• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Medical Sciences
  2. Vol 13 (3), 2013
  3. 160-168
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Medical Sciences

Year: 2013 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 160-168
DOI: 10.3923/jms.2013.160.168
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Review Article

Platinum Resistance: The Role of Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic Factors

Mohammed A. Ibrahim, Kalkunte S. Srivenugopal and Kakil Ibrahim Rasul

ABSTRACT


Active platinum compounds have important applications in treatment of number of malignant tumors and are used in the treatment of lung, ovarian, head and neck, testicular, cervical, colorectal and relapsed lymphoma. The success of platinum drugs in treatment of various types of cancers has been challenged by problems of intrinsic and acquired resistance. Biochemical and genetical studies have confirmed that platinum resistance is multifactorial and includes changes in drug transport leading to decreased drug accumulation, increased drug inactivation or detoxification, changes in DNA repair and damage bypass and alterations in the apoptotic cell death pathways. Molecular studies have revealed that genetic factors and epigenetic mechanisms are linked to platinum resistance. Proteomimetics might prove to be clinically useful as new anticancer agents capable of overcoming apoptosis resistance. The study summarizes the current and future trends of novel molecular discoveries which will find new ways to combat platinum resistance and permit the designing of patient-specific pharmacological interventions to circumvent platinum resistance and increase the drug efficacy.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
Received: January 01, 2013;   Accepted: February 22, 2013;   Published: May 17, 2013

How to cite this article

Mohammed A. Ibrahim, Kalkunte S. Srivenugopal and Kakil Ibrahim Rasul, 2013. Platinum Resistance: The Role of Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic Factors. Journal of Medical Sciences, 13: 160-168.

DOI: 10.3923/jms.2013.160.168

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jms.2013.160.168

INTRODUCTION


Chemotherapy is an important approach for treatment of various types of cancers, yet this type of treatment is facing the problem of drug resistance. Drug resistance was discovered in early days of cancer chemotherapeutic treatment by nitrogen mustard and recent investigations have shown that the problems of resistance encounter other active chemotherapeutic compounds (Goodman et al., 1946; Raguz and Yague, 2008). Several mechanisms are involved in development of drug resistance toward various antitumor agents, e.g., alteration in drug transport and metabolism, mutation and amplification of drug targets and others (Table 1). In addition, arising multidrug resistance creates thorny clinical problems which are difficult to overcome (Bidgoli et al., 2006; Garattini, 2007; Zahreddine and Borden, 2013). Another important point in this area of research is the genetic basis of resistance. The genetic mutational root of resistance was reported in cancer cells (Iwasa et al., 2006). Whereas other studies have shown that anticancer drug resistance and cross resistance are also under epigenetic control (Roberti et al., 2006; Ibrahim, 2010a). There are three main molecular epigenetic routes, DNA methylation, histone modifications and RNAi, which might lead to drug resistance in various types of cancers. In this connection, there are increasing support of possible involvement of epigenetic mechanisms in emerging of drug resistance in cancers cells and that the induction of epigenetic changes results in acquired resistance to cytotoxic drugs (Baker and El-Osta, 2003; Egger et al., 2004; Glasspool et al., 2006). For that, the aim of the present study is to review the recent advances of biochemical, genetic and epigenetic basis of platinum drugs resistance and their implication on cancer treatment.

PLATINUM DRUGS AND CANCER THERAPY

Active platinum compounds have important applications in treatment of number of malignant tumors. For almost three decades, they have been used in the treatment of lung, ovarian, head and neck, testicular, cervical, colorectal and relapsed lymphoma (Galluzzi et al., 2012). The best known compound in this group is cisplatin [cis-diammine-dichloroplatinum(II)] with MW of 300.1 and chemical formula (cis-[PtCl2(NH3)2]), also known as cis-DDP (Rabik and Dolan, 2007). The bioactivity of cisplatin was first discovered more than four decades ago, it showed inhibitory effect against Eschericia coli (Rosenberg et al., 1969); since then it has been shown as an anti-tumor drug and was approved by FDA in 1978 (Galluzzi et al., 2012). The drug is currently widely used in treatment of advanced or metastatic tumor of small cell lung carcinoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma, head and neck cancers, testis and ovarian tumors (Chu, 1994; Yoshida et al., 1994; Jamal et al., 2006). In contrast to cisplatin, the transplatin which possess the amine ligands in the trans-position is not effective as an antitumor agent (Kelland et al., 1994; Rabik and Dolan, 2007). Because of the toxicities associated with cisplatin therapy, namely, the nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity and ototoxicity (Cvitkovic et al., 1977; Kelland, 2007), two more platinum drugs with lower toxicity profiles were introduced to clinical practice. These are carboplatin [cis-diammine (cyclobutane-1,1-dicarboxylate-O,O’) platinum(II)] and oxaliplatin [(1R, 2R)-cyclohexane-1,2-diamine](ethanedioato-O,O) platinum(II) which have fewer adverse effects but similar antitumor activity (Kidani et al., 1978; Harrap, 1985; Galluzzi et al., 2012). In addition, these studies have shown that the substitution of the chloride in cisplatin with bulky groups as in carboplatin and oxaliplatin leads to a slower dissociation of the compounds into electrophilic species that interact with nucleophilic centers in DNA (mainly guanine N7). Carboplatin is used for the treatment of ovarian cancer, while oxaliplatin is approved for treatment of colorectal cancer in association with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (the so-called FOLFOX protocol) (Harrap, 1985; Goldberg et al., 2004). However both drugs show cross resistance to cisplatin (Stordal et al., 2007; Galluzzi et al., 2012).

Table 1: Mechanisms of antitumor drug resistance
Image for - Platinum Resistance: The Role of Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic Factors

The success of platinum drugs in cancer therapy has encouraged the investigators in this field to develop two more platinum drugs namely, picoplatin [amminedichloro (2-methylpyridine) Platinum] and satraplatin [(OC-6-43)-bis(acetato) amminedichloro (cyclohexylamine) platinum] (Choy, 2006; Eckardt et al., 2009), which are undergoing clinical trials.

Now-a-days, cisplatin is considered the most prominent anticancer drug of platinum compounds. Its therapeutic action is unquestionable in treatment of solid tumors. It is worth noting that testicular cancer can be cured by treatment with cisplatin combined with bleomycin and etoposide (Rabik and Dolan, 2007). The authors also indicated in their work that cisplatin is also used in combination with carboplatin for treatment of ovarian, cervical, head and neck, non-small cell lung and lymphoma.

MODES OF ACTION OF PLATINUM DRUGS

The mechanisms of anticancer activity of platinum drugs are well studied. It is established that the primary target of cisplatin and other active platinum drugs is DNA, yet other biological targets are important, since the nucleophilic sulfhydryl groups present in glutathione (GSH) and proteins are also targeted for platination (Jamieson and Lippard, 1999). The involvement of the Multi-drug Resistance Proteins (MRPs) in the transport of in glutathione-platinum conjugates is also well known (Deeley et al., 2006; Zhou et al., 2008). Much research has been done on the aquation and pre-association multistage process of cisplatin and some of its derivatives binding to DNA and the formation of inter-/intra-strand cross-links. As a result of these studies their main mode of action has been proposed to be via covalent binding to DNA (Suntharalingam et al., 2013). Another recent study showed the critical role of B-ring hydroxyls of flavonols in their interactions with a cisplatin-bound double stranded DNA surface. These molecular interactions between cisplatin and flavonols increased the efficacy of cisplatin when combating cancer (Zwang et al., 2013).

DNA cross links can halt proliferation as a consequence of prevention of DNA replication and the signaling events leading to cell death (Crul et al.,1997). Carboplatin and oxaliplatin have similar modes of action and form identical lesions on DNA (Chaney et al., 2005; Rabik and Dolan, 2007). The intra-strand cross links formed by oxaliplatin treatment bends the double helix more than intra-strands formed by cisplatin and carboplatin, whereas inter-strand lesions induce even more steric changes in DNA (Misset et al., 2000; Di Francesco et al., 2002). The High Mobility Group (HMG) of proteins is known to bind the platinated DNA strongly, this binding increases the degree of distortion of platinated DNA and it has been suggested that these complexes may shield DNA from intracellular repair, leading to cytotoxicity (Park and Lippard, 2012). In addition, cisplatin can induce cells to undergo apoptosis (Jamieson and Lippard, 1999).

PROBLEM OF DRUG RESISTANCE

Cisplatin and the other two platinum drugs (carboplatin and oxaliplatin) form the most effective and widely used agents for treatment of solid tumors (lung, bladder, ovary and testicular carcinoma). However, the development of secondary resistance remains a major obstacle to clinical efficacy. It was reported that prolonged cisplatin treatment raise the frequency of emergence of resistant tumors (Kartalou and Essigmann, 2001; Allingham-Hawkins et al., 2010; Oliver et al., 2010). Mechanisms of resistance to these drugs are well studied and arise as a result increased levels of DNA repair, reduced uptake, inactivation by glutathione and other anti-oxidants (Rabik and Dolan, 2007).

An important drawback of emerging resistance to an anticancer drug is cross resistance to other antitumor drugs (Gottesman and Ling, 2006). It was reported that ovarian cancer cell lines with low to very high levels of resistance to cisplatin are 8-to 850-fold resistant to the epipodophyllotoxin derivative etoposide (Hamaguchi et al., 1993). Adriamycin-resistant sublines were found cross-resistant to MDR-related drugs, epirubicin, mitoxantrone, vincristine, etoposide and taxol but not the MDR-unrelated drug, mytomycin (Uchiyama-Kokubu and Watanabe, 2001). In a study carried out by Shen et al. (1998), cross resistance to methotrexate (MTX) and several metal salts was observed in cisplatin-resistant human hepatoma and a cervical adenocarcinoma cell lines. Accordingly, Multiple Drug Resistance (MDR) is an important cause of failures of chemotherapy; it provides a shield for tumor cells against various antitumor drugs.

GENES INVOLVED IN RESISTANCE TO PLATINUM DRUGS

The genetic factors that are involved in the mechanisms of drug resistance and cross resistance have been investigated. The genetic mutational basis of resistance was reported, in addition to the other important genetic mechanism leading to drug resistance via epigenetic routes (Iwasa et al., 2006; Roberti et al., 2006). The epigenetic routes refer to the role of three main molecular mechanisms, DNA methylation, histone modifications and RNAi on development of drug resistance in various types of cancers (Ibrahim, 2010a).

Table 2: Genes involved in platinum drug resistance
Image for - Platinum Resistance: The Role of Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic Factors

Table 3: DNA methylation aberration of genes associated with cisplatin resistance
Image for - Platinum Resistance: The Role of Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic Factors

Now-a-days, it is well established that epigenetic changes are involved in the induction of resistance to cytotoxic drugs and are more frequent than gene mutation (Shoemaker, 2000; Egger et al., 2004; Glasspool et al., 2006, Chang et al., 2010). The modes of action associated with the expressions of some genes conferring resistance to platinum drugs were reported (Table 2). The products of these genes contribute to platinum drug resistance in one of following mechanisms: Copper influx/efflux transporters (Safaei et al., 2004; Safaei and Howell, 2005), multidrug resistant associated protein MRP 2 (Li et al., 2004), DNA-damage-responsive/anticancer barrier (Siddik, 2003; Huang et al., 2005). Yeast strains were also used to investigate genes involved in cisplatin resistance. Homozygous diploid deletion pool of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was used systematically to identify three novel genes (PSY1-3, “platinum sensitivity”) that when deleted confer sensitivity to the anticancer agents cisplatin, oxaliplatin and mitomycin C (Wu et al., 2004).

ROLE OF DNA METHYLATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF CANCER AND DRUG RESISTANCE

Aberrations of genomic DNA methylation, loss of genomic methylation or hypermethylation, cause genomics malfunctions. These changes from normal state lead to development of diseases, e.g., cancers and drug resistance (Ibrahim, 2010a-c; Ibrahim, 2012). Several investigations had shown the role of DNA hypermethylation in the development of drug resistance. Nyce and her colleagues were able to show that chemotherapeutic drugs can induce DNA hypermethylation in cultured cells (Nyce et al., 1986; Nyce, 1989; Nyce et al., 1993). Whereas other investigators had reported that resistance to cisplatin was accompanied by over-expression of DNA methyltransferases (Wang et al., 2001) and the resistance could be induced by over-expression of DNA methyltransferase genes (Qiu et al., 2005). Similar results were obtained when human breast adenocarcinoma cells were treated with adriamycin (Segura-Pacheco et al., 2006). More recent study by Kastl and his colleagues were able to demonstrate that changes in the DNA methylation machinery were associated with resistance to docetaxel in breast cancer cells (Kastl et al., 2010). Chang and his colleagues provided further evidence that epigenetic promoter methylation was a frequent event during chronic cisplatin exposure and that secondary changes in gene regulation can play an important role in generating drug resistant phenotypes (Chang et al., 2010). Changes in the DNA methylation patterns are observed in RASSF1A, HIC1 and MGMT genes of male germ cell tumor whereas other genes e.g., SAT, C8orf4, LAMB3 and others were observed in cell lines (Table 3). It is worth to mention that our search showed that several genes which are linked to the platinum drug resistance (Table 2) are prone to alteration of DNA methylation patterns, e.g., CTR1 (Stewart et al., 2009), bcl2 (Hanada et al., 1993), MDR1 (El-Osta et al., 2002).

IMPACT OF REVERSAL OF DNA METHYLATION PROFILES ON DRUG RESISTANCE

It is possible to hypothesize that reversal of DNA aberration of cancer cells or drug resistance cells to normal states might be considered as promising approach for cancer therapy and overcoming the problem of anticancer drug resistance (Perez-Plasencia and Duenas-Gonzalez, 2006). One interesting approach to overcome platinum compounds resistance is to use DNA methylation inhibitors. A study carried out by group of researchers showed that treatment of HeLa cells with hydralazine and valproic acid lead to an increase in the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, cisplatin and adriamycin (Chavez-Blanco et al., 2006). Other research group led by Candelaria showed that anticancer drug resistance which was associated with changes in the DNA methylation profiles could be reversed by epigenetic drugs (Candelaria et al., 2007). Research in this field is likely to lead to the development and discovery of epigenetic drugs especially from plant origin (Kirk et al., 2008; Link et al., 2010). These drugs might have future application in cancer therapy; in addition medicinal plants might be a good source for such epigenetic drugs (Ibrahim, 2010a; Jamal et al., 2010).

NEW NOVEL APPROACHES TO OVERCOME CISPLATIN RESISTANCE

Other ways to overcome cisplatin resistance have been investigated. A recent study showed that cisplatin resistant cells accumulate Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), this observation might prove useful in targeted therapy (Wangpaichitr et al., 2012). Another approach has been directed to study the correlation between cisplatin resistance and factors involved in cell growth. It was possible to show that cisplatin resistance can be reversed by inhibition of modulators of cell growth (Wangpaichitr et al., 2008). In addition, there is strong evidence which points at the association of cisplatin resistance with apoptotic resistance. Research in this area has shown that this type of resistance is under control of apoptotic regulators (Crawford et al., 2011). An important group of proteins which are involved in apoptosis process belong to Bcl-2 family of proteins and includes two types of factors, pro-and anti-apoptotic, these are acting at the mitochondrial level (Hanahan and Weinberg, 2000; Susnow et al., 2009). BH3 domain is an interesting feature of these proteins, it is suggested that the interactions are mediated by this domain that consists of approximately 20 amino acids (Zhai et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2007). It is possible to identify or synthesize chemicals that mimic the BH3 domain and have anti-cancer activities (Fesik, 2005; Zhai et al., 2006). In this connection, ABT-737 is an example of one of the first small-molecule that binds to Bcl-xL, Bcl-2 and Bcl-w with high affinity (Lee et al., 2007). Since apoptosis resistance is a key feature, we believe that targeting this pathway with the BH3 mimetics, e.g., ABT-737, is a viable strategy for sensitizing cisplatin resistant tumors. It is worth mentioned that despite high affinity of ABT-737 for BcL-2, BcL-xL and BcL-w, many cell types proved refractory to ABT-737. It is worth mentioned that resistance in this case was attributed to the inability of ABT-737 to target Mcl-1 (Van Delft et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2007). On the other hand, a more recent study has shown the potential of this approach when used in combination with cytotoxic drugs (Joudeh and Claxton, 2012). Further, they reported that several agents target the function of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members have entered clinical trials.

CONCLUSION


Cancer remains a major health problem with the incidence of solid tumors ever increasing, more so among women and the aging population. Platinum-based drugs, cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin form the most effective and widely used agents for these malignancies. Despite the powerful antitumor effects and reasonable improvement in the quality of life for many patients, the therapeutic efficacy of platinum drugs is limited because of intrinsic or acquired tumor resistance. DNA methylation is associated with resistance to active platinum compounds and some other important anticancer drugs. We believe that investigation of DNA methylation of genes, their products proved being involved in cisplatin resistance, will help in introducing molecular markers to detect acquired resistance to cisplatin and other platinum drugs in patients undergoing therapy. Furthermore, strong evidence points to the association of cisplatin resistance with apoptotic resistance resulting from the over expression of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family of genes or under expression of the apoptotic regulators. It has also been shown that BH3 domains possess selectivity and have important applications in cancer therapy. Accordingly, it is expected that proteomimetics will have potential as anti-cancer therapeutics.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


The authors would like to thank the Princess Sumaya University for Technology, TTUHSC School of Pharmacy, Weill Cornell Medical College and Hamad Medical Corporation for supporting the research related to this publication.

REFERENCES


  1. Allingham-Hawkins, D., A. Lea and S. Levine, 2010. ERCC1 expression analysis to guide therapy in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS Curr., Vol. 2.
    CrossRef

  2. Baker, E.K. and A. El-Osta, 2003. The rise of DNA methylation and the importance of chromatin on multidrug resistance in cancer. Exp. Cell Res., 290: 177-194.
    CrossRef

  3. Bidgoli, S.A., M. Bagher, Z. Mansoor Djamali, F. Shamileh and A. Ebrahim, 2006. P-glycoprotein and topoisomerase II α expression in advanced gastric cancer patients: Association with clinicopathological findings. Int. J. Pharmacol., 2: 383-393.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Candelaria, M., D. Gallardo-Rincon, C. Arce, L. Cetina and J.L. Aguilar-Ponce et al., 2007. A phase II study of epigenetic therapy with hydralazine and magnesium valproate to overcome chemotherapy resistance in refractory solid tumors. Ann. Oncol., 18: 1529-1538.
    Direct Link

  5. Chaney, S.G., S.L. Campbell, E. Bassett and Y. Wu, 2005. Recognition and processing of cisplatin- and oxaliplatin-DNA adducts. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol., 53: 3-11.
    CrossRefPubMed

  6. Chang, X., C.L. Monitto, S. Demokan, M.S. Kim and S.S. Chang et al., 2010. Identification of hypermethylated genes associated with cisplatin resistance in human cancers. Cancer Res., 70: 2870-2879.
    Direct Link

  7. Chavez-Blanco, A., C. Perez-Plasencia, E. Perez-Cardenas, C. Carrasco-Legleu and E. Rangel-Lopez et al., 2006. Antineoplastic effects of the DNA methylation inhibitor hydralazine and the histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid in cancer cell lines. Cancer Cell Int., Vol. 6.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  8. Chen, H.H. and M.T. Kuo, 2010. Role of glutathione in the regulation of cisplatin resistance in cancer chemotherapy. Met. Based Drugs.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Choy, H., 2006. Satraplatin: An orally available platinum analog for the treatment of cancer. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther., 6: 973-982.
    CrossRef

  10. Chu, G., 1994. Cellular responses to cisplatin: The roles of DNA-binding proteins and DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 787-790.

  11. Crawford, N., A.D. Chacko, K.I. Savage, F. McCoy, K. Redmond, D.B. Longley and D.A. Fennell, 2011. Platinum resistant cancer cells conserve sensitivity to BH3 domains and obatoclax induced mitochondrial apoptosis. Apoptosis, 16: 311-320.
    CrossRef

  12. Crul, M., J.H. Schellens, J.H. Beijnen and M. Maliepaard, 1997. Cisplatin resistance and DNA repair. Cancer Treat. Rev., 23: 341-366.
    PubMedDirect Link

  13. Cvitkovic, E., J. Spaulding, V. Bethune, J. Martin and W.F. Whitmore, 1977. Improvement of Cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum (NSC 119875): Therapeutic index in an animal model. Cancer, 39: 1357-1361.

  14. Deeley, R.G., C. Westlake and S.P.C. Cole, 2006. Transmembrane transport of endo- and xenobiotics by mammalian ATP-binding cassette multidrug resistance proteins. Physiol. Rev., 86: 849-899.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  15. Di Francesco, A.M., A. Ruggiero and R. Riccardi, 2002. Cellular and molecular aspects of drugs of the future: Oxaliplatin. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 59: 1914-1927.
    CrossRef

  16. Eckardt, J.R., D.L. Bentsion, O.N. Lipatov, I.S. Polyakov and F.R. Mackintosh et al., 2009. Phase II study of picoplatin as second-line therapy for patients with small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 27: 2046-2051.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  17. Egger, G., G. Liang, A. Aparicio and P.A. Jones, 2004. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature, 429: 457-463.
    PubMed

  18. El-Osta, A., P. Kantharidis, J.R. Zalcberg and A.P. Wolffe, 2002. Precipitous release of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 and histone deacetylase 1 from the methylated human multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) on activation. Mol. Cell Biol., 22: 1844-1857.
    CrossRef

  19. Ferry, K.V., T.C. Hamilton and S.W. Johnson, 2000. Increased nucleotide excision repair in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells: Role of ERCC1-XPF. Biochem. Pharmacol., 60: 1305-1313.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  20. Fesik, S.W., 2005. Promoting apoptosis as a strategy for cancer drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 5: 876-885.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  21. Fry, D.W. and R.C. Jackson, 1986. Membrane transport alterations as a mechanism of resistance to anticancer agents. Cancer Surv., 5: 47-79.
    PubMedDirect Link

  22. Galluzzi, L., L. Senovilla, I. Vitale, J. Michels and I. Martins et al., 2012. Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance. Oncogene, 31: 1869-1883.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  23. Garattini, S., 2007. Pharmacokinetics in cancer chemotherapy. Eur. J. Cancer, 43: 271-282.
    CrossRefPubMed

  24. Gately, D.P. and S.B. Howell, 1993. Cellular accumulation of the anticancer agent cisplatin: A review. Br. J. Cancer, 67: 1171-1176.
    PubMed

  25. Glasspool, R.M., J.M.Teodoridis and R. Brown, 2006. Epigenetics as a mechanism driving polygenic clinical drug resistance. Br. J. Cancer, 94: 1087-1092.
    CrossRef

  26. Goldberg, R.M., D.J. Sargent, R.F. Morton, C.S. Fuchs and R.K. Ramanathan et al., 2004. A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol., 22: 23-30.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  27. Goodman, L.S., M.M. Wintrobe, W. Dameshek, M.J. Goodman, A. Gilman and M.T. McLennan, 1946. Nitrogen mustard therapy: Use of methyl-bis(beta-chloroethyl)amine hydrochloride and tris(beta-chloroethyl)amine hydrochloride for Hodgkin's disease, lymphosarcoma, leukemia and certain allied and miscellaneous disorders. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 132: 126-132.
    CrossRef

  28. Gottesman, M.M. and V. Ling, 2006. The molecular basis of multidrug resistance in cancer: The early years of P-glycoprotein research. FEBS Lett., 580: 998-1009.
    CrossRef

  29. Hamaguchi, K., A.K. Godwin, M. Yakushiji, P.J. O'Dwyer, R.F. Ozols and T.C. Hamilton, 1993. Cross-resistance to diverse drugs is associated with primary cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Res., 53: 5225-5232.
    Direct Link

  30. Hanada, M., D. Delia, A. Aiello, E. Stadtmauer and J. C. Reed, 1993. Bcl-2 gene hypomethylation and high-level expression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood, 82: 1820-1828.
    Direct Link

  31. Hanahan, D. and R.A. Weinberg, 2000. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell, 100: 57-70.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  32. Harrap, K.R., 1985. Preclinical studies identifying carboplatin as a viable cisplatin alternative. Cancer Treat. Rev., 12: 21-33.
    CrossRef

  33. Huang, R.Y., M. Eddy, M. Vujcic and D. Kowalski, 2005. Genome-wide screen identifies genes whose inactivation confer resistance to cisplatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cancer Res., 65: 5890-5897.
    CrossRef

  34. Ibrahim, M.A., 2010. Perspective of DNA methylation in cancer research. Int. J. Cancer Res., 6: 188-201.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  35. Ibrahim, M.A., 2010. Advances in genomic DNA methylation analysis. Biotechnology, 9: 459-468.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  36. Ibrahim, M.A., 2010. Prospects for DNA methylation research in psychiatric disorders. Trends Med. Res., 5: 1-15.
    CrossRef

  37. Ibrahim, M.A., 2012. An insight into the use of genome, methylome and gethylome in synthetic biology. Asian J. Applied Sci., 5: 67-73.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  38. Iwasa, Y., M.A. Nowak and F. Michor, 2006. Evolution of resistance during clonal expansion. Genetics, 172: 2557-2566.
    CrossRef

  39. Jamal, A., R. Siegel, E.L. Ward, T. Murray, J. Xu, M. Smigal and J. Thun, 2006. Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin., 56: 106-130.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  40. Jamal, P., A.A. Barkat and A. Amid, 2010. Distribution of phenolics in various Malaysian medicinal plants. J. Applied Sci., 10: 2658-2662.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  41. Jamieson, E.R. and S.J. Lippard, 1999. Structure, recognition and processing of cisplatin-DNA adducts. Chem. Rev., 99: 2467-2498.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  42. Kartalou, M. and J.M. Essigmann, 2001. Mechanisms of resistance to cisplatin. Mut. Res., 478: 23-43.
    PubMedDirect Link

  43. Kastl, L., I. Brown and A.C. Schofield, 2010. Altered DNA methylation is associated with docetaxel resistance in human breast cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol., 36: 1235-1241.
    PubMed

  44. Kelland, L., 2007. The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 7: 573-584.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  45. Kelland, L.R., C.F. Barnard, K.J. Mellish, M. Jones and P.M. Goddard et al., 1994. A novel trans-platinum coordination complex possessing in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity. Cancer Res., 54: 5618-5622.
    PubMed

  46. Kidani, Y., K. Inagaki, M. Iigo, A. Hoshi and K. Kuretani, 1978. Antitumor activity of 1,2-diaminocyclohexaneplatinum complexes against Sarcoma-180 ascites form. J. Med. Chem., 21: 1315-1318.
    CrossRef

  47. Kirk, H., W.T. Cefalu, D. Ribnicky, Z. Liu and K.J. Eilertsen, 2008. Botanicals as epigenetic modulators for mechanisms contributing to development of metabolic syndrome. Metabolism Clin. Exp., 57: S16-S23.
    CrossRef

  48. Koberle, B., M.T. Tomicic, S. Usanova and B. Kaina, 2010. Cisplatin resistance: Preclinical findings and clinical implications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1806: 172-182.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  49. Koul, S., J. Houldsworth, M.M. Mansukhani, A. Donadio and J.M. McKiernan et al., 2002. Characteristic promoter hypermethylation signatures in male germ cell tumors. Mol. Cancer, Vol. 1.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  50. Koul, S., J.M. McKiernan, G. Narayan, J. Houldsworth and J. Bacik et al., 2004. Role of promoter hypermethylation in Cisplatin treatment response of male germ cell tumors. Mol. Cancer, Vol. 3.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  51. Lee, E.F., P.E. Czabotar, B.J. Smith, K. Deshayes, K. Zobel, P.M. Colman and W.D. Fairlie, 2007. Crystal structure of ABT-737 complexed with Bcl-xL: Implications for selectivity of antagonists of the Bcl-2 family. Cell Death Differ., 14: 1711-1713.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  52. Li, W.H., Y. Cui and J.R. Zhu, 2004. Methylated oligonucleotide inhibiting expression of human MRP2 and reversing multidrug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma CellHepG2. Ai Zheng, 23: 900-904.
    PubMed

  53. Link, A., F. Balaguer and A. Goel, 2010. Cancer chemoprevention by dietary polyphenols: Promising role for epigenetics. Biochem. Pharmacol., 80: 1771-1792.
    CrossRef

  54. Martin, L.P., T.C. Hamilton and R.J. Schilder, 2008. Platinum resistance: The role of DNA repair pathways. Clin. Cancer Res., 14: 1291-1295.
    CrossRef

  55. Misset, J.L., H. Bleiberg, W. Sutherland, M. Bekradda and E. Cvitkovic, 2000. Oxaliplatin clinical activity: A review. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol., 35: 75-93.
    CrossRefPubMed

  56. Nyce, J., L. Liu and P.A. Jones, 1986. Variable effects of DNA-synthesis inhibitors upon DNA methylation in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 14: 4353-4367.
    PubMed

  57. Nyce, J., 1989. Drug-induced DNA hypermethylation and drug resistance in human tumors. Cancer Res., 49: 5829-5836.
    PubMed

  58. Nyce, J., S. Leonard, D. Canupp, S. Schulz and S. Wong, 1993. Epigenetic mechanisms of drug resistance: drug-induced DNA hypermethylation and drug resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 90: 2960-2964.
    Direct Link

  59. Oliver, T.G., K.L. Mercer, L.C. Sayles, J.R. Burke and D. Mendus et al., 2010. Chronic cisplatin treatment promotes enhanced damage repair and tumor progression in a mouse model of lung cancer. Genes Dev., 24: 837-852.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  60. Park, S. and S.J. Lippard, 2012. Binding interaction of HMGB4 with cisplatin-modified DNA. Biochemistry, 51: 6728-6737.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  61. Perez-Plasencia, C. and A. Duenas-Gonzalez, 2006. Can the state of cancer chemotherapy resistance be reverted by epigenetic therapy? Mol. Cancer, Vol. 5.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  62. Qiu, Y.Y., B.L. Mirkin and R.S. Dwivedi, 2005. Inhibition of DNA methyltransferase reverses cisplatin induced drug resistance in murine neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Detect. Prev., 29: 456-463.
    PubMed

  63. Rabik, C.A. and M.E. Dolan, 2007. Molecular mechanisms of resistance and toxicity associated with platinating agents. Cancer Treatment Rev., 33: 9-23.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  64. Raguz, S. and E. Yague, 2008. Resistance to chemotherapy: New treatments and novel insights into an old problem. Br. J. Cancer, 99: 387-391.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  65. Roberti, A., D. La Sala and C. Cinti, 2006. Multiple genetic and epigenetic interacting mechanisms contribute to clonally selection of drug-resistant tumors: Current views and new therapeutic prospective. J. Cell. Physiol., 207: 571-581.
    CrossRef

  66. Rosenberg, B., L. Van Camp, J.E. Trosko, V.H. Mansour, 1969. Platinum compounds: A new class of potent antitumour agents. Nature, 22: 385-386.
    CrossRef

  67. Safaei, R., A. K. Holzer, K. Katano, G. Samimi and S.B. Howell, 2004. The role of copper transporters in the development of resistance to Pt drugs. J. Inorg. Biochem., 98: 1607-1613.
    CrossRef

  68. Safaei, R. and S.B. Howell, 2005. Copper transporters regulate the cellular pharmacology and sensitivity to Pt drugs. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol., 53: 13-23.
    CrossRef

  69. Segura-Pacheco, B., E. Perez-Cardenas, L. Taja-Chayeb, A. Chavez-Blanco, A. Revilla-Vazquez, L. Benitez-Bribiesca and A. Duenas-Gonzalez, 2006. Global DNA hypermethylation-associated cancer chemotherapy resistance and its reversion with the demethylating agent hydralazine. J. Transl. Med., Vol. 4.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  70. Shen, D.W., I. Pastan and M.M. Gottesman, 1998. Cross-resistance to methotrexate and metals in human cisplatin-resistant cell lines results from a pleiotropic defect in accumulation of these compounds associated with reduced plasma membrane binding proteins. Cancer Res., 58: 268-275.
    Direct Link

  71. Shoemaker, R.H., 2000. Genetic and epigenetic factors in anticancer drug resistance. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 92: 4-5.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  72. Siddik, Z.H., 2003. Cisplatin: Mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance. Oncogene, 22: 7265-7279.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  73. Stordal, B., N. Pavlakis and R. Davey, 2007. Oxaliplatin for the treatment of cisplatin-resistant cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat. Rev., 33: 347-357.
    CrossRef

  74. Stewart, D.J., J. Issa, R. Kurzrock, M.I. Nunez and J. Jelinek et al., 2009. Decitabine effect on tumor global DNA methylation and other parameters in a phase I trial in refractory solid tumors and lymphomas. Clin. Cancer Res., 15: 3881-3888.
    CrossRef

  75. Suntharalingam, K., O. Mendoza, A.A. Duarte, D.J. Mann and R. Vilar, 2013. A platinum complex that binds non-covalently to DNA and induces cell death via a different mechanism than cisplatin. Metallomics, (In Press).
    CrossRefDirect Link

  76. Susnow, N., L. Zeng, D. Margineantu and D.M. Hockenbery, 2009. Bcl-2 family proteins as regulators of oxidative stress. Semin. Cancer Biol., 19: 42-49.
    CrossRef

  77. Takezawa, K., V. Pirazzoli, M.E. Arcila, C.A. Nebhan and X. Song et al., 2012. HER2 amplification: A potential mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant lung cancers that lack the second-site EGFRT790M mutation. Cancer Discovery, 2: 922-933.
    CrossRef

  78. Uchiyama-Kokubu, N. and T. Watanabe, 2001. Establishment and characterization of adriamycin-resistant human colorectal adenocarcinoma HCT-15 cell lines with multidrug resistance. Anticancer Drugs, 12: 769-779.
    PubMedDirect Link

  79. Van Delft, M.F., A.H. Wei, K.D. Mason, C.J. Vandenberg and L. Chen et al., 2006. The BH3 mimetic ABT-737 targets selective Bcl-2 proteins and efficiently induces apoptosis via Bak/Bax if Mcl-1 is neutralized. Cancer Cell, 10: 389-399.
    CrossRef

  80. Wang, C., B.L. Mirkin and R.S. Dwivedi, 2001. DNA (cytosine) methyltransferase overexpression is associated with acquired drug resistance of murine neuroblastoma cells. Int. J. Oncol., 18: 323-329.
    PubMed

  81. Wangpaichitr, M., C. Wu, M. You, M.T. Kuo, L. Feun, T. Lampidis and N. Savaraj, 2008. Inhibition of mTOR restores cisplatin sensitivity through down-regulation of growth and anti-apoptotic proteins. Eur. J. Pharmacol., 591: 124-127.
    CrossRef

  82. Wangpaichitr, M., E.J. Sullivan, G. Theodoropoulos, C. Wu and M. You et al., 2012. The relationship of thioredoxin-1 and cisplatin resistance: Its impact on ROS and oxidative metabolism in lung cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther., 11: 604-615.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  83. Welsh, S.J., J. Titley, L. Brunton, M. Valenti, P. Monaghan, A.L. Jackman and G.W. Aherne, 2000. Comparison of Thymidylate Synthase (TS) protein up-regulation after exposure to TS inhibitors in normal and tumor cell lines and tissues. Clin. Cancer Res., 6: 2538-2546.
    Direct Link

  84. Wu, H.I., J.A. Brown, M.J. Dorie, L. Lazzeroni and J.M. Brown, 2004. Genome-wide identification of genes conferring resistance to the anticancer agents cisplatin, oxaliplatin and mitomycin C. Cancer Res., 64: 3940-3948.
    CrossRef

  85. Yoshida, M., A.R. Khokhar and Z.H. Siddik, 1994. Biochemical pharmacology of homologous alicyclic mixed amine platinum(II) complexes in sensitive and resistant tumor cell lines. Cancer Res., 54: 3468-3473.
    Direct Link

  86. Zhai, D., C. Jin, A.C. Satterthwait and J.C. Reed, 2006. Comparison of chemical inhibitors of antiapoptotic Bcl-2-family proteins. Cell Death Differ., 13: 1419-1421.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  87. Zhang, L. and B. Fang, 2005. Mechanisms of resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in cancer. Cancer Gene Ther., 12: 228-237.
    CrossRef

  88. Zahreddine, H. and K.L.B. Borden, 2013. Mechanisms and insights into drug resistance in cancer. Front. Pharmacol., Vol. 4.
    CrossRef

  89. Zhou, S.F., L.L. Wang, Y.M. Di, C.C. Xue, W. Duan, C.G. Li and Y. Li, 2008. Substrates and inhibitors of human multidrug resistance associated proteins and the implications in drug development. Curr. Med. Chem., 15: 1981-2039.
    Direct Link

  90. Zwang, T.J., K. Singh, M.S. Johal and C.R. Selassie, 2013. Elucidation of the molecular interaction between cisplatin and flavonol(s) and their effect on DNA binding. J. Med. Chem., 56: 1491-1498.
    CrossRef

  91. Joudeh, J. and D. Claxton, 2012. Obatoclax mesylate: Pharmacology and potential for therapy of hematological neoplasms. Expert Opin Investig. Drugs, 21: 363-373.
    CrossRefPubMed

Related Articles

P-glycoprotein and Topoisomerase II α Expression in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: Association with Clinicopathological Findings
Advances in Genomic DNA Methylation Analysis
Perspective of DNA Methylation in Cancer Research
Prospects for DNA Methylation Research in Psychiatric Disorders
An Insight into the Use of Genome, Methylome and Gethylome in Synthetic Biology

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved