Effects of Aqueous Leaf Extracts of Psidium guajava on Bacteria Isolated from the Navel of Day-Old Chicks
Plants are used widely in the tropics and sub-tropical Africa and Asia for the treatment and cure of various illnesses such as malaria, diarrhoea, burns, gonorrhoea, stomach disorders and other infectious diseases; among which are livestock and poultry related diseases. Present studies on the preliminary phytochemical composition of the leaf of this plant revealed the presence of flavonoids, tannins, saponins, phenols lectins, triterpenes and carotenoids among others. Studies on the swab content from the navel of the day old chicks of both strains (broilers and layers) had revealed the presence of several gram positive and gram negative organisms such as E. coli, Staphylococcus sp., Streptococcus sp., Proteus sp., Klebsiella sp. and Corynaebacterium. The susceptibility tests on the isolated organisms by the extract under study had showed an appreciable dose dependant zone of inhibition ranging from 13-25 mm. The activity of the extract (400 mg mL-1) can be favourably compared with that of the standard antibiotic-Oxytetracycline (10 mg mL-1) particularly between the E. coli and Streptococcus with 25:30 mm and 20:22 mm as inhibition zone respectively where no significant difference was observed. The extract exhibited a highest MIC of 12.5 mg mL-1 against Staphylococcus sp., while concentration of 25.0 mg mL-1 was noted as the MIC values against both E. coli and Streptococcus sp.
to cite this article:
Y.A. Geidam, H. Usman, M.B. Abubakar and B. Ibrahim, 2007. Effects of Aqueous Leaf Extracts of Psidium guajava on Bacteria Isolated from the Navel of Day-Old Chicks. Research Journal of Microbiology, 2: 960-965.
Traditionally, usage of plants in curing illness has deep roots in mans
history (Grabley and Thiericke, 1999; Aibinu et al., 2007). Plants are
used in treating malaria, diarrhoea, burns, gonorrhoea, stomach disorders and
other infectious diseases. Tremendous efforts of scientists have been employed
in establishing plants with promising antimicrobial activity and yielding fruitful
results (Adedayo et al., 2001; Ndukwe et al., 2005; Aibinu et
al., 2007). The plants are easily available and accessible in this part
of the World and cheaper than the conventional drugs. The disease condition
omphalitis is technically defined as an infectious but non-contagious disease
that is characterized by infected yolk sac often accompanied by unhealed navel
(Jordon and Pattison, 1999). In every flock, there is usually increased mortality
between 3-4 days of age due often to navel-yolk sac infection or omphalitis,
commonly associated with Escherichia coli infections or other bacterial
contamination. Because the navel is still open when the chick is hatching, or
when tissue is stock in the navel after closing; it is very easy for bacteria
to enter the body cavity, so infecting both the navel and the yolk sac. This
is to say that navel yolk sac infection is one of the causes of high mortality
during the early days of young chicks (Jordon and Pattison, 1999). Due to the
significant number of birds claimed by omphalitis, the tragedy is called naval-yolk
sac mortality. Bacterial pressure is the only determining factor through navel
deformity and the chicks ability to use its natural defense mechanisms
are also critical (Meigerhof, 2005). Common bacteria involved are E. coli,
Entrococcus species, Salmonella species and Pseudomonas species.
These bacteria can cause generalized septicemia and result in high mortality.
Affected birds will show depreciation, drooping of the head and hurdling near
the heat source. The navel may be inflamed and when fail to close produce a
wet spot abdomen. Treatment of this condition is not specific and no specific
antibiotic for the treatment. The antibiotic used is based on the prevalent
bacteria type involved but of probably little value (Koteeswaran et al.,
2004). It may not always be appropriate to be treated as if there is niggling
mortality. Treatment result in infected yolk sac retention and this can lead
to uneven mass in the flock (Jordon and Pattison, 1999). The escalating problems
of antibacterial resistance shown by several species of bacteria to most of
the antibiotics used today has made it mandatory to search for newer drugs that
are effective, affordable, acceptable and available. Many research groups and
organizations in many countries under take multidisciplinary research on local
medicinal plants with a view of revealing that plants are potential source of
drugs (Sofowora, 1993). Although, traditional medicine has been in practice
as far back as 1500BC and many plants have been used to cure certain diseases,
there may not be scientific data to confirm their efficacy (Sofowora, 1993).
Guava is a common shade tree or shrubs in the tropics and has a long history
of traditional medicinal uses, which led modern day researchers to study its
extracts ((Jordon et al., 2003). Extracts of roots, bark and leaves are
used to treat gastroenteritis, vomiting, diarrhea, dysentery, wounds, ulcers,
toothaches, coughs, sore throat, inflamed gums and a number of other conditions
(Morton, 1981). It has been documented to have pronounced antibacterial, antiamoebic
and antispasmodic activity. Its bark and leaf extracts have been shown to have
in vitro toxic action against numerous bacteria (Geidam et al.,
Therefore this study aims to isolate the common bacterial agents from the navel of day-old chicks from different hatcheries, determine the in vitro anti bacterial properties of Psidium guajava aqueous extract against the bacteria isolated from the navel of day-old-chicks and then establish the minimum inhibitory concentration of Psidium guajava aqueous leaf extract against the isolated bacterial agents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collection and Identification of Plant Materials
Fresh samples of the leaves were collected in May 2006 from a matured guava
tree within University of Maiduguri campus. The plant was identified and authenticated
by a plant taxonomist, Dr. S.S. Sanusi of the Department of Biological Sciences
and voucher specimen number (Chem: 242B) was deposited at Research Laboratory,
Chemistry Department University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri-Nigeria.
Preparation of Extract
The fresh leaves of Psidium guajava collected were then air-dried
in the laboratory under room temperature. The dried leaves were ground into
powder using mortar and pestle. Two hundred and fifty grams of the dried powdered
leaves of Psidium guajava were exhaustively extracted with water using
the reflux method for 3 h. The extract was then filtered and concentrated in
vacuo to yield a dark-green coloured mass.
Sixty day-old-chicks (30 broilers and 30 layers) were acquired from the
3 main sources of day-old-chicks in Maiduguri all of whom are agents of different
hatcheries in Nigeria.
Collection of Samples
Swaps were taken using sterile swap sticks from the naval of the 60 day-old
chicks. These were inoculated into the plates containing MacConkey and blood
agars. Using the half and quarter plate streaking method, respectively.
Culturing and Identification of the Organisms
The inoculated plates were incubated immediately for 24 h at 37°C, the
growth were then identified using colonial appearance, Gram stain, examination
of the organisms under microscopes and the use of sub-culture using different
media for confirmation of the organisms earlier identified. All media used were
prepared according to manufacturers instructions.
Determination of Anti-Bacterial Properties
The bacterial isolates from the naval of day-old-chicks were used for determining
the anti bacterial properties of Psidium guajava leaf extract. The isolates
were propagated and stored on nutrient agar plates. All the isolates were maintained
on nutrient agar plate at 4°C and sub-cultured in nutrient broth at 37°C
for 8 h prior to antimicrobial testing. One milliliter of the broth culture
was then used to flood the agar plates.
Concentration of Extracts
Stock solutions of the extract were prepared by dissolving known weight
of the extract in known volume of distilled water 0.01, 0.02 and 0.04 g of the
extracts were dissolve in 1 mL of distilled water to afford 100, 200 and 400
mg mL-1 of the extract, respectively. Standard antibacterial agent
oxytetracycline (Pfizer, Inc., USA) at a concentration of 10 mg mL-1
was also used on all the bacteria and the zones of inhibition compared with
those of the plant extract.
Antibacterial Sensitivity Testing
Bauer-Kirby disc diffusion method as described by Bauer et al. (1966)
was used to determine the antibacterial activity. Discs containing different
concentrations of dissolved extract were prepared. Sterilized filter papers
(Whatman No. 1, 6 mm in diameter) soaked in beakers containing different concentrations
(100, 200 and 400 mg mL-1) of the extract.
Over night cultures of each bacterial isolate was spread on the surface of dried nutrient agar plates. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 30 min before the discs were applied aseptically. The treated plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The same procedure was carried out with the oxytetracycline (10 mg mL-1) as standard antibiotic. Plates without the antibiotic or extract discs were set up as control experiment. The zones of inhibition above 6 mm diameter of each isolate were used as measure of susceptibility to the extracts and were compared to that of the standard antibiotic.
Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the Extracts
The MIC was determined using the method described by Greenwood (1989). For
each extract six sterile test tubes were arranges in a test tube rack in a row
for each organisms and 0.5 mL of sterile nutrient broth was pipetted into each
tube. Half a millimeter of the crude extract containing 100 mg mL-1
was pipetted into tube one to obtain a concentration of 50 mg mL-1.
There after there was a serial dilution of the extract to obtain concentrations
of 25, 12.5, 6.25 and 3.13 mg mL-1, respectively. 0.5 mL of the test
organism was pipetted into each test tube and incubated at 37°C for 24 h.
The MIC was recorded as the least concentration of plant extract that completely
inhibit the growth of the test organism.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Two hundred and fifty grams of the dried powder leaves of Psidium guajava was exhaustively extracted with 1.5 L of distilled water in a reflux apparatus and then concentrated to yield 70.8 g of the crude extracted that is 28.3% w/w with respect to the dried powdered extract.
Six different bacterial organisms were isolated from the 60 swabs taken from the navel of broilers and layers day-old-chicks. The isolated organisms include; Staphylococcus sp., E. coli, Proteus sp., Klebsiella sp. and Corynaebacteria sp. All these six organisms were isolated from layer day-old-chicks while only four of the organisms (Staphylococcus sp., Streptococcus sp., E. coli and Proteus sp.) were isolated from the broiler day-old-chicks (Table 1).
The effect of the three different concentrations of the extract on the bacteria isolated is presented in Table 2. The extract showed concentration dependent antibacterial activity against E. coli, Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus sp. and Proteus sp. However, Klebsiella and Corynaebacteria appeared to be resistant to the extract. The result of the MIC of the extract on the three susceptible organisms is presented in Table 3.
|| Bacterial organisms isolated from the navels of day-old-chicks
|+: Presence; -: Absence
|| Antibacterial Activity of Psidium guajava aqueous
leaf on organisms isolated from the navel of day-old chicks
|R = Resistant
||The minimum inhibition concentration of Psidium guajava
aqueous leaf extract against some of the isolated bacteria
|+: ve = With bacterial growth; -: ve = Without bacterial growth;
*: = MIC value
A study of the antibacterial effect of Psidium guajava aqueous leaf extract on bacterial organisms isolated from the navel of day old chicks was carried out. The result of the study showed that Psidium guajava leaf extract have concentration dependant inhibitory effect on the growth of E. coli, Staphylococcus sp., Streptococcus sp. and Proteus sp. isolated from the navel of day-old chicks. These results agree with those obtained by Jarlar and Wongkrajang (1999), who observed growth inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus. Similar results on growth inhibition were obtained by Gnan and Demello (1999), when testing the effect of the extract on Staphylococcus aureus by using guava leaf water extract. Iwu (1993) reported antibacterial effect Psidium guajava leaf extract against E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus and Proteus mirabilis. All the bacteria inhibited by the leaf extract have been incriminated in omphalitis as shown by Whittam and Wilson (1988) and Jordon and Pattison (1999).
The susceptibility test of the extract (400 mg mL-1) against most of the organisms screened indicated that E. coli exhibited the highest inhibition zone of 25 mm which could be compared favourably with 30 mm of Oxytetracycline (20 mg mL-1). The activity of the extract against E. coli is important since many avian pathogenic E. coli strains have been reported to be resistant to common antibacterial agents used in poultry production (Ewers et al., 2003). It has been reported that E. coli can be frequently isolated from a clear infection of Yolk sac (Whittam and Wilson, 1988). The minimum inhibitory concentration against the susceptible organisms indicated that E. coli and Proteus sp. had the lowest, suggesting that the extract can be a potential antibacterial agent if the active compound responsible is isolated.
Phytochemical evaluation of the leaf has shown the presence of flavonoids, tannins, saponins, Phenols lectins, triterpenes and carotenoids (Geidam et al., 2007). These compounds are known to be biologically active. The antimicrobial activity of the leaf extracts demonstrated can be attributed to the presence of flavonoids (Ali and Shamsuzzaman, 1996a). Similarly, Berdy et al. (1981) demonstrated that the antibacterial effect could also be due to guajaverine and psydiolic acid, which are also present in the leaf. Flavonoids derivatives have been found to inhibit the growth of Staphylococcus aureus at the dilution of 1: 10,000 (Ali et al., 1996b). This is medically important in the treatment of inflamed tissues (Mota et al., 1985). And lectins in guava were shown to bind to E. coli preventing its adhesion to the intestinal wall and thus preventing infection (Berdy et al., 1981). Therefore, the activity of the extract against the isolated organisms in this study could be linked to the aforementioned reports. These effects can explain the long history of guava use in traditional medicine as a cure for many bacterial diseases. In conclusion, this study has provided a basis for the use of Psidium guajava in the treatment of yolk sac infection caused by E. coli, Staphylococcus sp. Streptococcus and Proteus either primarily or in combination. However, it is necessary to further investigate the in vivo antibacterial activities of the extracts in chicks.
The authors wish to acknowledge Mr. Fine Akawo of the Department of Chemistry and Mal. Isa Gulani of the Department of Veterinary Medicine; University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria; for the technical assistance rendered.
Adedayo, O., W.A. Anderson, M. Young, V. Snieckus, P.A. Patil and D.O. Kolawole, 2001.
Phytochemistry and antibacterial activity of Senna alata
flower. J. Pharm. Biol., 39: 408-412.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Aibinu, I., T. Adenipekun, T. Adelowotan, T. Ogunsanya and T. Odugbemi, 2007.
Evaluation of the antimicrobial properties of different parts of Citrus aurantifolia
(lime fruit) as used locally. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med., 4: 185-190.PubMed | Direct Link |
Ali, A.M. and M. Shamsuzzaman, 1996.
Isolation and characterization of antibacterial constituents from the bark of Psidium guajava
. Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res., 31: 133-140.Direct Link |
Ali, A.M., M. Shamsuzzaman, H.M. Rahman and M.M. Hoque, 1996.
Screening of different solvent extracts of the bark of Psidium guajava
for antibacterial activity. Bangladesh J. Sci. Ind. Res., 31: 159-165.Direct Link |
Bauer, A.W., W.M.M. Kirby, J.C. Sherris and M. Turck, 1966.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 45: 493-496.CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
Berdy, J., A. Aszalos, M. Bostian and K.L. Mcntt, 1981.
Handbook of Antibacterial Compounds. CRC Press, Bocaratom
Ewers, C., T. Janssen and L.H. Wieler, 2003.
Avian Pathogenic E. coli
(APEC): A review. Berl Muuch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 116: 381-395.Direct Link |
Geidam, Y.A., A.G. Ambali and P.A. Onyeyili, 2007.
Phytochemical screening and antibacterial properties of organic solvent fractions of Psidium guajava
aqueous leaf extracts. Int. J. Pharmacol., 3: 68-73.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Grabley, S. and R. Thiericke, 1999.
Drug Discovery from Nature. 1st Edn., Springer, London, ISBN: 978-3-540-64844-4, pp: 5-7
Greenwood, D., 1989.
Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing. In: Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Greenwood, D. (Ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, USA., pp: 91-100
Iwu, M.M., 1993.
Handbook of African Medicinal Plants. 1st Edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., ISBN-10: 084934266X, pp: 464
Jaiarj, P., P. Khoohaswan, Y. Wongkrajang, P. Peungvicha, P. Suriyawong, M.L. Saraya and O. Ruangsomboom, 1999.
Anticough and antimicrobial activity of Psidium guajava
leaf extract. J. Ethnopharmacol., 67: 203-212.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Jordan, F.T.W. and M. Pattison, 1999.
Yolk Sac Infection: Poultry Diseases. 4th Edn., WB Saunders Co. Ltd., London, pp: 42-44
Jordan, M.J., C.A. Margaria, P.E. Shaw and K.I. Goodner, 2003.
Volatile components and aroma active compounds in aqueous essence and fresh pink guava fruit puree (Psidium guajava
L.) by GC-MS and multidimensional GC/GC-O. J. Agric. Food Chem., 51: 1421-1426.Direct Link |
Koteeswaran, A., S. Manoharan, A. Chandramohan and N.D.J. Chandran, 2004.
Studies on physical and microbiological qualities of day old chicks. Cheiron, 33: 63-68.
Meijerhof, R., 2005.
What counts for chick quality? Hybro B.V P.O. Box 30, 5830 AA, Boxmeer, Netherlands.
Morton, J.F., 1981.
Atlas of Medicinal Plants of Middle America. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, USA., pp: 23-30
Ndukwe, K.C., I.N. Okeke, A. Lamikanra, S.K. Adesina and O. Aboderin, 2005.
Antibacterial activity of aqueous extracts of selected chewing sticks. J. Contemp. Dent. Prac., 6: 86-94.PubMed | Direct Link |
Sofowora, A., 1993.
Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicines in Africa. Spectrum Books Ltd., Ibadan, Nigeria, pp: 199
Whittam, T.S. and R.A. Wilson, 1988.
Genetic relationships among pathogenic starins of avian Escherichia coli
. Infect. Immunol., 56: 2458-2466.
Gnan, S.O. and M.T. Demello, 1999.
Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus
by aqueous Goiaba extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol., 68: 103-108.CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |