echinococcus infections: Confirmatory testing and species differentiation by a new commercial western blot. J. Clin. Microbiol., 38: 3718-3721.
Direct Link  |  

25:  Mandell, G.L., R.G. Douglas, J.E. Bennett and R. Dolin, 2000. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th Edn., Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, ISBN: 9780443089350, pp: 2956-2965.

26:  McVie, A., K. Ersfeld, M.T. Rogan and P.S. Craig, 1997. Expression and immunological characterisation of Echinococcus granulosus recombinant antigen B for IgG4 subclass detection in human cystic echinococcosis. Acta Tropica, 67: 19-35.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

27:  Torcal, J., M. Navarro-Zorraquino, R. Lozano, L. Larrad and J.C. Salinas et al., 1996. Immune response and in vivo production of cytokines in patients with liver hydatidosis. Clin. Exp. Immunol., 106: 317-322.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

28:  Oriol, R., J.F. Williams, M.V. Perez Esandi and C. Oriol, 1971. Purification of lipoprotein antigens of Echinococcus granulosus from sheep hydatid fluid. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hygiene, 20: 569-574.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

29:  Ozkol, M., A.A. Kilimcioglu, N. Girginkardesler, I.C. Balcıoglu, N. Sakru, M. Korkmaz and U.Z. Ok, 2005. A discrepancy between cystic echinococcosis confirmed by ultrasound and seropositivity in Turkish children. Acta Tropica, 93: 213-216.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

30:  Romig, T., 2003. Epidemiology of echinococcosis. Langenbeck's Arch. Surg., 388: 209-217.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

31:  Saberi-Firouzi, M., F. Kaffashian, E. Hayati, A.A. Ghaderi and H. Keshavarz et al., 1998. Prevalence of hydatidosis in nomadic tribes of Southern Iran. Med. J. Islamic Republic Iran, 12: 113-118.
Direct Link  |  

32:  Sadjjadi, S.M., H. Abidi, B. Sarkari, A. Izadpanah and S. Kazemian, 2007. Evaluation of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, utilizing native antigen B for serodiagnosis of human hydatidosis. Iran J. Immunol., 4: 167-172.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

33:  Sadjjadi, S.M., F. Mikaeili, M. Karamian, S. Maraghi, F.S. Sadjjadi, S. Shariat-Torbaghan and E.B. Kia, 2013. Evidence that the Echinococcus granulosus G6 genotype has an affinity for the brain in humans. Int. J. Parasitol., 43: 875-877.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

34:  Sadjjadi, S.M., 2006. Present situation of echinococcosis in the Middle East and Arabic North Africa. Parasitol. Int., 55: S197-S202.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

35:  Saida, L.A. and A.S. Nouraddin, 2011. Epidemiological study of cystic echinococcosis in man and slaughtered Animals in Erbil province, Kurdistan Regional-Iraq. Tikrit J. Pure Sci., 16: 45-50.
Direct Link  |  

36:  Sandhu, P.S., A.K. Attri and M. Chandra, 2009. Diagnostic sensitivity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for IgG in hydatid disease. Indian J. Surg., 71: 202-205.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

37:  Schagger, H. and G. von Jagow, 1987. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem., 166: 368-379.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

38:  Schantz, P.M., J. Chai, P.S. Craig, J. Eckert, D.J. Jenkins, C.N.L. Macpherson and A. Thakur, 1995. Epidemiology and Control of Hydatid Disease. In: Echinococcus and Hydatid Disease, Thompson, R.C.A. and A.J. Lymbery (Eds.). CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK., ISBN: 0-85198-910-1, pp: 233-332.

39:  Williams, J.F., M.V. Perez Esandi and R. Riol, 1971. Evaluation of purified lipoprotein antigens of Echinococcus granulosus in the immunodiagnosis of human infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hygiene, 20: 575-579.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

40:  Yanagida, T., T. Mohammadzadeh, S. Kamhawi, M. Nakao and S.M. Sadjjadi et al., 2012. Genetic polymorphisms of Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto in the Middle East. Parasitol. Int., 61: 599-603.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

41:  Zariffard, M.R. and J. Massoud, 1998. Study of Echinococcus granulosus and Echinococcus multilocularis infections in Canidiae in Ardabile province of Iran. Arch. Razi Inst., 49: 47-52.
Direct Link  |  

42:  Handa, U., A. Bal and H. Mohan, 2004. Cytomorphology of hydatid disease. Internet J. Trop. Med., Vol. 2, No. 1.

43:  Abdel-Hafez, S.K. and S.A. Kamhawi, 1997. Cystic Echinococcosis in the Levant Countries (Jordan, Palestinian Autonomy, Israel, Syria and Lebanon). In: Compendium on Cystic Echinococcosis in Africa and in Middle Eastern Countries with Special Reference to Morocco, Anderson, F.L., H. Ouhelli and M. Kashani (Eds.). Brigham Young University, Provo, UT., USA., pp: 292-316.


More
©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved