|
|
|
|
Research Article
|
|
Prevalence and Molecular Discrimination of Cryptosporidium parvum in Calves in Behira Provinces, Egypt |
|
M.A. Hassanain,
Fathia A.M. Khalil,
K.A. AbdEl-Razik
and
R.M. Shaapan
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
|
Cryptosporidium parvum is a ubiquitous zonootic protozoan parasite which is associated with severe acute diarrhoea in humans and animals. Diarrhoiec fecal samples collected from young cattle calves at different localites in Behira Province, Egypt were coproscopically examined concerning the presence of Cryptosporidium spp., oocysts. Small sized Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected of typical shape and measurements of the C. parvum oocysts with a total prevalence of 54.4% (higher prevalence 61.6% in calves less than 1 month of age while lower 38.2% in calves aged 1-2 month). Molecular characterization was done using nested PCR amplification and partial sequence analysis. The nested PCR gave the expected 1st (1325 bp) and the 2nd (825 bp) PCR products from all the examined Egyptian isolates. The DNA sequence alignments and BLAST search analysis of the of Egyptian isolates of Cryptosporidium revealed 100% homology between the 825 bp amplified fragment of Egyptian isolates and the counterpart of the 18S rDNA sequences of C. parvum deposited in Gene bank and proved that the 10 positive PCR isolates were Cryptosporidium parvum. The high prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum among calves obtained by this investigation has pointed to the existence of this zoonotic genotype and suggesting that there is a potential risk of Cryptosporidiosis as a zoonotic transmission between calves and humans in this region.
|
|
|
|
|
Received: August 07, 2011;
Accepted: November 03, 2011;
Published: December 15, 2011
|
|
INTRODUCTION
The protozoan parasites Cryptosporidium are widespread in the environment
have proven potential to cause waterborne and foodborne disease and the major
outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis have occurred as a result of contaminated drinking
water. Their entire life cycle takes place in the intestinal epithelium and
transmission occurs in the form of environmentally resistant oocysts by the
fecal-oral route and/or through contaminated food and/or water (Dawson,
2005; Smith and Nichols, 2010).
The genus Cryptosporidium is composed of at least 13 species. Cattle
are infected with at least 4 Cryptosporidium parasites: C. parvum,
C. bovis, C. andersoni and the C. ryanae. The occurrence of
these Cryptosporidium spp., in cattle were shown to be age-related and
C. parvum is the only prevalent zoonotic species in cattle, is responsible
for about 85% of the Cryptosporidium infections in pre-weaned calves
but only 1% of the Cryptosporidium infections in postweaned calves and
1-2-year-old heifers (Santin et al., 2004; Fayer
et al., 2006).
Cryptosporidium parvum is the important species which infects the gastrointestinal
epithelium of most mammalian hosts including cattle and human worldwide, causes
severe acute diarrheal enteritis with substantial morbidity and mortality among
young calves, children and immunocompromised individuals such as AIDS patients
(Chalmers and Davies, 2010). Contact with infected calves
has been implicated as the cause of many cryptosporidiosis outbreaks in veterinary
students, research technicians and children attending agricultural (Coco
et al., 2009).
Extra-intestinal infections by Cryptosporidium parvum have been detected
in pigs and sheep. In addition to intestinal infections, cryptosporidial oocysts
were found in the gall-bladders of two pigs which were 2 months old and in some
organs of sheep aged 5 days, including the gall-bladder, mesenteric lymph nodes,
trachea, lung and the uterus of one lamb as reported by Fleta
et al. (1995). Moreover, infection of the uterine mucosa was induced
after experimental intra-uterine inoculation of adult mice with C. parvum
(Liebler et al., 1986).
Lack of distinctive morphologic features of Cryptosporidium oocysts render
microscopical examination inconvenient to clearly differentiate species rather
genotypes (Fall et al., 2003). Therefore, molecular
analyses have been widely used to characterize the genetic structure of Cryptosporidium
parasites and assessment of their zoonotic significance (Xiao,
2010). Molecular analysis of C. parvum revealed several families
among isolates from humans and/or cattle as well as several subtypes within
each family (Wielinga et al., 2008). Consequantelly,
C. parvum can be divided into two genetically distinct subpopulations
based on the molecular characterization of oocysts: genotype I (anthroponotic
genotype) which is associated exclusively with human infection and is recently
proposed as a new species, C. hominis and genotype II (zoonotic or cattle
genotype) which is associated with both human and animal infections (Hajdusek
et al., 2004; Abe et al., 2006).
In Egypt, limited studies were devoted to ascertain cryptosporidiosis in human
and animals. However, Cryptosporidium was responsible for considerable part
of diarrheal illness among American military personnel participated in a military
exercise in the northwestern Egyptian desert (Sanders et
al., 2005). Human cryptosporidiosis was also reported in different ages
(Youssef et al., 2008). Cryptosporidium
infection frequently affects domestic animals with strong relation between C.
parvum infection and diarrhoea among Egyptian buffalo calves (Warda
et al., 2002; El-Khodery and Osman, 2008).
Recentally, epidemiological and molecular findings on Cryptosporidium spp.,
from Egyptian dairy calves and stray dogs were performed by Amer
et al. (2010) and El-Madawy et al. (2010).
Though cryptosporidiosis is frequent in human and livestock in Egypt, very little information is available about the genetic diversity of this parasite. Therefore, this study was aimed to determine the prevalence and as well as molecular heterogeneity of Cryptosporidium spp., isolated from calves in Behira Province, Egypt. To this end, species identification was based on nested PCR amplification and DNA sequence analysis of these Egyptian isolates and compared with counterparts deposited in Gene bank. MATERIALS AND METHODS Coproscopical examination
Fecal samples: A total of 180 diarrhoeic fecal samples were collected from young cattle calves (125 from less than 1 month and 55 from 1-2 months-aged calves) in different localites at Behira Province, Egypt.
Detection of oocysts: Fine feces smears fixated with methanol spirit
and stained with Modified Ziehl-Neelsen Stain (MZN) for detection of Cryptosporidian
oocysts according to the procedure described by Henriksen
and Pohlenz (1981). The preparations were observed and the oocysts were
measured with the help of stage micrometer conjugated with a light microscope
at the eyepiece 10x and the objective 100x. All measurements were taken in micrometers
(μm) for about 20-50 oocysts, with the range in parenthesis following the
mean (Fayer and Xiao, 2008).
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR)
PCR-sample preparation: Oocysts of Cryptosporidium were purified
from collected calve fecal samples following sucrose and Percoll flotation (Arrowood
and Sterling, 1987). The purified oocysts were washed three times with PBS
solution and then stored at -20°C in 2.5% potassium dichromate solutions.
DNA extraction: DNA was extracted from the washed Cryptosporidium
oocysts using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen Co., Cat. no. 69504) with
modifications to the manufacturers protocols according to Lalonde
and Gajadhar (2009) as follows : (i) oocysts were first suspended in 300
mL of ATL buffer and subjected to 8 cycles of freeze-thaw for 1 min in liquid
nitrogen and 1 min in a 95°C water bath; (ii) lysed suspensions were incubated
with 20 mL proteinase K (20 mg mL-1, Qiagen) for 3 h at 56°C,
followed by incubation at 70°C for 10 min in 300 mL AL buffer with vortexing
for 10 sec every 3 min. DNA was purified through the provided columns according
to the manufacturers protocol and eluted in 50 mL of the supplied AE buffer
and stored at -20°C.
Nested PCR procedure: For the primary PCR (expected amplicon size: 1325
bp), primers were used as described by Xiao et al.
(2004): 18 SF: 5´-TTCTAGAGCTAATACATGCG-3´ (forward)
and 18 SR: 5´-CCCATTTCC TTCGAAACAGGA-3´ (reverse). For
the secondary PCR (expected amplicon size: 819-825 bp, depending on the species),
the following primers were used: 18 SNF: 5´-G G A A G G G T T G T
A T T T ATTAGATAAAG-3´ (forward) and 18 SNR 5´-AAGG A
G T A A G G A A CAACCTCCA-3´ (reverse). The primary Polymerase Chain
Reaction (PCR) contained: 1 μL (50 pmol) of each primer (18SF and 18SR),
28 μL Taq PCR Master Mix (Qiagen Co. Cat. no. 201443) and 3 μL of
DNA sample and milliQ water up to a total volume of 50 mL. The conditions for
the secondary PCR were the same as for the primary PCR. Both procedures were
performed in a thermocycler (PTC-100 Thermal Cycler, MJ Research, Incline Village,
USA) starting with initial denaturation of 95°C/2 min with the following
cycles: 35 cycles of 94°C/45 sec, 62°C/45 sec, 72°C/1 min-1,
with a final extension of 72°C/10 min. PCR products were separated on 1.2%
agarose gels and visualized after ethidium bromide staining.
DNA sequencing: PCR products were sequenced in a commercial sequencing
laboratory (Fermentas GMBH, Germany). The sequences obtained were submitted
to BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) (Altschul et
al., 1997) in order to identify their similarity with sequences of the
GenBank. Sequence alignment was performed using CLUSTAL W (Thompson
et al., 1994) with manual adjustments.
RESULTS
Morphology and measurements of Cryptosporidium oocysts: The detected
Cryptosporidium oocysts in the examined calve feces stained with Ziehl-Nelson
technique were morphologically similar to Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts
which characterized by spherical to ovoid shape with smooth wall and appeared
as acid fast (red-pink) on green back.
|
Fig. 1: |
Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in calve fecal smears
stained with Modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain (MZN) (X100) |
Table 1: |
Dimensions of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts detected
in calve fecal samples |
 |
Table 2: |
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum infection among
calves |
 |
The measurements of 50 oocysts were varied from 4.4-5.8x4.3-4.9 μm of
mean (5.1x4.6) and the shape index was 1.0-1.2 of mean (1.1) (Fig.
1 and Table 1).
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium oocysts: The extent of prevalence was 54.4% (98 out of 180) of total diarrhoeic fecal calve samples were found to be infected with Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. The older (1-2 month) calves revealed lower prevalence 38.2% (21 out of 55) while the younger (less than 1 month) calves showed higher Cryptosporidium infection 61.6% (77 out of 125) (Table 2). Nested PCR analysis: Using DNA extracted directly with simple modification from Cryptosporidium oocysts in nested PCR. This technique showed high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of Cryptosporidium spp., in ruminants. The nested PCR gave the expected 1st (1325 bp) and the 2nd (825 bp) PCR products from all the examined Egyptian isolates (Fig. 2).
|
Fig. 2: |
Nested PCR of Cryptosporidium DNA: Lane 1-3, shows
2nd PCR products (825 bp) from Cryptosporidium DNA; Lane 5, molecular
DNA size markers; Lanes 4 and 6, Positive controls (Cryptosporidium parvum
DNA) and Lane 7, 1st PCR product (1325 bp) from Cryptosporidium DNA |
DNA sequencing: The nucleotide sequence alignments and BLAST search
analysis of the Egyptian isolates of Cryptosporidium in GenBank revealed
100% homology between the 825 bp amplified fragment of Egyptian isolates and
the counterpart of the 18S rDNA sequences of C. parvum. Homology search
proved that all the 10 isolates were Cryptosporidium parvum.
DISCUSSION
The Cryptosporidium oocysts detected in calve fecal smears in this study
are morphologically similar to those of Cryptosporidium parvum described
in calves in many previous studies (Fall et al.,
2003; Fayer et al., 2006; Quilez
et al., 2008). Identification of the Cryptosporidium species
was depending upon the conventional criteria, such as oocyst morphology and
measurements, this opinion was agreed with Fayer et al.
(2000) and Morgan-Ryan et al. (2002), who
cited that morphometric measurement of oocysts represents the cornerstone of
cryptosporidium taxonomy and is one of the requirements for establishing
a new species, however, is not adequate by itself and should using multiple
parameters as electron microscopy, developmental biology, host specificity,
histopathology and/or molecular biology.
In the present study, 98 out of 180 (54.4%) of the total investigated calves
were confirmed by acid fast stain to be infected with Cryptosporidium.
These finding was higher than (21.7 and 30.2%) detected by Amer
et al. (2010) and El-Khodery and Osman (2008)
in Egyptian buffalo calves and dairy calves, respectively; but lower than (95%)
estimated by Ramirez et al. (2004) in US dairy
farms; wherease, these results are consistent with (52%) had been reported by
Silverlas et al. (2009) in Europian young calves.
Several factors may be responsible for the differences in the prevalence from
the present study to those previously surveyed, such as the breed of the calves,
husbandry and management system, exac age of the host, nursing conditions of
the calves, season of the sample collection as well as the sanitary conditions
inside and around the farms. Some of these factors may act individually or collectively
to increase the risk factor associated with transmission and prevalence of
Cryptosporidium between calves (Kvac et al.,
2006; Duranti et al., 2009).
Concerning age, higher prevalence of cryptosporidiosis in our study (61.6%)
was detected in calves less than 1 month however lower prevalence (38.2%) in
1-2 month aged calves. These findings agreed with Fayer
et al. (2006) in the United States who demonstrated that only preweaned
calves are important sources of zoonotic cryptosporidiosis in humans and also
Kvac et al. (2006) and Xiao
(2010) reported that, calves less than 2 months of age are the major contributors
of zoonotic C. parvum.
It is crucial to differentiate among Cryptosporidium species infecting
cattle because only C. parvum is zoonotic type of C. parvum and
is known to be infectious to many mammalian hosts worldwide, where C. bovis,
C. andersoni and C. ryanae are cattle adapted (Fayer
et al., 2006; Santin and Zarlenga, 2009).
Using nested PCR and sequences of the rDNA, this study revealed that calves,
in Behira Province, Egypt, are only infected with the zoonotic C. parvum
assumed to be of the cattle genotype. Such genotype is detected among animals
worldwide (Fayer et al., 2000; Hajdusek
et al., 2004; Abe et al., 2006). In
Egypt, DNA amplification of C. parvum has been identified only in calves
(Warda et al., 2002). However, little information
on gene sequence of isolates from Cryptosporidium species associated
with animal hosts in Egypt has been reported so, extensive studies are extremely
important including biological aspects associated with molecular techniques.
Regarding the epidemiology of C. parvum bovine genotype, water-, food-,
or air-borne transmission and person-toperson or animal-human contacts are reported
routes of infection, with a median dose of 130 oocysts (Fayer
et al., 2000). In developing countries, the risk of infection may
be higher and the disease probably exerts most of its impact on neonates and
infants and raditionally, cattle have been considered the primary non-human
species impacted by cryptosporidiosis and the major reservoir of Cryptosporidium
for human infections (Hunter et al., 2009). The
animal-human contact is considered as the most important transmission route
in Egypt, with cattle probably representing the most important source of human
and animal infections (Warda et al., 2002).
CONCLUSION Calves in Egypt carrying the zoonotic C. parvum could represent the important farm animal source of infection to human. The high Cryptosporidium prevalence rates among calves obtained by this study indicate the potential risk of its transmission to humans through contact with infected cattle feces or contaminated milk or food with these oocysts. Further molecular analyses are needed to elucidate the nature of the other unknown genotypes of Cryptosporidium sp., to better understand the source of infection and routes of transmission and ultimately, to improve risk assessment and measures for prevention and control of cryptosporidiosis ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Hesham Abdeen (Belfast Health and Social care Trust, Belfast, UK) for his assistance in carrying out the sequence analysis of PCR products.
|
REFERENCES |
1: Abe, N., M. Matsubayashi, I. Kimata and M. Iseki, 2006. Subgenotype analysis of Cryptosporidium parvum isolates from humans and animals in Japan using the 60-kDa glycoprotein gene sequences. Parasitol. Res., 99: 303-305. CrossRef | Direct Link |
2: Amer, S., H. Honma, M. Ikarashi, C. Tada, Y. Fukuda, Y. Suyama and Y. Nakai, 2010. Cryptosporidium genotypes and subtypes in dairy calves in Egypt. Vet. Parasitol., 169: 382-386. CrossRef | Direct Link |
3: Arrowood, M.J. and C.R. Sterling, 1987. Isolation of Cryptosporidium oocysts and sporozoites using discontinuous sucrose and isopycnic Percoll gradients. J. Parasitol., 73: 314-319. PubMed | Direct Link |
4: Altschul, S.F., T.L. Madden, A.A. Schaffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller and D.J. Lipman, 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucl. Acids Res., 25: 3389-3402. PubMed | Direct Link |
5: Chalmers, R.M. and A.P. Davies, 2010. Minireview: Clinical cryptosporidiosis. Exp. Parasitol., 124: 138-146. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
6: Dawson, D., 2005. Foodborne protozoan parasites. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 103: 207-227. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
7: Del Coco, V.F., M.A. Cordoba and J.A. Basualdo, 2009. Cryptosporidiosis: An emerging zoonosis. Rev. Argent Microbiol., 41: 185-196. PubMed | Direct Link |
8: Duranti, A., S.M. Caccio, E. Pozio, A. di Egidio, M. de Curtis, A. Battisti and P. Scaramozzino, 2009. Risk factors associated with Cryptosporidium parvum infection in cattle. Zoonoses Public Health, 56: 176-182. CrossRef | Direct Link |
9: El-Khodery, S.A. and S.A. Osman, 2008. Cryptosporidiosis in buffalo calves (Bubalus bubalis): Prevalence and potential risk factors. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 40: 419-426. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
10: El-Madawy, R.S., N.O. Khalifa and H.F. Khater, 2010. Detection of cryptosporidial infection among Egyptian stry dogs by using Crypyosopridium parvum wall protein gene. Bulgarian J. Vet. Med., 13: 104-110. Direct Link |
11: Fall, A., R.C.A Thompson, R.P. Hobbs and U. Morgan-Ryan, 2003. Morphology is not a reliable tool for delineating species within Cryptosporidium. J. Parasitol., 89: 399-402. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
12: Fayer, R. and L. Xiao, 2008. Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis. 2nd Edn., CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL., ISBN-13: 9781420052268, USA, Pages: 560
13: Fayer, R., U. Morgan and S.J. Upton, 2000. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium: Transmission, detection and identification. Int. J. Parasitol., 30: 1305-1322. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
14: Fayer, R., M. Santin, J.M. Trout and E. Greiner, 2006. Prevalence of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium found in 1-2-year-old dairy cattle in the Eastern United States. Vet. Parasitol., 135: 105-112. CrossRef | Direct Link |
15: Fleta, J., C. Sanchez-Achedo, A. Clavel and J. Quilez, 1995. Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in extra-intestinal tissues of sheep and pigs. Vet. Parasitol., 59: 201-205.
16: Hajdusek, O., O. Ditrich and J. Slapeta, 2004. Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in animal and human hosts from the Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol., 122: 183-192. CrossRef | Direct Link |
17: Henriksen, S.A. and J.F. Pohlenz, 1981. Staining of cryptosporidia by a modified Ziehl-Neelsen technique. Acta Vet. Scand., 22: 594-596. PubMed | Direct Link |
18: Thompson, J.D., D.G. Higgins and T.J. Gibson, 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 22: 4673-4680. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
19: Hunter, P., D. Zmirou-Navier and P. Hartemann, 2009. Estimating the impact on health of poor reliability of drinking water interventions in developing countries. Sci. Total Environ., 407: 2621-2624. PubMed |
20: Kvac, M., M. Kouba and J. Vıtovec, 2006. Age-related and housing dependence of Cryptosporidium infection of calves from dairy and beef herds in South Bohemia, Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol., 137: 202-209. PubMed |
21: Lalonde, L.F. and A.A. Gajadhar, 2009. Effect of storage media, temperature and time on preservation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts for PCR analysis. Vet. Parasitol., 160: 185-189. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
22: Liebler, E.M., J.F. Pohlenz and D.B. Woodmansee, 1986. Experimental intra-uterine infection of adult BABL/ c mice with Cryptosporidium sp. Infect. Immun., 57: 255-259. Direct Link |
23: Morgan-Ryan, U.M., A. Fall, L.A. Ward, N. Hijjawi and I. Sulaiman et al., 2002. Cryptosporidium hominis n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) from Homo sapiens. J. Eukaryotic Microbiol., 49: 433-440. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
24: Quilez, J., E. Torres, R.M. Chalmers, G. Robinson, E.D. Cacho and C. Sanchez-Acedo, 2008. Cryptosporidium species and subtype analysis from dairy calves in Spain. Parasitology, 135: 1613-1620. PubMed |
25: Ramirez, N.E., L.A. Ward and S.A. Sreevatsan, 2004. A review of the biology and epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in humans and animals. Microb. Infect., 6: 773-785. CrossRef | Direct Link |
26: Santin, M. and D.S. Zarlenga, 2009. A multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay to simultaneously distinguish Cryptosporidium species of veterinary and public health concern in cattle. Vet. Parasitol., 166: 32-37. CrossRef | Direct Link |
27: Santin, M., J.M. Trout, L. Xiao, L. Zhou, E. Greiner and R. Fayer, 2004. Prevalence and age-related variation of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in dairy calves. Vet. Parasitol., 122: 103-117. CrossRef | Direct Link |
28: Silverlas, C., U. Emanuelson, K. de Verdier and C. Bjorkman, 2009. Prevalence and associated management factors of Cryptosporidium shedding in 50 Swedish dairy herds. Prev. Vet. Med., 90: 242-253. PubMed |
29: Smith, H.V., and R.A. Nichols, 2010. Cryptosporidium: Detection in water and food. Exp. Parasitol., 124: 61-79. PubMed | Direct Link |
30: Warda, M., A. El-Ghaysh, M. Ghoneim, F. Khalil and M. Hilali, 2002. Polymerase chain reaction is a detectable tool to discriminate between Cryptosporidium parvumand other apicomplexan parasites using C. parvum 18s RRNa and Outer Wall Protein (COWP) genes. Proceedings of the 10th Scientific Conference, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, December 2002, Assiut University, Egypt, pp: 449-457
31: Wielinga, P.R., A. de Vries, T.H. van der Goot, T. Mank, M.H. Mars, L.M. Kortbeek and J.W.B. van der Giessen, 2008. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in humans and cattle in the Netherlands. Int. J. Parasitol., 38: 809-817. CrossRef |
32: Xiao, L., 2010. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: An update. Exp. Parasitol., 124: 80-89. CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
33: Sanders, J.W., S.D. Putnam, M.S. Riddle and D.R. Tribble, 2005. Military importance of diarrhea: Lessons from the Middle East. Military importance of diarrhea: Lessons from the Middle East. 21: 9-14. PubMed | Direct Link |
34: Youssef, F.G., I. Adib, M. Riddle and C. Schlett, 2008. A review of cryptosporidiosis in Egypt. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 38: 9-28. PubMed | Direct Link |
35: Xiao, L., A.A. Lal and J. Jiang, 2004. Detection and Differentiation of Cryptosporidium Oocysts in Water by PCR-RFLP. In: Public Health Microbiology: Methods and Protocols, John, F.T., S. Rugut and L. Alicia (Eds.). Humana Press, Otowa, pp: 163-176
|
|
|
 |